Fotnot 2108
It may be interesting to note that the plaintiff GIP in its defence argued that the proportionality of the Swedish prohibition should be assessed following the methodology advanced by the Commission in its Communication “TheFollow-up to the Green Paper on Commercial Communication in the Internal Market”, COM (1998) 121 final. MD 2003:5, 19.
It may be interesting to note that the plaintiff GIP in its defence argued that the proportionality of the Swedish prohibition should be assessed following the methodology advanced by the Commission in its Communication “TheFollow-up to the Green Paper on Commercial Communication in the Internal Market”, COM (1998) 121 final. MD 2003:5, 19.s. 821