Citat i kontext

Hela artikeln

Kontexten är avkortad på grund av storlek.

Fotnot 2108

It may be interesting to note that the plaintiff GIP in its defence argued that the proportionality of the Swedish prohibition should be assessed following the methodology advanced by the Commission in its Communication “TheFollow-up to the Green Paper on Commercial Communication in the Internal Market”, COM (1998) 121 final. MD 2003:5, 19.

Fair Trading Law in Flux?

National Legacies, Institutional Choice and

the Process of Europeanisation

1.Antonina Bakardjieva Engelbrekts. 7

2.Fair Trading Law in Flux? National Legacies, Institutional Choice and the Process ofs. 8

3.Europeanisations. 8

4.© Antonina Bakardjieva Engelbrekt 2003s. 8

5.ISBN 91-7265-751-0s. 8

6.Print: US-AB, Stockholms. 8

Abbreviations of periodicals 10

INTRODUCTION 13

1.Research topic 18 An institutional approach 20 Goals 22 Structure 24s. 74

I STUDYING INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE: ANALYTICAL APPROACH 27

Institutional anaysis in law, social science and economics 27

1.1.1 Institutions and institutional analysis in legal scholarship 27s. 74

2.1.2 Sociological approaches to institutions 29s. 74

3.1.3 Economic theory and institutions 30s. 74

4.1.3.1 From a frictionless world to transaction costs economics 30s. 74

5.1.3.2 Institutional economics 34s. 74

6.1.3.2.1 New Institutional Economics 35s. 74

7.1.3.2.2 Comparative institutional analysis 36s. 74

8.1.3.2.3 Historical institutionalism 40s. 74

The institutional approach in this study 44

1.2.1 Institution-centred perspective: the logic of institutional persistence 44s. 74

2.2.1.1 Formal rules, informal constraints, enforcement 46s. 74

3.2.1.1.1 Formal rules 46s. 74

4.2.1.1.2 Informal constraints 47s. 74

5.2.1.1.3 Enforcement 47s. 74

6.2.1.2 Macro-institutional context as a factor for path-dependence 49s. 74

7.2.1.3 Symbiotic relations and lock-ins 49 2.2 Participation-centred perspective: the dynamics of institutional change 49s. 74

8.2.2.1 The choice between decision-making processes as main element of thes. 74

9.institutional framework 50s. 74

10.2.2.2 The role of interests and distribution of stakes 51s. 74

11.2.2.3 Majoritarian vs. minoritarian bias in the political process 51s. 74

12.2.2.4 Enforcement design 52 2.3 Merging the institutional and the agency perspective 53s. 74

13.2.3.1 The importance of enforcement mechanisms 55s. 74

14.2.3.2 Adaptive efficiency and participation-centred approach 56 2.4 An institutional perspective on European integration 56 2.5 Cross-country comparison of the effects of European integration 58s. 74

15.2.5.1 The purpose of comparison 58s. 74

16.2.5.2 From comparing rules to comparing institutions 62s. 74

17.2.5.3 The institutional approach and theories of legal change 63 2.6 Methodological aspects 65s. 74

18.2.6.1 Methodological intricacies of contextualism 65s. 74

19.2.6.2 The use of the comparative legal method 66s. 74

Fair Trading: comparing the market, the political and the judicial process 69

1.3.1 Fair trading law as a patchwork area in focus 70 3.2 Ensuring fair trading through the market process 73s. 74

2.3.2.1 Information in the market and the market for information 73s. 74

3.3.2.1.1 Information asymmetry 74s. 74

4.3.2.1.2 Information cost 74s. 157

5.3.2.1.3 Information as public good 75s. 157

6.3.2.2 Problem areas 75s. 157

7.3.2.2.1 Free-riding and undersupply of information 76s. 157

8.3.2.2.2 Advertising and opportunistic behavior 77s. 157

9.3.2.2.3 Market institutions to cope with information and uncertainty 78s. 157

10.3.2.3 The potential role of alternative institutional processes 82s. 157

11.3.3 Fair trading in the political process 83s. 157

12.3.3.1 Interests involved: size and distribution of stakes 84s. 157

13.3.3.2 The costs of information and participation 86s. 157

14.3.3.2.1 Risk for minoritarian or majoritarian bias 88s. 157

15.3.3.2.2 Protectionism and paternalism 90s. 157

16.3.4 Fair trading through the judicial or the administrative process 92s. 157

17.3.4.1 Reliance on the judicial process 94s. 157

18.3.4.2 Reliance on the political/administrative process 97s. 157

II NATIONAL PATHS: GERMANY AND SWEDEN COMPARED 101

The roots of fair trading institutions in Germany and Sweden 104

1.4.1 Macro-institutional context 106s. 157

2.4.1.1 Between economic liberalism and interventionism 106s. 157

3.4.1.2 Constitutional constraints 111s. 157

4.4.1.3 The status of private law 116s. 157

5.4.1.4 Interim conclusions 121s. 157

6.4.2 Shaping the institutional framework in Germany 122s. 157

7.4.2.1 The legislative process: evolution and interests involved 122s. 157

8.4.2.2 The substantive rules of fair trading: a general clausea pproach 125s. 157

9.4.2.3 Enforcement design: the primacy of private ordering 127s. 157

10.4.2.3.1 General civil courts as main decision-making institutions 127s. 157

11.4.2.3.2 Generous litigious possibilities for business associations 128s. 157

12.4.2.3.3 Remedies: injunction and damages 130s. 157

13.4.2.3.4 Cost-efficient procedure 132s. 157

14.4.2.4 The Wettbewerbsverbände as beneficiaries from the institutional frameworks. 157

15.132s. 157

16.4.3 Shaping the institutional framework in Sweden 133s. 157

17.4.3.1 Evolution of the legislative process and interests involved 133s. 157

18.4.3.2 Substantive rules: preference for narrowly defined rules 137s. 157

19.4.3.3 Controlled enforcement 140s. 157

20.4.3.3.1 Deciding who decides 140s. 157

21.4.3.3.2 Remedies: emphasis on classical criminal law sanctions 140s. 157

22.4.3.3.3 Conditioned access of business associations to enforcement 142s. 157

23.4.3.4 The shift to self-regulation 143s. 157

24.4.4 The evolving standard of fairness 145s. 157

25.4.4.1 Germany: expansive protection of the competitive ‘status quo' ands. 157

26.‘Mittelstand’ interests 145s. 157

27.4.4.1.1 From individual rights to ‘general interest’ objectives, from monism tos. 157

28.pluralism 145s. 157

29.4.4.1.2 . Fallgruppen( categorieso f cases) 147s. 157

30.4.4.1.3 The standard of fairness in legal doctrine 157s. 157

31.4.4.2 Sweden: restrictive application of statutory rules vs. dynamic evolution ofs. 264

32.self-regulation 162s. 264

33.4.4.2.1 Restrictive interpretation of the unfair advertising clause by the judiciarys. 264

34.163s. 264

35.4.4.2.2 No complementary application of tort law 165s. 264

36.4.4.2.3 Dynamic and balanced practice of self-regulatory bodies 168s. 264

37.4.4.2.4 Legal doctrine 171s. 264

38.4.5 Comparative comments 171s. 264

39.4.5.1 Institutional choice 172s. 264

40.4.5.2 Interests in the political process 173s. 264

41.4.5.3 Enforcement design: the costs and benefits of participation 174s. 264

42.4.5.4 The standard of fairness 176s. 264

43.4.5.5 Institutional trajectories and institutional fossils 176s. 264

44.4.5.6 Institutional symbiosis 181s. 264

The institutional challenge of consumerism: Politicizing private law vs.

depoliticizing public law? 184

1.5.1 The macro-institutional context 186s. 264

2.5.1.1 Between market liberalism, Sozialstaat and social engineering 187s. 264

3.5.1.2 Constitutional constraints 190s. 264

4.5.1.3 The status of private law 197 5.2 The consumerist debate 198s. 264

5.5.2.1 The consumerist debate in Germany 198s. 264

6.5.2.1.1 The political debate 199s. 264

7.5.2.1.2 Legal doctrine 201s. 264

8.5.2.1.3 Institutional implications 205s. 264

9.5.2.2 The consumerist debate in Sweden 205s. 264

10.5.2.2.1 The political debate 205s. 264

11.5.2.2.2 Implications on institutional choice and design 211s. 264

12.5.2.2.3 Implications for legal doctrine 212 5.3 Changing the institutional framework in Germany: incremental change within the institutional core 214s. 264

13.5.3.1 The legislative process: evolution and interests involved 214s. 264

14.5.3.1.1 The 1965 UWG Novelle 214s. 264

15.5.3.1.2 The 1969 UWG Novelle 216s. 264

16.5.3.1.3 The futile reform discussions in the 1970s 217s. 264

17.5.3.1.4 The 1986 UWG Novelle 222s. 264

18.5.3.2 Substantive rules: true vs. false consumer concerns 223s. 264

19.5.3.2.1 The general clause 223s. 264

20.5.3.2.2 Excessive prohibitions of certain promotional techniques 224s. 264

21.5.3.3 Enforcement: the persistence of the choice for private ordering 225s. 264

22.5.3.3.1 The choice between administrative agency and courts 226s. 264

23.5.3.3.2 Right of action of consumer associations 232s. 264

24.5.3.3.3 The cost of prosecution and litigation 241s. 264

25.5.3.3.4 Problems of decentralized decision-making 254s. 264

26.5.3.3.5 Remedies: the debate on damage compensation for consumers 257s. 264

27.5.3.4 Organizations as a bi-product of the institutional framework 260s. 264

28.5.3.4.1 Preserved position of business associations 260s. 264

29.5.3.4.2 Consumer associations as new actors 264s. 264

30.5.4 Changing the institutional framework in Sweden: dramatic change and a news. 346

31.institutional core 267s. 346

32.5.4.1 The legislative process: twists and turns and interests involved 268s. 346

33.5.4.1.1 The Unfair Competition Inquiry Commission (SOU 1966:71) 268s. 346

34.5.4.1.2 The ’velvet revolution* of 1970: marketing a consumer policy issue 269s. 346

35.5.4.1.3 The completion of the regulative framework 272s. 346

36.5.4.1.4 The Guidelines Committee 273s. 346

37.5.4.1.5 Interests in the legislative process 274s. 346

38.5.4.2 Substantive rules: programmatic place of consumer protection concerns 276s. 346

39.5.4.2.1 A consumer-oriented general clause 276s. 346

40.5.4.2.2 Information disclosure 278s. 346

41.5.4.2.3 Special offers 279s. 346

42.5.4.2.4 Annex legislation 279s. 346

43.5.4.3 The design of the administrative process 280s. 346

44.5.4.3.1 Management of the KOV 281s. 346

45.5.4.3.2 Informal procedure and search for voluntary compliance 282s. 346

46.5.4.3.3 Decision-making in individual cases 286s. 346

47.5.4.3.4 Rule-making 289s. 346

48.5.4.3.5 Form of control over agency action 298s. 346

49.5.4.4 Adaptation of the judicial process to the new role of the state 299s. 346

50.5.4.4.1 The design of the judicial process 300s. 346

51.5.4.4.2 Access to the court and costs of litigation 305s. 346

52.5.4.4.3 Remedies: injunctions 310s. 346

53.5.4.5 Institutions as a product of the institutional framework 311s. 346

54.5.4.5.1 The KOV with the KO 311s. 346

55.5.4.5.2 The retreat of voluntary and self-regulatory organisations 312s. 346

56.5.5 The evolving standard of fairness 313s. 346

57.5.5.1 Germany: the persisting prevalence of competitor and Mittelstand interestss. 346

58.313s. 346

59.5.5.1.1 Consumer protection as a recognized ‘Schutzzweck’ in unfairs. 346

60.competition law 313s. 346

61.5.5.1.2 Categories of prohibited unfair practices 315s. 346

62.5.5.2 Sweden: shift towards consumer interest considerations 330s. 346

63.5.5.2.1 The information approach to misleading and comparative advertising 331s. 346

64.5.5.2.2 Information disclosure 334s. 346

65.5.5.2.3 The information approach to sales promotions 334s. 346

66.5.5.2.4 Lagstridighetsprincip: a short-cut to enforcement of paternalists. 346

67.legislation 335s. 346

68.5.5.2.5 Protection of particularly ‘exposed’ consumer groups - sociallys. 346

69.responsible marketing 336s. 346

70.5.6 Comparative comments 337s. 346

71.5.6.1 Institutional choice 337s. 346

72.5.6.2 Interests in the political process 338s. 346

73.5.6.2.1 Germany: preserved dominance of the Mittelstand and minoritarian biass. 346

74.338s. 346

75.5.6.2.2 Sweden: catalytic sub-groups and a majoritarian bias 339s. 346

76.5.6.3 Participation opportunities in the process of enforcement 341s. 346

77.5.6.3.1 Germany: the decentralised private model of enforcement 341s. 346

78.5.6.3.2 The mixed administrative- adjudicative model 346s. 346

79.5.6.4 The standard of fairness revisited 354s. 347

80.5.6.5 The influence of the institutional context 358s. 347

81.5.6.6 Path dependence and institutional symbiosis 359s. 347

III EUROPEANISATION 363

Fair trading in the texture and architecture of Community law 366

1.6.1 Institutional background 368s. 347

2.6.1.1 Between market-building and market-correction policies 368s. 347

3.6.1.1.1 Unfair competition law as part of the European Economic Constitutions. 347

4.368s. 347

5.6.1.1.2 From the neoliberal to the regulatory state 370s. 347

6.6.1.2 Fair trading in the Community constitutional design 374s. 347

7.6.1.2.1 Community vs. Member State competences 374s. 347

8.6.1.2.2 Legal basis for Community intervention 378s. 347

9.6.2 The evolution of positive European fair trading law 382s. 347

10.6.2.1 Between unfair competition and consumer protection (market building ands. 347

11.market correction) 383s. 347

12.6.2.1.1 Unfair competition approach: the Ulmer project (market buildings. 347

13.approach) 383s. 347

14.6.2.1.2 The consumerist approach (market correcting approach) 385s. 347

15.6.2.2 Substance and form of harmonisation of fair trading law (piecemeals. 347

16.harmonisation) 387s. 347

17.6.2.2.1 Misleading Advertising 388s. 347

18.6.2.2.2 Conditional Liberalisation of Comparative Advertising 393s. 347

19.6.2.2.3 Fair trading in the TV-Directive 402s. 347

20.6.2.2.4 Distance Selling Directive 408s. 347

21.6.2.2.5 Fair trading in the E-commerce Directive 409s. 347

22.6.2.3 Enforcement 414s. 347

23.6.2.3.1 Provisions on enforcement in fair trading directives 415s. 347

24.6.2.3.2 Special provisions on cross-border enforcement 425s. 347

25.6.2.3.3 Informal enforcement-facilitating techniques: information, cooperation,s. 347

26.self-regulation 426s. 347

27.6.2.3.4 Targeting Enforcement 429s. 347

28.6.3 Integration through the judicial process 433s. 347

29.6.3.1 Fair trading law and the free movement of goods 434s. 347

30.6.3.1.1 Discriminatory rules on fair trading 436s. 347

31.6.3.1.2 Non-discriminatory rules on fair trading before Keck 437s. 347

32.6.3.1.3 Keck and beyond 440s. 347

33.6.3.1.4 Justifications 443s. 347

34.6.3.2 Fair trading law and free movement of services 447s. 347

35.6.3.2.1 Advertising as a service 447s. 347

36.6.3.2.2 Diverging advertising laws as an obstacle to the free movement ofs. 347

37.services 448 6.4 Institutional implications 449s. 347

Institutional adaptation to European integration: Germany and Sweden

revisited 452

1.7.1 Transposing Community directives: exercises in appropriation of European laws. 347

2.453s. 347

3.7.1.1 Transposition of substantive fair trading directives 454s. 607

4.7.1.1.1 Compliance without change: the Misleading Advertising Directive 454s. 607

5.7.1.1.2 Comparative advertising 466s. 607

6.7.1.1.3 Regulating television advertising with an emphasis on childrens. 607

7.advertising 480s. 607

8.7.1.1.4 Discounts, gifts and other promotional offers 491s. 607

9.7.1.1.5 Protection of the private sphere 496s. 607

10.7.1.2 Changes in enforcement 499s. 607

11.7.1.2.1 Enforcement provisions in substantive law directives 499s. 607

12.7.1.2.2 The Injunctions Directive 500s. 607

13.7.1.2.3 The public/private divide and the evasive scope of national fair tradings. 607

14.law 506s. 607

15.7.1.2.3 Implementing or appropriating European law? 520s. 607

16.7.2 Judicial discourses over national institutional legacies 522s. 607

17.7.2.1 The Verbraucherleitbild debate: a battle over interests or over concepts? 523s. 607

18.7.2.2 Defending the paternalist state 533s. 607

19.7.2.2.1 De Agostini and the Swedish prohibition of children advertising 534s. 607

20.7.2.2.2 Gourmet and the Swedish prohibition of alcohol advertising 535s. 607

21.7.2.3 Institutional implications 542s. 607

22.7.3 European influences in the turbulence of internally generated reform 545s. 607

23.7.3.1 Germany: reform in the shadow of European integration 546s. 607

24.7.3.1.1 The 1994 UWG Novelle 546s. 607

25.7.3.1.2 Institutional interlocking in a multilevel system of governance 555s. 607

26.7.3.2 Changes in anticipation of European integration: 562s. 607

27.7.3.2.1 The legislative process: the 1995 MFL 562s. 607

28.7.3.2.2 Redesigning the administrative process 567s. 607

29.7.3.2.3 Redesigning the judicial process 570s. 607

30.7.4 Actors and organisations involved in enforcement: change or continuity? 582s. 607

31.7.4.1 Germany 582s. 607

32.7.4.1.1 Wettbewerbsverbände on the defensive? 582s. 607

33.7.4.1.2 Strengthened position of consumer organization 584s. 607

34.7.4.1.3 Governmental Consumer Protection Agency? 584s. 607

35.7.4.2 Sweden 585s. 607

36.7.4.2.1 The changing role of the KO 585s. 607

37.7.4.2.2 Consumer organizations as new actors on the stage? 587s. 607

38.7.4.2.3 Competitors and their associations 589s. 607

39.7.5 Comparative assessment 589s. 607

40.7.5.1 . Institutional choice 589s. 607

41.7.5.1.1 Deciding who decides 589s. 607

42.7.5.1.2 Interests in the political process 591s. 607

43.7.5.1.3 Participation opportunities in the process of enforcement 592s. 607

44.7.5.1.4 The standard of fairness 597s. 607

45.7.5.2 Institutional context and path dependence 598s. 607

46.7.5.3 The impact of Europeanisation 600s. 607

47.7.5.3.1 Spheres of influence 600s. 607

48.7.5.3.2 Convergence or divergence in fair trading law 603s. 607

49.7.5.4 Reducing or increasing institutional efficiency? 607s. 607

Peering into the future: towards a European Fair Trading Law? 609

1.8.1 The new Commission proposal on comprehensive Community Fair Trading Laws. 666

2.609s. 666

3.8.1.1 The ideology610s. 666

4.8.1.2 Substantive rules611s. 666

5.8.1.2.1 General clause611s. 666

6.8.1.2.2 Specific rules612s. 666

7.8.1.3 Form of harmonization613s. 666

8.8.2 Enforcement614s. 666

9.8.2.1 Enforcement in the Draft Directive614s. 666

10.8.2.2 The Regulation on Consumer Protection Cooperation616s. 666

11.8.3 Reactions of Governments and stake-holders618s. 666

12.8.3.1 The national institutional actors619s. 666

13.8.3.2 Governments622s. 666

14.8.4 Diversity and unity in a multilevel system of governance623s. 666

IV SUMMARY OF FINDINGS627

1.BIBILIOGRAPHY 637 OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS 662 TABLE OF CASES666s. 666

2.AJCL American Journal of Comparative Laws. 667

3.BBBetriebsberaters. 667

4.Bell J. Econ. &Mgmt Sci. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Sciences. 667

5.CLJ Consumer Law Journals. 667

6.CMLRev. Common Market Law Reviews. 667

7.CR Computer und Rechts. 667

8.DB Der Betriebs. 667

9.DWiR Deutsche Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrechts. 667

10.EBLR European Business Law Reviews. 667

11.ELRev. European Law Reviews. 667

12.ELJ European Law Journals. 667

13.ERPL European Review of Private Laws. 667

14.ERT Europarättslig tidskrifts. 667

15.FT Förvaltningsrättslig tidskrifts. 667

16.GRUR Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrechts. 667

17.GRUR Int.Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht.s. 667

18.Internationaler Teils. 667

19.ICLQ International and Comparative Law Quarterlys. 667

20.IICInternational Review of Industrial Property and Copyrights. 667

21.Laws. 667

22.IPRax Praxis des Internationalen Privatrechtss. 667

23.JCP Journal of Consumer Policys. 667

24.JZ Juristen Zeitschrifts. 667

25.JLE Journal of Law and Economicss. 667

26.JPE Journal of Political Economys. 667

27.JLS Journal of Legal Studiess. 667

28.JCMS Journal of Common Market Studiess. 667

29.MA Markenartikels. 667

30.MMRZeitschrift für Informations- Telekommunikations- unds. 667

31.Medienrechts. 667

32.MLR Modern Law Reviews. 667

33.RabelsZRabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und Internationaless. 667

34.Privatrechts. 667

35.REDC Revue européenne de droit de la consommations. 667

36.SSL Scandinavian Studies in Laws. 667

37.SvJT Svensk Juridisk Tidskrifts. 667

38.WRP Wettbewerb im Recht und Praxiss. 667

39.WuW Wirtschaft und Wettbewerbs. 667

40.ZEuP Zeitschrift für europäisches Privatrechts. 667

41.ZRP Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitiks. 667

42.ZUM Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrechts. 667

43.ZvglRWiss Zeitschrift für vergleichende Rechtswissenschafts. 667

44.ZZPZeitschrift für Zivilprozesss. 667

45.U. Chi. L.Rev.University of Chicago Law Reviews. 667

Other abbreviations

1.AFSwedish Advertisers Association (Annonsföreningen)s. 667

2.BGBBürgerliches Gesetzbuch (the Civil Code) BGH Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Supreme Court) ECJ European Court of Justice GG Grundgesetz (Basic Law) ISS Information Society Services MFL Marknadsföringslag (Marketing Practices Act) MP Members of Parliament MD Marknadsdomstolen (Market Court) RF Regeringsformen (Instrument of Government) IKL Lagen med vissa bestämmelsen om illojal konkurenslagen KF The Swedish Cooperative Union KOV Konsumentverket (Swedish Consumer Agency) KO Konsumentombudsman (Consumer Ombudsman) LOLandsorganisationen i Sverige (Swedish Trade Unions. 667

3.Confederation) NDMMarket Legislation Delegation of Swedish Trade ands. 668

4.Industry (Näringslivets Delegation for Marknadsrätt) NOpNäringslivets Opinionsnämnd (Swedish Council ons. 668

5.Marketing Practices) NONäringsfrihetsombudsmannen (Freedom of Competitions. 668

6.Ombudsman) RB Rättegångsbalken (Code of Judicial Procedure) SACOSveriges Akademikers Centralorganisation (Swedishs. 668

7.Confederation of Professional Organisations SAF Swedish Employers’ Association (SAF) SISveriges Industriförbund (the Federation of Swedishs. 668

8.Industries) SKFFederation of Swedish Retailers (Sverigess. 668

9.Köpmannaförbund) SkiSSveriges Konsumenter i Samverkan (Swedish Consumers. 668

10.Coalition) SKR Swedish Consumers’ Asscoiation SRFSveriges Reklamförbund (Advertising Association ofs. 668

11.Sweden) TDG Teledienstengesetz (Act on Telecommunication Services) TF Tryckfrihetsförordning (Freedom of the Press Act) TCOTjänstemännens Centralorganisation (Confederation ofs. 668

12.Professional Employees) TU Svenska Tidningsutgivareföreningen UWGGesetz gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb (Act Againsts. 668

13.Unfair Competition) UWG-EEntwurf eines Gesetzes gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerbs. 668

14.(Draft Act Against Unfair Competition) YGL Grundlag om yttrandefrihet ZPO Zivilprozessordnung (Code of Civil Procedure) ZAWZentrale Ausschuss der Werbewirtschaft (Central Board ofs. 668

15.the Advertising Industries)s. 668

16.13s. 670

INTRODUCTION

1.The law of fair trading belongs to one of the first realms of economic legislation to arise in the early industrial state. Already in the middle of the 19th century, soon after the establishment of the principle of laissez faire across Europe and after the breakthrough of free trade, the first rules on fairness of commercial conduct took shape under hardened conditions of competition.1 In some countries, like France, these rules emerged as a result of creative judicial interpretation of existing general tort law clauses. In common law countries protection against acts of unfair competition was granted restrictively on the basis of specific nominate torts. In other countries, notably Germany, special statutes on unfair competition were enacted, the first one dating from 1896 and the second one, valid even today, as of 1909. Irrespective of national idiosyncrasies of legal technique, there was much in common between the different approaches as far as protected interests, purpose and scope of legal rules were concerned. At the centre of attention was protection of the individual trader against unfair methods of competition. There was a relatively broad consensus as to the factual situations to be addressed: The honest trader was not to denigrate the goods and commercial activities of his competitor. He was to rely on his own achievements and not to engage in confusing imitation of goods or commercial activities. He was not to steal the commercial secrets or to induce breach of contract.2 The French concept Concurrence déloyal" neatly illustrated the element of moral disapproval towards these disparate categories of conduct, and acquired international acceptance. The general orientation of this area as belonging to private law, a sort of extension of tort law into the sphere of economic competition, and which was enforceable upon private action by affected competitors, also provided a common denominator between different national approaches. These developments prepared the ground for early international codification of unfair competition law into Arts. 10 bis and 10 ter of the Paris Convention on the Protection of Industrial Property of 1883.3 Almost a century later, the consumer movement of the 1960s and 1970s troubled the otherwise peaceful waters of national unfair competition (fair trading) law. Under real or potential pressures from consumer groups all modern regulatory states undertook some action to integrate the consumer interest into fair trading law. The fact that consumers were indirect beneficiaries from the enforcement of unfair competition laws was generally recognised. Yet the consumerist movement called for broader standards of deception and fairness, demanding that the specific interests of consumers explicitly be taken into account. More importantly, in a dramatic fashion it challenged the institutional and procedural landscape of fair trading law across Europe. News. 670

2.14s. 671

3.institutional arrangements and procedural avenues for giving voice to the consumers. 671

4.interest were deemed necessary.s. 671

5.In respect to institutional and procedural devices the response to similar consumerists. 671

6.pressures produced strikingly different results. Roughly speaking, whereas somes. 671

7.countries found it necessary to actively involve the state in the protection of thes. 671

8.consumer interest in fair trading, others opted for the preservation of the private-laws. 671

9.character of this legal field. In the first category of countries special public agenciess. 671

10.were empowered to act as champions for the consumer interest. In the latter categorys. 671

11.of states it was preferred to entrust the consumer interest into the hands of consumers. 671

12.organisations, while at the same time relying on an indirect beneficial effect fors. 671

13.consumers from competitors’ suits on unfair competition grounds. Within the confiness. 671

14.of this dichotomy a whole myriad of regulatory and enforcement techniques weres. 671

15.introduced, with significant variations in the detail.s. 671

16.It was these two basic models and the attendant patchwork of divergent national legals. 671

17.and institutional approaches that in the 1970s formed the background for the firsts. 671

18.efforts at harmonisation of fair trading law in the - then much smaller - Europeans. 671

19.Economic Community. Already at the beginning of the 1960s an ambitiouss. 671

20.comparative study of unfair competition laws across Europe was commissioned to thes. 671

21.Max Planck Institute of International and Foreign Patent, Copyright and Competitions. 671

22.law under the guidance of Prof. Eugen Ulmer.4 The project culminated in as. 671

23.comprehensive proposal for harmonisation of unfair competition law in Europe in thes. 671

24.form of a convention based on a general clause on fair trading. The failure of theses. 671

25.early and ambitious attempts to create a common unfair competition law for Europe iss. 671

26.notorious. Different authors ascribe it to different factors, but among the reasonss. 671

27.indisputably are England’s and Ireland’s accession to the Community and theirs. 671

28.diverging view on the limits and tasks of unfair competition law.5 Another majors. 671

29.development was the already mentioned consumerist wave and the growing ambitionss. 671

30.of the Community to take an active stand on this topical subject.6 Thus the onlys. 671

31.outcome of the harmonisation attempts was the Misleading Advertising Directive ofs. 671

32.1984 applying a minimum harmonisation approach.7s. 671

33.Meanwhile the situation appears to have changed significantly. Although fair tradings. 671

34.law cannot claim central importance to the European project, as an area with clears. 671

35.economic implications, it has been exposed to growing influence by both positive ands. 671

36.negative integration.8 The record of Community acts related to fair trading has becomes. 671

37.ever more impressive. It suffices to mention the Misleading and Comparatives. 671

38.15 Advertising Directive,9 the Television Without Frontiers Directive10, the Distance Selling Directive11 and the recent E-commerce Directive12 in order to recall that by now important general aspects of fair trading as well as marketing in the most significant media are objects of European legislative initiatives.13 Moreover, a large number of Community acts govern advertising and marketing in separate industry sectors, like foodstuffs, medicinal products, cosmetics, tobacco, etc.14 Finally, the Injunctions Directive of 1998 marked the first European agreement on harmonisation, or rather on mutual recognition, of enforcement devices in the consumer protection field, including enforcement of harmonised fair trading rules.15 The success of the harmonisation initiatives and the overall significance of European influences on national fair trading law have been differently assessed in the literature and have, moreover, changed course in pace with legal and political developments. The initial reactions to harmonisation were sceptical. Legal scholars and policy makers viewed the Misleading Advertising Directive as remaining wreckage of a crashed ship, and predicted a limited role for the Directive’s provisions for national law.16 With more national adjustments set out to implement the Directive being reported, the assessment has become more balanced.17 But on the whole harmonisation was regarded as modest. Community acts of more recent date, applying techniques like exhaustive harmonisation and reliance on a country of origin principle, have been seen to adopt a more powerful and effective harmonisation approach. They have, however, been criticised for the poor normative quality of their provisions or questioned in terms of their legitimacy.18s. 672

39.16s. 673

40.The impact of negative integration on national fair trading laws and practices produceds. 673

41.a livelier response than that of harmonisation. Following an expansive course ofs. 673

42.interpretation of the Community rules on free movement, the European Court ofs. 673

43.Justice (ECJ) frequently questioned the legitimacy and blocked the application ofs. 673

44.national fair trading rules and regulations. Also here the path has been uneven ands. 673

45.subject to controversial evaluation in legal doctrine. Originally Art. 28 (ex Art. 30) ofs. 673

46.the Treaty of Rome was considered applicable solely to discriminatory nationals. 673

47.measures on advertising and marketing.19 With the advance of the ‘mutual recognition’s. 673

48.approach in the late 1970s, the Court felt authorised to apply the Cassis de Dijon20 lines. 673

49.of reasoning also to indistinctly applicable marketing measures. Starting with thes. 673

50.Oosthoek21 judgment and notably in the GB-INNO ruling,22 the Court repeatedlys. 673

51.qualified also non-discriminatory marketing measures as potential barriers to trade,s. 673

52.justifiable only under the narrowly construed public interest considerations 'à las. 673

53.Cassis'.s. 673

54.This aggressive line of judicial interpretation triggered serious processes of rethinkings. 673

55.national fair trading laws in at least some Member States of the Community.23 In legals. 673

56.doctrine a heated discussion on the constitutional legitimacy of Community influences. 673

57.on national fair trading law was launched, touching upon issues like division ofs. 673

58.competencies and choice of appropriate decision-making forum.24 A significant turn ins. 673

59.these developments was marked by the Keck25 decision of the ECJ. Advertising ands. 673

60.marketing were explicitly qualified as ‘selling arrangements’ that as a rule should falls. 673

61.outside the scope of Art. 28 (ex Art. 30) EC Treaty and of the ‘Cassis de Dijon’ test.s. 673

62.The question about the reach of this new principle is, however, still far from settled,s. 673

63.especially in the light of the constant influx of new case law and the increasings. 673

64.importance of the Community provisions on free movement of services. News. 673

65.judgements from Luxembourg continue to challenge the ability of national legals. 673

66.systems to cope with uncertainty as the recent Gourmet ruling has demonstrated.s. 673

67.Despite these sometimes surprising twists and turns in Community law and practices. 673

68.and the corresponding fluctuations in scholarly opinion, there is a growing consensuss. 673

69.that European integration has exerted and continues to exert major impact on nationals. 673

70.fair trading law. Nowhere else has this view received more attention than in Germans. 673

71.legal doctrine. Dozens of scholarly articles and a number of monographs have tackleds. 673

72.the issue.27 Legal doctrine in other Member States has not dealt so intensely with thes. 673

73.question, but there is general recognition that European law and institutions constitutes. 673

74.17 important factors in modern development of national fair trading law.28 Especially in the light of recent revitalisation of the idea of a general legal framework of fair trading law authors and policy-makers now explicitly refer to a process of Europeanisation of fair trading law.2 Opinions diverge when it comes to the legitimacy and desirability of this trend. Quite in the spirit of Ulmer, a number of scholars see fruitful soil for further harmonisation of fair trading law for Europe. They express regret at the failure of the first systematic attempt at harmonisation and are inspired by new all-embracing proposals that aim at a comprehensive solution through a general clause and will mitigate national divergences and idiosyncrasies?0 In the opposite camp are those who doubt the feasibility of such harmonisation and fear disruptive repercussions on the coherence of national legal and institutional frameworks. At a different level, the debate is even more heated when it comes to assessing the legitimate scope and desirable method of harmonisation. Also here opinions can be classified on a wide scale from principled opposition to harmonisation to moderate concerns regarding the normative quality of European compromise solutions31 or the policy effects from the selected method of harmonisation. Applying the home country control principle without comprehensive harmonisation of substantive standards is the source of one such concern.32 The debate on the European influences over national laws is by no way unique for the area of fair trading law. The pervasive influence of European integration on law, policy-making and institutions of the Member States has been at the centre of a long­ standing and intense discussion in both legal and social science. Already in the early stages of European integration, the doctrines of direct effect and supremacy of Community law suggested the powerful potential of the European project to profoundly affect national law and regulative policies. Whereas the focus initially was on the abolition of technical barriers to trade and on shaping of Community competition law - activities firmly anchored in the Founding Treaties - more recent years have witnessed an expansion of European integration to ever wider areas of social and economic regulation and, importantly for this analysis, to core areas of private law and procedural law.33s. 674

75.18s. 675

76.As in fair trading law, reactions in the field of private law have been mixed, to say thes. 675

77.least. There is disagreement on the question of scope and depth of European influences. 675

78.as well as on its normative evaluation. A number of private law scholars simplys. 675

79.neglect European law. Taking a narrow view of private law as well as ofs. 675

80.Europeanisation (equating the latter with harmonised law), these scholars point at thes. 675

81.lack of comprehensive Community acts in the field of core private law areas such ass. 675

82.contracts, torts, property, inheritance and family law. Such ‘reductionism’ thens. 675

83.justifies a disinterest in European law developments.34 Another group of scholars, ins. 675

84.contrast, regard European law with its insistence on private autonomy and economics. 675

85.freedom as an ultimate acknowledgement of the supremacy of private law in thes. 675

86.national legal order. In this view European integration ‘has constitutionalised as. 675

87.private-law society’ with supremacy over national states.’35s. 675

88.Similar divergences are exhibited on the issues of the normative evaluation of thes. 675

89.European influence and the desirability of further integration in the area of private law.s. 675

90.On the one hand, legal historians and comparative lawyers have advanced ans. 675

91.optimistic view, where European integration is perceived as a welcome chance to builds. 675

92.a common European Civil Code and thus to make old ius commune dreams comes. 675

93.true.36 Others regard it as a return to the ‘common core’ of European private law.37s. 675

94.Again, from a comparative law perspective many private law scholars have expresseds. 675

95.concerns as to the disintegrative impact of European influences on the coherence ofs. 675

96.the national legal system and in particular of private law. It is being pointed out thats. 675

97.Community measures are often incidental and piecemeal. Consumer policy measuress. 675

98.in particular are said to have the form of a patchwork of detailed provisions attacheds. 675

99.artificially and standing as a foreign body in the otherwise well established ands. 675

100.coherent system of national private law, precedent and doctrine.38 Finally, comparatives. 675

101.lawyers of a post-modernist orientation tend to question the feasibility of grands. 675

102.European harmonisation projects. Some postmodernists refute the possibility of as. 675

103.common and harmonised European private law due to insurmountable divergencess. 675

104.between the legal cultures of individual states.39s. 675

105.19 Research topic This study purports to take a fresh look at the impact of European integration on national law by examining the case of fair trading. In the immediate focus are the fair trading laws in two Member States of the European Union (EU), namely Germany and Sweden. There are two components to this study. On the one hand it consists of an in­ depth comparison of the main features of the institutional frameworks of fair trading law in these countries, with an emphasis on institutional choice and enforcement design. The other component of the study is concerned with the influences of European integration on the institutional framework of national fair trading law in the two legal systems. When I use the term institutional choice I mean the choice between market, political process (legislative and administrative process) and adjudication for dealing with the particular regulative issues associated with fair trading. This fundamental choice is exercised differently in the two countries under analysis, depending, among others, on constitutional law and institutional tradition. In Sweden the emphasis is placed on the consumer interests in fair trading. Thereby, the state has been assigned an active role in protecting consumers against improper and unfair marketing practices. Confidence has been vested in the political process and in specialised public agencies, a Consumer Agency and a Consumer Ombudsman, to shape and enforce the standards of fair trading. Germany is by contrast a prominent example of a country that has consciously avoided setting up new public authorities and bodies. Instead the preference has been for private ordering, building on civil procedure and relying on private consumer and business organisations and on ordinary courts for enforcing the rules against unfair competition. Given the fundamental differences in institutional choice and design, the question of the feasibility of harmonisation projects in this area of law will be addressed. The concept of fair trading law is in the following used as a broad description of rules and regulations that govern marketing practices with the aim of protecting the interests of competitors, consumers and the general public.40 Domestic terminology (e.g. ‘unfair competition law’ or ‘marketing practices law’), national classifications of these rules as belonging to criminal, civil or administrative law, and doctrinal views on their systematic unity or disparity, are thereby of secondary importance. The law of fair trading, even when treated in a strictly national context, is often described as an eclectic area, gathering under one roof different conflict situations and responding to disparate interests and policy concerns.41 Here belong rules on such diverse phenomena such as slavish imitation, misappropriation and disparagement, misleading advertising and comparative advertising, free gifts, rebates and season sales, trade secrets and the bribing of employees. In functional terms a common denominator for many of these disparate rules can be found in that they address commercials. 676

106.20s. 677

107.communication.42 The focus in this study will be on rules governing commercials. 677

108.communication in the pre-contractual sphere.s. 677

109.The use of ‘fair trading’ as a unifying concept in this study is motivated by twos. 677

110.factors. On the one hand, there is the desire to avoid concepts that are specific for ones. 677

111.of the countries under analysis and will thus be coloured by the historical ands. 677

112.institutional environment in this particular state.43 On the other hand, one of mys. 677

113.ambitions is to trace the process of Europeanisation. In recent preparatory work ats. 677

114.Community level, the concept of fair trading has been used to denote the area ofs. 677

115.harmonisation. The latest developments in harmonisation seem to support a renamings. 677

116.of ‘fair trading’ to ‘fair trade practices’ law. This only comes to underscore the volatiles. 677

117.character of the area and the difficulty to introduce and sustain clear ands. 677

118.internationally accepted concepts.s. 677

119.There are several factors that make the area of fair trading particularly interesting fors. 677

120.analysis of European influences on national law. As stated above, the law of fairs. 677

121.trading has a relatively long history, dating back to the second half of the 19th century.s. 677

122.Although not of the same seniority as classical private law disciplines like torts ands. 677

123.contracts, it is intimately related with these core areas of private ordering. This allowss. 677

124.us to test propositions about the persistence of deeply embedded national institutionals. 677

125.constraints and their restraining effect on processes of legal change and ofs. 677

126.Europeanisation in particular.s. 677

127.Secondly, fair trading is notoriously stretched between private ordering and publics. 677

128.regulation. Ever since the intellectual ideas of consumerism received wider recognitions. 677

129.in modern welfare states, the protection of diffuse consumer interests has been at leasts. 677

130.nominally recognised as a policy objective beside the protection of individuals. 677

131.competitive interests. Divergent national choices of enforcement procedures, ands. 677

132.institutional structures to account for collective interests, reveal shifting conceptions ofs. 677

133.the role of the state in the market economy and the dividing line between public ands. 677

134.private. Finally, laying down standards of fair trading in unambiguous legislatives. 677

135.provisions has been a notoriously elusive enterprise. As a result, concrétisation of thes. 677

136.standards has been shifted to alternative decision-making institutions, like the courts ors. 677

137.administrative agencies. The choice of enforcement designs has thus not merely been as. 677

138.technical matter, but has had major impact on the effectiveness and the ideology of thes. 677

139.regulative system.s. 677

140.Because the mix of interests and policy objectives integrated in national fair tradings. 677

141.laws is so eclectic and procedure and enforcement design play a decisive role,s. 677

142.harmonisation at the European level has been a difficult task. In normative terms, thes. 677

143.objective of convergence never had a clear appeal. The precise impact ofs. 677

144.Europeanisation on national fair trading law and the desirability of furthers. 677

145.harmonisation have been subjects of controversies at both doctrinal and policy level.s. 677

146.This calls for closer empirical study of the effects of harmonisation and for findings. 677

147.21 more rigorous criteria for a normative evaluation of the impact of European integration on national law.s. 678

AN INSTITUTIONAL APPROACH

1.Legal analyses of European influences in the area of fair trading law have traditionally focused on changes in domestic statutory rules. Such approaches are of course fully legitimate if the focus is on dogmatic (re)systematisation of domestic law in a narrowly defined legal context. Yet, there is a growing consensus that European integration affects national legal systems in complex and less conspicuous ways. It exerts influence on the macro-level of constitutional law and jurisprudence, on institutional structures and procedures as well as on the expectations of actors about the law and about their legal positions. Legal science alone can hardly provide the appropriate tools for describing and explaining these phenomena. I therefore advocate the use of alternative, institutional approaches to the study of Europeanisation in order to capture and conceptualise these otherwise ‘invisible’ processes of legal change. The theoretical premises of an institutional approach will be developed in subsequent chapters. Here it suffices to say that the approach is inspired by the already classical contributions to institutional economic theory referred to as ‘neo-institutionalism’. On a micro-analytical level I follow a theoretical string in law and economics that has become known as comparative institutional analysis. The concept ‘institution’ is used in this theory as well as in much general economic theory in a very broad sense referring to the market, the political process and the courts. Whether to defer certain social problems or goals to the free play of market forces, to rely on private adjudication or to seek solution through the political process, including direct regulation and agency involvement, is at the heart of much political and legal decision making. Theorizing in this vein, comparative institutional analysis insists that institutional choices should be based on a careful comparison between the relative advantages and disadvantages of each alternative. As a main factor for this comparative evaluation one should consider the costs and benefits of affected actors for participation in the respective decision-making process, i.e. transaction costs, litigation costs and costs for political participation. The approach is therefore also called participation-centred.44 On a macro-analytical level, the participation-centred approach is complemented with a historical institutional perspective as advanced by economic historian Douglass North. Historical institutionalism highlights the role of institutions as humanly devised constraints, whose main function is to reduce uncertainty by providing a structure to everyday life.45 Institutions thus include formal legal rules, but also informal constraints (such as ideologies and customs) and the enforcement characteristics of both.46 North highlights institutions’ propensity to persist over time. Institutional paths may be followed not because they are efficient but because their change is costly.s. 678

2.Moreover, institutions tend to produce incentives for the creation of organisations,s. 679

3.which then depend on the institutional framework and contribute to the latter’ss. 679

4.stability (institutional symbiosis). A historical institutional perspective demonstratess. 679

5.that institutional choice is contingent on a historical and institutional context that hass. 679

6.been shaped through time and is generally resistant to change.s. 679

7.The concerns underlying historical institutionalism and Komesar’s participation-s. 679

8.centred approach may be said to converge in the category of adaptive efficiency, useds. 679

9.by North. Adaptive efficiency is a category that supposedly applies to normatives. 679

10.evaluations of a variety of institutional frameworks. According to North, adaptives. 679

11.efficiency “provides incentives to encourage the development of decentraliseds. 679

12.decision-making processes that will allow societies to maximize the efforts required tos. 679

13.explore alternative ways of solving problems”.47 Arguably by eliciting participation ass. 679

14.a central factor for institutional choice Komesar suggests one way of encouraging suchs. 679

15.decentralised decision-making processes. Originally developed as a concept ofs. 679

16.economic theory, adaptive efficiency may equally well relate to established categoriess. 679

17.in constitutional theory, such as representative democracy and access to justice. It iss. 679

18.this link between economic, political and legal theory that, I would submit, makess. 679

19.institutional analysis potentially promising for the study of law.s. 679

20.European integration impacts all levels of the institutional framework, changes formals. 679

21.rules as well as shapes new enforcement possibilities and decision-making fora. Mores. 679

22.importantly, it provides new actors and organisations access to national decision­s. 679

23.making processes and thus helps slowly undermine existing attitudes and ideologies.s. 679

24.In effect, European integration may break or at least destabilize symbiotic relationss. 679

25.between national institutional frameworks and organizations. Such wider implicationss. 679

26.can be studied only by looking at the national institutional frameworks in their richs. 679

27.complexity.s. 679

28.Another feature that distinguishes this study from previous analyses ofs. 679

29.Europeanisation of national law is the option for a comparative perspective. Thiss. 679

30.choice is motivated by a desire to draw more general conclusions about the effects ofs. 679

31.European integration on national law, over and beyond national idiosyncrasies. Thes. 679

32.choice of countries has been motivated by a variety of factors. Both Germany ands. 679

33.Sweden have had a long record of active implementation of fair trading law and prides. 679

34.themselves on the high level of protection of the affected interests. At the same time,s. 679

35.the two legal systems represent two distinct ideal types of institutional responses tos. 679

36.fair trading on the two far ends of the scale between public and private ordering.s. 679

37.Whereas Germany chiefly relies on market-oriented private law enforcement, Swedens. 679

38.provides an example of active public involvement in fair trading with the purpose ofs. 679

39.protecting the consumer interest. Comparative reflections on the two jurisdictions ares. 679

40.in my view facilitated by the fact that they belong to the Continental legal family, in as. 679

41.broad sense.48 The substantive rules on fair trading are not dissimilar to the point ofs. 679

42.significantly complicating an assessment of the impact of institutional factors.s. 679

43.23 Most importantly, both Germany and Sweden are members of the EU. They are bound by the Community ‘acquis’ and are directly exposed to the influence of European integration in many other important respects. Finally, the two countries have taken a high profile in the legislative and policy debate associated with fair trading. German and, more recently, Swedish political representatives, interest groups and experts have arguably been among the most active opinion-builders in the ongoing discussion about the future harmonisation of fair trading law in Europe. Thus, a comparative study may hopefully provide some clues as to the pitfalls and promises of Europeanisation in this area.s. 49

GOALS

1.The study has three more specific research goals: The first goal is to provide a dense account of the evolution of national fair trading laws in the two European countries under analysis. By tracing two distinct paths of legal and institutional development I seek to illustrate the problems of institutional diversity and ‘path dependence’49 that arguably plague attempts at closer European integration. National approaches to fair trading regulation differ in their reliance on the market, the political (administrative) process or the courts, each viewed as a complex decision-making institution. Divergences in institutional choice account for different enforcement procedures and for different actors and organisations having an opportunity to influence the emerging standards of fairness. These distinctive institutional features are rarely arbitrarily formed, but often become firmly embedded in a broader institutional environment of formal rules and less palpable informal constraints, such as economic ideas, constitutional and private law doctrines and ideologies. Legal change is consequently viewed as an incremental process, resulting from the tension between the dynamic of changing interests and preferences of affected actors and the constraining effect of institutional legacies. The second goal is to explore, in a comparative setting, the relative advantages and disadvantages of government intervention and private ordering as two distinct avenues for enforcement of fair trading law. In a time of deregulatory pressures the performance of public bodies of all kinds has increasingly come under fire, accused as the source of multiple regulatory failures and inefficiency. It is therefore worth asking whether governmental agencies in the area of fair trading offer any comparative advantage in the enforcement of fair trading laws seen against the background of existing private means of enforcement. A large number of Central and East European States have in the last decade opted for regulation of fair trade models which rely substantially on the involvement of public agencies. Indeed, such trends are not foreign to some Member States of the European Community. Are these institutional choices misguided? And is a model of restrained, informed and efficient action on the part of regulative agencies sustainable? A comparative study of European fair trading laws can arguably provide rich soil for reflections on the pros and cons of alternative enforcement mechanisms as explicitly in this area many arguments have been brought in defence of private ordering and enforcement. The mere fact that a number of important jurisdictions (such as that ofs. 49

2.24s. 50

3.Germany) still remain satisfied with basically private law means of enforcement of fairs. 50

4.trading rules is already sufficiently provoking. It calls for substantial justification ofs. 50

5.the very existence of public agencies and public enforcement in this field, let alone thes. 50

6.setting up of new ones. In any case there is a need for clear guidelines as to thes. 50

7.instances in which governmental intervention might be warranted and as to the forms. 50

8.and particular design of intervention.s. 50

9.The third goal is to explore, in a comparative manner, the subtle ways in whichs. 50

10.European Community law and policy influence national institutional choices ands. 50

11.institutional frameworks in the Community Member States. In this complex process Is. 50

12.suggest that national institutional frameworks play the role of refractors. Refraction iss. 50

13.defined in physics as: “the bending of rays or waves of light, heat, sound, or the likes. 50

14.when passed obliquely from one medium to another with a different rate ofs. 50

15.transmission”. In a similar manner European influences are ‘bent’ under differents. 50

16.angles as a result of their contact with different national institutional environments.s. 50

17.Given the existing institutional diversity on the national level, Community law iss. 50

18.inevitably ‘refracted’ through a different institutional prism and splits into a wides. 50

19.spectrum of influences, often unpredicted or undesired. The extent to which commons. 50

20.European rules and policies will induce changes in national institutional frameworkss. 50

21.will depend on how deeply actors and organisations are symbiotically related with thes. 50

22.existing framework, and on the extent to which European rules challenge the core ofs. 50

23.national institutions.50 Rather than moulding national institutional frameworks into as. 50

24.uniform regulatory model, European integration tends to expose instances of ‘lock in’s. 50

25.and decision-making biases, while rarely radically changing the direction ofs. 50

26.institutional evolution.s. 50

27.At the same time, Europeanisation should not be seen as one-way street running froms. 50

28.the Community to the Member States. As shown in a number of legal and politicals. 50

29.science studies, it is more plausible to conceive of Europeanisation as a two-ways. 50

30.process of dialogue and interaction.51 This implies on the one hand that nationals. 50

31.institutional frameworks adjust so that they achieve better representation of nationals. 50

32.interests and actors at the Community level. On the other hand, national actors ands. 50

33.decision-makers, when acting within the European context, inevitably remains. 50

34.influenced by their national institutional environment. Their action at the Communitys. 50

35.level are often guided by a desire to change perceived national institutionals. 50

36.malfunctions, or to the contrary by attempts to bring the Community institutionals. 50

37.framework closer to the familiar domestic institutional landscape, not least as a way ofs. 50

38.reducing information and other transaction costs. This conceptualisation carries a duals. 50

39.message. It is pessimistic in predicting persisting incoherence and imperfection of thes. 50

40.European institutional environment, an unwieldy hotchpotch of national approaches. Its. 50

41.nevertheless holds a promise of constant interaction and learning, challengings. 50

42.unproductive and inefficient equilibria.s. 50

43.25 Structure The study is organised into three parts. In part one the analytical framework is presented. I first elaborate the theoretical premises by survey of different streams of institutionalism in law, social sciences and economics. The emphasis is placed on institutional economics (Ch. 1). In a second step, I present the institutional approach used in this study. A participation-centred perspective is advanced for analysing the relative advantages and disadvantages of national institutional choices. At the same time a historical institutional perspective is employed to gain insights in the continuity and persistence of legal institutions and their embeddedness in a broader institutional context. The methodological problems associated with comparative and interdisciplinary approaches are discussed (Ch. 2). In a third step, and following Komesar, an abstract analysis of the market, the political process and the judicial process in the context of fair trading is conducted. The basic challenge of fair trading law is seen to lie in the public good properties of information and of associated decision-making. Institutionalization and representation of dispersed low-stake interests is highlighted as a dilemma in all institutional settings, including adjudication and public intervention (Ch. 3). In part two, a rich description of the institutional framework of fair trading law in Germany and Sweden is provided. The emphasis is on institutional choice and on the design of the preferred mechanisms of enforcement. By tracing the evolution of the institutional framework I inquire into the reasons for particular institutional arrangements and institutional choices, as well as the factors accounting for institutional fixity and flux. Closer scrutiny is devoted to two historical instances: the conception of the specific fair trading institutions (Ch. 4) and the change of the institutional framework under the influence of consumer protection pressures in the 1960s and 1970s (Ch. 5). In part three, the main elements of the European Community framework of fair trading are described. I identify different levels of pressure for change and adaptation coming from the EU, depending on the form and methods of integration (Ch. 6). I then look back at national law of the Member States and try to gauge the most important influences of European integration on national fair trading law, by way of an institutional perspective (Ch. 7). The immediate purpose is to analyze the most significant changes in national legal rules, in enforcement procedures, but also in the attitudes of relevant actors and organizations arguably triggered by the process of European integration. The study ends with a cursory analysis of the latest developments in the field of fair trading on the level of the EU (Ch. 8) and a summary of findings.s. 51

I Studying Institutional Change: Analytical Approach

Institutional anaysis in law, social science and economics

1.The approach taken in this thesis to the study of legal change and Europeanisation is inspired by a dynamic and unwieldy field of social studies that has become known as institutionalism. Naturally, a simple reference to an institutional approach does not say much. The term ‘institution’ has been used in many different contexts, by many disciplines and with shifting connotations. There is therefore much to be elaborated on the basic terminology and the main premises of the analytical approach employed in this study. 1.1 Institutions and institutional analysis in legal scholarship The origins of the term ‘institution’ in legal scholarship go back to Gaius famous distinction between the three institutions of civil law, namely personae, res and actiones.} As national law was consolidated in the early modern era, Roman law and its institutions became a model for many advocates of systematization and modernization of existing legal sources. Notably, at law faculties of German universities in the 18th and 19th centuries a vast literature was devoted to ‘Institutionen’. The term ‘institution’ is by no way foreign to modern legal scholarship either. In a number of analyses of constitutional and administrative law the concept ‘institution’ is used interchangeably with terms like ‘organization’, ‘organ’ or ‘agency’. In this narrow and structural sense ‘institution’ signifies a distinct conglomerate of people and functions, forming a structural unit, with its well-defined place in the mechanism of government. It is, for instance, accepted jargon in European legal studies to talk of the ‘institutions’ of the European Community when referring to the Parliament, Commission. Council and other decision- and policy-making bodies of the Community.2 In national law institutions in this structural sense are considered the domain of public, constitutional and procedural law. On a deeper theoretical level an institutional approach to law is often connected with a general acknowledgment of the need to take into account the broader social, economic and cultural context of legal rules. In this broader sense, theoretical currents in legal scholarship as old and influential as Savigny’s Historical School have been regarded as examples of an institutional approach to law.3 The institutional approach to law so defined has been contrasted to legal positivism, concerned mainly with hermeneutic systemic reasoning with no regard for social environment and effects. Among the mosts. 53

2.prominent exponents of an institutional approach to law in contemporary Germans. 54

3.jurisprudence are such scholars as Karl Larenz4, Ludwig Raiser5 und Josef Esser.6s. 54

4.At the same time, while rejecting legal positivism, such institutional theories of laws. 54

5.have not been particularly successful in presenting a convincing program for ans. 54

6.alternative approach, informed by social and economic considerations. In a sense,s. 54

7.alternative approaches have mainly been based on intuitive ‘contextualisations’ of laws. 54

8.and legal practice. One has often underestimated or simply ignored the theoretical ands. 54

9.methodological difficulties of combining two daunting tasks: on the one hands. 54

10.mastering the ‘context’ of law and on the other hand providing relevant ands. 54

11.meaningful analysis of the normative material that constitutes the core of positive law.s. 54

12.A jurisprudential approach that defines itself as institutional and legal positivist at thes. 54

13.same time is the one advanced by Neil McCormick and Ota Weinberger. Thiss. 54

14.theoretical approach emphasizes institutions as human constructs and looks at law ands. 54

15.legal rules as institutional facts.7 Weinberger offers the following understanding of thes. 54

16.at the same time enabling and constraining role of institutions:s. 54

17.Such an institutional theory is opposed to Hans Kelsen’s hierarchical understanding ofs. 54

18.law as Sollen (‘ought’) and exclusively a product of the will of the norm-creatings. 54

19.authority. In contrast to Kelsen‘s view, legal norms are not perceived as coercive only,s. 54

20.but as enabling and constraining human behaviour. At the same time, the authorss. 54

21.demonstrate an ambition to reconcile contextualism with legal positivism. In fact, theys. 54

22.explicitly declare their approach as legal positivist (cf. the title ‘Grundlagen dess. 54

23.Institutionalistischen Rechtspositivismus’), but defend a more sophisticated and open-s. 54

24.minded brand of positivism than the one familiar from Kelsen’s ‘pure theory of law’.s. 54

25.Consequently, the authors want to avoid drawing too sharp a distinction betweens. 54

26.(‘pure’) legal science and socially oriented disciplines such as legal sociology.9 Thes. 54

27.study of the social reality in which legal norms exist should in this view be integrateds. 54

28.in the definition and the agenda of positive legal science. The institutional approach proposed in this thesis has indeed much in common with the theoretical lines of reasoning described above. It proceeds from an understanding of the importance of considering legal rules as institutions in their societal context. However, I venture to go further in crossing the line between social disciplines in search for a viable framework for analysis. ‘Contextualism’ is thus employed in a more conscious manner, with an open account of the particular theoretical detours in neighbouring disciplines. 1.2 Sociological approaches to institutions Sociological institutionalism has a long and venerable history, dating back to the classical oevres of Émile Durkheim and Max Weber. While Durkheim paved the way for systemic approaches to social relations using large data sets, Weber investigated the political social, economic and legal practices of bureaucracy. He also founded the modern conception of the state and of rationality. The work of Robert Michels on political parties,11 Adolphe Berle and Gardiner Means on corporate management,12 and Herbert Simon on public administration progressively deepened the understanding of various forms of organization.13 By the 1960s students of bureaucracy, leadership, management and administration were beginning to forge a compatible terminology. At this point sociologists took the lead, insisting that there is more to institutions than an organization with staff, funding and a set of formal regulations and objectives. Apart from such rational, goal-oriented structures, institutions possess a social dimension. Over time, sociologists can demonstrate, an informal structure evolves that helps uphold (and sometimes partially subvert) the formal system once established. According to a leading sociological institutionalist, Philip Selznick, institutions are closely linked to the realization of values. Different from temporary or purely instrumental arrangements, institutions assume a distinctive character of function, become endowed with meaning and/or vested interests. A mature institution will no longer be limited to its original objectives. In Selznick’s view processes of institutionalization constrain conduct in two key ways: ‘b y bringmg with it a normative order, and by making it hostage to its own history”. The neoinstitutionalism of the late 1980s and early 1990s reinvigorated many of these insights.15 The attention of organizational theorists was again directed at thes. 54

29.embeddedness of state bureaucracies and private organizations in particular socials. 56

30.environments. Also economists and political scientists were attracted to the concept ofs. 56

31.institutions, although some were satisfied to analyze ‘social capital’ as an aggregates. 56

32.property.16 In this revival the most important feature of neoinstitutionalism may verys. 56

33.well have been the interaction between sociology and related disciplines such as socials. 56

34.psychology, anthropology, political science, but above all its expanding contacts withs. 56

35.economic theory.s. 56

36.1.3 Economic theory and institutionss. 56

37.A few decades ago economic theory did not have much to offer to legal scholarship.s. 56

38.Economic analysis was sometimes invoked for the implementation of legal rules, buts. 56

39.often sporadically and in the narrow areas of antitrust law or economic and trades. 56

40.regulation.17 At the same time economic theory showed a remarkable indifference tos. 56

41.the economic role of legal rules and of legal and political institutions. This attitudes. 56

42.reflected the state of theoretical sophistication of economic theory at the time. Thes. 56

43.classical (and neo-classical) model of perfect competition still dominated economics. 56

44.theory. Although far from real life competition, this highly abstract model wass. 56

45.considered rigorous enough to provide reliable predictions of markets and the prices. 56

46.mechanism.s. 56

47.Under assumptions of transparency, perfect information and rationality of markets. 56

48.actors, it is clear that economic theory cannot provide relevant explanations for thes. 56

49.existence of legal and political institutions. The latter were consequently generallys. 56

50.ignored in economic theory assumptions. In a perfect world of füll transparency,s. 56

51.rational market actors and given preferences, the very existence of law and politicss. 56

52.becomes a puzzle.s. 56

From a frictionless world to transaction costs economics

1.Several contributions in the late 1950s and 1960s that independently of each other hads. 56

2.the combined effect of changing this state of affairs. Notable is the classical analysis ofs. 56

3.Kenneth Arrow on the theory of decision-making under uncertainty, Stigler’s seminals. 56

4.article on the economics of information18 and Coase’s studies on the theory of the firms. 56

5.and on the problem of social cost.19 Despite the difference in theoretical approach, ones. 56

6.common feature of the emerging new economic theory consisted in relaxing thes. 56

7.assumptions of the perfect competition model and bringing it closer to the reality ofs. 56

8.markets. In this way economic theory was expected to account for more complex ands. 56

9.hitherto unexplained developments. Among the assumptions relaxed were notably thoses. 56

10.of perfect information and/or of rationality of actors.20 By ushering ignorance ands. 56

11.uncertainty into the ordered home of neo-classical economics, the new economic theory opened the way for exciting analysis and for bringing economics closer to the social sciences, as well as to law. In 1951 Kenneth Arrow directed his attention to processes of individual and collective choice under conditions of uncertainty.21 Although his main focus was the market, he was likewise interested in decision-making in broader contexts and succeeded in directing the economists’ attention to political and regulative processes.22 The school associated with this work of Arrow has become known as public choice theory and attempts to explain ”how political and bureaucratic bodies actually behave by assuming that political actors are self-interested maximizers of something (votes, agency budgets, profits, utility).”23 In the footsteps of Arrow, Anthony Downs ventured to apply economic theory to the study of the political process, offering economic explanations for phenomena such as party ideologies and majority voting.24 Two other classical exponents of the approach, James Buchanan and Gordon Tullock, developed a theory of politics that is very distant from conventional perceptions of the public-spirited politician. Buchanan and Tullock conceptualise politics as a market for votes, where rational individuals, pursuing individual interests of re-election, are trading with votes to maximize their chances for re-election.25 On a normative note, analysts tried to build a model of a decision-making process that satisfies certain desirable conditions for collective choice. Equally path breaking was the work of Stigler on the economics of information, published in 1961. Relaxing the assumption of transparency and perfect information, Stigler approached the problem of price dispersion and found an explanation in the existence of search costs. Building on these insights for the role of information asymmetries in economic life, a powerful analytical approach developed accounting for a number of economic institutions and phenomena that previously puzzled economists, such as the emergence of department stores, investment in reputation and advertising. We shall return to this theoretical line of reasoning when analysing the economic rationales for fair trading law. Yet the breakthrough of institutional economics is usually associated with the work of Ronald Coase. Already in his early contribution ‘Theory of the Firm’ Coase focused on the importance of transactions as the basis of markets and of all human interaction,s. 56

12.and hinted at the pervasiveness of transaction costs. He conceptualised the firm as ones. 29

13.form of economic organisation that has emerged as a response to problems ofs. 29

14.uncertainty and opportunism in contracting.26 A hierarchical organization has thuss. 29

15.provided an efficient substitute for horizontal contracting in specific situations. Thiss. 29

16.analysis was carried further in Coase’s seminal 1960 article ‘The Problem of Socials. 29

17.Cost’.27 It was this article which in a dramatic way attracted the attention ofs. 29

18.economists to law and legal institutions and, even if at a slower pace, the attention ofs. 29

19.lawyers to economic theory.s. 29

20.The powerful resonance of the article among economists can be understood having ins. 29

21.mind that Coase attacked the core of the then dominant paradigm of welfares. 29

22.economics. Challenging the widely accepted Pigouvian criteria for measurement ofs. 29

23.economic efficiency, proponents of welfare economics argued for governmentals. 29

24.intervention in all instances where markets would produce so called ‘externalities’.28s. 29

25.Externalities were defined as situations where economic exchange even unders. 29

26.competitive markets would produce unaccounted negative effects for third parties,s. 29

27.costs that would not be compensated for by the beneficiaries of the exchange. Thes. 29

28.classical example was that of environmental pollution and its repercussions for locals. 29

29.residents. The policy advice of welfare economics was logically to internalise thes. 29

30.incurred third-party costs, i.e. to devise mechanisms for increased accountability ofs. 29

31.market actors for the negative external effects of their activity. The most obviouss. 29

32.mechanisms for internalising external effects were liability rules and governmentals. 29

33.sanctions.29s. 29

34.Coase radically reversed the perspective. The problem of externality was in hiss. 29

35.analysis conceptualised as a problem of choice between alternative uses of one and thes. 29

36.same economic resource. Thus pollution in a residential area was not about the costs. 29

37.inflicted by the polluter to the residents. It was rather about choosing betweens. 29

38.residence and industrial production as two alternative uses of the same limiteds. 29

39.resource (clean air). In case the use of a property as residence was more highly valueds. 29

40.in society (value being measured by willingness to pay), then the residents would bes. 29

41.granted an injunction against the factory and the industrial production was to cease. Bys. 29

42.contrast, in case the factory’s activity was considered more valuable, the residentss. 29

43.would only be granted a right to compensation or to reasonable measures aimed ats. 29

44.diminishing the damage. Otherwise they would have to put up with the pollution ors. 29

45.give up their residence in the area. Coase predicted that irrespective of the outcome ofs. 29

46.the case, in a world with negligible transaction costs, market actors would eventuallys. 29

47.reach a state of optimal resource allocation through voluntary transactions irrespectives. 29

48.of the initial distribution of entitlements. The market would finally allocate thes. 29

49.resource to the party most willing to pay for it, i.e. efficiently. Following this admittedly oversimplified presentation of the Coase theorem, one may wonder in what way it contributed to the increased interest in the role of legal institutions. The straight-forward conclusion from the analysis appears to be that, given zero transaction costs, the initial resource allocation is unimportant and the economic significance of different legal arrangements on property rights remains obscure. This inference, prima facie, suggests the irrelevance of law rather than a new imperative to take legal institutions into consideration. The key to the puzzle is provided by a reversed (e contrairo) reading of the analysis. In the presence of nonnegligible transaction costs, legal institutions as well as initial allocation of entitlements, acquire crucial importance. The assertion that transaction costs in real markets are never zero does not need extensive corroboration. It is at this particular juncture, in the reduction of transaction costs, that the true economic relevance of legal institutions is seen to lie. A number of legal rules and institutions that previously have remained a mystery to economists suddenly obtain a new meaning and a rigorous explanation. Paradoxically, the Coase theorem gave rise to two quite divergent schools of thought both on an explanatory and on a normative level. On the one hand, it triggered abundant research on the efficiency maximizing (transaction costs minimizing) function of spontaneously evolved private law rules. For lawyers the theorem opened up a whole new world of alternative conceptualisations of basic private law doctrines. Since law and economics developed as a primarily American discipline, the focus was on common law as judge-made law. The message of the innate tendency of spontaneously evolving legal orders to enhance efficiency proved particularly appealing to legal scholars. One of the most eminent exponents of law and economics theory, Judge Richard Posner associated with the Chicago school of economic analysis, developed a general theory on the efficiency of the common law linked to its evolutionary and efficiency-oriented character.30 On a policy level, the underlying message of these analyses was the importance of a rigorous definition of property rights and a general scepticism towards attempts at governmental intervention in economic life. It similarly insisted on the advantages of private ordering. Generally, Coase’s contribution was conceived of as a powerful critique of conventional welfare theory with its conceptualisations of market failure, externalities and the ensuing approval of government intervention. In short, the thrust of the article was interpreted by a large group of economists and lawyers as a general appeal for limited government and praise of the virtues of the system of spontaneous allocation of resources through markets and private ordering. However, the Coase theorem gave birth to at least one alternative current of thought in terms of policy advice. In particular lawyers and economists interested in public policy saw the true message of Coase’s analysis to lie elsewhere. They agreed that the article was a reaction to the simplified and uncritical approach to governmental intervention as practiced by Pigouvian welfare economists. Indeed, part of Coase’s ambition was to demonstrate that in a number of situations government intervention would not do better than the market, and that it was generally wrong to use the ideal model of perfect competition as a benchmark against which actual economic performance coulds. 29

50.be judged. Yet they did not perceive Coase analysis as a sweeping denial of legislatives. 31

51.and governmental intervention and full reliance on a free market. On an explanatorys. 31

52.level, Coase’s article could quite to the contrary be read as a more robust explanations. 31

53.for the emergence of a number of institutions, not only a result of spontaneous regimess. 31

54.of private ordering, but also of deliberate public intervention.s. 31

55.The gist of Coase’s argument could be read as an appeal for what is often called as. 31

56.‘comparative system approach’,31 i.e. ‘an approach that compares the economics. 31

57.consequences of alternative ways of organising the allocation of resources’.32 Ass. 31

58.Coase himself stated in the conclusion of his much celebrated 1960 article:s. 31

59.Whereas in the first of his two most famous articles, “The Nature of the Firm”, Coases. 31

60.pioneered a comparative analysis between different market arrangements (i.e. contracts. 31

61.and firm), ”The Problem of Social Cost” called for comparison between the markets. 31

62.and alternative systems of resource allocation. Therefore, on a normative level, rathers. 31

63.than an unequivocal preference for the market, his analysis could be understood as as. 31

64.rigorous programme for selective and solidly motivated legislative and governmentals. 31

65.intervention based on insights into the pervasiveness of transaction costs. As Dahlmans. 31

66.noted:s. 31

Institutional economics

1.It was the alternative reading of Coase and the insights into the pervasiveness ofs. 31

2.transaction costs that gave new life to economic research focusing on institutions, ands. 31

3.which is of immediate interest for the purposes of this study. The designation ‘news. 31

4.institutional economics’ is sometimes used to contrast the new theoretical currentss. 31

5.from the old institutionalist approach in economics, notably that which is associateds. 31

6.with the work of John Commons.35 Institutional economics is far from a coherents. 31

7.theory. It is rather a set of theoretical propositions that all focus on the economics. 31

8.reasons and effects of institutions and on alternative forms of social and economics. 31

9.organisation. Similar to social science theories on such matters, institutions ins. 31

10.institutional economics are often conceived of as humanly constructed norms, ruless. 31

11.and conventions. However, the focus is on the way institutions and organizations contribute to shaping human cooperation and overcoming problems of transaction costs. Economic institutionalists build their theories without necessarily abandoning methodological individualism as a main premise of economic theory. Yet in contrast to classical economists, they relax assumptions of transparency and costless exchange. Within the broad category of ‘institutional economics’, the approaches vary on the one hand concerning level, focus, and unit of analysis. On the other hand they differ in terms of behavioural assumptions. In an extensive survey of institutional economics, Oliver Williamson has proposed a three-level scheme for organizing and positioning institutional research: the level of the individual, the level of the organisation and the level of institutions.36 Institutional research may focus on each of these levels depending on the purposes of investigation and take the other two levels as exogenous variables. Another point of difference concerns the main behavioural assumption of the neo­ classical model, namely that of rationality. A large community of institutionalists, while acknowledging the importance of transaction costs, does not question the rationality model of classical economic theory. Others are inclined to search for more realistic assumptions even in this respect. Students of institutional economics in this divergence perceive an important schism between two trends in institutional economics, differently labelled in order to properly reflect the distinction. The term ‘Neoinstitutionalism’ is used for those analyses which, although focusing on institutions and critical of the neoclassical approach, remain within the ‘hard core’ of neoclassical research program and the rational choice model. By contrast, the designation New Institutional Economics is applied only to those institutionalist theories that abandon the rationality assumption.37 13.2J New Institutional Economics One of the most famous exponents of the New Institutional Economics is Oliver Williamson. In his ‘The Economic Institutions of Capitalism’ Williamson carried the Coasean analysis (especially ‘The Nature of the Firm’) further, and sought to explain the origins of horizontal and hierarchical market organization in terms of economizing on transaction costs. In this and other earlier works Williamson did not make a clear distinction between institutions and organizations. Markets and hierarchies as alternative organizations of economic activity were described as institutions. In more recent analyses Williamson has been more precise to underline the distinction between institution and organisation and has described his own interests and contributions to lie on the level of organisations.38 His focus is thus on the process of governance. Organizations are seen as reacting to both individual preferences and to the institutional environment, and subsequently accommodating these influences throughs. 31

12.adapted forms of governance. Institutions in the forms of norms, rules and codes ofs. 39

13.conducts are consequently perceived as something external, exogenous, ass. 39

14.environment for the organization, constantly posing new challenges to governance.s. 39

15.When it comes to behavioural assumptions, Williamson’s ambition is to introduce as. 39

16.maximum measure of realism but one that would not weaken the theoretical stringencys. 39

17.and predictive power of the analysis. For this purpose Williamson finds support ins. 39

18.Coase:s. 39

19.The actor is not the ‘rational man’ but the so-called ‘contractual man’, characterizeds. 39

20.through the concepts of bounded rationality and opportunism. Following the classicals. 39

21.definition of Herbert Simon of bounded rationality, economic actors are assumed to bes. 39

22.‘intendedly rational, but only limitedly so.’40s. 39

23.1.3.2.2 Comparative institutional analysiss. 39

24.A promising approach to the analysis of institutions has been advanced by publics. 39

25.policy scholar Neil Komesar.41 Building essentially on Coase, but also on other stringss. 39

26.of institutional and public policy analysis42, Komesar conceptualises the market, thes. 39

27.political process and the courts as alternative decision-making processes. His mains. 39

28.thesis is that the choice between decision-making institutions is crucial for the efficients. 39

29.achievement of any social goals. The analysis is, thus, decidedly normative. Komesars. 39

30.defines the approach as “revisionist law and economics”. And indeed, much ofs. 39

31.classical Posnerian law and economics focuses on either demonstrating the efficiencys. 39

32.of private ordering (the common law in the American setting) or on criticising thes. 39

33.malfunctioning of public regulation. Komesar argues convincingly that such analysess. 39

34.are flawed because of their one-sidedness. The performance of the analysed institutions. 39

35.should instead be evaluated against the background of possible failures in thes. 39

36.performance of alternative institutions.s. 39

37.The key to the comparative system evaluation advocated by Komesar is the so-calleds. 39

38.participation-centred approach. The use of the broad concept of ‘participation’ servess. 39

39.to facilitate the extension of the Coasean transaction cost approach from markets tos. 39

40.politics and to adjudication. It brings the logic of economic theory closer to publics. 39

41.policy and law. Studying the opportunities for participation (and representation)s. 39

42.implies on the one hand analysis of the interests involved in a particular policy issues. 39

43.and, on the other hand, analysis of characteristics of the alternative decision-makings. 39

44.processes that enhance or reduce participation. Clearly, participation alters shapes. 39

45.depending on the decision-making process. Thus, participation in markets primarily occurs through the process of transacting. Participation in the political process (legislation or administrative process) can take place through a variety of forms among which voting and lobbying are the most important. And finally, participation in adjudication takes the form of litigation. The focus is on the mass of participants, i.e. consumers and producers for the market process, voters and lobbyists for the political process and litigants for the judicial process.43 Official actors in the political and the legislative process - judges and law-makers - are only attributed secondary importance. Participation opportunities are weighed through assessing the costs incurred and the benefits expected from participation of the actors in the respective decision-making process. For the market these are transaction costs and benefits, while for the courts they are litigation costs and benefits. In terms of the political process, such opportunities depend on the costs and benefits of political participation. Benefits and costs of participation thus become the main units of analysis. They account for the relative efficiency of the alternative decision-making processes with regard to a specific law and public policy issue. Naturally, costs and benefits are often related and difficult to analyse independently. Yet for the sake of more stringent analysis Komesar insists on distinguishing between the two. Participation costs are subdivided into two main categories, i.e. information and organisation costs. More specifically, the costs of participation depend “on the complexity or difficulty of understanding the issue in question, the number of people on one side or the other of the interest in question, and the formal barriers to access associated with institutional rules and procedures.”44 As organisation costs Mancur Olson had defined: “the costs of communication among group members, the costs of any bargaining among them, and the costs of creating, staffing and maintaining any formal group organisation”.45 Arguably, in the final analysis even organisation expenses boil down to information costs. The benefits of participation are measured through the per-capita stakes of affected actors. The emphasis on stakes as determinants for the benefit of participation in decision-making processes allows for further refinement of the analysis. The stakes of potential participants differ both in terms of size and in terms of their distribution among the group. One can usefully distinguish between high stakes and low stakes and between concentrated and dispersed stakes. The distribution of the stakes between potential participants in a decision-making process is decisive for the probability of successful participation. An even distribution of stakes on both sides of the transaction and a relatively low number of parties involved are suggestive of high benefits and thus of high probability of participation. In contrast, skewed distribution with concentrated stakes on one side and dispersed stakes on the other reflects a problematic, non-optimal transaction situation. In this aspect Komesar’s approach resembles Mancur Olson’s classical analysis of collective action.46 Olson provided a convincing explanation as to why actors would be disinterested in participation ins. 39

46.collective action concerning broadly dispersed interests, despite possibilities tos. 53

47.improve the situation of the group. Olson argued that due to high costs of organisations. 53

48.and risk of ‘free-riding’ such behaviour was rational. His pessimistic prediction reads:s. 53

49.In general, comparative institutional analysis stresses that the dilemmas of institutionals. 53

50.choice begin with large numbers. This proposition is familiar from Coaseans. 53

51.comparative system analysis. Given small numbers of actors (low transaction costs)s. 53

52.markets can be expected to cope endogenously with resource allocation throughs. 53

53.voluntary transactions.48 But if there are many actors on one side of the interestss. 53

54.involved, transaction costs increase and at least potentially the question arises whethers. 53

55.resorting to alternative institutions might reduce allocative inefficiencies. Yet,s. 53

56.comparative institutional analysis demonstrates convincingly that large numbers ofs. 53

57.affected parties constitute a problem in every setting. Similar interest constellationss. 53

58.cause analogous problems of organisation and representation. Participations. 53

59.malfunctions in the market setting are reproduced in the political process and ins. 53

60.adjudication. In other words, institutions tend to ‘move together’.49s. 53

61.Still, some categories of participation malfunction are linked to particular decision­s. 53

62.making processes. When studying the political process, Komesar identifies twos. 53

63.categories of situations that are particularly conducive to representative malfunction.s. 53

64.The first is characterized by the dominance of small, concentrated interest groupss. 53

65.(which is in conformity with well-established theories of public choice and interest-s. 53

66.groups politics).50 Komesar labels this situation a case of ‘minoritarian bias’.51 Thes. 53

67.theory predicts that, when public policy issues involve balancing between concentrateds. 53

68.high-stake interests and dispersed small-stake interests, the former will prevail in thes. 53

69.legislative process as well as in public agency decision-making. This is the result ofs. 53

70.free riding and low benefits of organization associated with diffuse interest groups52,s. 53

71.but also due to principal-agent problems characteristic of the political and thes. 53

72.administrative process.53 Interest group theories of politics provide empirical evidence of överrepresentation of concentrated interests in the political process, along with the ‘capturing’ of public agencies by defenders of the very interests they are set to regulate. Komesar, however, augments the interest group theory with analysis of the role of majorities which allows him to identify a second category of mal-representation, namely ’the tyranny of the majority4. This second category of mal-representation is labelled ’majoritarian bias‘. All theorists of public choice recognize some importance for the influence of the majority but do not offer any explanation as to when and why such an influence may produce adverse effects.55 In order to come to a more satisfactory answer Komesar proceeds to analyse the character of the large group. He offers two explanatory factors that may be decisive for the success of public action despite high numbers. In the first place, the average per capita stakes are important. This factor predicts that the greater the mean, the higher the probability that collective action will follow. The second factor is the variance and skewness of the stakes. Uneven distribution of the stakes brings the analysis of the large group closer to that of the small group, since a small subgroup with high stakes will then act as a driving force for collective action. The term ‘catalytic sub-group’ nicely captures this phenomenon.56 Finally, there are better opportunities for mobilizing dormant majorities if the issue concerned is simple and easy to be communicated in powerful metaphoric terms. Finally, the framework proposed by Komesar requires a rigorous analysis of the characteristics of each of the institutional alternatives in terms of effects on participation costs and benefits. To take one example, in contrast to the political process, participation in adjudication is typically a costly enterprise, involving litigation fees and requiring sophisticated expert advice. Access to the judicial process is highly formalised through rules on standing, jurisdiction, and choice of law.57 The judiciary operates on a very limited scale and possesses only limited expertise to decide on highly technical issues. At the same time, the judicial process has the advantages of ensuring direct access, careful and lengthy examination of the issue by a body principally isolated from political pressure and information manipulation. These aggregate characteristics of the judicial process makes it particularly apt to deal with certain situations of skewed distribution of stakes, for instance where the political process suffers from severe majoritarian bias like the violation of minority rights.58s. 53

73.The approach advanced by Komesar offers powerful insights in the comparatives. 55

74.advantages and disadvantages of different decision-making processes, moreover ins. 55

75.relation to different policy settings. The advantage of Komesar’s analytical approach iss. 55

76.that it uses relatively clear-cut categories and can be easily applied to different legals. 55

77.and public policy issues. Since one of the intricacies of fair trading regulation is seens. 55

78.to reside with small and dispersed consumer, stakes as well as with high costs ofs. 55

79.information, organisation and litigation, the model appears particularly suitable for thes. 55

80.purposes of this investigation.s. 55

81.1.3.2.3 Historical institutionalisms. 55

82.A different perspective on institutions is adopted by another variation in thes. 55

83.neoinstitutionalist line of theorizing, better known as historical institutionalism. Thes. 55

84.leading name is Douglass North. As pointed out above, North understands institutionss. 55

85.as humanly constructed constraints to social and economic behaviour. Theses. 55

86.constraints appear in the form of routines, rules and customs which frame humans. 55

87.conduct and help reduce uncertainty. The emphasis is on the level of institutions,s. 55

88.where institutions are defined as “formal rules, informal constraints and thes. 55

89.enforcement characteristics of both.”59 The main question he poses is: how dos. 55

90.institutions evolve over time and how do present institutions influence futures. 55

91.individual and institutional choices?s. 55

92.One of the main puzzles that drives North’s analysis is the dramatic divergence ins. 55

93.economic performance and development between different countries in the world.60s. 55

94.The unravelling of this puzzle brings him to insights in the constraining force ofs. 55

95.institutions. Institutions frame human behaviour and serve to reduce uncertainty ands. 55

96.economize on transaction costs. According to the evolutionary theory of economics. 55

97.development elaborated by Alchian, competitive markets should over time produces. 55

98.efficient institutions.61 Yet according to North the empirical evidence for suchs. 55

99.convergence is lacking and even amounts to the contrary proposition. Inefficients. 55

100.institutions prosper and divergence between developing and developed countries ins. 55

101.efficiency terms even increases. It was this discrepancy that provoked his interest fors. 55

102.institutions and their role for economic performance and efficiency.s. 55

103.Unlike other institutionalists who treat organizations as institutions, North insists ons. 55

104.distinguishing between the two in order to enable stringent analysis of theirs. 55

105.interaction.62 The distinction is crucial, since in this way the analytical approach iss. 55

106.capable of capturing not only processes of stability and inertia but also processes ofs. 55

107.change at incremental or more dynamic pace. Organizations are conceived as “groupss. 55

108.of individual engaged in a purposive activity.” They are designed by their creators to maximize wealth, income, or other objectives defined by the opportunities afforded by the institutional structure of society.63 This broad definition covers the classical market organization, the firm, but likewise the guild, the political party, the Congress or the executive agency. It allows for parallel consideration of market, political and adjudicative processes and organizations. Institutions open new opportunities for gains from trade and thus give rise to organizations and institutional agents who are willing to make use of these new opportunities. In the words of North: The backside of the interaction between institutions and organizations is the ensuing risk of symbiotic relations between organizations and institutional frameworks, leading to situations of institutional lock-in, i.e. pronounced resistance to change despite efficiency losses. Contrary to claims of evolutionary theories of economic growth65, North convincingly demonstrates that institutions are not necessarily evolving towards increased efficiency in a classical Pareto sense.66 This is particularly so for institutions which are a product of the political process, typically legal rules resulting from legislative processes. Given differential bargaining power in societies, it is not at all given that these institutions will be created to promote efficiency. Rather they may further the interests of those with greater bargaining strength.67 Adopting more realistic behavioural assumptions such as expected utility and bounded rationality, North views the persistence of institutional inefficiency as a problem of knowledge and learning. Even if institutions do not promote increased efficiency, they have a tendency to persist over time because institutional agents follow imperfect subjective models of reality and are influenced by informal constraints that change slowly. The core of the theory of institutional change advanced by North could be summarized as aiming to explain “how the past influences the present and the future, the way incremental institutional change affects the choice set at a moment of time, and the nature of path dependence."68 It is the symbiotic relations between the institutional framework and the organizations it (re)produces that account for the persistence of institutions over time. So-called ‘path dependence’ is according to North a result ofs. 55

109.incomplete markets, fragmentary information feedback and significant transactions. 76

110.costs. Under these conditions ‘the subjective models of actors modified both by verys. 76

111.imperfect feedback and by ideology will shape the path.’69s. 76

112.The long-term, historical perspective and the emphasis on institutional persistences. 76

113.have provoked criticism that the analysis suffers from a conservative and deterministics. 76

114.bias.71 Thus, it is claimed, the analysis does not capture situations where potential fors. 76

115.change and transformation exists. This criticism, however, does not really do justice tos. 76

116.North’s analytical model, at least not if one is to judge from North’s classicals. 76

117.monograph: Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Althoughs. 76

118.the main focus is on the constraining force of institutions, the analysis offers valuables. 76

119.insights into the role of organizations and actors as factors of institutional change. It iss. 76

120.true that change is described as incremental and it is underlined that evens. 76

121.revolutionary change does not totally wipe out the pervasive influence of pasts. 76

122.institutional constraints.72 At the same time there is an implicit awareness of thes. 76

123.importance of institutional actors and their changing preferences as factors fors. 76

124.institutional change.s. 76

125.North’s approach is basically explanatory. Through an extensive analysis of the role ofs. 76

126.institutions throughout economic history, he seeks to explain diversity in economics. 76

127.development across countries. Yet there is at least one important insight withs. 76

128.normative implications. Discussing the question of how one should evaluates. 76

129.institutions and their impact on economic efficiency, North develops the concept ofs. 76

130.‘adaptive efficiency’. North describes adaptive efficiency as providing:s. 76

131.With Hayek74, North argues that a society that permits the maximum generation ofs. 76

132.trials will be most likely to solve more problems through time.75This is certainly ans. 76

133.interesting and exciting approach, since at the same time it questions normatives. 76

134.analyses based on abstract criteria of efficiency (Nirvana solutions).76 But it likewise demonstrates that comparative system analyses of the Coasean type cannot ignore historical reality and tradition.s. 76

135.Having presented a number of different institutional perspectives in law, sociology ands. 78

136.economics, it is now time to pull the strings together and provide a more systematics. 78

137.account of the institutional approach used in this study as well as to define the mains. 78

138.variables of analysis. The institutional approach proposed here combines an interest ins. 78

139.the stabilizing role of institutions and the dynamic role of interests and agents ins. 78

140.explaining a continuous movement from stability to change. It builds in its micro-s. 78

141.analytical sections on comparative institutional analysis, but is sensitive for the role ofs. 78

142.institutional path dependence and contingency, in tune with historical institutionalism.s. 78

143.2.1 Institution-centred perspective: the logic of institutional persistences. 78

144.I shall first outline those aspects which make historical institutional analysiss. 78

145.particularly conducive to integration with legal analysis. A kinship between historicals. 78

146.institutionalism and legal analysis can be found on a number of levels. An evidents. 78

147.commonality is the shared interest in legal rules and enforcement mechanisms. Likes. 78

148.historical institutionalists, legal analysts tend to view legal rules as importants. 78

149.institutions constraining human behaviour. Either intellectual endeavour insists on thes. 78

150.importance of enforcement. Yet whereas legal analysis stops here, economics. 78

151.institutionalism inquires further into the relation of the institutional framework withs. 78

152.economic efficiency. As we shall see, however, the question of efficiency is not - or ats. 78

153.least should not be - wholly uninteresting for lawyers either. Many legal regimes aims. 78

154.explicitly at enhancing economic efficiency. And even where the goal of certain legals. 78

155.rule is other than efficiency, the efficiency of the legal framework would finally bes. 78

156.decisive for the achievement of the goal.78s. 78

157.Another commonality is the mutual interest in the history and the evolution of legals. 78

158.rules. For historical institutionalism this interest forms an integral part of its agenda,s. 78

159.namely substantiating the decisive influence of past institutions on present choice-sets.s. 78

160.But looking at the history of legal rules is an indispensable component of any legals. 78

161.analysis worth its name. Lawyers in most countries would at least glance at thes. 78

162.original legislative intent of statutes, consider preparatory material and search fors. 78

163.precedents (in both common law and Continental systems). In fact, legal doctrine cans. 78

164.be said to be one of the transmission belts for the influence of the past on presents. 78

165.institutions and thus an important factor for achieving the continuity so interesting fors. 78

166.historical institutionalists.s. 78

167.Historical institutionalism shares the general advantage of economic analysis of law,s. 78

168.namely that it directs the search light to the problem of efficiency. Yet, in contrast tos. 78

169.classical law and economics, historical institutionalism with its awareness of thes. 78

170.conservative force of inherited institutions and intellectual frames of references. 78

171.provides a much more realistic picture of the world in which legal change takes place.s. 78

172.Normative advice on the basis of economic analysis is often influenced by thes. 78

173.frictionless paradigm of the neo-classical model. Historical institutionalism givess. 78

174.insights into the conservative force of existing institutions, formal and informals. 78

175.constraints as well as into the role of organizations and institutional agents as factorss. 78

176.of continuity or change. Historical institutionalism demonstrates the complexity of the institutional framework and requires an integrated analysis of all its components. This could exert a refreshing impact on the highly technical and isolationist analysis typical for legal scholarship. One major contribution of historical institutionalism would be to sensitise legal scholars to the importance of the existing mechanisms of enforcement. The rules in combination of mechanisms of enforcement to a large extent predetermine what agents and organizations will emerge on the institutional scene and whether they are in a position to exploit the framework and induce institutional change once preferences and prices change (to effectively signal the need for change). Finally, historical institutionalism is particularly promising in comparative legal studies. It provides analytical tools to test hypothesis of autonomous legal orders vs. instrumentalist logic of legal transplants, hypothesis of convergence or persistence of legal cultures. As a theory lying on the macro level it is better suited to be applied to more complex large-scale phenomena such as comparative study of legal change and influence of European integration over national frameworks. Conventional economic analysis of law may provide excellent tools for micro analysis of particular legal doctrines in a limited national setting. Historical institutionalism, by contrast, provides an intellectual framework for macro analyses. Historical institutionalism and legal analysis differ as to the level of detail they require. Whereas legal analysis looks typically at the micro-institutional level of single provisions, precedent, or at a group of rules forming a systematic unity, historical institutionalism is interested in the broad picture and in the institutional framework as a whole. Legal analysis could be compared with classicist painting in its desire to capture the tiniest detail and find its exact place in the picture. Historical institutionalists take a more ‘impressionist’ approach, where the object can be recognized, but precision is not a virtue. In a similar vein, the time perspective varies substantially. Historical institutionalism digs long back into the past in order to find explanation for present institutional developments. Legal analysis, in contrast, typically limits the travel in time to the near past, which can generate material for legal interpretation. As always with different disciplines, the most important difference concerns the goals of analysis. Historical institutionalism seeks to explain the effect of legal rules and institutions on economic efficiency. Normatively it tries to shape institutional frameworks that are conducive to economic growth. Conventional legal analysis, in contrast, represents normative analysis in a different meaning, namely in offering guidance for interpretation and application of legal rules. Naturally, where transposition problems exist, one needs to adjust the framework to its new purposes. How can historical institutionalism be ‘translated’ into the language of law? The integration between institutional and legal analysis requires several modifications of the design that have to be explicitly reported. It should become evident that the degree of detail is a result of a compromise. The present study zooms in on the picture in comparison to the historical type of analysis conducted by North. As a lawyer I cannot be satisfied with the birds-eye view of a historian. Therefore, as is conventional in legal analysis, I will descend to the level of individual rules ands. 78

177.cases. Since one of the goals of this study is to comparatively explore different legals. 79

178.approaches to the regulation of marketing practices, I provide a relatively detaileds. 79

179.picture of substantive rules and enforcement procedures. Yet unlike conventional legals. 79

180.analysis, I do not strive for exhaustiveness of analysis. My ambition is to realisticallys. 79

181.capture the institutional core of national legal systems seen as ideal types, to reflects. 79

182.and communicate their particular flavour and character. Finally, in order to enhances. 79

183.the normative aspect of the analysis, I complement the historical institutionalists. 79

184.perspective with insights gained from the ‘instrumentalist’ approach of comparatives. 79

185.institutional analysis.s. 79

Formal rules, informal constraints, enforcement

1.The way the term ‘institution’ is used in this study is influenced by North’s, by nows. 79

2.classical, definition. Institutions are consequently understood as “formal rules,s. 79

3.informal constraints (norms of behaviour, conventions and self-imposed codes ofs. 79

4.conduct) and the enforcement characteristics of both.”79 Even if this definition mays. 79

5.appear rather broad, it is not altogether foreign to a lawyer. Classical legal analysiss. 79

6.tends to deal with each of these elements, albeit often in isolation from the others.s. 79

7.Arguably, the majority of legal investigations are devoted to formal rules. I refer heres. 79

8.to various analyses of what is called ‘substantive law’. Another group of legal scholarss. 79

9.focus on procedure and thus on enforcement of rules. Finally, case law and legals. 79

10.doctrine reveal deeply embedded informal constraints that influence the behaviour ofs. 79

11.courts and other relevant agents. Missing is a more complex analysis, integrating thes. 79

12.different institutional elements and looking at their interaction and mutual dependence.s. 79

13.The three categories - formal rules, informal rules and enforcement will be used as mains. 79

14.variables of the institutional analysis also in this study, yet with significant qualificationss. 79

15.due to the interdisciplinary character of the analysis.s. 79

16.Despite its strength, the definition per enumeration provided by North does not names. 79

17.the core element of the concept institution. And this core element has actually much ins. 79

18.common with the definitions given in sociological studies on institutions. Formals. 79

19.rules, informal constraints and enforcement are there for repeated reference ands. 79

20.application. Only in this sense do they act as constraints of human behaviour. In thiss. 79

21.context it is questionable to what extent formal rules that are ‘rules in the books’ coulds. 79

22.be called institutions (law in the books vs. law in action).s. 79

23.2.L1.1 Formal ruless. 79

24.The formal rules category sounds, at least prima facie, familiar to a lawyer. Yet ones. 79

25.should not be induced to believe that North follows some Kelsenian logic ands. 79

26.precision in the distinction between formal and informal rules. Under formal ruless. 79

27.North classifies ‘political (and judicial) rules’, ‘economic rules and contracts.’ There iss. 79

28.awareness about the hierarchy between the different rules from constitutions, statutorys. 79

29.law, down to individual contracts. In the economists’ jargon hierarchy is described ass. 79

30.differing costs for alteration. This means that the higher up in the hierarchy a legal acts. 79

31.is found, the costlier its amendment. At the top of this hierarchy is the Constitution,s. 79

32.requiring special procedure for its amendment. However, North treats all rules in as. 79

33.similar manner, namely as constraints of human behaviour. This refreshing perspectives. 79

34.on rules lends support to a broad concept of legal sources that includes contracts, for instance in law merchant and in industrial relations. For my own part I will maintain a more legalistic definition of this category and will focus on rules deriving their validity from the legislative process. Guidelines issued by public agencies will be treated to the extent they have strong formal or informal authority for the addressees, whereas contracts are not relevant for this particular analysis. 2.1.1.2 Informal constraints More problematic from a legal perspective is the concept of ‘informal constraints’. According to North, among these are codes of conduct, norms of behaviour, conventions, beliefs and ideologies.80 He insists on the pervasiveness of informal constraints. Eventually, it is the embeddedness of formal institutions in informal constraints that accounts for the incremental and slow process of institutional change. Yet in the world of beliefs and convention, both economists and legal scholars tend to feel they find themselves in muddy waters. The necessary tools for studying informal beliefs appear to be in the domain of sociology. Historical institutionalism circumvents that ‘trap’ by adopting a long-term perspective and by applying a conventional historical approach. Seen from the distance of centuries, historical institutionalists argue that informal constraints and changes thereof can be established with acceptable degree of certainty. Thus, when North refers to changing attitudes towards women and slaves in Western society he is safe from methodological criticism. Also in this respect an adaptation to legal analysis is needed. Due to methodological difficulties, the analysis in this study sticks to the use of conventional legal material. Consequently, I venture to identify informal constraints through examining judicial practice and legal doctrine. Clearly, this narrowing down of the perspective would not allow capturing the whole range of attitudes and informal constraints. If we turn to the fashionable term ‘legal culture’, often employed by legal sociologists, the analysis here remains focused on ‘internal’ legal culture.81 Yet, given the decisive role that lawyers play on all levels from designing formal rules to their enforcement, the wider intellectual reference systems of those important actors should be taken into consideration. This side of the institutional framework probably remains more hidden to the non-lawyer. Its pervasive influence has, however, rightly been emphasized by legal historians like Alan Watson, who in this legal frame of mind perceives the most important factor of legal change.82 Seen in a historical perspective and as an aggregate of individual cases and decisions, legal practice carries the flavour and fragrance of changing or persisting attitudes and ideologies. Case law and doctrine in this sense are not treated as normative, but as empirical material, albeit with admittedly lower coefficient of representativity than sociological opinion polls. 2.1.1.3 Enforcement The third element of the institutional framework to be analysed is enforcement. In his early analysis, North included mainly formal rules and informal constraints in the concept ‘institution’. In his 1990 monograph, however, he showed a growings. 79

35.awareness for the role of enforcement mechanisms and bodies, devoting them as. 81

36.separate chapter of his book. Again there is a risk that familiar terminology may leads. 81

37.lawyers astray. Enforcement covers in North’s view not only procedural rules ands. 81

38.third-party enforcement bodies. An important part of enforcement is self-enforcement,s. 81

39.i.e. voluntary compliance with a contract or a rule. However, high transaction costss. 81

40.due to imperfect information and opportunism make third-party enforcement (typicallys. 81

41.courts) imperative in many settings.s. 81

42.Clearly, given the legal character of this study I will focus on the statutory rules ofs. 81

43.procedural and organizational nature. This does not imply completely loosing sight ofs. 81

44.the enforcement that takes place outside formal legal procedures. When relevant I wills. 81

45.consider mechanisms of self-regulation and will try to find evidence for the degree ofs. 81

46.self-enforcement. Nevertheless, also informal enforcement occurs ‘in the shadow ofs. 81

47.the law’83 and largely depends on credible threat (probability) of formal enforcement.s. 81

48.Therefore, the emphasis on third-party enforcement possibilities appears justified.s. 81

49.One of the goals of this study is to highlight the central role of enforcement for thes. 81

50.emergence of adaptively efficient institutional frameworks. Especially in moderns. 81

51.welfare states, regulation takes often the form of broad and rather general standardss. 81

52.and clauses, leaving concrétisation in individual cases to decision-making by thes. 81

53.judiciary or administrative agencies. The use of general clauses increases thes. 81

54.importance of rules on procedure and enforcement which ensure the participation ofs. 81

55.affected agents in shaping of substantive standards. Legal scholars speak ofs. 81

56.‘proceduralisation of law’.84s. 81

57.When putting the three institutional components of the framework to work in thes. 81

58.analysis, I shall first treat formal rules and enforcement and discuss theirs. 81

59.interdependence. In a second stage I will elaborate on case law and doctrine ass. 81

60.indicators of the evolving informal constraints (the standard of fair trading). Aparts. 81

61.from the classification of formal rules, informal constraints and enforcement Norths. 81

62.himself offers an alternative logic for classification, namely created and evolvings. 81

63.institution.85 Formal rules and enforcement typically fall under the category ‘createds. 81

64.institutions’, as they are brought to existence by deliberate political and legislatives. 81

65.action. Evolving institutions, on the contrary, develop more or less spontaneously ands. 81

66.less visibly through the aggregation of individual actions and decision. The latters. 81

67.typically become more resistant to change. At the same time, they may in certains. 81

68.situations serve as a forum for expressing new preferences and values in society, ass. 81

69.‘incubators’ for future formal rules.s. 81

Macro-institutional context as a factor for path-dependence

1.One of the main propositions of historical institutionalism concerns the embeddedness of institutions in a broader institutional context. The function of institutions is to constrain and frame human behaviour in the face of uncertainty and imperfect patterns of gaining knowledge. In this sense adherence to familiar institutions is an economically understandable (rational) way for handling complexity. Lawyers are arguably well aware of the conservative role of inherited legal institutions, in the form of established doctrines, principles and rules of seniority. Thus new rules in the sphere of public administration or private law are often seen to depend on rules, doctrines and ideologies that have shaped these complex areas through time. It suffices to mention the frequently invoked genetic connection of many modern private law doctrines with principles to be found in Roman law.86 Apart from coming as a confirmation of intuitive or scientifically defended perceptions, historical institutionalism reveals the two faces of tradition and continuity. Institutional choices that have led towards increased efficiency may generate production of efficient institutions also in the future. And just to the contrary, taking a path of inefficiency may determine distorted institutional development for years to come (path dependence).s. 86

Symbiotic relations and lock-ins

1.For legal analysis, a particularly intriguing insight of historical institutionalism concerns the intimate relationships between an institutional framework, enforcement in particular, and organizations which evolve as products of that framework. Legal enforcement procedures are not infrequently designed to rely on specific organizations and agents to ‘breathe life’ into institutional rules. A successful enforcement design is usually associated with intensive implementation and with the emergence of interested and engaged ‘enforcers’. Historical institutionalism, however, shows the reverse side of the coin, namely the evolution of symbiotic relations between institutional framework and organizations as an impediment to institutional change and as a factor that sustains inefficient institutions (so called ‘lock in’). This insight prompts an inquiry into the effects of the institutional framework on organizations and agents. 2.2 Participation-centred perspective: the dynamics of institutional change Historical institutionalism is concerned with demonstrating the large-scale effects that are observable only from the distance of time. It provides a general theoretical framework for capturing long-term legal change within and across national legal systems. This framework is, however, neither intended nor adapted to serve for deeper inquiries into issues of institutional design or allocation of enforcement competence. Legal analysis, by contrast, is bound to the present and is supposed to offer workable models for improved law and policy making. At this point the insights of historical institutionalism need to be linked to a robust research agenda capable of eliciting details. Most importantly, the question should be faced as to whether there are situations more likely to produce inefficient lock-ins than others or situations where adaptive efficiency can be attained. In my view, comparative institutional analysis augments historical institutionalism by providing further tools for empirical analysis. In contrast to historical institutionalism, which focuses on institutions and thus adopts a top-down perspective, comparative institutional analysis looks at interests ands. 86

2.agents, thereby arguably taking a bottom-up perspective.87 The approach can likewises. 87

3.be classified as lying on the micro-level since it requires studying specific law ands. 87

4.public policy issues. When can we expect interests to be adequately represented ins. 87

5.decision-making processes and finally in institutions, broadly construed? And whats. 87

6.are the situations conducive for distorted representation and for ensuing institutionals. 87

7.malfunctioning?s. 87

8.The advantage in Komesar’s approach is that it is genuinely comparative, i.e. nos. 87

9.decision-making process is taken a priori as superior over the others. At the same times. 87

10.it advances a conceptualisation of the economic, legal and political system as mutuallys. 87

11.dependant. It provides insights into the economic effects of politics and at the publics. 87

12.policy effects of markets. It brings democratic decision-making, access to justice ands. 87

13.market efficiency in relation to each other and demonstrates the interrelations betweens. 87

14.law, politics and economics.89s. 87

15.The influence of the participation-centred approach is less visible from the structurals. 87

16.components of the present study. Yet it informs the entire analysis and accounts for thes. 87

17.special attention devoted to interest-representation in the legislative process, to choices. 87

18.of institutional structures, and to cost-benefit reasoning in regard to participation in thes. 87

19.administrative process and in litigation. Comparative institutional analysis is designeds. 87

20.to be used by lawyers. But nevertheless some of the main concepts may needs. 87

21.additional adaptation and qualification. More specifically, the suggestion that benefitss. 87

22.and costs have to be measured and compared fills no lawyer’s heart with enthusiasm.s. 87

23.Are we not in the forbidding realm of exact science? The question is justified, but stills. 87

24.what is apparently implied is a more approximate even though more vulnerable sort ofs. 87

25.evaluation, something illustrated by Komesar’s own applications of the approach. Ins. 87

26.this sense qualifications such as high or low stakes should necessarily be understood ass. 87

27.rough evaluations. Where even lawyers can be fairly accurate is on the size ofs. 87

28.litigation costs and formalized costs for participation in the administrative process.s. 87

The choice between decision-making processes as main element of the

institutional framework

1.The major contribution of comparative institutional analysis is to advance a way tos. 87

2.look at the market, the political process and the judicial process as alternative decision­s. 87

3.making processes for law and public policy issues. Moreover, it helps to distinguishs. 87

4.the matter of goal choice from the matter of institutional choice and to highlight thes. 87

5.decisive importance of the latter. The matter of institutional choice (as Komesars. 87

6.defines it) is to be found at all levels of the institutional framework. Indeed, a choice tos. 87

7.leave a decision to the market means to rely on existing informal constraints ands. 87

8.informal enforcement mechanisms. Likewise, a choice to entrust a particular policy issue entirely to the political process would imply a comprehensive statutory regulation of this issue (formal rules). Yet few issues are entirely left to the one or the other process. It is most often a question of supportive and complementary interplay between these processes.s. 87

The role of interests and distribution of stakes

1.Comparative institutional analysis urges us to look closer into the interests involved. It is not a question of ‘substantive’, but of ‘structural’ interest analysis. Much conventional legal analysis at least purportedly involves the balancing of different individual, group and public interests against each other. In intellectual property law, for example, we say that the interest of the author to receive remuneration for his or her creative activity is weighed against the interest of the general public to have free access to the object of creation (as well as society’s interest to promote intellectual activity in general). The question about which interest should prevail in situations of conflict occupies volumes of legislative and scholarly reasoning. ‘Structural’ interest analysis, by contrast, requires analysis of the opposed interests in terms of numbers of individuals concerned, size and distribution of the stakes (individual interests, concentrated group interests, and widely dispersed group interests). This specific model of interest analysis is preferred due to the main goal pursued, namely to highlight participation in decision-making. The question is not: which interest is worthier of protection but rather whether the interest structure can cause for representation distortions in the decision-making process? In legal scholarship awareness for structural interest analysis has been manifested in ‘access to justice’ approaches mainly in consumer law and environmental law.90 Such approaches have often led to appeals for alternative dispute resolution schemes, or to novel approaches to adjudication. What is new is that participation costs and benefits are assumed as the main units of analysis and the model applied to all major decision­ making processes. In addition, we possess a model for conceptualising the political process in situations that involve decisions over complex public policy issues.s. 92

Majoritarian vs. minoritarian bias in the political process

1.The categories ‘majoritarian’ and ‘minoritarian’ influence or bias will be used when relevant in the analysis of the law-making process. James Wilson in The Politics of Regulation has earlier advanced these categories.91 In his contribution to that volume, Wilson advances taxonomy of various forms of regulation. Depending on the influence of powerful concentrated interests or of majority interests regulation types are classified under four headings: client politics, interest group politics, majoritarian politics and entrepreneurial politics. With his more sophisticated elaboration of the model of benefits and costs of participation, Komesar brings this analysis one step further and offers a model for predicting when and where a particular form of politics will arise.92 Especially in view of the broad cross-country comparison in this study, the broad categories for analysing the legislative and political process are well-suited.s. 92

2.Likewise the idea of catalytic sub-groups as one factor for mobilizing dormants. 95

3.majorities and leading to majoritarian influence or bias will be tested. The definition ofs. 95

4.a catalytic sub-group is, however, somewhat unclear. Komesar identifies two ways ofs. 95

5.defining the catalytic subgroup: the first emphasizes the (at least potential) capacity tos. 95

6.activate the majority even if the result from this is detrimental to the majority.s. 95

7.According to the second definition a subgroup is majoritarian if it had the sames. 95

8.interests as the majority without regard to whether they could activate the saids. 95

9.majority. Komesar himself employs a third definition that combines the previous two:s. 95

10.“those parts of the majority whose interests coincide with the majority and who haves. 95

11.some ability to activate the majority.”93s. 95

12.It appears that the latter view excludes all minoritarian influence from the definition ofs. 95

13.the majoritarian catalytic group. It is not clear whether there is another well-suiteds. 95

14.concept to capture the important phenomenon of appropriation of the majority interests. 95

15.and its manipulative use to serve the interests of the minority.94 Since I find this types. 95

16.of influence on the political process as particularly interesting and not fully reflecteds. 95

17.by the less qualified concept of minoritarian influence, I will treat it as a separate types. 95

18.of interest mal-representation.s. 95

Enforcement design

1.Apart from the specific constellation of interests for each law and public policy issue,s. 95

2.comparative institutional analysis insists that institutional choice depends ons. 95

3.characteristics inherent to each decision-making process. These characteristics have tos. 95

4.do both with the more salient features of the market, the political process ands. 95

5.adjudication, but also with the particular design of these complex institutions that mays. 95

6.vary from country to country and from one issue/market to the other. Such features ass. 95

7.litigation costs, openness of the judicial process to class action and to action bys. 95

8.organizations, the flexibility of the administrative process, transparency - are alls. 95

9.factors that influence the costs and benefits of participation and respectively thes. 95

10.relative advantages and disadvantages of these complex systems.s. 95

11.As a legal category enforcement covers a number of more specific institutions. Centrals. 95

12.among them is the choice of institutional structures to be entrusted with enforcement.95s. 95

13.These are typically either the courts or administrative agencies that could, in their turn,s. 95

14.be subject to more or less comprehensive judicial review. Another element ofs. 95

15.enforcement is the access provided of the affected actors to the institutions ofs. 95

16.enforcement. Any form of legal enforcement carefully defines the circle of individualss. 95

17.and organizations that are authorized to trigger enforcement (standing). Finally, ins. 95

18.some systems remedies tend to be viewed as part of enforcement and in others as parts. 95

19.of substantive law. In this study they are going to be uniformly treated in the sectionss. 95

20.on enforcement, since it could be argued that remedies provide the most importants. 95

21.incentives for making use of the enforcement opportunities, thus influencing thes. 95

22.benefits of participation. 2.3 Merging the institutional and the agency perspective The approaches promoted by North and Komesar may be perceived as incompatible and in a sense even diametrically opposite. They adopt different time perspectives and largely pursue different goals. Whereas North purports to explain incremental historical change, Komesar is interested in situation-specific, every day policy decision-making. North’s analysis is prevailingly explanatory, while Komesar’s approach is explicitly normative. The latter’s ambition is to provide an operative analytical framework that can generate policy advice on divergent public policy issues. Historical institutionalism focuses on the role of institutions and thus attaches secondary importance to agents and interests. By contrast, comparative institutional analysis emphasizes interests and participants. Thereby institutions and institutional processes are treated as given. In general, the story told by historical institutionalism is one about institutions as constraints on human behaviour, whereas comparative institutional analysis tells us about individuals who collectively use and shape institutions according to their interests. Yet despite this prima facie incompatibility, I shall argue that the two approaches in many respects may be seen as complementary and mutually supportive of each other. The evolutionary approach advanced by historical institutionalism allows us to see national institutions as products of an incremental process of institutional change that does not necessarily increase efficiency, but may sustain inefficient institutional solutions (lock-ins). Institutions are in this theoretical perspective embedded in, and to a great extent determined by, a broader institutional context. In that context constitutional constraints, dominant perceptions about the role of government and public administration, as well as the divide between public and private, come into play. Historical institutionalism also directs the attention to organizations that have evolved as products of institutional frameworks and live in symbiosis with it. It provides rigorous explanation for often observed instances of resistance to institutional change despite declared political will to the contrary. At the same time, historical institutionalism does not tell us when situations of ‘lock in’ would be most persistent and difficult to dismantle. Indeed, in his Nobel Prize lecture North explicitly addressed the problem of bargaining strength when discussing the process of creating formal rules (the legislative process). But it was never North’s purpose to offer the analytical tools for studying such problems. In this respect the participation-centred approach advanced by Komesar represents a welcome opportunity for refinement of historical institutionalism. The combined approach urges us to inquire deeper into the interests lying behind each law and public policy issue, as well as into opportunities for these interests to be adequately represented in the relevant institutional decision-making processes.97 The framework for analysis of costs and benefits of participation in relation to the decision-making process, to the interests and to the issue involved, presents a rigorouss. 95

23.tool-box for diagnosing instances of persistent institutional malfunctioning and,s. 100

24.respectively, of situations more ripe for change in accordance with the preferences ofs. 100

25.the actors concerned. Komesar is thus not only critical of simplistic evolutionarys. 100

26.approaches that predict stable move towards efficiency, but moreover has a convincings. 100

27.answer as to when such predictions tend to fail:s. 100

28.In a similar way historical institutionalism may offer a useful complementarys. 100

29.perspective to the somewhat sweeping ‘cure-all’ stance lurking in Komesar’ss. 100

30.approach. The approach advanced by Komesar offers powerful insights into thes. 100

31.comparative advantages and disadvantages of different decision-making process, ands. 100

32.moreover in relation to different policy settings. The analytical framework advanceds. 100

33.by Komesar holds the promise of a universal formula to guide the difficult choices. 100

34.between - admittedly imperfect - institutional alternatives for the efficients. 100

35.implementation of social goals." The somewhat instrumentalist predisposition hiddens. 100

36.in Komesar’s approach is appealing to lawyers who are accustomed to looking at laws. 100

37.as an instrument to change social reality. Here, however, historical institutionalisms. 100

38.may introduce a healthy and sobering influence. It warns against naively trusting thes. 100

39.efficiency of instrumentalist approaches to law and public policy. Even well-informeds. 100

40.and well-intended choice between decision-making alternatives may eventually remains. 100

41.entrenched in inherited institutional solutions. Therefore, endeavours such as legals. 100

42.reform, legal transplants and harmonisation of law need to take the stumblings. 100

43.interference of institutional legacies and inertia into account.s. 100

44.One problem with the linking of perspectives lies in that the concept ‘institution’ iss. 100

45.used differently by the two theorists. This only underscores the hidden risks in using as. 100

46.concept that has already been employed in different scholarly and conventionals. 100

47.contexts. As noted above, Komesar uses the concept ‘institution’ in a broad senses. 100

48.referring to three main decision-making processes, namely the market, the politicals. 100

49.process and the courts. This conforms with the understanding of the concept in as. 100

50.whole branch of institutional economics, where institutions correspond to distincts. 100

51.forms of organisational arrangement. Williamson, one of the most famous contributorss. 100

52.to the institutional economics and follower of Coase, thus contrasts different forms ofs. 100

53.market organisations, such as firms, relational contracting and atomistic spots. 100

54.markets.100 Likewise, Komesar suggests that the macro institutional processes he tackles could be sub-divided for analytical purposes to include trade unions, large corporations, etc. North’s definition of institution as presented earlier in this study is clearly more extensive than that of Komesar, covering formal rules, informal constraints and the enforcement characteristics of both. North particularly insists that it is essential for his framework to distinguish between institutions and organisations. Organisations are the agents of institutional change, whereas institutions represent constraints that shape the conduct of organisations. As I explained in the introduction, I find this second definition more convincing, since it captures the essence of institutions as structuring human behaviour. Moreover, it appears more practicable for the purposes of the present investigation (given the broad comparative approach and the goal to conceptualise legal change). In order to maintain a consistent terminology throughout this study, I will in the following substitute the term institution in Komesar’s sense by the terms ‘decision-making process’ or ‘system’. I am confident that this terminological substitution will not do injustice to Komesar’s conceptual framework. Komesar himself often uses the term ‘process’ interchangeably with ‘institution’. He also insists on the central role of Coase for his framework (and the analysis of Coase is often called ‘comparative system approach’).101 Combining the two approaches appears particularly attractive for this study. Historical institutionalism provides the intellectual macro-frame, helping us to conceptualise long-term phenomena such as institutional persistence and processes of incremental institutional change such as Europeanisation. The participation-centred approach in its turn offers a practical toolbox for micro analysis of specific institutional solutions - and of enforcement mechanisms in particular - in terms of their effect on the costs and benefits of actor participation and representation. The combination of the two is expected to allow for a rigorous analysis of divergent institutional solutions to fair trading in a broad comparative, European context.s. 100

The importance of enforcement mechanisms

1.There are several specific intersections between historical institutionalism and the participation-centred approach in comparative institutional analysis. The first one concerns the view of enforcement. In economic terms, enforcement provides the link between actors, organizations and rules. Historical institutionalism demonstrates how institutional frameworks (and enforcement opportunities provided thereof) may produce incentives for new organizations that benefit from the institutional framework and through symbiotic relations contribute to its perpetuation and, finally, to lock-in. The participation centred approach suggests that such lock-ins are more likely to occur where the political process suffers of representation malfunctions. In situations conducive to minoritarian bias, the political process is likely to produce formal rules and enforcement mechanisms that excessively favour minority groups at the expense of the majority. The more dispersed and low the stakes of the majority, the more such arrangements are likely to persist. On the other hand, majoritarian bias may assume the form of governmental intervention (e.g. public agency action) shouldering the interest of the majority and converting a skewed distribution into a uniform high distribution of stakes.s. 101

Adaptive efficiency and participation-centred approach

1.The most important intersection between the two approaches appears to lie in thes. 102

2.understanding of efficiency. Both historical institutionalism and the comparatives. 102

3.institutional analysis advanced by Komesar are characterized by an unorthodox views. 102

4.on efficiency. North in particular elaborates at length on the concept of adaptives. 102

5.efficiency of institutions, according to which efficiency is equalled with generating thes. 102

6.highest possible number of trials. This concept can be seen as coming close to thes. 102

7.participation-centred approach advanced by Komesar. Efficient representation of alls. 102

8.interests concerned in the decision-making processes and at all levels, both in rule­s. 102

9.making and enforcement, is arguably intimately related, if not synonymous, withs. 102

10.ability to generate a high number of trials. Efficient representation will per definitions. 102

11.imply high interest awareness and will supposedly bring about challenge of thes. 102

12.institutional framework with any perceived inefficiency. Like the analysis of Komesar,s. 102

13.North’s conceptualisation also finds a productive conjunction between economics,s. 102

14.politics and law by demonstrating the immediate economic importance of democratics. 102

15.government and institutions.s. 102

16.If we try to translate this normative component into legal terms, then the question mays. 102

17.be: how do we shape legal rules and enforcement mechanisms which can betters. 102

18.account for all interests involved and avoid unproductive lock-ins? Cast in these terms,s. 102

19.the concept of ‘adaptive efficiency’ becomes much clearer and appealing for legals. 102

20.analysis. Success in economic history is associated with legal and political institutionss. 102

21.including rules on enforcement that have rendered the institutional framework mores. 102

22.responsive to changing preferences and costs, assuring more adequate interests. 102

23.representation and making room for new interests and actors as they emerge. Broads. 102

24.representation through democratic procedures thus receives a concrete economics. 102

25.meaning, as it contributes to improved economic performance through better capturings. 102

26.and reflecting the preferences of involved interests. The concept ‘deliberation’ familiars. 102

27.from legal and political science is close to mind.s. 102

An institutional perspective on European integration

1.Finally, an institutional perspective allows for a more productive conceptualisation ofs. 102

2.the complex relationship between national law and European law. Also heres. 102

3.combining a participation-centred approach with a historical institutional perspectives. 102

4.promises to give insights in the complex process of continuity and change associateds. 102

5.with European integration and its influence on national institutional frameworks.s. 102

6.Seen from the viewpoint of institutional choice one manifest feature of the Europeans. 102

7.Community project is that it offers new arenas for decision-making. The nationals. 102

8.market flows over into a Common Market. National political and legislative processess. 102

9.are connected by way of dense net of visible and invisible rules to the political processs. 102

10.at the Community level. The European judiciary enters as a new decision-makings. 102

11.institution, concurring with national courts and acting often as an arbiter ands. 102

12.distributor of decision-making competencies between Community and Member Statess. 102

13.as well as between the different Community institutions. For national economic ands. 102

14.political actors European integration inevitably changes the established balance ofs. 102

15.participation, powerfully influencing previously insulated procedures of law-makings. 102

16.and rule-implementation. Obviously the costs and benefits of participation in the European decision-making may vary from those in respective national arrangements. These changes in the domain of institutional choice are going to be explored in more detail when looking at how particular European measures have been implemented at the national level and how do national stake-holders adapt to the change in opportunity set. From a historical institutional perspective the focus is on the different ways in which Europeanisation fits into or challenges long-standing institutional constraints such as ideologies of legal regulation or well-engrained habits in case-law and administrative implementation. Is implementation of European measures disrupting efficient institutional equilibria, causing disarray among the actors involved and decreasing coherence and predictability? Or does it expose inefficient lock-ins and, thus, enhance the adaptiveness of the institutional framework?102 To what extent Europeanisation opens for new variations and possibilities of learning and influencing the framework? And when are we to expect the one or the other eventuality. The whole European project is per definition about institutional change, pursuing openly the effectuation of change in formal legal rules (harmonisation), informal constraints (attitudes in market actors, consumer and European citizens) and enforcement (new mechanisms of enforcement before European and national bodies). A central theme in the Europeanisation debate has been that of convergence or divergence of national legal systems, cultures or regulative approaches in more specific areas. By tracing on the one hand the changed opportunities for participation of affected interests, and on the other, the constraining effects of deeply embedded institutional habits, I hope to be able to shed some new light into this debate.103 When Community law has been approached by traditionally trained national lawyers, this has been done on a sector-specific basis. More recently, attempts have been undertaken to bring the observations of such lawyers together into more structured comparative accounts of Community influence, thus trying to capitalise on the synergies of different national experiences.104 Such studies present parallel accounts of stories that have a common subject but they rarely amount to real joining of different perspectives into a true comparative analysis. The general frame of reference but also the references to literature and legal source material remain national in nature. Thus perceptions about Community influence may dramatically shift from one observer to the next. An in-depth understanding of the effects of Community law seems to require a joining of all these perspectives into one single account. This is both a demanding and exciting perspective. It is demanding by the sheer volume of material to be reviewed and by the quasi-impossible exercise of acquiring adequate understanding about multiple complex legal systems and their environment. At the same time it is exciting for it provides an opportunity to feel the pulse of European integration, to hears. 102

17.the multilingual and multicultural choir of actors and interests that make use or ares. 104

18.affected by this process and to observe an array of incongruent, divergent and oftens. 104

19.unpredicted influences, far away from the ideal world of systemic coherence lawyerss. 104

20.once believed to exist.s. 104

21.2,5 Cross-country comparison of the effects of European integrations. 104

22.It has already been suggested that an analysis of the influence of European law ons. 104

23.national legal systems holds more promise if the process of influence and change iss. 104

24.placed in a broad comparative perspective. If confined to a single legal system, thes. 104

25.results of the study may remain specific to the jurisdiction under analysis and not yields. 104

26.to generalization. At any rate, the comparative approach is better suited to generates. 104

27.findings of broader validity. It also brings the research design closer to the dynamics. 104

28.reality of European integration where Community legal rules and principles are forgeds. 104

29.against a background of divergent national legal and institutional approaches and thens. 104

30.transmitted back for implementation and enforcement in the same nationals. 104

31.environment. Only a comparative analysis of legal change under European influences. 104

32.allows us to test contradictory claims of convergence and divergence of legal systems,s. 104

33.of harmonisation or of disintegrative influences of European law on national law.s. 104

34.A comparative approach, however, is laden with multiple risks and pitfalls ands. 104

35.requires careful consideration of theoretical and methodological premises. Importantly,s. 104

36.one needs to clarify the scope, level and ambition of comparison, to identify thes. 104

37.common denominator and component parts, and finally to elicit possible criteria fors. 104

38.evaluation of the comparative results.s. 104

The purpose of comparison

1.Naturally, comparisons between legal systems or legal institutions can be conducteds. 104

2.with different purposes and with different levels of ambition. Comparative work mays. 104

3.precede and inspire new national legislation (instrumental objective); it may be part ofs. 104

4.the preparation for harmonisation at a regional or international level (harmonisations. 104

5.objective). It has been convincingly argued that in the sphere of economic law,s. 104

6.contemporary comparative law can also perform a third task, namely co-ordinations. 104

7.between different levels of legal orders - the national, the regional and thes. 104

8.international one.105s. 104

9.Partly depending on the underlying objective the ambition and scope of comparatives. 104

10.legal analyses may differ as well. In comparative law a threefold classification ofs. 104

11.comparative analyses has been advanced by Strömholm.106 He distinguishes betweens. 104

12.studies where the comparison serves as a background and inspiration, studies wheres. 104

13.the comparison is the central element and studies being a mixture of the two aboves. 104

14.mentioned categories. In the first category the comparative element has an accidental,s. 104

15.complementary (instrumental) role, while domestic law remains at the core of analysis.s. 104

16.In this category of comparative studies the foreign legal material is used to achieves. 104

17.objectives typical of the conventional positivistic legal research. The desire is to provide answers to problems anchored in one national legal system. Such brief contacts with foreign law and legal institutions may play an important value-oriented role in that they emphasize the commonality of social problems and of legal solutions.107 They enhance the awareness of the relativity of legal concepts and institutes, otherwise conveniently covered by a cloak of unreflected immersion in one domestic legal order. This comparative ‘spicing’ of a legal analysis does not lack methodological intricacies, yet these are far from the fundamental problems which pose themselves if the scope and ambition of comparison are expanded. The real trouble with (and the real challenge of) comparative law begins with lifting the objective of comparison from the national to the cross-national level. It is at this point that the comparison ceases to perform an instrumental role and turns into the main, bearing principle of the research design. In such comparative studies the legal systems under comparison are investigated on an equivalent basis, without taking any of the systems as a self-evident point of departure (or arrival). As Strömholm observes in such studies the comparison is the dominant element. Solutions to similar problems in different legal systems are juxtaposed as equally possible alternatives and examined with a purpose other than finding answers to problems in the framework of one or the other national legal system. It is to this second group of comparative studies that the present analysis belongs. The purpose is not confined to giving recommendations for the solution of practical legal problems of a specific legal system. The interest is rather in the process of co­ ordination between different legal orders and its broader socio-economic implications. As Strömholm rightly cautions, the pitfalls of such scholarly endeavours are numerous. He notes that such comparative studies are a rare branch of legal science. More seriously, they often risk remaining hollow program declarations with few convincing examples of practical application.108 Yet, in embarking on this study I am still encouraged by Strömholm's tempered optimism that despite the risks, such studies can contribute to increasing the knowledge and understanding of legal phenomena.109 The term ‘comparative law’ has become infamous for the abundance of contributions consisting mainly of dry inventories of legal rules with only schematic attempts at deeper analysis on causes and consequences of legal similarities and differences. The most frequent trap of such studies has been a bias towards uncritical description of black letter rules.110 This profile of the field has largely been predetermined by the unreflecting transposition of the classical ‘dogmatic’ approach to law in the sphere of legal comparison. Yet, whereas within the context of the national legal order description and systematization are always guided by the attempt at improved coherence of legal rules in a given field of law, this purpose cannot fully apply fors. 104

18.comparative studies. The outsider position implicit in ‘genuine comparisons’, i.e.s. 106

19.comparisons that are not only instrumental to the dogmatic analysis of domestic law,s. 106

20.makes the traditionally trained lawyer feel there is no longer solid ground under his ors. 106

21.her feet. The conclusions can no longer be directed at systematic or teleologicals. 106

22.interpretations within a (more or less) closed systemic context.s. 106

23.The key question for large-scale comparative works is therefore what this ‘other’s. 106

24.purpose should be that is not related to solving domestic-law problems? And mores. 106

25.importantly, are there ‘other’ purposes that could be legitimately and convincinglys. 106

26.pursued by lawyers, given the specific character of their discipline? Some of the mosts. 106

27.influential writers in comparative law, who have set their intellectual mark on wholes. 106

28.generations of comparatists, tend to address such questions with admirable light­s. 106

29.headedness, seemingly unconcerned about the methodological and theoreticals. 106

30.difficulties implied. Thus Zweigert and Kötz in their much quoted treatise ons. 106

31.Comparative Law regard the principal aim of comparative law in its ‘theoretical-s. 106

32.descriptive’ form to be ‘to say how and why certain legal systems are different ors. 106

33.alike’?11 In the conclusion of their chapter on the method of comparative law, thes. 106

34.authors briefly discuss another objective of comparative law, namely offering a criticals. 106

35.evaluation of the results from a comparison. However, they do not elaborate on thes. 106

36.basis for such an evaluation. Should the criterion be deduced from legal policys. 106

37.objectives as defined by the national law-maker, or should the starting point be soughts. 106

38.somewhere else? Might the comparatist even outline his or her own normative set ofs. 106

39.priorities? 112s. 106

40.Other comparative law scholars subscribe to a similar understanding of researchs. 106

41.objectives. According to Bogdan comparative law encompasses:s. 106

42.Obviously, whereas purely descriptive accounts of similarities and differences may bes. 106

43.satisfactorily provided with the traditional tools of dogmatic legal analysis, the goalss. 106

44.of explaining interrelations, highlighting reasons and providing evaluation (‘how’,s. 106

45.‘why’, and ‘which is better’) constitute a challenge for lawyers on both theoretical ands. 106

46.methodological levels.114s. 106

47.61 The research question in such ‘genuine’ comparative studies is no longer of the same category as research questions in traditional dogmatic research. Respectively, new research questions require recourse to new theoretical and methodological tools. This is generally acknowledged by comparative lawyers. Indeed, Zweigert and Kötz see a room for productive use of the methods of legal sociology in comparative research.115 Likewise at a recent symposium on the future of comparative law, Reitz observed the drive inherent in comparative law studies towards higher levels of abstraction and to the neighbouring ‘law and’ disciplines.116 The inherent interdisciplinarity of comparative law was eloquently praised already by Ernst Rabel in his early appeals to comparative lawyers to constantly broaden their horizons: Yet it is one thing to broadly agree on the usefulness of contextual analysis, and quite another to offer a pragmatic and feasible programme for such integrative research design. Rabel’s agenda, if put into action, would in the first place present insurmountable feasibility problems. It would take a lawyer endowed with a superior intellect, or at least a highly encyclopaedic mind, to conform even to part of his requirements. But what is even more knotty, the use of the neighbouring disciplines risks to be met with utmost scepticism and criticism from all quarters, unless it complies with rigorous methodological criteria. Here new questions arise: Should the lawyer only take the findings of the neighbouring disciplines as given and use them only as a source of inspiration for contextualising one’s own observations? Or should one be more ambitious and try to master the methodology of other social sciences and then conduct original research on the basis of the comparative material at hand? In this case, what norms of selection of source material and processing should apply? Shall one apply those valid in legal research or those of the respective social discipline? These are not easy questions and few comparative law scholars have ever ventured to suggest an answer. Thus, on the one hand, the use of social sciences in legal comparison remains quite limited. On the other hand, most comparative lawyerss. 107

48.62s. 119

49.attempting some integration of disciplines tend to downplay the importance of thes. 119

50.interdisciplinary element in their work and avoid theorising methodological issues.s. 119

51.They are quick to point that they do not have a genuinely interdisciplinary ambitions. 119

52.and that the neighbouring disciplines are only used as background and inspiration. Fors. 119

53.the most part the intertwining of disciplines thus proceeds on an intuitive level.s. 119

54.As indicated above, the approach taken in this study is overtly interdisciplinary as wells. 119

55.as comparative. I thereby embrace the view that any comparative evaluation ands. 119

56.analysis, with ambitions beyond the mere description of legal rules, can profits. 119

57.considerably from utilising insights and methods from other social disciplines.s. 119

58.Genuine comparisons imply abandoning the ‘insider’ perspective. The analyst thens. 119

59.needs a ‘fulcrum’ and a ‘lever’, i.e. a firm basis and special tools that make the task ofs. 119

60.an outsider comparison possible. These cannot be found in the methods of legals. 119

61.dogmatics because the latter presupposes treating national law as a closed and (mores. 119

62.or less) coherent system of rules. It is submitted that the key should instead be soughts. 119

63.in neighbouring social disciplines such as legal theory, legal history, legal sociology,s. 119

64.law and economics. The choice of discipline obviously depends on the category of laws. 119

65.and subject matter studied, but also on the purposes and the research question of thes. 119

66.study.s. 119

From comparing rules to comparing institutions

1.There are several advantages in taking an institutional approach to comparative law.s. 119

2.The Komesarian type of comparative institutional analysis outlined above arguablys. 119

3.provides a convenient basis for comparison between different legal and regulatives. 119

4.approaches on a cross-country basis. Using participation costs and benefits as as. 119

5.common unit of analysis provides the common denominator needed for comparatives. 119

6.legal studies. It also offers a point of orientation for the normative evaluation ofs. 119

7.alternative institutional approaches. At the same time the opposite is also true. Cross­s. 119

8.country legal comparison gives an opportunity to compare concrete institutionals. 119

9.solutions in their historical context and as applied in practical life, so that they do nots. 119

10.remain abstract alternatives.118.s. 119

11.Yet a cross country comparison also exposes some of the weaknesses of Komesar’ss. 119

12.analysis, namely the underlying assumption that institutional choice can be exerciseds. 119

13.in an instrumentalist manner. The approach is thus insensitive to endowed positionss. 119

14.and historical contingencies.119 The combination of a cross-country legal comparisons. 119

15.and a historical institutional perspective is designed to compensate for this deficiency.s. 119

16.Comparative law is often accused of uncritically accepting evolutionary theories ofs. 119

17.law and society. Classical exponents of the discipline nurture a vision of universals. 119

18.convergence of law and a unilinear progress. In this respect the discipline has inheriteds. 119

19.an evolutionist and deterministic bias. Historical institutionalism exhibits a differents. 119

20.kind of determinism, namely that societies often follow a trajectory which determiness. 119

21.historical developments in institutional life. Institutional and legal evolution iss. 119

22.63 constrained by events and decisions of the past, whereby chance and accident may also play a role.120s. 124

The institutional approach and theories of legal change

1.In legal theory and in comparative law in particular there has been a lively debate on the relevance of societal context of legal change.121 Legal historians like Alan Watson, taking a long-term perspective, have tried to demonstrate the continuity of law despite changing social-political contexts. Watson has stressed the autonomy of legal rules and institutions and the possibility of ‘transplanting’ law irrespective of divergent social­ political contexts.122 Other comparatists, such as Otto Kahn-Freund, have proposed a context-sensitive approach to the study of legal reform differentiating between separate fields of law. Having conducted research on legal regulation characteristic of the modern welfare state, Kahn-Freund underlined the importance of taking account of the social-political context (constitutional and political order) in areas where pressure groups and political interests exert powerful influence. Naturally, one source of confusion in such a debate can be, and often is, the very concept of legal transplants and what is meant by ‘possibility’ or ‘success’ of legal transplants. As Kahn-Freund has observed, the notion of ‘legal transplant’ suggests that we have to do with living, ‘organic’ matter. This in turn presumes a sociological view of law. If by legal transplants we merely mean the mechanical transfer of written provisions, the searchlight would be directed at ‘law in the books’. But for such purposes the proper term ought to be ‘legal borrowings’ to avoid confusion with massive, purposeful transfer of law (and legal culture). This simple distinction could clarify a lot of misunderstandings in contemporary comparative law methodology. The different conclusions of the two authors are apparently dependent on the legal areas that form the subject of the bulk of their own work. While Kahn-Freund (despite his broad competence), has been most prolific in the area of industrial relations, which is also at the centre of his 1974 article, Watson is an expert in Roman law and has mainly dealt with tracing the Roman law origin of many doctrines in contemporary European civil law.123 In his argumentation Kahn-Freund is clearly aware of the importance of the specifics of each legal area, and speaks of a continuum of legal rules and areas from ‘organic matter’ where the concept transplant is appropriate, to ‘mechanical matter’ where one can speak of a simple change (e.g. of a carburettor).124 When seen in the light of these distinctions the debate between Watson and Kahn­ Freund in fact appears to be a non-debate. Kahn-Freund, while not fully subscribing tos. 124

2.64s. 125

3.Montesquieu’s ambitious view on compatibility on law’s contingency on its social ands. 125

4.physical environment, believes in the deep connections between law and underlyings. 125

5.societal structures and conditions. In contrast, Watson seems fascinated by thes. 125

6.‘textual’ tenacity of legal rules and their tendency to migrate. If Kahn-Freund arguess. 125

7.normatively that context should be respected, particularly when political and groups. 125

8.interests are involved, Watson focuses on empirically demonstrating that legal ruless. 125

9.are in fact borrowed and survive ‘textually’ irrespective of gross differences ins. 125

10.context. The latter evidence, however, does not contradict the normative advices. 125

11.inherent in Kahn-Freund’s analysis. It only underscores the important fact that law iss. 125

12.often a product of autonomous processes and that the members of the legal profession,s. 125

13.rather than posing as ‘creators’ of rules, choose to refer to the authority of foreigns. 125

14.normative solutions.s. 125

15.Even if we take Watson’s arguments to suggest that transferred rules in fact can works. 125

16.similarly in widely divergent contexts, this claim is not necessarily incompatible withs. 125

17.Kahn-Freund’s arguments. From an institutional perspective the two claims are nots. 125

18.mutually exclusive and possibly even harmonious. Both authors agree on thes. 125

19.importance of law as an institution. In the area of core private law, where the mains. 125

20.interests of Watson lie, one might from an institutional economics perspective argues. 125

21.that law performs the function of assigning initial property-rights in a world ofs. 125

22.individual exchange with low transaction costs. Following Coase, the main role of laws. 125

23.is to determine the initial allocation of property rights, where efficient outcomes woulds. 125

24.anyway be achieved through bargaining between actors. In other words, the rule itselfs. 125

25.is not important, but the very existence of the rule and the certainty it creates helps. 125

26.actors to arrive at mutually advantageous solutions. This may explain the lack ofs. 125

27.resistance (apart from, nowadays, resistance from legal professional circles) to transfers. 125

28.of legal rules.s. 125

29.In contrast, industrial relations, as much of economic regulation produced in thes. 125

30.modern welfare state, have aimed at coping with problems of transaction costs,s. 125

31.externalities and market failures. In this case the political and legal systems have beens. 125

32.challenged to step in as alternative institutions to the market. However, the sames. 125

33.transaction cost problem has plagued these alternative processes. The solution has thens. 125

34.been dependent on the political system and its particular constitutional design, on thes. 125

35.availability of interest groups, the possibility for collective interest representation ins. 125

36.the political and judicial processes.s. 125

37.An institutional economic analysis thus hints at some answers to the puzzle of varyings. 125

38.rules and their ‘transplantability’. The more rules are connected to public goods ands. 125

39.complex processes, involving high number of actors, low transparency, highs. 125

40.transaction costs and requiring a high degree of human cooperation, the more difficults. 125

41.is the transfer of solutions. Even if formal rules may be borrowed in these situations,s. 125

42.their integration in the institutional environment may produce very different results.s. 125

43.In summing up, whereas Kahn-Freund emphasizes interests and institutional structuress. 125

44.and thus is close to the participation approach advanced by Komesar, Watsons. 125

45.emphasizes continuity, the decisive influence of the legal profession and the self-s. 125

46.referentiality of law, as well as the detachedness of law from its immediate politicals. 125

47.65 context and interest struggles. It therefore seems fair to say that Watson’s understanding of legal change has affinities with historical institutionalism. 2.6 Methodological aspectss. 126

Methodological intricacies of contextualism

1.Acquiescence to the desirability of analyzing the context of law does not necessarily mean denying all the theoretical, methodological and epistemological difficulties associated with such an enterprise. The traditional method of legal dogmatics does not offer the requisite methodological tools for studying the context of law. Dogmatic analysis operates with a largely fictive model of legal rules forming a coherent, non­ contradictory whole (system), and thus confines the role of legal scholarship to perfecting this coherence. There are actually interesting parallels between perfect competition models in economic theory and the systemic coherence model of positivistic legal theory. Users of either theory admit that their models depart from reality but note that these second-best alternative are workable and hold promise due to their inherent normative character. As always with interdisciplinary adventures, one of the main problems that the analyst faces is the availability of not just one, but plentiful, versions of the invoked ‘alien’ social discipline. The temporary ‘visitor’ in the field is thus forced to choose between various controversial views and interpretations, what we might call the selection problem of interdisciplinary analysis. One need not subscribe to sophisticated views of self-reference (autopoeisis) of highly differentiated social spheres to realize that discourses in economics or in political science are often specific, dynamic and ‘selfreferential.’ In order to be applied to the study of law, economic theory needs to be funnelled into an applicable model, which inevitably implies reduction of the complexity of the respective discipline at the expense of possible distortion. Whereas this problem should not be underestimated, I nevertheless believe that it should not be exaggerated either. Finally, reduction of complexity is at the heart of every scholarly endeavour and is not exclusive to interdisciplinary analysis. In legal scholarship, sceptics hold that interdisciplinary studies more easily fall into the trap of ex post selection and adjustment of theoretical frames to desired results. While there may be some truth in this accusation, rejecting contextual analysis on such grounds would be equal to embracing a highly unrealistic epistemological ideal of science that hardly can be met by mono-disciplinary studies either. Many contemporary theorists of science believe that social sciences at best can provide convincing reconstructions of reality, but that it would be erroneous to measure scholarly success with the yardstick of natural sciences and respective claims at correspondence to objective truth.125 Finally, one should not loose sight of the different discourses characterizing law and economic theory respectively. Joerges warns against rapid and unreflected transposition of arguments from the one field into the other. Legal analysis is inherently normative. What is required is careful fine-tuning and translation of thes. 126

2.66s. 128

3.economic jargon to practicable tools for legal analysis.126 The need for cautiouss. 128

4.interpretation is well-expressed by Buxbaum:s. 128

5.Methodologically, the institutional approach taken in this study has implied two majors. 128

6.deviations from traditional dogmatic methods. The first one is represented by thes. 128

7.extensive historical accounts on the legal developments, especially in Germany ands. 128

8.Sweden. While historical reviews are often part of legal analysis, these accountss. 128

9.remain cursory and only perform a background function. In this study the historicals. 128

10.accounts serve to demonstrate deeply seated national institutional constraints and ares. 128

11.so part and parcel of the method. The historicisation of institutions aims to discloses. 128

12.continuity in legal institutions and to exhibit possible symbiotic relations betweens. 128

13.institutions and organisations. Moreover, in contrast to classical treatments of legals. 128

14.history, which mainly deal with changes in legal rules, the focus in this study is ons. 128

15.interests and interest representation in the legislative process.s. 128

16.A second methodological concession is the treatment of legal material not only as as. 128

17.source of dogmatic interpretation, but also as evidence of prevailing ideals ands. 128

18.ideologies. The analysis at points comes close to a ‘discursive’ one, which accountss. 128

19.for the abundant quotations from original sources, such as preparatory material,s. 128

20.parliamentary discussions and judicial decisions.s. 128

The use of the comparative legal method

1.The choice and treatment of sources is also influenced by the comparative perspectives. 128

2.embraced in this study. To begin with, we have two legal systems with two sets ofs. 128

3.legal source material and their distinctive modes of production, interpretation ands. 128

4.enforcement of legal norms. A basic principle of comparative law methodology is thats. 128

5.each norm is analysed from the viewpoint of the domestic legal system of which it is as. 128

6.part.128 In the following I have tried to utilise original source material, as well as tos. 128

7.respect the integrity of each system and to immerse myself in the German and Swedishs. 128

8.legal discourse, to the greatest extent possible.s. 128

9.This has implied paying more attention to preparatory legislative material (travauxs. 128

10.préparatoires) in the Swedish context, and making more extensive use of doctrinals. 128

11.reasoning when discussing German law. When approaching precedents ands. 128

12.interpretation of general clauses, the account on German developments reflects thes. 128

13.deductive way of reasoning characteristic of German lawyers. Turning to Sweden, Is. 128

14.have been less concerned with systematic categorisations in view of the pragmatic ands. 128

15.functional approach distinctive of this country’s fair trading law. Given the keys. 128

16.position of public institutions in the Swedish model of fair trading law, thes. 128

17.67 administrative practice of the KOV has been frequently invoked. Attention has likewise been given to non-binding decisions of self-regulatory bodies and administrative guidelines in Sweden. In any comparative legal study language and terminology are issues to be seriously considered. From one country to another the legal terminology will inevitably differ as will the more general philosophical notions on which law is based. Comparatists caution against falling into the trap of equating homonyms that conceal deep differences in substance and systemic connotations. The problem is further complicated when two legal systems are analysed in a language belonging to a third one, in my case English (and I was first trained as a Bulgarian lawyer). As far as possible I have tried to translate German and Swedish legal terms into English. In order to preserve as much linguistic precision as possible, though, I have provided the reader with the equivalent in the original language.129 Furthermore, I have attempted to suppress unnecessary ‘disturbance’ by avoiding legal concepts predominantly applied in Anglo-Saxon (notably common law) legal scholarship. Comparative law is premised on the principle of equivalence of units that form part of the study. Constantinesco underscores the importance of constructing and following a common comparative scheme when moving to detailed analysis?30 This scheme should be based on concepts that are sufficiently broad to accommodate variations of legal rules and institutes in the systems under investigation. In order to conform to this methodological advice, I have subdivided the study according to two main criteria. Chronologically, the study is divided into three parts: the origins of fair trading, the consumerist wave and its implications and, finally, the era of Europeanisation. Analytically, each of the three parts encompasses an examination of substantive rules, enforcement and the evolving standards of fairness. The institutional approach adopted in this study has led me to envelop each of the parts examining the legal sources within a contextualizing frame in which broader issues are treated. More precisely, each of the parts is preceded by a section elaborating the institutional context in which fair trading law evolves, and a concluding section summarizing the key findings from the viewpoint of the institutional approach in the study (with emphasis on institutional choice, participation in alternative decision­ making processes and path dependence). The two units of comparison, Germany and Sweden, have been treated successively and separately in the first two chronological parts (discussing origins of fair trading and consumerism). Reflecting the interweaving with European legal developments in recent years, however, the two countries are examined simultaneously in the final part.131 Last but not least, any comparative study, including a legal one has to explicitly or implicitly confront and solve the problem of comparability. This requires a carefuls. 129

18.68s. 137

19.selection and delineation of a common denominator (tertium comparationis), i.e. of as. 137

20.controlled variable, that has to be kept constant throughout the analysis.132 Mainstreams. 137

21.comparative lawyers find the common denominator in the common function of legals. 137

22.rules. Zweigert and Kötz are particularly categorical that “in law the only things whichs. 137

23.are comparable are those that fulfil the same function.”133 Function is, in turn, defineds. 137

24.as the factual situation (or the problem) legal rules and legal institutes intend tos. 137

25.regulate.134 Two rules have consequently a common function if they concern “thes. 137

26.same segments in life.”135 Whereas it appears exaggerated to claim such exclusivity fors. 137

27.function as a controlled variable for comparative legal analysis, it certainly provides as. 137

28.more solid point of departure than commonality in concepts or in origin.136 For thes. 137

29.present study the common denominator has been found in commercial information ands. 137

30.communication within the pre-contractual sphere. These are the ‘segments of life’ thats. 137

31.are at the heart of different national rules and institutes pertaining to what I broadlys. 137

32.define as fair trading law. I will draw additional limitations to this subject in the nexts. 137

33.chapter where I also turn to economic theories for analysis of the phenomenas. 137

34.described.s. 137

35.Another intricacy of the problem of comparability pertinently highlighted by Bogdans. 137

36.consists in the need to distinguish between the function of legal rules and theirs. 137

37.legal/political purpose. According to Bogdan, comparative evaluation, or in others. 137

38.words normative comparative analysis, can be credibly made only if one cans. 137

39.reasonably assume that the objectives of the compared legal systems (and rules) ares. 137

40.identical (or similar).137 The institutional approach advanced in this study turns thes. 137

41.interests and legal policy objectives behind legal rules into an independent object ofs. 137

42.analysis and thus gurantees a sensitivity for differences of objective. As to normatives. 137

43.evaluation, indeed it has to be underscored that the purpose of this study is mainlys. 137

44.descriptive and explanatory, and only weakly normative inasmuch as I reflect on thes. 137

45.importance of adaptive efficiency of institutional frameworks.s. 137

46.69s. 138

Fair Trading: comparing the market, the political and the judicial

1.The main purpose of this chapter is to relate the categories and analytical tools presented above to the area of fair trading. More specifically, I wish to provide an illustration of the comparative institutional analysis advanced by Komesar, which forms the inner, ‘microanalytical’, part of the analytical framework. The outer, macroanalytical frame, building on historical institutionalism, will not be treated here since it per definition can only be applied in relation to a specific historic institutional context. I first introduce the concept of fair trading and the regulative issues it involves, thereby defining the focus of the present study (3.1). Then the market is analysed as a decision making process for setting the standards of fair trading (3.2). The performance of the market is examined in respect to information, communication and trust in order to use this analysis as a point of orientation when comparing this performance with the political process and the judiciary. The analytical tools are borrowed from information economic theory. Information economics is preferred as the approach offering most convincing conceptualisation of the role of information in the marketplace. Information economics brings marketing in general, and advertising in particular, in relation to the costs and benefits of information for market actors. It thus fits neatly into the participation-centred approach advocated by Komesar. More specifically, I scrutinize the estimates derived from economic theory about the potential of the market to achieve a quantity and quality of information that adequately reflects the preferences of the participating actors. The question is: what are the advantages and disadvantages of the market as an institutional system for determining the standard of fairness in marketing? Can we identify instances where the market fails and - at least theoretically - a question arises whether it can be substituted for an alternative institutional solution? Although market conditions may differ from one country to another, the economic reasoning in this section in principle applies to all states with a relatively free (or mixed) market economy. Therefore the findings should mutatis mutandi be relevant for both countries under analysis. The economic analysis is expected to give us a starting point for the individual country analyses and a benchmark with the help of which to tentatively judge the performance of institutional frameworks relying on the political process, on the courts or on administrative agencies. In a next section (3.3) I briefly examine the prospects for the political process to ‘correct’ or complement the market in cases of information and communication failures, notably through specific legislation. Following the comparative systems approach advanced by Komesar, I map out the interests typically affected by fair trading laws and inquire into the opportunities for adequate participation of these interests in the political process. Proceeding from Komesar’s taxonomy over possible distortions in interest representation in the political process, an extrapolative assessment is made for the area of fair trading. The two categories—majoritarian and minoritarian bias—are employed when discussing the most widely perceived risks for political mål-representation.s. 138

2.70s. 139

3.Concluding this chapter (3.4), I direct the attention to the courts and to administratives. 139

4.agencies as the institutions most commonly entrusted with the implementation ands. 139

5.refinement of the standards of fair trading. Proceeding from the interest structure ins. 139

6.some typical situations of unfair trading, the potential advantages and disadvantages ofs. 139

7.these instiutions from the vantagepoint of participation and representation are outlined.s. 139

8.Like the analysis of the market, also the analyses of the political, judicial and thes. 139

9.administrative process are in this chapter conducted at an abstract (systemic) level ands. 139

10.without reference to any particular country. The alternative decision-making systemss. 139

11.are treated in accordance with their most general and common characteristics. Thes. 139

12.purpose is to obtain a categorization of potential distortions associated with each ofs. 139

13.these processes, later to be confirmed or refuted by the detailed country analyses. Ofs. 139

14.course such an analysis is detached from reality. As Komesar notes “the pattern ofs. 139

15.governmental (and we can add judicial) behaviour is not random, it can be affected bys. 139

16.the design of government and predicted by an analysis that takes into account thes. 139

17.interaction between the features of that design and the characteristics of the socials. 139

18.issues in question.”138s. 139

19.As the in-depth instistutional analyses will show, the judicial and administratives. 139

20.processes can be differently designed from one legal and institutional system tos. 139

21.another. More importantly, decision-making processes and institutional choices ares. 139

22.embedded in a broader institutional framework, which is highly path-dependent.s. 139

23.Therefore the normative advice from comparative institutional analysis should alwayss. 139

24.be put into perspective. The short-term, microanalysis of interests and participations. 139

25.needs to be combined with the long-term, macro perspective of embeddedness ands. 139

26.path-dependence. Only then, the complex process of persistence and change of legals. 139

27.institutions can be more realistically captured.s. 139

28.3.1 Fair trading law as a patchwork area in focuss. 139

29.Honesty and trust are virtues, whose overall importance for economic life has beens. 139

30.appreciated at a very early stage in human history. Societies have in all times produceds. 139

31.institutions - formal and informal, deliberately created and spontaneously evolving -s. 139

32.for promoting fair trading, although with differential success. Family bonds and groups. 139

33.belonging have been a source of trust in early commerce, supported by possibilities fors. 139

34.reputation, stigma and ostracism. The guilds with their strict rules of access ands. 139

35.conduct took care of fair trading in the late medieval and mercantilist eras. With thes. 139

36.advance of modern industrial society, these communitarian institutions based on closes. 139

37.personal communication were strained. Exchange between anonymous actors replaceds. 139

38.the local market, while consumer products grew in number and complexity ands. 139

39.impediments to cross-border trade were lifted.139 Significantly, the community ofs. 139

40.market actors and consumers became less homogenous, hosting a wide diversity ofs. 139

41.value-systems and expectations. The standards of fair trading changed and theirs. 139

42.enforcement gradually required new institutional arrangements. Some of these weres. 139

43.provided by the market, whereas others could be supplied through alternative decision­s. 139

44.making processes, such as the judicial systems or administrative control.s. 139

45.71 Fair trading is of relevance for all spheres of economic exchange from production via marketing and contract formation, to performance and after-sale service. For the purposes of this study, however, the term fair trading is narrowed down to rules, practices and procedures that ensure bona fide standards of commercial communications. We are, in other words, in the sphere of marketing and advertising, at the stage prior to a contract being signed. Truthful and non-deceptive market information is a generally accepted element of fair trading so defined. But there are also other, more or less controversial, values that may be (and occasionally have been) integrated in the standards of fair trading. Some of these gravitate toward the sphere of relations between competitors. A time-hounoured virtue is never to sell or market products which imitate or approximate that of competitors. Furthermore, the use of defamatory, personal or aggressive advetising or mere reference to competitive products, represent practices that have been banished as unfair conduct for decades. Other values have more to do with the relations between competitors and consumers. Here we can mention transparency of commercial communication, disclosure of relevant and important information, respect for the personal sphere of customers, and account for limitations in certain consumer groups’ abilities to adequately perceive and react to an advert (children, elderly, sick). Finally, on a more general level, advertising and marketing are increasingly charged with meeting general public interest objectives. Contemporary marketing is often expected to show respect for human dignity and personal integrity, not to promote illegal or otherwise undesirable conduct (such as conduct detrimental to human health or to the environment), to comply with statutory prohibitions and other legal requirements. As we are going to see in the following, the understanding of what is or should be covered by the concept of fair trading has been changing in pace with changing societal conditions, even if some standards are more persistant than others. Given the fluid borders of the area under analysis, the demarcation lines of the present study should be more clearly defined. The focus is on rules and practices that do not primarily concern the interests of individual competitors, but instead directly affect collective (group) and public interests. Thus rules on misappropriation, slavish imitation, passing off and trade secrets, as much as they form the core of the original national and international regimes of fair trading, are deliberately excluded from the scope of this study. These institutions of fair trading once emerged as liability rules, seeking to establish quasi-property rights in different badges of trade and to complement a still evolving system of protection of intellectual property rights. The purpose was (and still is) to provide supplementary protection for trade names, indications of origin, unregistered trademarks, but also for other creations that did not meet the stringent requirements of exlcusive intellectual property rights. These rules will mainly be considered when drawing up the profile of a particular national system of fair trading law. The cases I am interested in concern collective choices and involve group or public interests. These are cases of ‘big numbers’ and occasionally of skewed distribution of stakes, to use Komesar’s categorization. Whether an advertising message should be prohibited as misleading or unfair is a question that typically affects not just the parties of a dispute, but broader groups of competitors and the broad consuming public as well. It is impossible to confine the effects of such decisions exclusively (ors. 140

46.72s. 141

47.prevailingly) to private parties. It is these cases that require cooperative solutionss. 141

48.through organization and/or representation. The control over diffuse interests, overs. 141

49.their identification, formulation and representation can be described as ‘loose.’ Thes. 141

50.incentives for participation and representation are not always clear or at hand.s. 141

51.Decision-making is thus a difficult and highly imperfect process irrespective of thes. 141

52.particular decision-making process preferred. Neither markets, nor political process ors. 141

53.adjudication can offer a fully reliable solution. The question is about choosing betweens. 141

54.imperfect alternatives.140s. 141

55.Historically, the first type of situations of the above category that entered fair tradings. 141

56.law was probably a generally stated prohibition of misleading advertising. The originals. 141

57.focus of attention was the competitor, who could be negatively affected by businesss. 141

58.being diverged. However, by laying down a general and all-embracing obligation tos. 141

59.abstain from deceptive information, the lawmaker - willingly or not - addressed as. 141

60.collective interest and thereby triggered all the intricacies of ‘big numbers’ decision­s. 141

61.making. Decisive for the qualification of an advertising message as misleading weres. 141

62.the perceptions of the consuming public. How do consumers understand thes. 141

63.advertising? How many consumers are misled by it? What is the relevance of thes. 141

64.advertising information to the buyer? These are all questions that arise and whoses. 141

65.solutions depend on the representation of relevant interests in the decision-makings. 141

66.process.s. 141

67.Other examples of fair trading rules that concern collective and public interests ares. 141

68.prohibitions or restrictions of special offers, sales and sales promotions, prohibitions ofs. 141

69.marketing violating legal standards, or rules on information disclosure. Rules ons. 141

70.comparative advertising occupy a middle ground between public and private interests. 141

71.offences. Comparative advertising often identifies an individual competitor or a groups. 141

72.of competitors and as such affects well-identified individual interests. At the sames. 141

73.time comparative advertising is normally addressed to the general public and can ins. 141

74.certain instances be a highly effective information carrier. It can therefore not bes. 141

75.treated exclusively as a private interest matter. The interest of the consuming publics. 141

76.does not necessarily coincide with that of the advertiser and this conflict may requires. 141

77.issues of representation to be settled.s. 141

78.Admittedly the distinction between private interest and collective interest rules iss. 141

79.somewhat artificial. Protection of trademarks and other commercial signs froms. 141

80.confusion and misappropriation may primarily serve the interests of the right-holder,s. 141

81.but at the end it benefits collective consumer interests in that this protection guaranteess. 141

82.a reliable system of identification and market communication.141 Yet there is ans. 141

83.important distinction between these situations and the ones that are of primary interests. 141

84.to this study. In all cases where an individual interest can be clearly identified, thes. 141

85.question of bringing this interest before the appropriate decision-making processs. 141

86.(market, political process or courts) does not pose particular problems. One can bes. 141

87.73 confident that the negatively affected competitor will take care of identifying the problem, presenting the relevant information in a comprehensive manner and channelling it through the respective decision-making forum.142 Most often than not, the private conflict of interests would sufficiently reflect and elucidate all interests involved. Pure private interest offences are therefore not within the scope of the present study.143| 3.2 Ensuring fair trading through the market process Fair trading is about information and commercial communication. An analysis of the market process as an institution ensuring fair trading needs consequently to address the potential of the market to achieve an optimal quality and quantity of market information. By optimal I mean information that ensures the highest number of mutually advantageous transactions, reflecting the preferences of the individual market actors. Yet, if markets are narrowly understood through the lenses of classical economic theory, such analysis would be obsolete. If we follow the assumptions of transparency and perfect information inherent in the equilibrium competition model building the basis of modern price theory, concerns about fairness of commercial communications should be dimissed as a non-issue. Not surprisingly, many exponents of classical and neoclassical economic theory view advertising and marketing with suspicion, mainly as a source of artificial entry barriers. A more profound understanding about the role of information, uncertainty and trust in economic life requires other analytical tools, provided first with the advance of information economics. The analysis offered by information economists can easily be recast in terms of participation, i.e. in terms of the ability of the market to generate transaction opportunities. In fact one of the principle merits of information economics is to have highlighted information asymmetries and information distortions as one major source of transaction costs. Consequently the findings of information economists in many respects conform to those from an analysis based on a participation centred approach.s. 142

Information in the market and the market for information

1.There are three pretty straight-forward and simple starting points in the analysis of market information, (i) Information is unevenly distributed among market actors, (ii) Information is costly, (iii) Information reveals public-goods characteristics. Each of these propositions needs closer elaboration in order to understand its bearing on problems of fair trading.s. 142

2.74s. 148

3.3.2.1.1 Information asymmetrys. 148

4.That market information is unevenly distributed among market actors does not needs. 148

5.much substantiation. Buyers generally are in a much inferior position than sellers ins. 148

6.respect to both price and quality. Information asymmetry and uncertainty mays. 148

7.therefore be a better description of markets than the notion of transparency.144 There iss. 148

8.price dispersion in almost all markets. Prices are consequently not easy to ascertain.s. 148

9.Ascertaining quality is an even more complex process. Philip Nelson points at a trivials. 148

10.but fundamentally important distinction between product characteristics. Somes. 148

11.features of a product, much like price, can be readily established prior to or at the verys. 148

12.moment of purchase (the colour of a pair of shoes). Others can only be ascertaineds. 148

13.after the purchase (the taste of a bottle of beer).145 Nelson calls these two types ofs. 148

14.product characteristics ‘search’ (or inspection’) and "experience’ qualities,s. 148

15.respectively. This classification is further refined by Darby and Kami, who note thats. 148

16.there are product qualities which do not yield costless judgement even after purchase.s. 148

17.They refer to this category as "credence qualities". Credence qualities cannot bes. 148

18.evaluated in normal use but only through a highly qualified and costly expertise.146 Ans. 148

19.example that readily comes to mind is the quality, and indeed the necessity, of a cars. 148

20.repair service. To take another example from modern marketing - the allegeds. 148

21.environmental-friendliness of a product (high decomposability of a detergent ors. 148

22.recycling properties of paper) is a typical credence quality. It is obvious thats. 148

23.asymmetry and ensuing consumer uncertainty are more pervasive with respect tos. 148

24.credence product characteristics than in the case of price search product qualities.s. 148

25.Analysts note, however, that also price can be composed in various ways so as to makes. 148

26.consumer scrutiny more difficult.147s. 148

27.3.2.1.2 Information costs. 148

28.The second simple observation is that information is costly. Production, disseminations. 148

29.and assimilation of information all involve costs for producers and consumers. Unders. 148

30.conditions of price and quality uncertainty purchase decisions are not mades. 148

31.automatically, but are preceded by an intricate process of ascertaining quality ands. 148

32.price. This process, called by Stigler search, involves sometimes non-negligible costs.s. 148

33.The pattern of consumer search for ascertaining price as a rule differ significantly froms. 148

34.those for ascertaining quality. Price-search would mainly consist in canvassings. 148

35.different sellers and comparing their asking prices. The costs are chiefly associateds. 148

36.with transportation and time.148Ascertaining quality is a much more complex process.s. 148

37.Apart from canvassing more than one seller prior to purchase, consumers will bes. 148

38.reading advertising materials, consumer journals, consulting friends and relatives, etc.s. 148

39.Obviously, in view of the distinction between product qualities discussed above, fors. 148

40.75 some categories of goods ascertaining quality will be associated with prohibitive costs. This means that purchase of such goods will always be conducted in uncertainty. Information costs depend on two main variables: (i) buyers’ opportunity cost of time (i.e. the value of opportunities foregone to the consumer by his engaging in search) 149 and (ii) the time spent per unit good.150 It is important to note that consumers will be willing to engage in search only to the extent that the expected marginal cost of search does not exceed (outstrip) the expected marginal return (i.e. the gain from buying at a lower price or better quality). Both price search and quality search are consequently a function of the value of the product to consumer. In a perceptive analysis on information and consumer behaviour Nelson demonstrated the complex relation between product characteristics in terms of quality (search/experience goods) and relate to the value of the purchased good and to the frequency of purchase. Two other distinctions in the characteristics of goods provide further insights in the costs of consumer information and the structure of search: the value of the good (high-value and low-value goods) and the frequency of purchase (durables and non-durables). For low-value non-durables Nelson shows that is is cheaper for consumers to search through experimenting, i.e. by bying and trying the product. Conversly, for high-value durables consumers will be more inclined to engage in costly search. Alternative pre-purchase information is demanded most for durable experience goods.151 3.2.1.3 Information as public good Finally, information reveals the typical characteristics of a public good.152 As other public goods information is characterised by ‘non-rivalrous’ consumption. Not one, but many persons can typically make use of the information without its utility being diminished. 153 Information can also be described as a non-appropriable good. Those who have information can never loose it by transmitting it. There are few adequate mechanisms for assuring property rights in information. Information is indivisible and therefore difficult to measure and, respectively, to price. Inspection prior to purchase is impossible without revealing the information, which makes the transaction obsolete. In addition, it is problematic to exclude those who do not pay from the use of the good - so-called non-exclusivity.s. 153

Problem areas

1.All these characteristics account for the considerable complexity of the market for information, whereby the problems are partly different in respect to seller-provided information and in respect to information supplied independently from the product.s. 153

2.76s. 154

3.Two main problem areas can be identified: (i) there may be an undersupply ins. 154

4.information even in competitive markets; (ii) information problems create space fors. 154

5.opportunistic behaviour, i.e. for deception and misrepresentation.s. 154

6.3.2.2.1 Free-riding and undersupply of informations. 154

7.Given the demand for product-related information, one would expect that the frees. 154

8.market would readily provide such information. We can reasonably anticipate thats. 154

9.some market actors (other than producers themselves) will specialise in the productions. 154

10.and distribution of market information. Indeed, publications of consumer journals cans. 154

11.be seen as a response to this demand.154 However, there are serious impediments to ans. 154

12.efficient market of product-related information, separate from the product market. Thes. 154

13.public-good qualities of information account for substantial free-rider problems. Thes. 154

14.purchase, production and use of information by some consumers generate a market­s. 154

15.perfecting external benefit to uninformed consumers. In the hope of costlessly usings. 154

16.the information purchased by others, many will not reveal their realistic preferencess. 154

17.and readiness to pay for the good. In order to cover expenses incurred in thes. 154

18.production of information, producers (of information) will charge those few who pays. 154

19.with inadequately high prices. Therefore, there might not be enough incentives fors. 154

20.third-party information providers.155 As a result undersupply of the good may bes. 154

21.observed. Seen in participation terms many efficiency increasing transactions withs. 154

22.information will not take place.156s. 154

23.The demand for product-related information and the problems observed with third-s. 154

24.party product information seem to enhance the importance of information provided bys. 154

25.interested sellers. There is a natural economy in the joint production of a commoditys. 154

26.and of information about that commodity. Sellers typically have a lot of informations. 154

27.about their product attributes which is costly for other parties to ascertain. Thiss. 154

28.information is acquired ‘casually’, as a by-product of their overall activity. Theys. 154

29.benefit from the knowledge in many different ways and have multiple incentives tos. 154

30.acquire information.157 This solution appears to be Pareto efficient.s. 154

31.However, the same public goods properties of information that inhibit markets fors. 154

32.thrid-party information account for externalities in seller-provided information as well.s. 154

33.An important factor, constraining an optimal information disclosure in a competitives. 154

34.market, is the risk of free-riding on a competitor’s information due to the public-goods. 154

35.properties of information discussed above. Sellers may not be interested to disseminates. 154

36.relevant product information, if the benefit resulting from this dissemination will bes. 154

37.shared with other competitors. Similarly, incentives for counteracting incorrect ands. 154

38.77 deceptive claims of competitors will be small if the benefits from such actions do a service to other competitors. On a different note, the fact that advertsing is a function of sellers’ marketing efforts, generally makes disclosure improbable if revealing the truth may negatively affect one’s own business. A typical case of information failure in a competitive market is when all the competitors share the same negative product characteristic. The advertising of cigarettes is a particularly telling example.158 Albeit cigarettes are a product with serious health effects, no producer has the incentive to reveal these negative characteristics to consumers. 3.2.2.2 Advertising and opportunistic behavior Asymmetric information distribution and excessive (or prohibitive) search costs have multiple implications for the behaviour of market actors and the efficiency of market transactions. More generally, they open space for opportunistic behaviour, i.e. for cheating and misrepresentation. Seller-provided information (typically in the form of advertising) aims at determining consumers’ purchasing behaviour.159 Sellers have incentives to misrepresent and the information they provide is contaminated by credibility problems?60 Opportunistic behaviour is a clear danger. Two patterns of behaviour have been highlighted as particularly serious sources of market distortions. They are usually summarised under the concepts ‘moral hazard’ and ‘adverse selection’. Moral hazard may be defined as opportunistic behaviour whereby a market actor may change behaviour if he can remain unnoticed by the opposite party. Thus, producers may use consumers’ ignorance about quality and shift to lower quality production, charging the same price. Similarly, in an insurance contract the insured party may switch to a more hazardous behaviour omitting the necessary precautions once the risk has been passed on to the insurer. With the term adverse selection information economists describe a situation in which market participants are uncertain about the quality of a product or service, and are not in a position to distinguish between good and bad quality despite their willingness to pay for this discriminating ability. Arguably, under these conditions market actors will orient their decisions after the visible quality. The effects of adverse selection in the setting of strong asymmetry of information have been vividly demonstrated through the so called "lemon market’ model designed by Akerlof.161 The example chosen is the market for used cars. Akerlof detects a paradox on this market. Owners of good-quality cars are less inclined to sell their cars since they cannot convincingly communicate quality information to interested buyers and can hardly hope of getting a satisfactory price. Thus poor-quality cars (‘lemons’) prevail on the market. For a ‘lemon’ market to emerge the following conditions have to exist: (i) Consumers must be unable to determine quality before purchase, i.e. it must be as. 155

39.78s. 168

40.question of experience or credence goods, (ii) Higher quality goods should cost more tos. 168

41.produce than lower quality. In other words, there should be a premium for producerss. 168

42.from switching to lower quality, so called opportunism premium, (iii) There must be nos. 168

43.credible way for a seller to communicate quality. Arguably, under these conditionss. 168

44.consumers will orient their purchasing decisions after price as a more easily observables. 168

45.characteristic. Better quality sellers will be driven out of the market. It can eventuallys. 168

46.result into a market break-down, in that better quality producers may be driven out of thes. 168

47.market.162 The described phenomenon may cause flagrant misallocation of resources. Ins. 168

48.a worst-case scenario the market may collapse. Economists speak of the risk fors. 168

49.functional inefficiency.163 Akerlof links this analysis with the observed differentials. 168

50.market conditions in developed and developing countries and calls this ‘the cost ofs. 168

51.dishonesty’.s. 168

52.3.2.2.3 Market institutions to cope with information and uncertaintys. 168

53.The market has produced a number of institutions to cope with or at least to mitigates. 168

54.problems of uncertainty and information. Attempts to minimize search costs ares. 168

55.behind some of the secrets of various forms of distribution - ex via specialised traders,s. 168

56.located markets, etc.164 The department store, which generates expertise ands. 168

57.knowledge on brands, is seen to be a response (among others) to exactly that necessitys. 168

58.of consumers to get hold of a more precise and objective information than the ones. 168

59.offered by producers themselves.s. 168

60.One way by which the specific setting of ‘lemon markets’ is avoided is the triggerings. 168

61.of "signal competition.1 5 ‘Signal competition’ means a transfer of competition froms. 168

62.the field of invisible quality characteristics to the field of indirect but visibles. 168

63.symptoms, that is to signs (signals) of quality. Building a trademark and investing ins. 168

64.goodwill and reputation are among the most common ways of signalling quality.166s. 168

65.But investment in a franchise or in a luxurious store may have a similar effect.s. 168

66.Providing warranties or trial periods and other contractual arrangements may bes. 168

67.viewed as alternative ways to give consumers a time to build experience with as. 168

68.product and to communicate quality.167 Arguably, even high prices can function as as. 168

69.signal for quality. A seller who charges a high price indicates that he values repeats. 168

70.sales highly and thus has an incentive to provide high quality product in order to retains. 168

71.his customers.s. 168

72.In Stigler's view goodwill can be defined as continued patronage by customers withouts. 168

73.continuous search (that is, no more than occasional verification).168 Goodwill ands. 168

74.reputation create certain monopolistic space for the individual supplier. The incentivess. 168

75.for sellers to maintain quality and the likelihood of establishing goodwill depend ons. 168

76.79 several variables. Particularly decisive appears to be consumers’ ability to keep track of brand-specific performance experience.169 It is also important that consumers purchase the product frequently, that true quality is relatively easy to judge after use of the product, that the future is not discounted too heavily and that consumers tend to stay in the market for a long time. An alternative way to promote reputation is to invest in collective reputation by subscribing under and promoting collective ethical codes. The increased reliability of a profession is a shared benefit for all members.170 Collective reputation thus provides substitute to the information about the conduct and reliability of an individual trader. Generally speaking, signals indicate that the seller has made a significant investment (economists speak of ‘sunk costs’) and has much to loose if customers are unhappy.1 1 The findings of information economics sketched out above suggest that the market provides information in many subtle ways. One of the market’s great advantages is that it generates a huge number of information signals in a spontaneous manner. Opportunistic behaviour and undersupply of information are certainly often occurring but there are a variety of mechanisms to curb such inefficiencies and to induce transactions. Nevertheless, there are several areas where fair adequate quantity and quality of information will not be ensured by the market, or will be ensured only imperfectly. In the area of price information, consumer ignorance creates certain incentives for traders for manipulation of prices and deliberate price dispersion. In the area of quality, non-disclosure of information and use of deceptive information can be rewarded in some situations. The persistence of such informational failures and the chances for their correction through the market appear to depend on several factors, among them the structure of the market and the product characteristics in point, being the most important. Both factors can be directly related to conditions for paricipation in the market. Market structure and product characteristics will determine the distribution of stakes on the part of sellers whereas the value of the good and the frequency of purchase determine the size and distribution of stakes among consumers. Market structure Under rigorous competition, producers will arguably have stimuli to reveal information that is relevant for consumer choice. From the positions of the neoliberal Chicago school of economic analysis, economists argue that the risk of opportunistic behaviour, i.e. engaging in deceptive practice, will ideally be neutralised by producers’ incentives to induce repeat purchases on consumers.172 Likewise, competition is supposed to give sufficient incentives for self-control, deception disclosure and prosecution among competitors.173 Monopolistic markets imply that the stakes on the one side of the transaction are highly concentrated. On the one hand price and quality variety will not exist and the costs for canvassing different sellers are zero. On the other hand the asymmetry as tos. 169

77.80s. 177

78.the quality of goods is great. There are no competing products and there are nos. 177

79.incentives for the seller to disclose and to inform consumers. Intuitively one mights. 177

80.think that monopolistic markets would make an excellent environment from the points. 177

81.of view of market transparency. In a fully monopolistic market consumers are faceds. 177

82.with products coming from one source only. This would supposedly make searchs. 177

83.obsolete and thus eliminate search costs. Despite this intuitive assumption, economistss. 177

84.generally argue that monopolistic markets have adverse effects on market informations. 177

85.in many respects. A monopolist has fewer incentives to provide information thans. 177

86.sellers under intensive competition do. Consumers are not in a position to disciplines. 177

87.the monopolist through shifting their preference to alternative products and there ares. 177

88.no competitors that would have the incentive to provide the missing bits ofs. 177

89.information or to counteract false claims.174s. 177

90.Another structural arrangement that is particularly problematic from informations. 177

91.perspective is the turbulent market. As turbulent we can describe markets withs. 177

92.instability of supply and demand conditions and constantly changing identity of buyerss. 177

93.and sellers. Analysing phenomena of price dispersion resulting from the imperfections. 177

94.of information about prices, Stigler mentions several factors that deepen the impact ofs. 177

95.this market distortion. Among these are: the instability of supply and demands. 177

96.conditions and the changing identity of buyers and sellers that increase ignorance.175s. 177

97.In principle, as Stigler notes, “there is a flow of new buyers and sellers in every markets. 177

98.and they are initially uninformed on prices and by their presence make the information ofs. 177

99.experienced buyers somewhat obsolete." 176 More flagrant example of turbulent marketss. 177

100.to be found in most economies are tourist markets known for an unusually highs. 177

101.mobility of buyers and occasionally of sellers as well.s. 177

102.When it comes to changing identity of sellers, one can generally distinguish betweens. 177

103.firms who plan for a continuous stay in business and so called ‘fly-by-night’ actors,s. 177

104.who strike once and then move to a different field of business. In established markets. 177

105.economies firms in most industries are closer to the former type. Therefore economics. 177

106.analysis usually doesn’t deal with the ‘fly-by-night’ type of firm taking it as atypical.177s. 177

107.The situation, however, changes drastically if one shifts the focus to developings. 177

108.countries and emerging markets. Clearly, transient participants in business are lesss. 177

109.likely to be disciplined through market institutions such as repeat purchases ands. 177

110.reputation. Warning of the grave consequences of asymmetric information abouts. 177

111.product quality, Akerlof underlines that dishonesty in business is a more seriouss. 177

112.problem and that quality variation is greater in underdeveloped countries than ins. 177

113.developed areas. The presence of people who are willing to offer inferior goods tendss. 177

114.to drive the market out of existence. It is this possibility that represents the major costs. 177

115.of dishonesty - because dishonest dealings tend to drive honest dealings out of thes. 177

116.81 market.178 The message is simple but powerful: fragile markets create an environment more likely to produce informational market failures. This insight has a particular bearing on the analysis of emerging post-communist markets, where dynamic change of actors occurs both on the demand and on the supply side. The role ofp roduct characteristics Apart from and irrespective of market structure, the potential of market forces to remedy informational failures, and to discipline deception in particular, would very much depend on the specific characteristics of the products in question. Here both product qualities are important but also price category and frequency of consumption. In the context of the already introduced classification of product qualities, it is clear that sellers would have little incentives to misrepresent search qualities facing the prospect of immediate detection. In the cases of experience goods, where consumers can determine quality only by purchasing and using the good, the situation is more nuanced. While in this group of goods advertisers may have an incentive to mislead, for low-priced often-purchased goods such opportunistic behaviour would presumably be curbed by sellers interest in repeat purchases. By contrast, consumers’ power over advertising is substantially weaker in the case of credence goods and expensive and rarely-purchased experience goods.179 Arguably, signals would in a similar manner work unsatisfactorily if consumers are not in a position to get any reliable post­ purchase information about the quality of the product, either by their own experience or from a third person, and where they buy the product only infrequently. When consumption is only occasional (it is guaranteed that each consumer will consume the product/service only once), the distinction between credence and experience goods is irrelevant, since ascertainment of quality through consumption will as a rule not lead to correction of future choices. Consumers do not have possibility to communicate their dissatisfaction through their purchases.180 The analysis of information economists can be easily recast in terms of the participation-centered approach advanced by Komesar. Both cases - of undersupply of information and of opportunistic behaviour - are in a position to negatively affect institutional behaviour in the market, i.e. transacting. Efficient transactions will not take place or alternatively transactions will be concluded which do not adequately reflect the preferences of consumers. The participation-centered approach suggests that persistence of such failures will depend on the cost conditions as well as on the distribution of stakes as determinants of institutional participation.181 Comparing advertising with political propaganda, Komesar speaks of advertising as ‘rent-seeking’ in the market context.182 In the typical case of marketing and advertisings. 178

117.82s. 184

118.we have a single actor, the seller, with high and concentrated stakes on the one sides. 184

119.and a mass of consumers, with low and dispersed stakes on the other side of thes. 184

120.interests. At the lowest stakes level, as Komesar puts it, “consumers do not haves. 184

121.sufficient interest to even recognize the problem or to be interested in attempting tos. 184

122.assimilate any information - false or otherwise. They can neither be led nor misled.”s. 184

123.According to Komesar this recognition failure is problematic, but does not lead tos. 184

124.economic rent-seeking and instead only leaves a potential need unrealised.s. 184

125.The really problematic cases that Komesar identifies are the mid-stakes consumers,s. 184

126.who are sufficiently interested to register information, but not sufficiently interested tos. 184

127.discern information.183 It is within this group that rent-seeking in the form ofs. 184

128.misleading or other manipulative advertising and marketing could be successful. Ats. 184

129.this level Komesar turns to the role of the issue being at the centre of advertising, i.e.s. 184

130.price and quality of a product. The more complex the issue, the greater the space fors. 184

131.economic rent-seeking from misleading information. Again the correspondence withs. 184

132.Nelson’s analysis on the role of product characteristics for defining the space fors. 184

133.misleading advertising is noteworthy.s. 184

134.Bringing this analysis a step further, it can be argued that the situation will be differents. 184

135.if the market in question is characterised by a sufficient portion of high-stakes. 184

136.consumers. Misleading information and manipulative product differentiation will ins. 184

137.these cases not be a serious issue, since these consumers would have sufficients. 184

138.incentives to get informed through alternative channels. The developed secondarys. 184

139.markets for information in such industry sectors as cars, computers and others. 184

140.expensive electronic equipment demonstrates that high stakes normally would prompts. 184

141.information-seeking. This hypothesis finds support in Nelson’s analysis on advertisings. 184

142.of high-value goods.184s. 184

143.Finally, one should make an important caveat for irrational consumer behavior.s. 184

144.Information economics proceeds in general from the basic behavioural assumptions ofs. 184

145.neoclassical economic theory (the ‘homo economicus’ model). In reality, however,s. 184

146.consumers are often not in a position to adequately process and evaluate information.s. 184

147.There are clear limitations on the amount of information consumers are willing tos. 184

148.absorb and able to process. Consumers are often poor negotiators and yield to pressures. 184

149.and other techniques of persuasion and marketing.s. 184

The potential role of alternative institutional processes

1.Summing up, information economics provides a more sophisticated analysis ofs. 184

2.markets than neoclassical theory, identifying market failure as a result of informations. 184

3.imperfections as well as market institutions that have emerged to compensate for theses. 184

4.imperfections. At least at a first blush it appears that these findings open the gate fors. 184

5.intervention by alternative non-market institutional processes. The political processs. 184

6.83 could potentially serve as an instrument for reducing the cost of information through creating non-market institutions for protection of trust and goodwill and through appropriate legislation for policing deception. The judicial and the administrative process can likewise be entrusted with shaping and enforcing fairness standards. Diagnosing a disease, however, is not the same as prescribing the right medicine. For any credible normative conclusions to be drawn from the analysis above, one has to leave the Nirvana approach characteristic of much economic analysis and to embark on a true comparative system analysis. The conclusion about the imperfection of markets as a decision-making process on issues of market information requires analysis of the institutional characteristics of alternative decision-making processes and setting them in relation with the social policy issue at point. What is needed is a more careful evaluation of the relative abilities of these alternative processes to ensure a more efficient (less imperfect), participation and representation of all interests involved. 3.3 Fair trading in the political process The economic analysis above provides a new pespective on fair trading law. Fair trading law is conceptualised as a complex of legal institutions facilitating market communication and protecting trust and goodwill in the marketplace. By discouraging opportunistic behaviour (i.e. minimising the premium for opportunism) fair trading laws seek to enhance market transparency and efficiency. Moreover, such institutions can potentially promote trust, which in a world of increasing information asymmetries is a cost-effective substitute to knowledge.185 Yet, this type of economic analysis implicitely assumes that the alternative processes (political, judicial and/or administrative) that will be entrusted with shaping these standards and will step in place (or by the side) of the market mechanism would work in a tension-free manner. The analysis assumes that these processes will be in a position to provide the desired efficient solution. It does not deal with the working of these alternative processes and is thus one-sided. In contrast, the comparative system-approach advanced by Komesar requires to look critically at the political, administrative and the judicial process called to substitute or complement the market and to comparatively analyse their institutional strengths and weaknesses. Turning to the legislative (political) process, consumers and producers change their role into voters and lobbyists and transactions are substituted by different forms of participation in the political process, among them lobbying and voting being the most important. Decisions are no longer directed at specific products (transactions), but concern more abstract regulative issues, typically involving aggregation of different interests. To analyse this process, the participation-centered approach suggests several components. The first two concern the regulative issue (its complexity and importance) and the interest structure behind it. A third component is the examination of the characteristics of the political process in terms of possibilities and impediments to participation. All three factors are at best analyzed in the contexts. 185

7.84s. 186

8.of a concrete legislative measure in a specific legal system. Nevertheless somes. 186

9.generalizations are also possible.s. 186

Interests involved: size and distribution of stakes

1.The area of fair trading law as defined above involves a great variety of regulatives. 186

2.issues having different degree of complexity and involving different interests. Twos. 186

3.groups of actors are, however, inevitably affected by legislative decision-making,s. 186

4.namely competitors and consumers. With a risk of simplification I will attempt as. 186

5.categorisation of the regulative issues in terms of size and distribution of stakess. 186

6.between these major institutional actors. Looking at the interests of competitors, wes. 186

7.can identify, broadly speaking, four categories of situations. The first category can bes. 186

8.dubbed ‘quasi-propety’ issues. Rules on passing off, misappropriation, trade secretss. 186

9.and libel have justifications exhibiting kinship with those valid for protection ofs. 186

10.intellectual property rights. Fair trading law is involed to serve as an extension ofs. 186

11.trademark and intellectual property rights or complements personal rights (e.g. thes. 186

12.right to personal integrity).16s. 186

13.The second category of issues can be termed ‘horizontal’, since they, at least prior tos. 186

14.regulation, affect in a similar manner all businesses, irrespective of sector belonging.s. 186

15.Here fall rules such as a general prohibition of deceptive advertising, broads. 186

16.requirements of fair competition and a general duty of information disclosure. The sizes. 186

17.of stakes is in the low and medium range, but ex ante regulation the stakes are evenlys. 186

18.distributed across industries. It is certainly important for traders to influence theses. 186

19.general legislative standards of commercial communication. But in ex ante regulations. 186

20.each competitor can picture himself or herself both on the side of the accused ins. 186

21.misleading advertising, or on the side of the negatively affected by such advertising.s. 186

22.Moreover, since the form of regulation will often consist in laying down quite open-s. 186

23.ended standards of fairness and correctness of marketing and advertising, this woulds. 186

24.not be expected to be an issue of controversy. The refinement of this standard wills. 186

25.typically take place in other institutional arenas.s. 186

26.In the third category we can classify issues concerning a specific industry sector whichs. 186

27.can therefore be defined as ‘vertical’. One example is restrictions on tobaccos. 186

28.advertising, on alcohol or drugs advertising. The stakes of the affected traders ares. 186

29.definitely high and concentrated. The industry is well-identified and, depending on thes. 186

30.specific form of intervention (general standards, restrictions or plain prohibition)s. 186

31.regulation may bring about serious losses for the respective sector.s. 186

32.A fourth category of regulative issues, while formulated in a general manner, tends tos. 186

33.affect harder some industries at the expense of others, and can therefore be labeled ass. 186

34.‘preferential’ (or hidden sectoral). An example here could be restrictions on certains. 186

35.forms of marketing that are more intensively employed by some industries or industrys. 186

36.sectors and thus promising to provide competitive advantages to the firms nots. 186

37.employing the regulated marketing strategies. A classical example is the controversys. 186

38.between wholesale traders and produces on the one side vs. retail traders, on the other,s. 186

39.in respect to restrictions on rebates and special offers.s. 186

40.85 If we turn to the interests of consumers, as a general observation, one can say that most instances of regulation in the sphere of fair trading involve broad and diffuse consumer interests. Fair trading is about information. Given the public-good properties of information, each general or specific legislative decision concerning marketing has an effect on the broad consuming public. A decision to permit or to prohibit certain marketing measure cannot be confined to one single transaction but works inevitably erga omnes. Characteristic of diffuse consumer interests is that they concern nearly all subjects of a given jurisdiction and that every consumer has different value preferences and hierarchies.187 The stakes are low and distribution is uniform. Setting fair trading standards in specific sectors can occasionally change the size and distribution of stakes. For instance regulating fair trading in real-estate or car markets may raise the stakes of affected consumers and increase the concentration of stakes. Yet, even then consumers will be many and difficult to identify. The interest structure ex ante regulation for the most part is characterized by low stakes and dispersed interests on the part of consumers. In his analysis of the political process Komesar chiefly proceeds from a bipolar interest structure. In reality, however, the interests involved in a certain regulative issue may reflect more complex arrangements.188 Indeed, certain issues of fair trading exhibit a triangular structure, where we have opposing industries lobbying for different regulative strategies and a broad consumer interest that may (or may not) coincide with one of the alternatives supported by the industries. In the area of fair trading typical examples of such interest structures are the different positions taken by small and medium-sized enterprises and by big industry, or by retail industry vs. wholesale business on issues of aggressive marketing strategies such as combined offers, rebates, price comparisons, etc. Behind these prima facie neutral and horizontal regulative issues structural interests of divergent nature may transpire. If we apply the categories of comparative institutional analysis, the issues can be divided into four different categories depending on the size and distribution of the stakes involved. In the first catregory we find issues with uniform high distribution of stakes. Trade secrets, confusing imitations, comparative and disparaging advertising are situations involving high stake business interests on both sides. In a second category we have issues with uniform low stake distribution. Arguably, misleading advertising at least prior to legislative regulation is an issue involving many potential wrongdoers and many potential victims. The stakes are certainly higher on the side of competitors, than on the side of consumers, but are relatively evenly distributed. Thirdly, there are regulative measures that target a specific industry group restricting substantially the choice of marketing instruments, while bringing alleged benefits for a large and dispersed group of consumers. The issues in this category can be calleds. 187

41.86s. 188

42.sectoral. This is an example of skewed distribution of stakes. Prohibitions, or severes. 188

43.restrictions on tobacco, children or alcohol advertising are examples of such stakes. 188

44.distribution. Finally, there are situations, where on the surface the regulative measures. 188

45.affects uniform distribution of low (or medium) stakes. Under the disguise ofs. 188

46.neutrality the measures may, however, accord greater benefits to certain interests. 188

47.groups at the expense of broad consumer interests and consequently present a situations. 188

48.of skewed distribution. Regulations on rebates and special offers are examples ins. 188

49.point. This tentative categorisations of regulative issues and size and distribution ofs. 188

50.stakes is presented in the table below.s. 188

DistributionUniform HighSkewedSkewedUniform Low/

Mulitple InterestsMid-range

Size and high high high/medium-range low/mid-range

distribution concentratedconcentratedconcentratednot

of stakesv vvconcentrated

1.high low dispersedhigh/medium range vs. 188

2.concentratedconcentratedlow disperseds. 188

3.vs. 188

4.low disperseds. 188

Regulative QuasipropertySectoralPreferentialHorizontal

issue

1.-confusing Prohibition of:Abstract restrictions on -general clauses. 188

2.imitation;-tobaccocertain marketing forms: on fair tradings. 188

3.-disparagement;-alcohol- price comparisons -misleadings. 188

4.-trade secrets;-children - rebates;advertisings. 188

5.-corruption of advertising- promotional offerss. 188

6.employerss. 188

7.Lastly, it should be noted that the particular form of intervention also affects the stakess. 188

8.involved. Depending on the remedies and sanctions envisaged for specific conduct thes. 188

9.stakes may be raised or diminished. Participation in the political process wills. 188

10.predictably be much more intensive on the part of the affected industry in case ans. 188

11.outright prohibition on the marketing of specific product than if general standardss. 188

12.leaving broad margin for interpretation are on the legislative agenda. The threat ofs. 188

13.injunction on a particular advertising message will assumably not provoke strongs. 188

14.reactions, given the broad variety of communication means at the disposal of everys. 188

15.trader.s. 188

The costs of information and participation

1.Participation in the legislative process on the part of affected institutional actors wills. 188

2.depend not only on the size and distribution of stakes but also on the cost ofs. 188

3.information and organisation connected with participation. Information costs depends. 188

4.on the complexity of the regulative issue and the costs associated with acquiring thes. 188

5.87 necessary understanding. A simple and emotionally charged issue may have a strong potential to provoke participation even on the part of broad and otherwise dormant majority.189 Conversly, complex law and public policy questions requiring expertise may pass unnoticed. Rules on deceptive and unfair advertising are generally likely to provoke popular support without triggering strong reaction among the general public. Issues of sector regulation may be more complex to approach, but could incidentally attract public attention if they relate to health and safety or the environment (as is the case with tobacco advertising for instance). Finally, issues of preferential regulation tend to be muddled and difficult to penetrate. The second component in the analysis of the costs of participation in the political process relates to the costs of organisation. In the political science and economics literature diffuse interests are given as a typical example of rational disinterest in organisation. The difference in value preferences and hierarchies makes it impossible to integrate consumer interests in collective bargaining. Moreover, the pulic good qualities of consumer information gives rise to severe free riding problems, making it difficult for consumers to organize into membership-based organisations. Non­ members also benefit from the initiatives of the activists organisations without paying any costs for it.190 Therefore private organisations have few incentives to improve the overall consumption standards. One should not forget, however, that lobbying is not the only way by which consumers partcipate in the political process. Consumers are also voters and as such they may exercise considerable influence at the polls. This ability will, however again depends on the complexity of the issue and its potential to provoke media attention.191 In contrast to consumers, industry is as a rule well organised into membership associations. Political influence (lobbying) is just one among the broad variety variety of goals these industry organisations are set up to pursue. The plurality of objectives usually makes membership attractive, ensuring continuity and financial stability. It endows these organisations with advantages of synergy, knowledge and economies of scale. Likewise, the capacity of such organisations to acquire information and expertise about specific regulative issues is high. Finally, the costs of participation largely depend on the characteristics of the political process in terms of size, complexity and openness.192 Here generalizations are of little use. One can sweepingly say that the political process in small jurisdictions may reveal a higher degree of transparency and accessibility than that in a big jurisdiction. Conversely, it has been claimed that complex political structures such as federal structures (and for that matter the Community political process) tend to open more room for influence of concentrated and well-organized groups.193 Such groups cans. 193

6.88s. 194

7.invest in gaining knowledge about complex decision-making processes and thus finds. 194

8.effective ways to influence the political agenda. Interest groups, which can muster thes. 194

9.resources to study these complex decision-making processes, can expect to bes. 194

10.successful in their lobbying activity. Last but not least, constitutional traditions may bes. 194

11.based on an open or more closed nature of the legislative and the political process (bys. 194

12.for instance different regulation of access to information), which encourages ors. 194

13.discourages participation. This would have immediate implications for the chances ofs. 194

14.diffuse groups to participate in the political process and have their concerns addressed.s. 194

15.In a negative sense, small and transparent jurisdictions may be more susceptible tos. 194

16.majoritarian bias, whereas federal jurisdictions create more levels at which strongs. 194

17.interest groups can find a sympathetic ear to their demands.s. 194

18.3.3.2.1 Risk for minoritarian or majoritarian biass. 194

19.The interest structure for most of the regulative issues that enter the sphere of fairs. 194

20.trading promises a rather balanced consideration of the issues in the political process,s. 194

21.although with a substantial tilt towards the interests of business and less visible ands. 194

22.recognizable attention to the interests of consumers. One should not, however, bes. 194

23.hasty to exclude any risk for bias in the political process in a minoritarian or in as. 194

24.majoritarian direction. For industry the situation may change with shift towards greaters. 194

25.specification of the regulative issue in terms of substance or in terms of industrys. 194

26.sector. In the latter instances industry is likely to mobilize and organize for betters. 194

27.representation in the political debate. One such shift in the area of marketing ands. 194

28.advertising is witnessed in attempts to regulate the marketing of certain products, likes. 194

29.tobacco or alcohol. Such attempts reveal different distribution of stakes with the stakess. 194

30.of the regulated industry being much higher and concentrated than those of the broads. 194

31.interests in the name of which regulation is undertaken. Another reshuffling ofs. 194

32.interests could possibly take place if certain marketing methods were more narrowlys. 194

33.associated with certain industries. For instance, attempts at regulation of directs. 194

34.marketing face a more concentrated interest structure on the business side than thats. 194

35.created through generally applicable prohibitions of deceptive advertising.s. 194

36.Likewise, interests may awaken and mobilize if restrictions on specific forms ofs. 194

37.marketing are sought that would create benefits of trade for identifiable industrys. 194

38.groups. Limitations on aggressive price reduction campaigns, sales promotions ands. 194

39.sales under production costs are often driven by organizations representing medium­s. 194

40.and small-size enterprises, which perceive the new marketing strategies as a threat tos. 194

41.the competitive status quo and associate possible legislative intervention with somes. 194

42.benefits from trade.s. 194

43.In all of the interest constellations discussed above a risk of minoritarian bias in thes. 194

44.political process is at hand. It may be expected that the industries threatened bys. 194

45.regulation will be sufficiently motivated to organize and lobby in order to exerts. 194

46.influence on the political process either by completely blocking the intendeds. 194

47.regulation or by trying to soften the instruments and effects of regulation. Likewise, as. 194

48.particular industry may feel that regulation in a certain direction could bring benefitss. 194

49.of trade, and would actively push the issue through the legislative process. Provideds. 194

50.that the losers from the novel regulation are primarily to be found in the broads. 194

51.consumer community, resistance is unlikely.s. 194

52.89 Whereas interests on the part of industry may take different shape depending on the regulative issue involved, it appears at least prima facie that no such variations are likely to occur on the consumer side. Ex ante regulation consumers are typically a big and anonymous mass with low and highly dispersed stakes. They have difficulty to even recognize the regulative issue as one affecting their interest. The debate is likely to be dominated by industry. This is, however, not the full story. One important caveat applies. As Komesar reminds us, there are situations where a dormant majority can be successfully mobilized to participate and influence the political debate. Crucial is the emergence of a catalytic sub-group that would represent higher stakes in comparison to the rest of the group and that would feel motivated to move the issue to the political arena on behalf of the whole group. We can imagine here action by an interest group of high-stake investors in shares (consumers of financial services) lobbying for instance on the issues of more transparent financial markets and better control of insider trading. Even if the prevailing number of shareholders consisted of small-stake actors, for whom it would not pay to even recognize the issue (rational disinterest), this group of high-stake actors would still continue to have a perceptible interest of improved regulation that would justify the costs invested in lobbying and organization. Alternatively, as Wilson pointed out, it may suffice that a skillful entrepreneur emerges who is able to mobilize the majority or at least to convincingly threaten to do so.194 In such situations we may face a genuine attempt to represent consumers’ best interests. One example that has acquired emblematic significance in the consumer protection field is the activist work of the American consumer advocate Ralph Nader in the 1960s and 1970s.195 In a somewhat different vein, it can happen that a group outside the circle of consumers defines itself as acting in the interest of consumers of its own accord (self-appointed consumer advocates). A benevolent scenario finds an internal motivation for action that diverges from, but does not run contrary to, the ‘genuine’ interest of consumers. A political group or actor may simply find it attractive to stand out as pro-consumer in the general political debate. Pushing consumer interests in fair trading law may be bringing voting points or may move the image of an organizations in a desired direction. A malevolent scenario involves misappropriation and misrepresentation of interests, culminating in regulative results running contrary to the genuine interest of consumers. The usual example is industry organizations lobbying for restrictive tariffs or quality standards in the name of consumers but pursuing anti-competitive (and hence anti­ consumer) effects. In the case of fair trading industry representatives may on the surface support restrictions on advertising and marketing in the name of consumers while pursuing competitive advantage over import products that are less adapted to the existing regulative framework. Also on the consumer side, the characteristics of the policy issue involved in terms of benefits from participation and costs of gathering knowledge and understanding, matter. If we consider the stakes, the more palpable the interests affected, the greater the chance of even diffuse interests being activated. In this respect fair trading does nots. 195

53.90s. 196

54.promise a constant and intensive attention on the part of the public. The stakes are as as. 196

55.rule very low.s. 196

56.The costs for the majority of becoming informed (or at least becoming sensitized) is ans. 196

57.important variable. This potential is more readily available where the regulative issues. 196

58.is less complex and easier to mobilize under the impression of a powerful metaphorics. 196

59.language. Fair trading is not particularly conducive for such situations to emerge.s. 196

60.Although the interests of consumers are likely to be substantial in aggregate terms,s. 196

61.violations of fair trading rules unlike other consumer-related scandals (like the Mads. 196

62.Cow disease and the Thyroid accidents) rarely make newspaper headlines. At any rate,s. 196

63.Komesar’s analysis sharpens our attention for situations where the particulars. 196

64.combination between regulative issue and interest arrangement may result in as. 196

65.majoritarian orientation or majoritarian bias of the political debate. This may bes. 196

66.facilitated by the relatively moderate stakes industry has in the regulation of fairs. 196

67.trading.s. 196

68.33.2.2 Protectionism and paternalisms. 196

69.Seen from a slightly different angle, some of the instances of majoritarian ands. 196

70.minoritarian bias may be related to two familiar although debatable categories ofs. 196

71.policy-making, popularly known as protectionism and paternalism. With the terms. 196

72.protectionism one usually dubs political decision-making where, under the disguise ofs. 196

73.public interest objectives, regulation is introduced that is in fact driven by attempts tos. 196

74.favor a particular domestic industry.196 It may be a question of conferring benefits tos. 196

75.one domestic industry at the expense of another (sector protectionism), or mores. 196

76.typically, at the expense of foreign competitors. In the latter case domestic industrys. 196

77.may even support an otherwise burdensome regulation, knowing that it is betters. 196

78.adapted to meet the requirements than is the import industry. Regulation may thus bes. 196

79.relied upon to impede imports and assure windfall profits to the better-adapteds. 196

80.domestic industry. Protectionism is probably one of the most widespread and tenaciouss. 196

81.forms of minoritarian biases in the legislative process. According to liberal economistss. 196

82.the costs of protectionism are invariably borne by the consuming public.s. 196

83.Fair trading is prima facie not an area where protectionist policy-making has a naturals. 196

84.place. General standards against unfair and deceptive practices appear neutral ands. 196

85.meant to be equally applicable irrespective of industry sector. Yet as we noted aboves. 196

86.there are forms of regulation that under a neutral surface can more negatively affects. 196

87.certain industry sectors or imports, thus securing gains of trade to less competitives. 196

88.industry sectors or to domestic industry and trade in relation to imports. Such are thes. 196

89.examples of some regulations on direct marketing, on aggressive promotionals. 196

90.techniques, rebates and special offers, etc. The area is thus not fully immune againsts. 196

91.the allure of protectionism.s. 196

92.Paternalism can be placed on the opposite side of the scale between minoritarian ands. 196

93.majoritarian influences. There are instances of regulation, where the majoritys. 196

94.substitutes the preferences of certain group of individuals with its own preferences, thes. 196

95.main argument being that the individuals are not in a position to independently decides. 196

96.91 in their best interest (children, drug-, tobacco- and alcohol- abusers, persons addicted to games of chance, etc.). Paternalistic interventions imply that individual choices are overridden.197 Not all paternalist motivated regulation has a minority group as a target. In their classical article on property rights and liability rules, Calabresi and Melamed address the problem of paternalism when they discuss a third category of rules for protecting and regulating entitlements, apart from property rights and liability rules, namely inalienablity.198 Inalienable entitlements often take the form of prohibitions of transacting with certain rights and entitlements that cannot be waived by individual agreement. Calabresi and Melamed suggest that there may be good efficiency arguments for such prohibitions. Among the justifications for inalienability, the authors highlight a specific category of external effects that are of non-pecuniary nature. Thus, the preference exhibited by some for pornographic literature or for slavery may cause disquiet and moral concern with another social group. This category of justifications is called moralisms. A major source of transaction costs in this case is, apart from high numbers, the fact that this category of external costs “do not lend themselves to collective measurement which is acceptably objective and nonarbitrary.”199 In the view of Calabresi and Melamed prohibitions on grounds of moralism can be successfully analyzed in efficiency terms. It may be more cost­ efficient to prohibit transactions with an entitlement, then to regulate entitlements through property or liability rules. Another category of justifications for inalienability is paternalism. The authors distinguish between self-paternalism and true paternalism. Under self-paternalism the authors classify instances of “individuals passing a bill of rights so that they will be prevented from yielding to momentary temptations which they deem harmful to themselves.”200 According to Calabresi and Melamed this type of limitation cannot really be called paternalism. It is moreover a fully Pareto- efficient solution, since here the individual decides for himself and no one else knows better what is best for him. Self-paternalism entails giving up some freedom of choice in the short run, but this is in order to secure long-term freedom of choice.202 Marketing and advertising do not directly affect the exchange of goods. As indicated in the analysis of market information, they are a function of the market for goods and services. Nevertheless, regulations and limitations on marketing and advertising may well be undertaken with the intention to limit the exchange and the consumption of certain goods and services. Restrictions on tobacco advertising, on alcohol and drugs advertising are examples that readily come to mind. Although these rules are not equal to prohibitions of smoking or drinking they are intended to reduce consumption.s. 197

97.92s. 203

98.Alternatively we can say that these rules affect the entitlement to information about thes. 203

99.products in point and can arguably be classified as self-paternalism. Naturally, ins. 203

100.making collective choices, not all actors agree on these limitations. What is perceiveds. 203

101.as a necessary self-limitation by some could well be considered as an extremes. 203

102.limitation of freedom of choice by others. Self-paternalism in a (democratic) politicals. 203

103.process is therefore always a result of majoritarian decisions and may well be a case ofs. 203

104.majoritarian bias.s. 203

105.Calabresi and Melamed reserve the term ‘true paternalism’ for prohibitions where thes. 203

106.majority decides for a certain minority group what is in the latter’s best interest unders. 203

107.the presumption that it cannot decide for itself. The classical example is of limitationss. 203

108.on the rights of children to perform certain transactions. In the area of advertising ands. 203

109.marketing, restrictions on targeting children with commercials may have trues. 203

110.paternalist tilt. Calabresi and Melamed see also this category of prohibitions ass. 203

111.conforming to efficiency considerations. True paternalism can in their view not bes. 203

112.measured in Pareto-efficient terms, since the reason for the prohibition (inalienability)s. 203

113.is that the person would be better off if prohibited from transacting.s. 203

114.Calabresi and Melamed use the terms ‘moralisms’, ‘self-paternalism’ and trues. 203

115.paternalism for genuinely intended interventions. They warn, however, that moralists. 203

116.and paternalist motives could be used to disguise political agendas and fors. 203

117.redistributional goals. Alternatively, genuine moralist and paternalist concerns coulds. 203

118.bring about unwanted distributional results. Thus, prohibiting liability waivers ins. 203

119.product sales contracts would not only benefit the injured. Since producers tend tos. 203

120.transfer the costs of regulation into product prices, such prohibition would arguably bes. 203

121.to the disadvantage of make poorer all those consumers who were not injured and paids. 203

122.a higher price. In the words of Calabresi and Melamed:s. 203

123.Summing up a cursory analysis of the politics of fair trading demonstrates that thes. 203

124.political process and in particular the legislative process is not saved from the risks ofs. 203

125.mal-representation. Specific exemplifications of this abstract analysis will be provideds. 203

126.in the country analyses below.s. 203

127.3.4 Fair trading through the judicial or the administrative processs. 203

128.As indicated above, due to the changing standards and forms of unfairness, thes. 203

129.legislative process only rarely defines the precise standards of fair trading. More oftens. 203

130.the statutory provisions take the form of broad general clauses, the implementation ands. 203

131.shaping of the standards being left to alternative institutions such as the courts and/ors. 203

132.administrative agencies. Thus, even post legislative intervention, substantial room iss. 203

133.left to market actors to continue to influence the the standards of fair trade. With thes. 203

134.exception of the common law system in England, all European countries have suchs. 203

135.general clauses on fair trading (fair competition, fair commercial practices, bonoss. 203

136.mores, etc.). By keeping the standard broad and open, the political process recognizess. 203

Fotnoter

  1. 1On the history of unfair competition law see Ladas, Patents, Trademarks and Related Rights, Vol. 3 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975), 1676 ff. Schricker, ‘Möglichkeiten zur Verbesserung des Schutzes der Verbraucher und des funktionsfähigen Wettbewerbs im Recht des unlauteren Wettbewerbs’ (1975) ZHR, 139 ff., 208 ff.; Beier, ‘The Law of Unfair Competition in the European Community - Its Development and Present Status’ (1985) 16 IIC, 139 ff.
  2. 2Schricker (1975), 208 ff., at 209.
  3. 3Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, 1883 (PC). Revised at Brussels 1900, Washington 1911, the Hague 1925, London 1934, Lisbon 1958 and Stockholm 1967. Unfair competition was included in the subject-matter of the Paris Convention with the Brussels Revision of 1900, Zweigert/Kroppholler, Sources of International Uniform Law, Vol. 3 (Leiden: A.W. Sijthoff, 1973), 129 ff.
  4. 4Ulmer, Das Recht des unlauteren Wettbewerbs in den Mitgliedstaaten der EWG. Band I Vergleichende Darstellung (Köln: Carl Heymann, 1965).
  5. 5For a perceptive analysis of the reasons for the failure of the harmonisation project see Ohly, ‘Die Bemühungen um eine Rechtsvereinheitlichung auf EU-Ebene von den Anfänge bis zur Richtlinie über irrefuhrene Werbung von 1984’ in: Schricker/Henning-Bodewig (eds.), Neuordnung des Wettbewerbsrechts (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1998/99), 69 ff.
  6. 6Bourgoignie, ‘Consumer Law and the European Community: Issues and Prospects’ in: Bourgoignie/Trubek/Trubek, Consumer Law and Federalism (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1987), 89 ff.
  7. 7Directive 84/450/EEC, OJ 1984 L 250/17 (Misleading Advertising Directive).
  8. 8Economists have defined ‘positive integration’ as the creation of equal conditions for the functioning of the integrated parts of the economy and ‘negative integration’ as the elimination of obstacles to trade. See Molle, The Economics of European Integration (Dartmouth: Aldershot, 1990), 11. See below Ch. 6.
  9. 9Directive 97/55/EC amending Directive 84/450, OJ 1997 L 290/18 (Comparative Advertising Directive).
  10. 10Directive 89/552/EEC, OJ 1989 L 298/23, amended by Directive 97/36/EC, OJ 1997 L 202/60 (Television Directive).
  11. 11Directive 97/7/EC, OJ 1997 L144/19 (Distance Selling Directive). On specific marketing methods see also Directive 85/577/EEC to protect the consumer in respect pf contracts negotiated away from business premises OJ 1985 L 372/31.
  12. 12Directive 2000/31/EC, OJ 2000 L 178/1 (Electronic Commerce Directive).
  13. 13In the area of general consumer information see also the Directive 98/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 on consumer protection in the indication of the prices of products offered to consumers, OJ 1998 L 80/27.
  14. 14See for instance Directive 90/496/EEC of 24 September 1990 on nutrition labelling for foodstuffs, OJ 1990 L 276/40; Directive 2000/13/EC on the labelling, presentation and advertising of foodstuffs, OJ 2000 L 109/29; Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use; Directive 1999/45/EC on the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous preparations, OJ 1999 L 200/1; Directive 2003/33/EC on advertising and sponsorship of tobacco products, OJ 2003 L 152/16 (Tobacco Advertising Directive).
  15. 15Directive 98/27/EC, OJ 1998 L 166/51 (Injunctions Directive).
  16. 16Schricker, ‘Probleme der Angleichung des Rechts des unlauteren Wettbewerbs’ in: Bernstein/Drobnig/Kötz (eds.), Festschrift Zweigert (Tübingen: Mohr, 1981), 537 ff.
  17. 17Schricker, ‘Die Bekämpfung der irreführenden Werbung in den Mitgliedstaaten der EG’ (1990) GRUR Int.,
  18. 18ff.
  19. 19For a discussion on the efforts for European harmonisation in the area of comparative advertising see Kur, ‘Die vergleichende Werbung in Europa: Kurz vor dem Pyrrhussieg?’ in: Levin (ed.), Vennebog till Mogens Kokvedgaard (Stockholm: Nerenius & Santérus, 1993), 436 ff.; Henning-Bodewig, ‘Vergleichende Werbung - Liberalisierung des deutschen Rechts?’ (1999) GRUR Int., 385 ff; Bernitz, ‘The EC Directive on Comparative Advertising and its Implementation in the Nordic Countries: Especially in Relation to Intellectual Property’ (2002a) 42 SSL, 11 ff; Ohly/Spence, ‘Vergleichende Werbung: Die Auslegung der Richtlinie 97/55/EG in Deutschland und Großbritannien’ (1999) GRUR Int., 681 ff.
  20. 20Cf. Case C-152/78 Commission v France [1980] ECR 2299 ff.
  21. 21Case C-120/78 REWE v Bundesmonopolverwaltung für Branntwein (‘Cassis de Dijon’) [1979] ECR 649.
  22. 22Case C-268/81 Oosthoek’s Uitgeversmaatschappij [1982] ECR 4575.
  23. 23Case C-362/88 GB-INNO-BM[1990] ECR 1-667.
  24. 24On repercussions of Europeanisation on German unfair competition law, see below Ch. 7.
  25. 25For a sympathetic view on these influences see Schricker, ‘European Harmonisation of Unfair Competition Law - A Futile Venture?’ (1991a) IIC, 788 ff.; for a critical analysis see Kisseler, ‘Das deutsche Wettbewerbsrecht im Binnenmarkt’ (1994) WRP, 1 ff.
  26. 26Joined Cases C-267 & C-268/91 Keck and Mithouard [1993] ECR 1-6097
  27. 27Case C-405/98 Konsumentombudsmannen (KO) v Gourmet International Products (GIP) [2001] ECR 1-1795
  28. 28See Dethloff, Europäisierung des Wettbewerbsrechts (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2001); Beater, Verbraucherschutz und Schutzzweckdenken im Wettbewerbsrecht (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000).
  29. 29More generally for consumer law in Sweden see Olsen, ‘Mot en ny konsumtionsrätt?’ (2000-01) JT, 304 ff., at
  30. 30ff.; Olsen ‘Det konsumtionsrättsliga regelverket - en överblick över ett dynamiskt rättsområde’ (2001-02) JT, 815 ff., at 846.
  31. 31See Dethloff (2001); Towards a Hamonised View of Fair Trading in Europe, Report of the Conference held in Stockholm, 10 March 2002; Micklitz et al., Study on the Feasibility of a General Legislative Framework on Fair Trading, Volumes I-II, Institut fur Europäisches Wirtschafts- und Verbraucherrecht e.V., November 2000.
  32. 32See Micklitz/Keßler, ‘Europäisches Lauterkeitsrecht. Dogmatische und ökonomische Aspekte einer Harmonisierung des Wettbewerbsverhaltens im europäischen Binnenmarkt’ (2002) GRUR Int., 885 ff.; Schricker/Henning-Bodewig, ‘Elemente einer Harmonisierung des Rechts des unlauteren Wettbewerbsrechts’ (2001) WRP, 1367 ff.
  33. 33Kur (1993).
  34. 34In respect to integration on the basis of a country-of-origin principle in the E-Commerce Directive concerns have been expressed as to the risk of ‘race to the bottom’ or ‘Delawerisation’ of unfair competition law. See Lehmann, ‘Rechtsgeschäfte und Verantwortlichkeit im Netz - Der Richtlinienvorschlag der EU-Kommission’ (1999) ZUM, 180 ff., at 181; Henning-Bodewig, ‘E-Commerce und irreführende Werbung’ (2001) WRP, 771 ff., at 777.
  35. 35For a comprehensive summary of the debate see Joerges, ‘The Impact of European Integration on Private Law: Reductionist Perceptions, True Conflicts and a New Constitutional Perspective’ (1997) 3 ELI, 378 ff.
  36. 36Joerges (1997), 379.
  37. 37Joerges (1997), 383.
  38. 38Zimmerman, ‘Civil Code and Civil Law. The “Europeanisation” of Private Law and the Re-emergence of a European Legal Science’ (1994/95) Columbia Journal of European Law, 63 ff.; Wieacker, ‘Historical Models for the Unification of European Law’ in: Krawietz/MacCormick/von Wright (eds.), Prescriptive Formality and Normative Rationality in Modern Legal Systems. Festschrift for Robert Summers (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1994).
  39. 39See for instance Lando, ‘Principles of European Contract Law’ (1992) RabelsZ, 261 ff; Basedow, ‘A Common Contract Law for the Common Market’ (1996) CMLRev., 1169 ff. On the Trento ‘common core’ project see Busani/Mattei, ‘The Common Core Approach to European Private Law’ (2002), at http://www.jus.unitn.it/cardozo/home.html.
  40. 40See for instance Editorial comments, ‘On the Way to a European Consumer Sales Law?’ (1997) 34 CMLRev.,
  41. 41ff.
  42. 42See Collins, ‘European Private Law and the Cultural Identity of States’ (1995) 3 ERPL, 353 ff.; Legrand, ‘European Legal Systems are not Converging’ (1996) 45 ICLQ, 52 ff.; Legrand, ‘Uniformity, Tradition and the Law’s Limits’ (1996-97) JT, 306 ff. From the perspective of autopoietic theory of self-referencial societal systems see Teubner, ‘Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends Up in New Divergences’ in: Snyder (ed.), The Europeanisation of Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2000), 243 ff.
  43. 43This was also the tentative term used for the recently advanced proposal of the European Commission for a general clause on fair trading in European Union. See, Micklitz et al. (2000). Meanwhile the Commission has shown preference for the concept ‘fair commercial practices’, which only comes to underscore the volatility of the subject matter under analysis.
  44. 44See Bernitz, Marknadsrätt (Stockholm: Jurist och Samhällsvetareförbundets Förlags AB, 1969); Bakardjieva Engelbrekt, A., ‘Unfair Competition Law After TRIPs: Yet Another Challenge to Doctrinal Cohesion’ (1998) NIR, 371 ff.; Micklitz et al. (2000).
  45. 45Commercial communication is a term taken from economic theory and applied in Community policy papers. See Green Paper on Commercial Communication in the Internal Market, COM (1996) 192 final.
  46. 46In the following, the term ‘unfair competition law’ will be most often used to signify the German approach to fair trading and ‘marketing practices law’ - the Swedish one.
  47. 47See Komesar, Imperfect Alternatives. Choosing Institutions in Law, Economics and Public Policy (Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press, 1994). In its emphasis on participation costs and benefits comparative institutional analysis is of course closely related with transaction cost economics as developed by Roland Coase in his famous, ‘The Problem of Social Cost’ (1960) 3 JLE, 1 ff.
  48. 48North, ‘Institutions’ (1991) 5 Journal of Economic Perspectives, 97.
  49. 49On institutions and institutional changes generally, see North, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge University Press, 1990).
  50. 50North, ‘Institutional Change: A Framework of Analysis’ in: Sjöstrand (ed.), Institutional Change. Theory and Empirical Findings (Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe, 1993), 35 ff., at 36.
  51. 51On the peculiar standing occupied by Swedish law see, Zweigert/Kötz, Introduction to Comparative Law, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998) 276 ff. See, however, Strömholm, 'Comparative Legal Science - Risks and Possibilities’ in: Suksi, M., Law under Exogenous Influences (Åbo: Turku Law School, 1994), 5 ff., at 14.
  52. 52See North (1990).
  53. 53Knill, The Europeanisation ofN ational Administrations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 13 ff.
  54. 54Héritier/Mingers/Knill/Becka, Die Veränderung von Staatlichkeit in Europa: Ein regulativer Wettbewerb (Opladen: Leske und Budrich, 1994); Koopmans (1991), 495 ff.
  55. 55Wieacker, A History of Private Law of Europe, English translation by Tony Weir, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995), 330; Andreev, Rimsko častno pravo (Sofia, 1975), 75 ff.
  56. 56See Hartley, The Foundations of European Community Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).
  57. 57See in particular v. Savigny’s plea for viewing legal rules in their ‘organic context’ (“organischen Zusammenhang”), v. Savigny, System des heutigen römischen Rechts I (1840), 14; cf. Reuter, ‘Plädoyer für das institutionelle Rechtsdenken’ in: Immenga et al. (eds.), Festschriftför Mestmäcker (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1996), 271.
  58. 58See Larenz, Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft (Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1979).
  59. 59Raiser, ‘Rechtsschutz und Institutionenschutz im Privatrecht’ in: Summum ius-summa inuria. Individualgerechtigkeit und der Schutz allgemeiner Werte im Rechtsleben (Tübingen: Mohr, 1963), 145 ff.
  60. 60Esser, Grundsatz und Norm in der richterlichen Fortbildung des Privatrechts (Tübingen: Mohr, 1990), in particular at 346 ff.
  61. 61MacCormick, ‘Law as Institutional Fact’ in MacCormick/Weinberger, An Institutional Theory ofL aw (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1986), 49 ff.
  62. 62See Weinberger, ‘Einleitung’ in: MacCormick/Weinberger, Grundlagen des Institutionalistischen Rechtspositivismus (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1985), 26.
  63. 63See Weinberger, ‘The Norm as Thought and as Reality’ in: MacCormick/Weinberger, Grundlagen des Institutionalistischen Rechtspositivismus (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1985), 31 ff., at 44.
  64. 64Ibid., 44.
  65. 65Michels, Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy, reprint (Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1915/1962).
  66. 66Berle/Means, The Modern Corporation and Private Property (New York: Macmillan, 1933).
  67. 67Simon, Administrative Behavior (New York: Macmillan, 1958).
  68. 68Selznick, The Moral Commonwealth: Social Power and the Promise of Community (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1992), 232.
  69. 69A key contribution was DiMaggio/Powell (eds.). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1991).
  70. 70James Coleman and Robert Putnam, to mention two prominent representatives.
  71. 71For a detailed account see Posner, Economic Analysis ofL aw (Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1992) 21 ff.; MacKaay, Economics of Information and the Law (Boston: Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing, 1982); see also Rose-Ackerman, ‘Progressive Law and Economics and the New Administrative Law’ (1988) 98 Yale Law Journal, 341 ff.
  72. 72Stigler, ‘The Economics of Information’ (1961) JPE, 213 ff.
  73. 73Coase, ‘The Nature of the Firm’ (1937) 4 Econometrica, 386 ff.; Coase (1960).
  74. 74Related and equally significant is the assumption of given preferences. Fo a critical analysis see Sunstein, ‘Legal Interference with Private Preferences’ (1986) 53 U. Chi. L. Rev., 1129 ff.
  75. 75Arrow, Social Choice and Public Values (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1951).
  76. 76Arrow, ‘Rationality of Self and Others in an Economic System’ in: Hogarth and Reder (eds.), Rational Choice (University of Chicago Press: 1987).
  77. 77Rose-Ackerman (1988), at 344 ff. See also Rose-Ackerman, ‘Recht und Ökonomie: Paradigma, Politik oder Philosophie’ in: Ott/Schäfer, Allokationseffizienz in der Rechtsordnung (Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1989), 269 ff., cf. Kübier, ‘Schlusswort: Vergleichende Überlegungen zur rechtspraktischen Bedeutung der ökonomischen Analyse’ in: Ott/Schäfer (1989), 293 ff
  78. 78Downs, An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1957). Building on Arrow’s insights in the importance of uncertainty and information problems, Downs demonstrated that seeking to exhaustively inform oneself as a voter was not optimal. Downs offered a more sophisticated understanding of rationality, in which ‘the ideal of looking for what is substantively the best solution is abandoned as unrealistic. Instead, to be rational in this sense means to look for the best solution that it is worth looking for’. Cf. Mackaay (1982), 111.
  79. 79Buchanan/Tullock, The Calculus of Consent. Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy, 2nd ed. (Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press, 1967).
  80. 80Coase (1937).
  81. 81Coase (1960).
  82. 82Pigou argued that the existence of externalities and market imperfection in general formed a sufficient condition for government intervention. The problem of externality is addressed by Pigou in his The Economics of Welfare 5th ed. (London: Macmillan & Co., 1952), 172 ff. See Coase, The Firm, the Market and the Law (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1988), 20 ff. See also Reich, Staatliche Regulierung zwischen Marktversagen und Politikversagen (Heidelberg: C.F. Müller Verlag, 1984), 9.
  83. 83See Reich (1984), 9.
  84. 84Posner (1992), 251 ff.
  85. 85Demsetz, ‘Information and Efficiency. Another Viewpoint’ (1969) 12 JLE, 1 ff.
  86. 86This is very insightfully emphasised by Dahlman, ‘The Problem of Externality’ (1979) 22 JLE, 141 ff., at 161.
  87. 87Coase (1960), 18.
  88. 88Dahlman (1979), 161.
  89. 89See Sjöstrand, ‘On Institutional Thought in the Social and Economic Sciences’ in: Sjöstrand (ed.), Institutional Change. Theory and Empirical Fiindings (Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe, 1993), 3 ff., at 6, referring to Commons, Institutional Economics (New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publisher, 1934/1990).
  90. 90Williamson, The Mechanisms of Governance (New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), 219 ff., at
  91. 91Especially in his earlier analysis the distinction between organization and institutions is somewhat blurred. Thus in Williamson’s analysis firms and alternative organizations of markets are likewise described as institutions.
  92. 92For a review on the opinions of different institutional economists on this particular issue, see Eggertsson, Economic Behaviour and Institutions (Cambridge University Press, 1990), 6 ff. The distinction mentioned here is not universally accepted, though. Moreover, some authors who initially adopted a strict rational choice model, later came to accept modified assumptions regarding social behaviour. See for instance North (1990), 17 ff.
  93. 93Williamson (1996), 223.
  94. 94Williamson, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (New York: Free Press, 1985), 44.
  95. 95Williamson (1985), 45.
  96. 96Komesar (1994). See also Komesar, ‘In Search of a General Approach to Legal Analysis: A Comparative Institutional Alternative’ (1981) 79 Michigan Law Review, 1350 ff.; Komesar, ‘A Job for the Judges: The Judiciary and the Constitution in a Massive and Complex Society’ (1988) 86 Michigan Law Review, 657 ff.
  97. 97Shepsle/Weingast, ‘Political Solutions to Market Problems’ (1984) 78 American Political Science Review, 417 ff.; Calabresi, The Costs ofA ccidents (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1970).
  98. 98Komesar (1994), 7.
  99. 99Komesar (1994), 8.
  100. 100Olson, The Logic of Collective Action. Public Goods and the Theory of the Group (New York: Schocken Books, 1965), 47.
  101. 101Olson (1965).
  102. 102Olson (1965), 48.
  103. 103Of course, even in small numbers situations transaction costs can be high due to information uncertainty, strategic behaviour or other factors.
  104. 104“Quite commonly, albeit not always, institutions move together. When one institution is at its best or worst, the alternative institutions are often at their best or worst.” Komesar (1994), 23.
  105. 105Stigler, ‘The Theory of Economic Regulation’ (1971) 2 Bell J. Econ. & Mgmt Sci, 3 ff.; Buchanan/Tollison/Tullock, (eds.), Towards the Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society (College Station, TX: A&M University Press, 1980). Buchanan/Tullock (1967).
  106. 106In contrast to influence, ‘bias’ is described as a normative or prescriptive issue. “From the standpoint of resource allocation efficiency, minoritarian bias occurs when a concentrated high per capita minority prevails over the dormant low per capita majority even though the total social costs imposed on the losing majority are greater than the total social benefits gained by the successful minority.” Komesar (1994), 76.
  107. 107As demonstrated by Olson (1965).
  108. 108On the theory of agency and the principal-agent problem, see Eggertsson (1990), 40 ff. with further references.
  109. 109See Buchanan/Tullock (1967); Rubin, ‘On the Form of Special Interest Legislation’ (1975) 21 Public Choice,
  110. 110ff.
  111. 111Komesar observes some recognition for the interplay between majoritarian and minoritarian forces in Downs: “Proposition 6: Democratic governments tend to redistribute income from the rich to the poor ... Proposition 7: Democratic governments tend to favour producers more than consumers in their actions.” Downs (1957), 297.
  112. 112For a similar argument, see Stigler, ‘Free Riders and Collective Action: An Appendix to the Theories of Economic Regulation’ (1974) 5 Bell J. Econ. &Mgmt Sci., 359 ff.: “The small number solution has a wider scope than a literal count of numbers would suggest, the size distribution (sales of firm, property of family). The large individuals in a group may therefore properly view themselves as members of a small number industry if their aggregate share of the group resources is large.” 5Komesar (1994), 126.
  113. 113Another constellation of interests and stake distribution envisaged by Komesar is the so called skewed ‘shifted’ distribution. It occurs where dispersed interests ex ante (for instance consumer interests in product liability cases) transform into concentrated high stake interests ex post (e.g. severe individual injury). Also in this situation the judicial process may prove a more attractive decision-making forum than the market or the political process.
  114. 114North (1993), 36.
  115. 115North, (1990), 6.
  116. 116Alchian, ‘Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory’ (1950) 58 JPE, 211 ff.
  117. 117Williamson in his early work does not distinguish between institution and organisation. In the school of sociological institutionalism a joint treatment of institutions and organizations is represented by March and Olsen. They include in the definition of institutions not only “social norms and culturally stabilized systems of meaning but also social entities that are capable of purposive action.” March/Olsen, Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics (New Yok: Free Press, 1989). On the definition of institution and the distinction with organisation and corporate actors see Scharpf, Games Real Actors Play. Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research (Westview Press, 1997), 38.
  118. 118North (1993), 36.
  119. 119North, ‘Economic Performance Through Time’ (1994) 84 The American Economic Review, 359 ff., at 361.
  120. 120Alchian (1950).
  121. 121A Pareto-superior (or Pareto-efficient) transaction is defined in economics as a transaction that makes at least one person better off without making anyone worse off. See Posner (1992), 13.
  122. 122North (1994), 361.
  123. 123North (1990), 3.
  124. 124North (1990), 95.
  125. 125North (1990), 137.
  126. 126Knill (2001), 25 ff.
  127. 127North (1990), 90.
  128. 128North (1990), 81.
  129. 129See Hayek, The Constitution ofL iberty (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960).
  130. 130North (1990), 80.
  131. 131For criticism of ‘nirvana’ type analysis see Demsetz (1969), 1 ff.
  132. 132See Buzbee’s emphasis of historical context and the time element as underdeveloped facets of Komesar’s institutional choice analysis in Buzbee, ‘Sprawl’s Dynamics: A Comparative Institutional Analysis Critique’ (2000) 35 Wake Forest Law Review, 509 ff., at 516.
  133. 133THE INSTITUTIONAL APPROACH IN THIS STUDY
  134. 134See Rose-Ackermann (1988), 348; Komesar (1994), 14 ff.
  135. 135North (1993), 36.
  136. 136See North (1993), 36.
  137. 137This concept is to be distinguished from ‘external legal culture’. The concepts have been coined by Lawrence Friedman. See the discussion between Cotterell and Friedman in Nelken, Comparing Legal Cultures (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1996).
  138. 138Watson, ‘Legal Transplants and Law Reform’ (1976) Law Quarterly Review, 79 ff.; Watson, Legal Transplants. An Approach to Comparative Law (Edinburgh: 1974).
  139. 139Mnookin/Komhauser, ‘Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce’ (1978-79) 88 Yale Law Journal, 950 ff.
  140. 140See the discussion in Teubner, Dilemmas ofL aw in the Welfare State (Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1986); Teubner, Juridification of Social Spheres (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1987); Teubner, Law as an Autopoietic System (Oxford: Blackwell, 1993); for an early analysis see Teubner, Standards und Direktiven in Generalklausulen (Frankfurt: Athenäum, 1971).
  141. 141North (1990), 4. North’s example of created institution is the Constitution of the United States and of evolving institutions - the common law.
  142. 142On this connection, see in particular Watson (1974); Watson (1976); Wieacker (1995).
  143. 143On the three-level scheme proposed by Williamson for capturing the research agenda of institutional economics see Williamson (1996), 325 ff.
  144. 144It may be objected here that also comparative institutional analysis advances a rather ambitious ‘macro’ framework for analysis. While the approach is indeed ambitious in that it looks at the market, the courts and the political process as separate institutional systems and compares their performance, it simultaneously provides tools for analysis on a ‘micro’ level, for instance a single case (Booman), single doctrine (strict liability, the takings clause in the American Constitution), etc. See Komesar (1994).
  145. 145In a similar sense concerning the concept of “Interdependenz der Ordnungen” and with emphasis on ordo­ liberal theory and the new institutional economics, see Drexl, Die wirtschaftliche Selbstbestimmung des Verbrauchers (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1998), 203.
  146. 146See Cappelletti/Garth, Access to Justice, Vol. I, II, III (Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff and Noordhoff, 1978/79); Lindblom, Progressiv process. Spridda uppsatser om domstolsprocessen och samhällsutvecklingen (Uppsala: Iustus, 2000).
  147. 147Wilson (ed.), The Politics ofR egulation (New York: Basic Books, 1980).
  148. 148Komesar (1994), 87.
  149. 149Komesar (1994), 84.
  150. 150As Komesar notes, “majorities faced with complex issues and limited incentives to independently investigate may be manipulated or misled into supporting positions that are detrimental to them.” Komesar (1994), 83.
  151. 151See below Ch. 2.3.1 on the connection with the comparative institutional approach in this respect.
  152. 152“Institutions are not necessarily or even usually created to be socially efficient; rather they, or at least the formal rules, are created to serve the interests of those with the bargaining power to create new rules. In a world of zero transaction costs, bargaining strength does not affect the efficiency of outcomes; but in a world of positive transaction costs it does.” North (1994), 359 ff., at 360 f.
  153. 153Naturally there are other possible theoretical tools for approaching interests. A classical interest-oriented approach is the game-theoretic one. See Scharpf (1997).
  154. 154Komesar (1994), 114.
  155. 155Certainly, proponents of comparative institutional analysis may argue that by rigorous analysis of interests (costs and stakes) in a particular situation, historically created institutional dependencies should be taken into account and calculated as high stakes, low costs, or vice versa.
  156. 156Williamson (1985).
  157. 157See Demsetz (1969), 1.
  158. 158For an application of historical institutionalism in the analysis of European influences over national public administrations, see Knill (2001).
  159. 159See Weatherill, ‘Addressing Problems of Imbalanced Implementation in EC Law: Remedies in an Institutional Perspective’ in: Kilpatrick/Novik/Skidmore, The Future of Remedies in Europe (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2000), 87 ff.
  160. 160See Slaughter/Sweet/Weiler, The European Courts and National Courts. Doctrine and Jurisprudence (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1998); Ladeur (ed.), Europeanisation ofA dministrative Law. Transforming National Decision­ Making Procedures (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002).
  161. 161Buxbaum, ‘Die Rechtsvergleichung zwischen nationalem Staat und internationaler Wirtschaft’ (1996) RabelsZ, 201 ff., at 201.
  162. 162See Strömholm, ‘Har den komparativa rätten en metod?’ (1972) SvJT, 456 ff. See also Bogdan, Comparative Law (Deventer: Kluwer, 1994). On the method of comparative law, see the detailed account of Constantinesco, Rechtsvergleichung, Band II, Die Rechtsvergleichende Methode (Köln: Carl Heymanns Verlag, 1972).
  163. 163A compilation of national reports on a specific subject cannot be called a truly comparative work, although it can provide the background for such analysis. See Zweigert/Kötz (1998), 6.
  164. 164Strömholm (1972), 464.
  165. 165”Icke desto mindre förefaller det jämförande studiet av de rättsliga fenomenen, insatta i deras historiska, idéhistoriska, sociologiska, ekonomiska och allmänt samhälleliga kontext att ha så mycket att bjuda när det gäller att öka kunskap om dessa fenomen, att det vore orimlighet att avvisa detta studium som en värdefull självständig komponent i rättsvetenskapen.” Strömholm (1972), 464.
  166. 166For a critical analysis see Van Hoecke/Warrington ‘Legal Culture, Legal Paradigm and Legal Doctrine: Toward a New Model for Comparative Law’ (1998) 47 ICLQ, 495 ff.
  167. 167Zweigert/Kötz (1998), 11.
  168. 168Zweigert/Kötz (1998), 11 ff. For a critical view, see Gunnerstad/Ingvarsson, ‘Den komparativa rätten -värd en omväg?’ (1996) SvJT, 152 ff.
  169. 169Bogdan (1994), 18.
  170. 170See the reflections on the ‘what’ and ‘why’ questions of comparative law by Fahlbeck, R‘Pleasures and Torments of Comparative Legal Research’ in: Festskrift till G. Kamell (Stockholm: Carlsson Law Network, 1999), 161 ff.
  171. 171Zweigert/Kötz (1998), 45 ff.
  172. 172See Reitz, ‘How to do Comparative Law’ (1998) AJCL, 617 ff. See also Mattei, Comparative Law and Economics (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1997).
  173. 173Rabel, ‘Aufgabe und Notwendigkeit der Rechtsvergleichung’ (1925), reprinted in: Rabel, Gesammelte Aufsätze III (ed. Leser 1967), 1 ff., at 3 ff. Quotation after Zweigert/Kötz (1998), 36. According to Bogdan the comparatist needs to take into account the economic system, the political system and ideology, religion, history and geography, the demographic factor, co-influence of other means of control, accidental and unknown factors, when explaining the similarities and differencies between legal systems. Bogdan (1994), 68 ff.
  174. 174Mattei argues that comparative law provides economic analysis with a “reservoir of institutional alternatives, which are not merely theoretical but actually tested by legal history”.See Mattei (1997), 28, with reference to Komesar’s comparative institutional approach.
  175. 175See for similar criticism Buzbee (2000), 516.
  176. 176For a critical legal approach with affinities to the one proposed here, see Frankenberg, ‘Critical Comparison: Re-thinking Comparative Law’, (1985) 26 Harvard International Law Journal, 411 ff., at 454, quoting Thompson, The Poverty of Theory and Other Essays (London: Merlin P., 1978), 96.
  177. 177See the famous debate between Kahn-Freund and Watson in Kahn-Freund, ‘On Uses and Misuses of Comparative Law’ (1976) 37 MLR and Watson (1974), 79 ff.
  178. 178This is a recurrent theme in Watson’s abundant scholarship. See in particular Watson (1974); Watson, The Evolution of Law (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985), Watson, Law out of Context (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 2000); Watson, Legal Origins and Legal Change (London: Humbeldon, 1991). For a comprehensive critical analysis of Watson’s scholarship, see Ewald, ‘Comparative Jurisprudence (II): The Logic of Legal Transplants’ (1995a) 43 AJCL, 489 ff.
  179. 179See Watson (1974).
  180. 180Kahn-Freund (1974), 5.
  181. 181Bhaskar, Reclaiming Reality: A Critical Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy (London: Verso, 1992); Rorty, Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989).
  182. 182Joerges, ‘Quality Regulation in Consumer Goods Markets: Theoretical Concepts and Practical Examples’ in: Daintith/Teubner (eds.), Contract and Organisation (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1986), 132 ff., at 147.
  183. 183Buxbaum, ‘Federal Aspects of Corporate Law and Economic Theory’ in: Daintith/Teubner (1986), 8.
  184. 184Constantinesco (1972), 150 ff; Bogdan (1994), 45 ff.
  185. 185The most important Swedish quotations have been translated into English. Translation is by the author if no other translator is given. German quotations are given in the original laguage proceeding from a (probably unrealistic) assumption of knowledge of the German language among the interested readers. This choice has admittedly been also prompted by considerations of time and space.
  186. 186Constantinesco (1972), 146 ff.
  187. 187On the presentation of comparative studies in a successive or a simultaneous fashion see Constantinesco (1972), 329 ff.
  188. 188See Constantinesco (1972), 31; Zweigert/Kötz (1998), 34 ff.; Dehousse, ‘Comparing National and EC Law: The Problem of the Level of Analysis’ (1994) AJCL, 761, 768 ff
  189. 189Zweigert/Kötz (1998), 34 ff.
  190. 190Bogdan (1994), 80.
  191. 191Bogdan (1994), 60.
  192. 192In a similar sense see Dehousse (1994), 768.
  193. 193Bogdan (1994), 80.
  194. 194Komesar (1994), 115.
  195. 195For a recognition of the important “law functions” excercised by private means in early markets, see Komesar (1994), 113; Coase (1988), 7 ff., as well as North (1990), 5.
  196. 196Komesar (1994).
  197. 197See for an economic analysis of trademarks Landes/Posner, ‘Trademark Law: An Economic Perspective’ (1987) 30 JLE, 265 ff. For an analysis of unfair competition law from the perspective of strengthening the protection of intellectual and industrial creativity and of quasi-property rights in different badges of trade, see Kamperman Sanders, Unfair Competition. The Protection of Intellectual and Industrial Creativity (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).
  198. 198It is another matter that broader public interests also could be relevant and there may be a problem of establishing and representing these interests in the decision-making process. See Henning-Bodewig/Kur, Marke und Verbraucher, Band I (Weinheim: VCH, 1988).
  199. 199Another categorization that may be helpful for defining the focus of this study is the distinction between facilitative and regulative rules. Whereas the rules of the first category described above, i.e. misappropriation, passing off and trade secrets serve mainly to facilitate market transactions, the rules of the second category seek to solve problems of public interest. They can consequently be better described as regulative. This is not folly accepted among lawyers. As we shall see, especially in German law all rules regarding unfair competition law are traditionally treated as private law rules, and hence as facilitative. For the distinction between facilitative and regulative rules, see Ogus, Regulation. Legal Form and Economic Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994), 2.
  200. 200Stigler (1961), 213 ff.
  201. 201This classification was first introduced by Nelson, who distinguished only between search and credence qualities, see Nelson, ‘Information and consumer behaviour’ (1970) 78 JPE, 311.
  202. 202Darby/Kami, ‘Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud’ (1973) JLE, 67 ff., at 69: “We distinguish then three types of qualities associated with a particular purchase: search qualities which are known before purchase, experience qualities which are known costlessly only after purchase, and credence qualities, which are expensive to judge even after purchase.” As an example of credence qualities of a purchase, the authors then discuss the provision of repair services.
  203. 203See Ippolito, ‘Consumer Protection Economics, A Selective Survey’ in: Ippolito/Scheffinan (eds.), Empirical Approaches to Consumer Protection Economics (Washington DC: FTC, 1986), 1 ff., at 5.
  204. 204Stigler (1961), 213 ff.; Ippolito (1986), 1ff
  205. 205See Posner (1992), 6.
  206. 206Ehrlich/Fisher, ‘The Derived Demand for Advertising. Theoretical and Empirical Investigation’ (1982) The American Economic Review, 366. See also Van den Bergh/Lehmann, ‘Informationsökonomie und Verbraucherschutz im Wettbewerbs- und Warenzeichenrecht’ (1992) GRUR Int., 588 ff., at 589 f.
  207. 207Nelson (1970), 318 ff. By using the two variables: search/experience and durables/non-durables Nelson demonstrates that: monopoly is greater with experience and with durables than with search non-durable goods; the same goes for third-party information. Clustering of stores is higher for search than for experience goods (since the quality of experience goods cannot be inspected in the shop). National brand advertising is less attractive for search than for experience goods.
  208. 208See Arrow (1984), 136 ff., at 142 ff.
  209. 209Arrow (1984), 142; Schäfer/Ott, Ökonomische Analyse des Zivilrechtes (Berlin: Springer, 1986), 77.
  210. 210See Stigler (1961), 51.
  211. 211Arrow (1984), 142; MacKaay (1982), 114 f.
  212. 212On the positive side, the better-informed consumers arguably contribute to raising the transparency of the whole market. Shapiro, ‘Consumer Policy in the United States’ (1983) Zeitschriftf iir die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 527 ff., at 530; Beales/Craswell/Salop, ‘The Efficient Regulation of Consumer Information’ (1981) JLE, 491 ff., at 503 f.
  213. 213In an analysis of mistake and disclosure in contract law Kronman distinguishes beween deliberately acquired information and casually acquired information. In this light Kronman discusses cases under common law when a duty to disclose has been imposed on a seller concerning the properties of his goods. Arguably such solutions are efficient since they do not undermine the seller’s incentive for future investment in acquiring information. Kronman, ‘Mistake, Disclosure, Information and the Law of Contract’ (1978) 7 JLS, 1 ff, 13, 26.
  214. 214Posner, Regulation of Advertising by the Federal Trade Commission (1973).
  215. 215This is to be seen by some private initiatives for test magazines: they provide only this type of information that would lead to an increased distribution of the magazine. On these issues, see Assmann/Kübler, Verbraucherinformation im Ordnungsgefüge des Privatrechts (Königstein: Athenäum 1981), 29. 160Assmann/Kübler (1981), 29; Shapiro (1983), 530.
  216. 216See Akerlof, ‘The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and Market Mechanism’, in: Akerlof, An Economic Theorist's Book of Tales (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984), 7 ff.
  217. 217See Akerlof (1984), 16; Rubin, ‘The Economics of Regulating Deception’ (1991) CATO Journal, 667 ff., at 667.
  218. 218Assmann, Prospekthaftung (Köln: 1985), 289.
  219. 219Stigler (1961), 218.
  220. 220See Nelson (1970), 311; Beales/Craswell/Salop (1981), 507.
  221. 221Stigler (1961), 218. Some authors distinguish between signals, bonds and reputation; see Ippolito (1986), 7 ff. Of course, overinvestment in signals can, in tum, give rise to imperfections on the product market since it aims at redistribution of consumers between different brands, which is not always socially efficient. See Beales/Craswell/Salop (1981), 507.
  222. 222Akerlof (1984), 20 f. under the concept “counteracting institutions”.
  223. 223Stigler (1961), 218
  224. 224Shapiro (1983), 530.
  225. 225Arrow (1984); Schäfer/Ott (1986), 311 f.
  226. 226Signals can be used as indicators of quality but also as an instrument of selection, for instance in the job or insurance market.
  227. 227See Jordan/Rubin, ‘An Economic Analysis of the Law of False Advertising’ (1979) 8 JLS, 527 ff., at 530.
  228. 228This is, however, a truth with many modifications, some of them related to the characteristics of the product. See the section below.
  229. 229Posner (1973), 8 f. On oligopolistic markets see Pitofsky, ‘Beyond Nader: Consumer Protection and the Regulation of Advertising Regulation’ (1977) 90 Harvard Law Review, 661 ff., at 665. For a sophisticated argument that monopolistic markets may stimulate customer activism (‘voice’) instead of switching to competitive products (‘exit’), see Hirschmann, Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Responses to the Decline in Firms, Organizations and States (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970).
  230. 230A third factor is the size of the market in terms of both dollars and number of sellers. According to Stigler, as the market grows there will appear a set of firms which specialise in collecting and selling information, taking the form of trade journals or specialized brokers. See Stigler (1961), 215.
  231. 231See Stigler (1961), 220.
  232. 232See Clark, Competition as a Dynamic Process (Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1961), 93.
  233. 233“Any comparison of the heterogeneity of quality in the street market and the canned qualities of the American supermarket suggests that quality variation is a greater problem in the East than in the West.” See Akerlof(1984), 7 ff.
  234. 234Nelson, ‘Advertising as Information’ (1974) 81 JPE, 729 ff., at 730; see also Jordan/Rubin (1979), 530
  235. 235See Schäfer/Ott (1986), 306 f.
  236. 236Komesar (1994), 117.
  237. 237See “Rent-seeking in the market and in political processes”, Komesar (1994), 115. Rent-seeking is a concept coined on the basis of Buchanan and Tullock’s economic theory of the political process, describing politicians as
  238. 238Komesar (1994), 117.
  239. 239See Nelson (1974), 130.
  240. 240Schäfer/Ott (1986), 301. In the same line of argument, the legal system could arguably enhance market transparency by promoting institutions that signal quality. Protection of trademarks as well as creating additional quasi-property rights in different badges of trade are devices that have the aggregate effect of enabling reliable communication of goodwill and quality from producers to consumers. See Van den Bergh/Lehmann (1992); Landes/Posner (1987), Drexl (1998), 593 ff.
  241. 241See Kamperman-Sanders (1997).
  242. 242See Reich, Internal Market and Diffuse Interests (Bruxelles: Story-Scientia 1990), 15 f.
  243. 243Komesar admits the need for multiple interest analysis. He insists, however, that such analysis should also consider the same factors determining political participation, namely: absolute per capita stakes, uniformity of distibution, size of group and complexity of the issue, the cost of information. He adds: “As such, one can imagine a whole range of interest groups concerned about any particular governmental decision. These groups may vary in size, heterogeneity, per capita impact, endowed knowledge, or any of the other factos that have been suggested in this chapter. Their political influence could be ranked according to the factors suggested in the two- force model.” See Komesar (1994), 89.
  244. 244Komesar speaks of a stock of “simple symbols” which provides some social issues with easy recognition. Komesar (1994), 73.
  245. 245See Reich (1990), 15 f.
  246. 246“Each culture has certain subjects such as religion or ethnicity that are part of the common experience of the members of that culture...Because the press and the media provide cheap and accessible information, press and media response is a central element in determining the degree of majoritarian influence.” Komesar (1994), 73.
  247. 247“The more complex and extensive the political process, the more difficult it is to understand its rules and discover its channels of influence - both formal and informal. These various costs of information and the associated costs of organizing political action often have a threshold or fixed quality.” Komesar (1994), 72.
  248. 248Scharpf (1997).
  249. 249See Wilson (1980), 357 ff.
  250. 250Wilson provides an example of less felicitous entrepreneurial politics, namely the power of mobilization through the skillful machinations of Joseph McCarthy, launching the ‘McCharthyist’ era in American history. Wilson (1980), 370.
  251. 251Knill uses the terms ‘sectoral protectionism’ and ‘interventionism’ to describe the German regulative tradtion. See Knill (2001), 219.
  252. 252See Ogus (1994), 51.
  253. 253Calabresi/Melamed, ‘Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral’ (1972)
  254. 254Harvard Law Review, 1089 ff., at 1113.
  255. 255Calabresi/Melamed (1972), 1111.
  256. 256Calabresi/Melamed (1972), 1113.
  257. 257In the political science literature this type of decisions are called self-binding, or pre-commitment. The analogy is with Ulysses’ decision to tie himself to the mast of his ship in order to resist the ‘fatal attraction’ of the sirens. In Elster’s reading Ulysses is “the model of rational compensation for irrationality”, see Elster, Ulysses and the Sirens (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1984), 36 ff. Offe, Modernity and the State: East, West (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996), 38.
  258. 258Calabresi/Melamed (1972), 1113. On differing views on paternalist interventions from liberal and antiindidvidualist perspectives, see Ogus (1994), 52 f.
  259. 259Calabresi/Melamed (1972), 1115.
  260. 260“Es hat den Anschein, als sei mit dem Begriff der Guten Sitten zu allen Zeiten und in allen Ländern der Wissenschaft und der Rechtsprechung ein Rätsel aufgegeben worden.“ Teubner continues this quote from Deutsch (JZ, 1963, 385 ff., 389), as follows: „Diese begriffliche Unklarheit hat weitreichende Konsequenzen. Sie wirkt sich in der verfassungsrechtlichen Deutung aus und in den Methoden der Generalklauselpräzisierung.“ Teubner (1971), 9.
  261. 261Komesar (1994), 134 ff.
  262. 262It should be recalled that fair trading as defined here does not cover the sphere of contractual relations. Deception leading to contract would typically be examined under the rules of contract law and is therefore not subject to the present analysis.
  263. 263Komesar (1994), 123.
  264. 264See on such tendencies under German unfair competition law, Jordan/Rubin (1979), 549.
  265. 265Schäfer, ‘Die ökonomischen Grundlagen der Bündelung gleichgerichteter Interessen im Prozess’ in: Basedow/Hopt/Kötz/Baetge, Die Bündelung gleichgerichteter Interessen im Prozess (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1999), 67 ff.
  266. 266See Olson (1965), 34.
  267. 267Komesar (1994), 119.
  268. 268Schäfer (1999), 67 ff., at 86.
  269. 269Bebchuk, ‘Suing Only to Extract Settlement Offers’ (1988) 17 JLS, 437 ff.; Rosenberg/Shavell, ‘A Model in Which Suits are Brought in for their Nuisance Value’ (1985) 5 International Review ofL aw and Economics, 3 ff.
  270. 270Komesar (1994), 136.
  271. 271See Reich (1984). Pertschuk, Revolt Against Regulation. The Rise and Pause of the Consumer Movement (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1982). For the experience in the UK, see Cranston, Regulating Business. Law and Consumer Agencies (London: Macmillan Press, 1979).
  272. 272Posner (1992), 530 ff.
  273. 273See Trubek, ‘Environmental Defense’ in: Weisbrod/Handler/Komesar, Public Interest Law: an Economic Analysis of Institutional Innovation ( Berkley, Univ, of California Press, 1978); Trubek, ‘Public Advocacy: Administrative Government and the Representation of Diffuse Interests’, in: Cappelletti, M. / Garth, B., Access to Justice, Vol. III (Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff and Noordhoff, 1979), 447 ff., at 457.
  274. 274See Bernstein, Regulating Business by Independent Commission (Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1955).
  275. 275It should not be forgotten that the intervention of the legislator in some countries is very limited and the evolution of fair trading standards has prevailingly been left to self-regulatory bodies. On developments in the UK, see Circus, Towards a General Rule to Trade Fairly? (Essex: 1988); Miracle/Navett, Voluntary Regulation of Advertising. A Comparative Analysis of the UK and US (Toronto: Lexington, 1987).
  276. 276This is rightly observed by Schäfer when analysing punitive damages and similar constructions: “Mit derartigen Konstruktionen entfernt man sich allerdings vom klassischen Zivilrecht und gelangt zu hybriden Lösungen, die nur noch schwer von verwaltungsrechtlichen zu unterscheiden sind. Schäfer (1999), 91.
  277. 277See Micklitz et al. (2000).
  278. 278Legrand (1996), 52 ff.
  279. 279It may be objected that Sweden joined the European Union at a later stage. Yet, as a member of EFTA it had to keep a close eye on European developments and was bound by many of the principles of European law. See Ch. 7.1.
  280. 280For a detailed analysis of the influence of German legal thought on Swedish doctrine during the second half of the nineteenth century and until the 1920s, see Sundell, Tysk påverkan på svensk civilråttsoktrin 1870-1914 (Stockholm: Nordiska bokhandeln, 1987).
  281. 281It suffices to mention some of the numerous UWG commentaries: Baumbach/Hefermehl, UWG Kommentar, 20th ed. (München: Beck, 1998); Köhler/Piper, UWG Kommentar, 3rd ed. (München: Beck, 2002); Emmerich, Das Recht des unlauteren Wettbewerbs, 3rd ed. (München: Beck, 1990); Jakobs/Lindacher/Teplitzky, Handbuch des Wettbewerbs (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1994). For an early and still authoritative comparative analysis from a Swedish perspective, see Bernitz (1969), 438 ff.
  282. 282See, however, the commentaries by Bernitz, Svensk marknadsrätt, 3rd ed. (Stockholm: Juristförlaget, 1991); Bernitz, Marknadsföringslagen (Stockholm: Juristförlaget, 1997); Bernitz, Otillbörlig konkurrens mellan näringsidkare (Stockholm: Norstedts, 1993); Svensson/Stenlund/Brink/Ström, Praktisk marknadsrätt, 7th ed. (Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik, 1996).
  283. 283THE ROOTS OF FAIR TRADING INSTITUTIONS IN Germany And Sweden
  284. 284See references in Kohler, Der unlautere Wettbewerb (Berlin & Leipzig: Dr. Walter Rotschild Verlag, 1914), 33 ff. For Sweden references to the „skrå-, hall- och handelsordningar“ of the 17th century can be found in Bernitz/Modig/Mallmén, Otillbörlig marknadsföring (Stockholm: Jurist- och samhällsvetareförbundet, 1970), 37.
  285. 285Recent accounts in economic history suggest that the demise of guild control has not been as radical as it sometimes appears. See Fukuyama, Trust (Penguin Books, 1995). 9RG 3, 68. The decision of the Court was severely criticized in legal doctrine. Even nowadays in the influential Baumbach/Hefermehl commentary, the decision is qualified as a misconception. The reasoning in the decision according to the same authors is based on an “ungeheurlichen Gegenschluß” (horrendous a contrario conclusion) that everything outside the Trade Mark Protection Act should be regarded as allowed. See Baumbach/Hefermehl (1998), Einl. UWG, Rdnr. 16, 188.
  286. 286Brüggemeier, ‘Probleme einer Theorie des Wirtschaftsrechts’ in: Assmann/ Brüggemeier/Hart/Joerges, Wirtschafisrecht als Kritik des Privatrechts (Athenäum, 1980), 9 ff., at 44 ff.
  287. 287See Ulmer, ‘Wandlungen und Aufgaben im Wettbewerbsrecht’ (1937) GRUR, 769 ff., at 770. Efforts in this direction were particularly made by the two fathers of German unfair competition law, namely Kohler, Das Recht des Markenschutzes (Würzburg: 1884), and Lobe, Die Bekämpfung des unlauteren Wettbewerbs, Vol. I-III (Leipzig: Dieterische Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1907), 8 ff.
  288. 288See Brüggemeier (1980), 44.
  289. 289Gesetz gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb vom 7.6.1909, RGBl 499.
  290. 290See Kleineman, Renformögenhetsskada (Stockholm: Juristförlaget, 1987), 206 ff. with references to early case law.
  291. 291Winroth, Om skadestånd. Strödda uppsatser IV, 2nd ed. (Uppsala: 1907), 138.
  292. 292Prop. 1931:175, 6.
  293. 293See SOU 1966:71, 46.
  294. 294See lagen den 19 juni 1919 med vissa bestämmelser mot illojal konkurrens.
  295. 295Prop. 1931:175.
  296. 296Fukuyama (1995), 246.
  297. 297Brüggemeier (1980), 47.
  298. 298For a historical account and statistical data see Brüggemeier (1980), 47.
  299. 299Ibid., 49. In comparative terms Kitschelt/Lange/ Marks/Stephens speak of a “business-coordinated market economies” (CME) and “liberal market economies” (LME). See Kitschelt/Lange/Marks/Stephens (eds.), Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999). The emphasis here is obviously on business-labour relations. Within this taxonomy Germany and Sweden may fall under the same category of CME. Our analysis, however, reveals other aspects that rather produce divergence. In Germany the state much more openly allows protectionist corporate practices and even actively intervenes in a protectionist manner. In Sweden open protectionism is less tolerated and free market attitudes are stronger.
  300. 300See Ulmer, Sinnzusammenhänge im Recht des unlauteren Wettbewerbs (Berlin: Verlag von Julius Springer, 1932), 17 ff., Ulmer summarizes the developments like this: “Der Staat in seiner immer stärker werdenden Tendenz zur Beeinflussung privater Wirtschaft arbeitet zum Teil auf Mehrung der gebundenen, zum Teil umgekehrt auf Wiederherstellung der freien Konkurrenz“. Ibid., 9.
  301. 301RGZ 28,238 ff., at 244.
  302. 302See the case RGZ 28, 238 („Börsenverein der deutschen Buchhändler“).
  303. 303This position was elaborated in the Reichsgeicht’s decision in the Sächsischer Holzstoff case, RGZ 38, 155 referred by Fikentscher, Wettbewerb und gewerblicher Rechtschutz (München: Beck, 1958), 167; cf. Bernitz (1969), 320.
  304. 304See RGZ 28,237 ff, at 247 f.
  305. 305Wieacker (1995), 433.
  306. 306Fikentscher (1958), 172.
  307. 307Ibid., 179 ff.
  308. 308Waelde/Gunderson, ‘Legislative Reform in Transition Economies: Western Transplants - A Shortcut to Social Market Economy Status?’ (1994) 43 ICLQ, 347 ff., at 369.
  309. 309Strömholm, ‘General Features of Swedish Law’ in: Bogdan (ed.), Swedish Law in the New Millennium (Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik, 2000), 31 ff., at 32.
  310. 310The first regulation which made decisive steps towards laissez-faire economy was SFS 1846:39.
  311. 311Bernitz (1969), 31 ff. “Konkurrensfrihet, konsumtionsfrihet och en vittgående avtalsfrihet torde ha uppfattats som tämligen självklara, ehuru okodifierade utgångspunkter för förmögenhetsrätten, vilka inte fordrade någon närmare normering i sig.”, 32.
  312. 312Nilsson, Sverige i förnyelsens Europa (Malmö: Liber-Hermod, 1995), 58.
  313. 313Inger, Svensk rättshistoria, 4th ed.(Malmö: Liber Ekonomi, 1997), 219.
  314. 314Nilsson (1995), 58.
  315. 315For a detailed overview and analysis of the early developments of competition law in Sweden, see Bernitz (1969), 410 ff.
  316. 316The history of the trade unions in Sweden culminated in the establishment of the Swedish Trade Union Confederation (LO), an organization uniting the large part of trade unions in Sweden in 1888.
  317. 317Bernitz (1969), 411 f.
  318. 318Bernitz (1969), 414 ff.
  319. 319Westberg, Den demokratiska drömträdgården (Stockholm: Statsvetenskapliga institutionen, 2003).
  320. 320Bernitz (1969), 413.
  321. 321With the Peace of Prague of 1866 the dissolution of the German Alliance (Deutscher Bund) between the two main powers Russia and Austria was declared. The same year the North German Union was proclaimed. In November 1870 the North German Union concluded the November Treaties with the states of Hessen, Baden and Bayern.
  322. 322Eisenhardt, Deutsche Rechtsgeschichte, 3rd ed. (München: Beck, 1999), 392 ff.
  323. 323In contrast to the early Constitution of the German Alliance, the Constitution of 1871 did not contain a catalogue of citizens’ rights.
  324. 324See for a detailed account Ewald, ‘Comparative Jurisprudence: What Is It To Try a Rat’ (1995b) 143 University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1889 ff, at 2046 ff. According to Ewald, whereas the main idea could be traced back to thinkers like Machiavelli, Locke, Montesquieu and Rousseau, the concept itself was a very German creation with no counterpart in any other language. Kant himself never used the very term Rechtsstaat, which was, arguably, coined by Robert von Mohl; Ewald (1995), 2047.
  325. 325As Ewald notes, later on the last principle of independence was substituted by liberal adherents to the Rechtstaat idea with a principle of protection of private property. This, however, was not the original Kantian definition. Ewald (1995), 2046.
  326. 326Ewald (1995), 2053.
  327. 327Ewald (1995).
  328. 328Eisenhardt (1999), 394.
  329. 329See about this ideal Sundell (1987), 55.
  330. 330Both acts entered into force in 1879.
  331. 331Eisenhardt, (1999), 399 ff.
  332. 332Ibid., 399 ff.
  333. 333See Eisenhardt (1999), 348 ff. and 401 ff.
  334. 334See Knill, (2001), 65.
  335. 335Hereby a contrast is often drawn to early parliamentary developments in Britain, but, as we are going to see, this consideration is valid also in regard to Sweden. See Heady, Public Administration. A Comparative Perspective (New York: Marcel Decker, 1979). Cf. Knill (2001), 66.
  336. 336For a brief review of early Swedish legal and political history see Strömholm (2000), 31 ff.
  337. 337See Strömholm (2000), ibid.
  338. 338“Den svenska staten vilar sedan gammalt på en egenartad växelverkan mellan kungamakt och folkmakt.” Herlitz, Svensk självstyrelse (Stockholm: Gebers, 1933), 24 ff. Herlitz, Grunddragen i det svenska statskickets historia, 6th (Stockholm: Norstedts, 1964), 216 ff. See also Söderlind/Petersson, Svenskförvaltningspolitik (Uppsala: Diskurs, 1986), 34.
  339. 339Söderlind/Petersson (1986), 34.
  340. 340See Strömholm, who makes an analogy with the Parliament standing behind the monarchy in Tudor England; Strömholm (2000), 33.
  341. 341On the unusually high level of press freedom in late 18th Century Stockholm, see Hallberg, The Age ofL iberty (Stockholm: Statsvetenskapliga institutionen, 2003).
  342. 342See Inger (1997).
  343. 343Inger (1997), 187.
  344. 344Immergut, ‘The rules of the game: The logic of health policy-making in France, Switzerland and Sweden’ in: Steinmo/Thelen/Longstreth, Structuring Politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), 57 ff., at 78.
  345. 345Inger (1997), 190 ff.
  346. 346Söderlind/Petersson (1986), 34.
  347. 347Strömholm (2000), 34.
  348. 348On a different note Strömholm suggests that harsh natural conditions, a scattered and rather homogeneous population, may have contributed to broad acceptance of collective fiat for dealing with many of life’s hardships. See Strömholm (2000), 37 f.
  349. 349Ibid., 79.
  350. 350Immergut (1992), 79 ff. with reference to Nyman, Svensk parlamentarism 1932-196. Från Minoritetsparlamentarism till majoritetskoalition, unpublished dissertation, Skrifter utgivna av Statsvetenskplig Föreningen i Uppsala genom Axel Brusewitz, No. 27 (Uppsala: Almqvist & Wicksell, 1947).
  351. 351See Inger (1997), 184.
  352. 352According to Louis Favoreu, the judiciary is not recognized as the third branch of power in most European countries, and this is certainly so, especially when viewed in comparison with the activist political role played by the judiciary in the United States. However, within the group of European legal systems, the modest position of the judiciary in Sweden is conspicuous. See Favoreu, ‘Constitutional Review in Europe’ in: Henkin/Rosenthal (eds.) Constitutionalism and Rights (New York: Columbia University Press, 1990), 38 ff., at 53.
  353. 353Strömholm (2000), 38.
  354. 354Due to the principle of free access to public information preparatory legislative materials were published in a systematic form from a very early date in Sweden. Arguably, this fact accounts for the very strong position of preparatory works in Sweden as a source of interpretation of law. For a detailed account of the history of TF, see Persson, Exklusivitetsfrågan (Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik, 2002). A discussion on the effect of this law on the development of unfair competition law can be found at 75 ff.
  355. 355The reason for the reception and for its subsequent diffusion and triumph in Germany is usually found in the absence of a centralised system of courts and of a unified legal profession in the fragmented German territories throughout the Middle Ages. See Wieacker (1995), de Cruz, Comparative Law in a Changing World (London: Cavendish Publishing, 1999).
  356. 356According to the operative Ordinance of the Reichskammergericht of 1495, judges were to decide cases coming before them “according to the common law of the Empire”, meaning Roman law. Statutes and customs were placed on equal footing. See de Cruz (1999), 80.
  357. 357It is well known that one of the most celebrated texts in German legal scholarship, Savigny’s ‘Vom Beruf unserer Zeit für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft’, came as a powerful negative response to early proposals for codification advanced by Thibault. See Savigny, ‘Vom Beruf unserer Zeit für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft’ (Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1967 [1840]).
  358. 358On the position of the learned bench and of Faculties in Germany before the unification, see Wieacker (1995),
  359. 359ff.
  360. 360Zweigert/Kötz (1998), 258.
  361. 361See Köhler, ‘Einführung’ in: BGB, 51st ed. (München: Beck’s Texte im dtv, 2002), IX.
  362. 362See Wieacker (1995), 371 ff.
  363. 363Ewald (1995b): A very pertinent expression of these ideas is to be found in the following passage by Windscheid, a prominent professor on the Pandects and one of the fathers of the BGB: “Law is the ordering of the powers of will that exist in the world. The wills that exist in the world, if left to their natural impulses will collide with one another, begin to fight, and try to subjugate each other. Law creates for each will a space within which alien wills bounce off it, and within which it dominates. Law [Recht] is in the first instance not a constraint, but the acknowledgement of human freedom; the constraint is only the other side of the acknowledgement thus guaranteed. Positive law [Rechtsgesetz] only imposes duties in order to protect rights [Rechte]; the moral law [Sittengesetz] imposes only duties. If one likes epigrams one can say: positive law protects rights, the moral law imposes duties.” Windscheid, as quoted in Ewald (1995b), 2072.
  364. 364See Knill (2001), 65, with references to Dyson, The State Tradition in Western Europe. A Study of an Idea and Institution (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1980), 42 and Damaska, The Faces of Justice and State Authority a Comparative Approach to the Legal Process (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986).
  365. 365de Cruz (1999), 91.
  366. 366See Kohler (1914), 17.
  367. 367See Brüggemeier (1980), 9 ff., at 41; Zweigert/Kötz (1998), 143 ff.
  368. 368The Germanist school ofj urisprudence was, similar to Savigny, strongly influenced by Herderian ideas. However, in contrast to Savigny, Germanists refused to seek the Volksgeist in Roman law, but insisted on the importance of studying local legal institutions. See Wieacker (1995), 286 ff.
  369. 369Die Genossenschaftstheorie und die deutsche Rechtsprechung, 1887. In the words of Wolff, this was „ein groß angelegter Versuch in der Zeit der Pandektistik das Fortleben der Formen und Grundsätze deutscher Genossenschaftsbildung im Rechtsleben aufzuzeigen.“ Wolff, Grosse Rechtsdenker der deutschen Geschichte (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1963), 669 ff., at 689.
  370. 370See Wieacker (1995), 358 ff.; Ewald (1995b), 2055 ff. and 2074 ff; Wolff (1963), 669 ff, at 701 ff.
  371. 371The following citation is a classic: „In unserem öffentlichen Recht muss ein Hauch des naturrechtlichen Freiheitsraumes wehen und unser Privatrecht muss ein Tropfen sozialistischen Öles durchsickem.“ Gierke, Die Soziale Aufgabe des Privatrechts (Berlin, 1889), 13, quoted after Wolff (1963), 702. On the general clauses as fulfilling the function of such „drops of socialist oil“, see Zweigert/Kötz (1998), 142..
  372. 372Wolff (1963), 702.
  373. 373Gierke (1889), 12, quoted after Wolff (1963), 701.
  374. 374See Ewald (1995b), 2055 ff.
  375. 375Lagkommitéens förslag till allmän civillag (Sthlm 1826). See reference in Kleineman (1987), 23.
  376. 376Bernitz, European Law in Sweden - Its Implementation and Role in Market and Consumer Law, Juridiska fakulteten, Skriftserien Nr. 70 (Stockholm University: 2002b), 16.
  377. 377The systematisation does not follow the Pandects but rather an original Swedish systematization covering both public and private law. The original Äktenskapsbalk, Föräldrabalk, Ärvdabalk, Jordabalk, Handlesbalk, Byggningsbalk, Brottsbalk and Rättegångsbalk have been complemented with time through more modern codes (balks) such as Miljöbalk, Fastighetsbildningslag. See Vogel, ‘Sources of Swedish Law’ in: Bogdan (ed.), Swedish Law in the New Millennium (Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik, 2000), 48 ff.
  378. 378See the analysis of the method used by Winroth in Kleineman (1987), 91; cf. Sundell (1987), 77 ff. on the late transition from the concept of 'lagfarenhet (experience in law) to that of * rättsvetenskap’ (legal science) in Sweden.
  379. 379On the contemporary debate about the social purposes of civil law, see Wilhelmsson, ‘En social avtalsrätt - Några kommentarer’ (1993-94) JT, 499 ff, and the response by Sandgren, ‘En social avtalsrätt?’ I-II (1992-93) JT, 456 ff., 643 ff.
  380. 380Hart, Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983), Essay 6, ‘Scandinavian Realism’, 161 ff.
  381. 381Ross, as quoted by Hart (1983), 162.
  382. 382Källström, ’Riddaren av det moderna. Om värdenihilism och samhällsbygge’ in: Hallberg/Lernerstedt, Svenska värderingar (Stockholm: Carlssons, 2002), 21 ff., at 25, quoting Myrdal about the appeal of the Uppsala school among advocates of radical social reform: ”Hägerström tilltalade dem som ville ändra på saker och ting”.
  383. 383Quoted after Källström (2002), 22.
  384. 384Källström (2002), 23.
  385. 385The aim of law-givers is “to impress a certain behaviour on people”. Olivecrona, Law as Fact (Copenhagen: E. Munksgaard, 1939), 31.
  386. 386Hart (1983), 162.
  387. 387For a critical analysis see Hedenius, Om rätt och moral (Stockholm: Tidens Förlag, 1941).
  388. 388See Schricker, ‘Unlauterer Wettbewerb und Verbraucherschutz’ (1970a) GRUR Int., 32 ff., 33.
  389. 389See ‘Erste Beratung des Entwurfs eines Gesetzes gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb’ (1909) GRUR, speech by member of parliament Findel, 114.
  390. 390GRUR 1909, 119.
  391. 391GRUR 1909, speech of MP Linz, 119.
  392. 392This quotation has been referred to as justification of subsequent attempts to use the UWG for structural- political goals. According to Ballmann, it confirms that the fathers of the UWG aimed among other things to provide protection for the smaller-sized enterprises against certain practices of their more powerful rivals. Lobe (1907), Band III, 14. Cf. Ballman, Der Machtaspekt im UWG. Die Bedeutung der Macht eines Wettbewerbers för die Anwendung des § 1 UWG (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1990), 146.
  393. 393„.. mit der Vorlage des Entwurfs einem neuen Wettbewerbsgesetze erfüllen die verbündete Regierungen einen aus den Kreisen unseres wirtschaftlichen Mittelstands lebhaft lautgewordenen Wunsch, der auch bei den Vertretern der verschiedensten Parteien des Reichstags Widerhall gefunden und sich in mannigfachen Resolutionen verdichtet hat.“, GRUR 1909, 106.
  394. 394Cf. the statements in the course of parliamentary debates in GRUR 1909, 106 ff: MP Giese, at 109: „Hoffentlich gelingt es dieser Kommission, ein gutes Stück Mittelstandspolitik zu vollziehen und den Mittelstand in seiner schwer bedrohten und bedrängten Existenz, die ihm die unlautere Konkurrenz bereitet, durch das neue Gesetz zu strärken.“; MP Findel, at 116: „Deshalb werden wir gern an einem Gesetze mitarbeiten, welches berufen ist, Treu und Glauben wieder zu Ehren zu bringen und unserem Mittelstand diejenige Schaffensfreude zu ermöglichen, die er zu seinem Gedeihen braucht und die neben seiner vaterländischen Gesinnung noch immer sein schönstes Kennzeichen war.“; MP Linz, at 119: „Auch meine politischen Freunde haben den Gesetzesentwurf als ein erfreuliches Zeichen des zunehmenden Verständnisses für die Not und die Bedürfnisse des Mittelstandes freudig begrüßt...“
  395. 395Denkschrift zum I Regierungsentwurf des UWG vom 27.5.1896: „Auf der anderen Seite würde man unmögliches anstreben, wenn man versuchen wollte, in Handel und Wandel jedem Verstoß gegen die guten Sitten schlechthin durch gesetzliche Bestimmungen vorzubeugen. Nur insoweit, als gewisse Mittel, welche moralisch verwerflich, wenngleich vom Gesetz bisher nicht verboten sind, zu dem Zweck angewendet werde, um unberechtigte Vorteile gegenüber den Konkurrenten zu gewinnen, ist Abhilfe nötig und erreichbar.“, in: Lobe (1907) Band III, 17.
  396. 396See Ballmann (1990).
  397. 397Parliamentary debates, GRUR 1909, 106.
  398. 398See GRUR 1909, speech of MP Giese, 109; MP Findel, 116.
  399. 399See GRUR 1909, 116. Speech of MP Frank: „[d]er unlautere Wettbewerb gedeiht auf dem Grenzgebiet zwischen Betrug und Reklame; und die Bekämpfung liegt nicht bloss im Interesse des redlichen Kaufmanns, sondern meist auch im Interesse des konsumierenden und kaufenden Publikums.“
  400. 400See authoritative comments (amtliche Begründung) to the 1896 UWG in Lobe (1907) Band III, 51; cf. Schricker (1975), 213; Pause (1984), 259 ff.
  401. 401See the evaluation by Bernitz (1969), 145.
  402. 402Brüggemeier (1980), 44.
  403. 403See also Art. 5, which set forth a general delegation of the Bundesrat to issue regulations on weights and measures.
  404. 404One example of this careful drafting technique is § 1 1896 UWG, which exists as § 3 1909 UWG even to this day in a somewhat modified fashion. The fact that the provision yields to broad interpretation, despite the detailed enumeration, is well evidenced by the thousands of cases, which have been decided on its basis throughout the years. In this sense see Beater (2000), 141.
  405. 405These restrictions were removed with amendment of UWG in 1969; see Ch. 5.
  406. 406See GRUR 1909, 106 ff.
  407. 407Speech of MP Bethmann-Hollweg, GRUR 1909, 106.
  408. 408Similar interpretation in Bernitz (1969), 145.
  409. 409The clause revealed close kinship with the general clause on tort law in the new German Civil Code, drafted some years earlier, § 823 BGB.
  410. 410Callmann, Der unlautere Wettbewerb, 2 Aufl. (Mannheim: J. Bensheimer, 1929), 197.
  411. 411See speech of MP Linz, referring expressly to “the power sphere of the judiciary” ( “die gerichtliche Machtsphäre”), GRUR 1909, 121.
  412. 412Speech of MP Linz, GRUR 1909, 121.
  413. 413See speech of MP Linz, GRUR 1909, 121. See also MP Roeren, GRUR 1909, 110.
  414. 414See comments of MP Linz, GRUR 1909, 116. Cf. Ohly, Richterrecht und Generalklausel im Recht des unlauteren Wettbewerbs (Köln: Carl Heymanns, 1997), 202.
  415. 415See speech of MP Dove, GRUR 1909, 124.
  416. 416On the function of general clauses in German law see Teubner (1971). •
  417. 417GRUR 1909, 106 ff., at 107.
  418. 418See § 13: der Gewerbetreibende, der Waren oder Leistungen gleicher oder verwandter Art herstellt oder in den geschäftlichen Verkehr bringt.
  419. 419See speech of MP Findel, GRUR 1909, 116.
  420. 420Pastor, ‘Verbraucherverbände im Sinne des § 13 Abs. 1 a UWG' (1969) GRUR, 573 ff.
  421. 421See speech of MP Findel, who called for explicit listing of the chambers among those having standing to sue, GRUR 1909, 116.
  422. 422See RGZ 79, 326.
  423. 423In German law the disctinction between right of action (a substantive right) and standing to sue is important. For analysis of this dogmatic distinction in relation to recent reforms on association suits see Greger, ‘Verbandsklage und Prozessrechtsdogmatik: Neue Entwicklungen in einer schwierigen Beziehung’ (2000) 113 ZZP, 399 ff.
  424. 424See RGSt. 45, 358, quoted by Callmann (1929), 236.
  425. 425RGZ 128, 339 ff., at 342 ff. See Schricker (1970a), 32 ff., at 34.
  426. 426RGZ 105, 375; RGSt. 45, 361 as quoted by Callmann (1929), 236.
  427. 427See Brüggemeier (1980), 47.
  428. 428See Beater, Zur ‘Zur Deregulierung des Wettbewerbsrechts’ (1995) ZHR, 217 ff. Brüggemeier (1980), 47.
  429. 429See, however, complaints in the speech of Roeren about the tendency of tradesmen under the 1896 UWG to resort to the public prosecutor instead of taking the matter into their own hands, GRUR 1909, 112.
  430. 430See Callmann (1929), 58 ff.
  431. 431Callmann (1929), 435.
  432. 432Of course the injunction finds its limits in the defendant’s right of action for damages caused by an ungrounded preliminary injunction, i.e. by the forced interruption of activities that have been the subject of the injunction. See Callmann (1929), 436.
  433. 433See Callmann (1929), 79.
  434. 434Callmann (1929), 82.
  435. 435See Callmann (1929), 72.
  436. 436Callmann (1929), 84.
  437. 437Brüggemeier (1980), 47.
  438. 438On the history of the Zentrale, see 75 Jahre Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs (Bad Homburg, 1987); Baumbach/Hefermehl (1998), Einl. UWG, Rdnr. 36, 194; Grimes, ‘Control of Advertising in the United States and Germany, Volkswagen Has a Better Idea’ (1971) 84 Harvard Law Review, 1760 ff., at 1784.
  439. 439See the list with respective references to decisions of the Reichsgericht in Callmann (1929), 237.
  440. 440See Callmann (1929), 237.
  441. 441“ohne die Förderung gewerblicher Interessen zu bezwecken, lediglich die Förderung der Interessen von Verbrauchern (Konsumenten) zum Ziel gesetzt hat”, RG St. 45, 360.
  442. 442See the Bill to the 1965 UWG amendment, BT-Drs. IV/2217, 3.
  443. 443Since German experience was always referred as a model, the absence of commercial courts in Sweden was seen as an obstacle to legal borrowing. See Levin, Lag med vissa bestämmelser mot illojal konkurrens. Lagtext och kommentar (Lund: C.W.K. Gleerups Förlag, 1944).
  444. 444See Persson (2002), 76.
  445. 445Förslag till lag mot illojal konkurrens, Patentlagstiftningskommitténs betänkanden, band IV, Stockholm 1915 (hereinafter Betänkande).
  446. 446Committee Report (Betänkande), 98.
  447. 447Betänkande, 55.
  448. 448Betänkande, 17, 99.
  449. 449See the deliberations on the impact of legislation against untruthful advertising on the interests of competitors and customers. Betänkande, 84 f.
  450. 450”Icke mindre vore den illojala konkurrensen av betydelse för hela den köpande allmänheten, i synnerhet om man fåste sig vid den art av konkurrens, som under den ena eller andra formen föregåve sig att erbjuda sällsport gynnsamma tillfallen till inköp... Kommitterade trodde sig därför med skäl kunna påstå, att den illojala konkurrensen hotade att bliva ett farligt samhällsont.” Betänkande, 55.
  451. 451It should be noted that the concept ‘consumer’ (konsument) had not been accepted in the Swedish language at that time. The word habitually used was rather ‘customers’ (kunder) or ‘the public’ (allmänheten).
  452. 452”Och att kunden merendels skulle draga sig för att med risk av ytterligare förlust själv anställa en ofta kostsam rättegång eller angiva brottet till åtal och således bringa offentligheten att han låtit föra sig bakom ljuset, vore lätt förklarligt, i synnerhet som några större värden i allmänhet ej stode på spel och, enligt vad förut påpekats, det i många fall vore ganska svårt att anskaffa nödig bevisning.” Betänkande, 85.
  453. 453Betänkande, 510.
  454. 454Prop. 1931:175, 12. See Tengelin, ‘Illojal reklam och annan illojal marknadsföring’ (1959) NIR, 93 ff., 99; Bernitz/Modig/Malmén (1970), 40.
  455. 455Prop. 1931:175, 39.
  456. 456The Union expressed misgivings as to the introduction of a broad general clause of unfair competition, in line with the 1909 UWG considering such a clause as all too broad. Betänkande, 77.
  457. 457See Ch. 4.1.2 above.
  458. 458Om patentlagstiftningskomitténs betānkanden 5 maj 1915 medförslag till lag mot illojal konkurrens, yttrande af styrelsen för svenska tidningsutgivarförening, 1915 (Yttrande).
  459. 459”Den särställning som vår tryckfrihetsrätt i jämförelse med andra länders intager på olika punkter, komplicerar, såsom redan antytts, i avsevärd mån spörsmålet om införande i vår lagstiftning av stadganden om illojal konkurrens genom tryckt skrift. ...Tryckfrihetslagens ordning i fråga om anonymitätsrätt, ansvarighet, rättegång, juryväsen och åtalsrätt, allt har fått vika för konkurrensskyddets kraft.” Quotation after Persson (2002), 81, referring to Yttrande, 62, 74.
  460. 460The Chambers of Commerce in Stockholm, Gothenburg, Skåne, the Association of Leather Producers, the Stockholm Manufacturers’ Association, etc.
  461. 461Prop. 1931:175, 8.
  462. 462Prop. 1931:175, 57.
  463. 463For comparisons with German law concerning free gifts and rebate coupon systems, see Betänkande, 233; on reducing prices of branded products, see Betänkande, 210. 188” [E]tt sådant system, om än ur teoretisk synpunkt tilltalande, vore alltför svävande och hos oss föga lämpligt med hänsyn till vår domstolsorganisation och processordning”, Betänkande, 75.
  464. 464”Även kommittén är av den uppfattning, att det franska systemet icke bör läggas till grund för en svensk lagstiftning i ämnet. Utan tvivel skulle nämligen därav uppstå ett osäkerhetstillstånd, som vore i hög grad menligt. I själva verket göras med ett sådant system domstolarna på sätt och vis till lagstiftare å ett område, där den verklige lagstiftaren ansett svårigheter möta för uppställande av speciella bestämmelser. Det är ett betydande krav som sålunda ställes på domstolarna.” See Betänkande, 75 f.
  465. 465See prop. 1931:175, 10.
  466. 466The Swedish Association for Protection of Industrial Property also had objections against a broad general clause.
  467. 467”[P]å ett område som detta även med ett sådant system som 1909 års tyska helt visst skulle, om än i mindre mån än med tillämpning av det franska systemet, uppstå ett osäkerhetstillstånd av betänklig art. Vad som strider mot ”god sed” eller ”sunt affärsmoral" torde i många fall vara synnerligen vanskligt att avgöra, även för affärsmannen själv. Om också straff icke kunde ifrågakomma utan blott förbud mot handlingens fortsättande eller upprepande och eventuellt skadeståndsskyldighet, skulle den redbare affärsmannen ofta komma att draga sig för att använda konkurrensmedel, som rätteligen icke vore att anse som illojala. Fruktan att utsättas för obehaget av en, låt vara obefogad rättegång skulle sannolikt ej sällan avhålla honom t.o.m. från åtgöranden, angående vilkas lagenlighet han visserligen själv icke hyste någon tvivel, men som han befarade kunna av annan, kanske i syfte endast att åsamka honom skada och obehag, stämplas som illojala. Och även om trakasseringssyfte icke förelåge, kunde obefogade rättegångar lätt komma att väckas av dem, som i den hårda
  468. 468The Council on Legislation is a specific Swedish institution which exercises ex ante control on constitutionality of most legislative acts. Its status is at present regulated in RF 8:18. The recommendations of the Council are not binding on the Government and Paliament, but are normally given a very thorough consideration and are as a rule respected. See Strömberg, Sverigesförfattning (Lund: Studentlitteratur, 1999), 90 ff.
  469. 4691 § 1931 IKL read as follows: ”Illojal reklam” Den, som i utövning av näringsverksamhet genom meddelande å vara, anslag eller skylt eller i annons, circular, prospekt eller priskurant eller genom annat för stt större antal personer avsett meddelande i uppenbar strid mot god affärssed angående verksamheten eller däri utbjudna varor eller prestationer lämnar oriktig uppgift, ägnad att framkalla uppfattningen om ett fördelaktigt anbud, straffes, där han haft eller bort hava vetskap om uppgiftens oriktighet, för illojal reklam med böter från och med fem till och med två tusen kronor eller, där omständigheterna äro synnerligen försvårande, med fängelse från och med en månad till och med ett år; ersätte ock uppkommen skada.
  470. 470The example given in the Bill was the antiseptic qualities of a mouthwash, but not its nice aroma. Prop. 1931:175,21.
  471. 471Prop. 1931:175, 23. Bernitz/Modig/Malmén (1970), 41.
  472. 472This restriction was supported by the National Board of Trade with reference to the German clause on misleading advertising as well as by the TU.
  473. 473Prop. 1931:175, 10.
  474. 474”Enligt förevarande paragraf äro jämväl mål angående sanningslös reklam, vilka ej innefatta yrkande om straff eller ens om skadestånd utan allenast gå ut på meddelande av förbud mot ett visst förfarande, i tillämpliga avseenden att betrakta såsom brottmål däri talan om ansvar föres.” Betänkande, 414 ff.
  475. 475The possibility for granting injunction in the absence of express statutory support was rejected by the Supreme Court in the case Bönan Lyx, NJA1948, 642 (“Bönan Lyx”). See the critical comments of Bernitz (1993), 75 ff. and 106 ff. The Court took a more lenient stance in a later decision NJA 1956, 664 (“A-Bilskola”), Bernitz (1993), 76.
  476. 476This is still the case under the 2 §5 of the Tort Liability Act (Skadeståndslagen, SkL).
  477. 477See SOU 1966:71, 284 ff; cf. generally Kleineman (1987).
  478. 478Though see the critical attitude of the Gothenburg Chamber of Commerce towards wider possibilities for damage compensation. Prop. 1931:175, 28. In general it appears that Swedish industry tried to walk a fine line between introducing some restrictions to unfair competitive methods, but at the same time not itself be exposed too directly to the judicial process. In trying to solve this dilemma the fear of litigation often took the upper hand and attractive possibilities like damage compensation were sacrificed.
  479. 479SOU 1966:71, 56; 1915 Betänkande, 126.
  480. 480Despite this limitation there are a number of decisions in which the courts awarded damages even without conclusive evidence on the size of the loss suffered, NJA 1940, 145, (“Centrum radio”); NJA 1941, 580 (“Svensk uppslagsbok”).
  481. 481RB 35:5.
  482. 482SOU 1966:71, 56. RB 35:5 ”Om det är fråga om uppskattning av en inträffad skada och full bevisning om skadan inte alls eller endast med svårighet kan föras, får rätten uppskatta skadan till skäligt belopp.”
  483. 483SOU 1966:71, 56.
  484. 484NJA 1954, 113, interpreting 11 § IKL in connection with RB 20:8.
  485. 485See 11 § IKL, SOU 1966:71, 56 ff. It may be interesting to note that in the other Scandinavian countries the resistance to intervention in the freedom of economic enterprise was also rather strong and reflected on the procedural rights of traders to sue on unfair competition grounds. Thus in Denmark the locus standi in the first place belonged to trade associations, particularly authorized for the purpose by the Minister of Trade. Individual
  486. 486In a similar sense Treis, Recht des unlauteren Wettbewerbs und Marktvertriebsrecht in Schweden (Köln: Carl Heymanns, 1991).
  487. 487See Betänkande 1915, 130, 134, SOU 1966:71, 56.
  488. 488”Gällande lagstiftning mot illojal konkurrens saknar s.k. generalklausul... till följd härav har näringslivets organisationer sedan lång tid tillbaka varit nödsakade att själva söka genom lämpliga åtgärder effektivt bekämpa de skiftande yttringar av illojal konkurrens, som tid efter annan uppkomma, och vilka icke äro kriminaliserade av lagstiftningen."God affarssed och illojal konkurrens (Stockholm: AB Nordiska Bokhandeln, 1953), 5 ff.
  489. 489On the history and activity of industry self-regulation see Eberstein, ‘Generalklausulen mot illojal konkurrens’ (1951a) SvJT, 1 ff., at 12 ff.; Körner, ‘God affärssed och illojal konkurrens’ (1954) NIR, 81 ff., Tengelin, ‘Den illojala konkurrensen i blickpunkten’ (1957) NIR, 137 ff.; Tengelin, ‘Självsanering på marknadsföringsområdet’ (1970) NIR, 111 ff.
  490. 490See God afferssed (1954), 5. In the following I shall use the abbreviation NOps when I refer to the period when several Councils existed and NOp for the centralized Council established in 1957.
  491. 491These were the SI, the Federation of Swedish Retailers (Sveriges Köpmannaförbund, SKF), the Association of Swedish Enterprises (Sveriges Hantverks- och Småindustriorganisationen, SHS), the Swedish Cooperative Union (Kooperativa Förbundet), Ibid, 5 ff.
  492. 492§ 1 Rules. For a detailed account on the organization and activity of the NO with references to their Rules of procedure see Eberstein (1951a), 13 ff.
  493. 493See Eberstein (1951a), 15. The decisions of the Board were, however, made public in an anonymous form through publications of the chambers of commerce. See Körner (1954), 81 ff.
  494. 494Tengelin, ‘Den illojala konkurrensen i blickpunkten’ (1957) NIR, 137 ff., at 140. Otillbörlig konkurrens och god afförssed. Yttranden avgivna av Näringslivets Opinionsnämnd under åren 1957-58 (Stockholm: Norstedt & söner, 1963), 5.
  495. 495Tengelin (1970), 119.
  496. 496According to estimate by Tengelin individual petitions made for 20 percent of the cases before the Board, Tengelin (1970), 118.
  497. 497Tengelin (1957), 141. I have not been able to find references to the ICC Code in reports on the activity of the early NOs.
  498. 498See Bernitz/Modig/Malmén (1970), 45.
  499. 499Ramsay, Consumer Protection (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1989), 91.
  500. 500See Ohly (1997).
  501. 501See the cases quoted by Pause, Die Berücksichtigung der Interessen der Allgemeinheit bei der Beurteilung wettbewerblichen Handelns (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1984), 18 ff.; cf. also Schricker (1970), 32 ff., at 34.
  502. 502See the quotations from the parliamentary debate above.
  503. 503RGZ 120, 47 ff., at 49. The RG pointed out that in the first Bill to the UWG there was a proposal to grant those lodging subsequent claims on the same ground (e.g.unions) only the right to step in the proceedings as joint plaintiffs. Since this proposal had not been incorporated in the legal text, the court drew an e contrario conclusion of multiple rights of action in the same matter. See also RGZ 128, 330 ff., at 332. Cf. Baumbach/Hefermehl (1998), 197. See Schricker (1970), 34.
  504. 504For an even earlier case with reference to public interests in connection with Verbandsklage see RGZ 79, 325, in Leidl, Rechtsprechung des Reichsgerichts in UWG Sachen (Verlag Gisela Liedl, 1968), 349, See also the examples quoted by Pause (1984), 13.
  505. 505Pause (1984), 13.
  506. 506See Pause (1984), 17 ff. with further references.
  507. 507See Schricker (1975), 213, fh. 20.
  508. 508See Pause (1984), 235 ff.
  509. 509RGZ 79, 327.
  510. 510RGZ 48, 114 ff., at 124.
  511. 511Breach of statutory duty. See Ohly (1997), 240. A catalogue with examples from case law is provided by Callmann (1929), 130 ff.
  512. 512See Schricker, Gesetzesverletzung und Sittenverstoß (München: Beck, 1970b), 21.
  513. 513„Eine ein gesetzliches Verbot verletzende Handlung verstößt indessen noch nicht schlechthin gegen die guten Sitten.“ RGZ 77, 217 ff, at 220, quoted after Callmann (1929), 99, § 1, Rdnr. 16.
  514. 514See Schricker (1970b), 24 with reference to cases on pyramid sales and on the activity of cooperatives without a license.
  515. 515“es ist überhaupt größte Vorsicht geboten, weil vielfach unvergleichbare Interessen einander gegenüberstehen und die moralische Bewertung privatwirtschaftlichen Handelns unabhängig ist von Normen, die etwa ausschließlich von der Staatsräson beeinflusst sind.“ Callmann (1929), 99.
  516. 516“ein Verstoß gegen gewerbepolizeiliche Vorschriften noch nicht notwendig eine Sittenwidrigkeit enthielte, auch dann nicht wenn er mit einer vorsätzlichen Benachteiligung eines Mitbewerbers verbunden war.“ Callmann (1929), 99.
  517. 517RGZ 77, 217 ff., at 220: “...ihre [der Zuwiderhandlung] gesundheitspolizeiliche [Seite] kommt für den Anspruch des Klägers nicht in Frage...“
  518. 518The situation changed only after approximately 50 years when the BGH explicitly dissociated itself from this line of precedent and confirmed a broader range of protected interests under unfair competition law. See Schricker (1970b), 22, with further references. Schricker ascribes the change to altered understanding of courts as to the protected interests under unfair competition law, including the interests of consumers and the general public Schricker (1970b).
  519. 519RGZ 115,319. See Schricker (1970b), 23.
  520. 520Also in this category of cases Schricker notes a change in attitude in that it would arguably be easier to infer an act against good morals from violation of a criminal prohibition. See Schricker (1970b), 24, with further references.
  521. 521RGZ 117, 16 ff., at 20.
  522. 522„Der Beklagte verwertet demnach einen durch Rechts- und Vertragsbruch erlangten gewerblichen Vorteil, nämlich die erheblich niedrigeren Einstandspreise seiner gewerblichen Leistungen, dazu, um sich vor den tariftreuen Wettbewerbern durch seine so ermöglichten sehr viel billigeren Vergütungssätze einen Vorsprung im gewerblichen Wettkampf zu sichern.“ RGZ 117, 16 ff., at 24.
  523. 523RGZ 166, 315 ff, at 319. The dispute regarded an alleged violation of a prohibition to deal with procurement of real estate and mortgage contracts.
  524. 524Kohler (1914), 26. |
  525. 525RGZ 88, 9; RGZ 120, 47 („Markenschutzverband").
  526. 526Ulmer (1932), 16.
  527. 527Kohler (1914), 31.
  528. 528Ulmer (1932), 24.
  529. 529RGZ 51, 385; RGZ 56, 274; RGZ 76, 43.
  530. 530RGZ 28, 238 („Börsenverein der deutschen Buchhändler“) on inneren Organisationszwang; RGZ 56, 271 („Verein deutschen Buchhändler“) on äußeren Organisationszwang.
  531. 531Callmann (1929), 106 ff. with further references.
  532. 532Quotation as in Callmann (1929), 106.
  533. 533See Callmann (1929), 136.
  534. 534Callmann (1929), 134.
  535. 535Gesetz über Preisnachlässe (Rabattgesetz), 25 November 1933, RGBl I, 1011; Verordnung des Reichspräsidenten zum Schutz der Wirtschaft, 9 March 1932, RGBl. I S. 121 (Zugabeverordnung).
  536. 536RG GRUR 1936, 810 (,,Diamantine“).
  537. 537RG GRUR 1938, 207 („Persil“). See also the cases RG GRUR 1938, 849 („Eierbrikett"); RG GRUR 1939,
  538. 538(„Lockenwickler").
  539. 539RG GRUR 1936, 810 („Diamantine“), 811.
  540. 540Ibid., 812.
  541. 541RG GRUR 1936, 810 (“Diamantine”), 812.
  542. 542See BGH GRUR 1965, 489 (,Kleenex").
  543. 543RG GRUR 1936, 810 (“Diamantine”), 812; cf. Pause (1984), 15 pointing at the mention of „Verbraucher“ and „kaufendes Publikum“.
  544. 544See § 14 UWG. The closest English concept would be that of the tort of ‘injurious falsehood’, which in English law does, however, require proof of intent or negligence (malice). See Ohly (1997), 30 ff.
  545. 545See § 15 UWG.
  546. 546Callmann (1929), 1329, quoting Kohler (MuW XVI, 128).
  547. 547Bastian ‘Comparative Advertising in Germany - Present Situation and Implementation of the EC Directive’ (2000) 31 IIC, 151 ff., at 153, quoting Kohler (NJW, 1917, 127, ff).
  548. 548Callmann (1929), 131.
  549. 549On this evolution see Ohly (1997), 302 ff.
  550. 550On the concurrent application of the general clause and the catalogue provisions see the Markenverband judgement, RGZ 120.
  551. 551This concept corresponds closer to the English concepts of defamation and slander. See Ohly (1997), 29.
  552. 552RG GRUR 1927, 486, 488.
  553. 553RG GRUR 1931, 1299 ff. (“Hellegold”).
  554. 554Ibid.
  555. 555RG GRUR 1931, 1299 ff., 1301. Ohly and Spence see the gist of this decision in the old saying that no one can be a judge in his own case, see Ohly/Spence (1999), 684; cf. Reich/Ahrazoglu, ‘EG-Binnenmarkts und Werberecht’ (Bremen: ZERP, 1990), 30.
  556. 556Callmann (1929), 133.
  557. 557The example given by Callmann concerned spreading information about lung disease of a competitor (dentist), RG MuW XI, 436. Since it would be open for everybody to inform the interested customers, this was considered allowed for the competitor as well. The conduct was nevertheless prohibited, but on other grounds. Callmann (1929), 133. In a similar sense RG, GRUR 1916, 186 (information about fatalities resulted from consumption of vinegar essence.
  558. 558See Ohly/Spence (1999), 684 with reference to Nerreter, GRUR 1931, 8 ff.
  559. 559Beater (2000), 8 ff.
  560. 560See Callmann (1929), 160 with further references.
  561. 561See Callmann (1929) with further references: RG 58, 239: RG I MuW XIV, 182, RG i. MuW 27/28, 25.
  562. 562See Callmann (1929), with references to RG 99, 28, 135; RGSt. 36, 378 and other cases.
  563. 563Callmann (1929), with reference to RGZ 77, 431 ff., at 433.
  564. 564Ulmer (1932), 31. Similar already earlier Kohler (1914), 104 ff.
  565. 565Schricker (1970b).
  566. 566RGSt. 36, 378; RGSt. 48, 41.
  567. 567See Pause (1984), 15.
  568. 568See Kohler (1914). Kohler was not only one of the pioneers in the scholarly analysis of intellectual and industrial property law (cf. his Markenrecht, Autorenrecht), but also a respected scholar in the field of legal history and theory of law (cf. the five-volume encyclopedia devoted to legal science published under his editorship: Kohler, (ed.), Enzyklopädie der Rechtswissenschaft in systematischer Bearbeitung (München: 1913­ 1915).
  569. 569Ibid., 22 ff.
  570. 570„Die heutige Wirtschaft, welche den Einzlenen als Enzelnen zum selbstentscheidenen Träger der Produktion und des Verkehrs macht, muss durch das Persönlichkeitsrecht bestimmt werden. Hiernach ist die Wirtschaft individualistisch frei, aber so, dass die Persönlichkeit nicht angetastet werden darf. Jede Wirtschaft des Einen hat sich in den Grenzen zu halten, welche die Persönlichkeit des Anderen erfordert. Die Persönlichkeit eines jeden verlangt aber, dass er nicht durch täuschende anstandswidrige Mittel geschädigt, oder unterdrückt wird.“ Kohler (1914), 17.
  571. 571On the Kantian influence on Kohler in the context of copyright law see Strömholm, Le droit moral de I’autor, /(Stockholm: Norstedts & söner, 1966), 184 ff.
  572. 572Cf. the comparative comments of Kleineman (1987) in this respect.
  573. 573Kohler (1914), 16.
  574. 574„Man täusche sich nicht: es ist nicht der Verlust des einzelnen Individuums, der Vermögensniedergang eines einzelnen redlichen Arbeiters, um den es sich handelt; es ist die Demoralisation des ganzen Verkehrs, welche eintritt, wenn rechtswidrige Übergriffe ungeahndet ihr Spiel treiben können; es ist der Mangel des Vertrauens, welcher alle Verkehrsoperationen in furchtbarer Weise lähmt“, see Kohler (1914), 42.
  575. 575„Trotzdem handelt es sich hauptsächlich um bürgerlich rechtliche Interessen; denn es gilt der Grundsatz: wo das bürgerliche Recht ausreicht, soll das öffentliche Recht in die Verkehrsverhältnisse nicht eingreifen; nur wo das bürgerliche Recht nicht genügt, um den sicheren Lauf der Ding zu gewährleisten, wird es erforderlich sein, auch von Seiten des öffentlichen Rechtes Bestimmungen zu geben, damit der Gang des Verkehrs nicht die Grenzen überschreitet, welche die ruhige Entwicklung der menschliche Verhältnisse verlangt.“ Kohler (1914), 17.
  576. 576Joerges, ‘Die klassische Konzeption des internationalen Privatrechts und das Recht des unlauteren Wettbewerbs’ (1972) 36 RabelsZ, 421 ff., at 443, quotes Kohler as saying: „Man denke an die Grenzbezeichnungen, an das Grundbuchwesen und an das Registerwersen ... - überall der gleiche Zweck und dieselbe ... rechtliche Hilfe“ (Kohler, Warenzeichenrecht, 1910, 68).
  577. 577„...Eingriffe der Staatsgesetzgebung in das natürliche Spiel der Privatrechte“ für die jede privatrechtliche Grundlage fehle“ See Mayer, ‘Die concurrence déloyale’ (1881) 26 ZgesHR, 363 ff, at 434; quoted after Joerges (1972), 444.
  578. 578See references in Schricker (1970a), 32 ff., at 33; Callmann (1929), 43 ff.
  579. 579See Ohly (1997).
  580. 580See the retrospective analysis by Fezer, ‘Modernisierung des deutschen Rechts gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb auf der Grundlage einer Europäisierung des Wettbewerbsrechts’ (2001) WRP, 989 ff., at 996.
  581. 581Callman (1929), 34.
  582. 582Callmann finds support for this view in RGSt. 13, 44; 42, 16.
  583. 583Nipperdey, Wettbewerb und Existenzvernichtung (Berlin, 1930) quoted after Ulmer (1932), 16. Interestingly, through the interest of Franz Böhm in unfair competition law ‘Leistungswettbewerbs’ turned into a conceptual building block in the theory of Ordoliberalism, that has been particularly influential when laying down the foundations of the postwar German Sozialstaat. See Gerber, ‘Constitutionalizing the Economy: German Neo­ Liberalism, Competition Law and the “New” Europe’ (1994) 42 AJCL, 25 ff., at 53.
  584. 584Ulmer (1932), 18 with reference to Nipperdey (1930). See also Gerber (1994), 53.
  585. 585See Nerreter, Allgemeine Grundlagen eines deutschen Wettbewerbsrechts (Berlin, 1936). On the evolution of the taxonomy in unfair competition law and the Fallgruppen see Baumbach/Hefermehl (1998), Einl. UWG, Rdnr. 158 ff., 246 ff.
  586. 586Ulmer (1932).
  587. 587Ulmer (1937), 769 ff., at 770: “Die Gewerbefreiheit ist die Wirtschaftsverfassung, unter der ein starkes Aufblühen des Wirtschaftslebens sich vollzieht.”
  588. 588Ulmer (1937), 769 ff, at 771.
  589. 589„Nun ist kein Zweifel: Der Schutz der schöpferischen Leistung des Einzelnen ist und bleibt in hervorragendem Masse Ziel der Wettbewerbsordnung. Aber daneben stehen doch für uns zwei weitere entscheidende Zielsetzungen: Da ist zunächst das Interesse des Volksganzen an einer gesunden und sauberen Ordnung des Wirtschaftslebens....Und ferner, was oft - in der Rechtsprechung - unter dem Titel des Interesses der Allgemeinheit damit zusammengeworfen wird, in Wahrheit aber auf einem besonderen Blatt steht: es geht auch um die Interessen der Abnehmer, des Publikums.“ Ulmer (1937), 769 ff.
  590. 590See v. Gierke, ‘Der Rechtsgrund des Schutzes gegen unlauteren Wettbewerb’ (1895) Zeitschrift jur gewerblichen Rechtsschutz, 109 ff.
  591. 591Gierke cited in Wolff 1963), 702; Wieacker (1995), 432 ff.
  592. 592Ohly (1997), 288 ff.
  593. 593See SOU 1966:71, 59 ff. Bernitz/Modig,/Malmén (1970), 42.
  594. 594See prop. 1931:175, 23.
  595. 595NJA 1935, 593. SOU 1966:71, 59. See the critique of Eberstein, ‘Generalklausulen mot illojal konkurrens och Pariskonventionen’ (1951b) NIR, 1 ff., 5. Likewise an advertising of glass items, using a geographical indication (“Glas från Kosta”) misleadingly similar to the trade name of a famous glass-factory (AB “Kosta”), was not regarded to fall within the scope of 1 § IKL. The message was indeed misleading, but not incorrect since the advertiser’s workshop was indeed situated in the Kosta area. Cf. NJA 1950, 365, NIR 950, 260. See Bemitz/Modig/ Malmén (1970), 121.
  596. 596NJA 1938, 193.
  597. 597NJA 1938, 193. The decision led to a change, however not in IKL but in the Criminal Code’s provision on fraud, which originally required evidence of actually suffered damage for a sentence.
  598. 598See above, prop. 1931:175, 41 and Bernitz/Modig/Malmén (1970), 41.
  599. 599NJA 1957, 188. See for other first instance cases Godaffärssed (1954).
  600. 600See decision of Stockholm Rådhusrätt in: God affärssed (1954), 17, 20, 44 ff.
  601. 601NJA Avd. I 1941, 580; cf. God affärssed (1954), 18.
  602. 602See SOU 1966:71.
  603. 603SvJT, 1935, 78; SvJT 1944, 47.
  604. 604SvJT 1944, 86; God affärssed (1954), 27, 10.
  605. 605See Bernitz (1993), 111.
  606. 606NJA 1935, 686 and NJA 1937, 154. Bernitz/Modig/Malmén (1970), 42. See also Levin (1944), 63.
  607. 607See Bernitz (1993), 229.
  608. 608The problem of compensation of pure economic loss in Swedish law has received its most extensive treatment in Kleineman (1987).
  609. 609“Hela det nuvarande samhällsskicket, med dess alltjämt så omfattande möjligheter till fri konkurrens och företagsamhet, bygger på att det i största utsträckning är tillåtet, ja att det är för samhället nyttigt, att vi tillfogar varandra skador”; quoted from Karlgren, SvJT 1938, 373, quotated after Kleineman (1987), 281.
  610. 610NJA 1906, 509. Kleineman (1987), 209. See also Heuman, Målsägande (Stockholm: Norstedts, 1973), 381.
  611. 611On the situation in German unfair competition law, see Ch. 4.4.1 above.
  612. 612See Kleineman (1987), 267 ff.
  613. 613Ibid., 267 ff. with further referenes.
  614. 614”Om exempelvis någon, i ostridigt afsigt att bringa ruin öfver en konkurrent, säljer varor till underpris, erbjuder icke lagen den senare några skyddsmedel”; cited from Winroth (1907), 138. This is a popular quotation to be found in Eberstein (1951a), 1 ff., at 2; Kleineman (1987), 280, and Helgesson, Affärshemligheter i samtid och framtid (Stockholms Universitet, 2001), 230.
  615. 615”Förhållandet ändras icke, om falska uppgifter lemnas till at förklara varornas prisbillighet och göra dem ytterligare begärliga för kunder, ej heller om för ändamålet jämförelse anställes mellan egna priser och konkurrentens eller till sist sjelfa handeln drifves utan laga lof eller anmälan.” Winroth (1907), 138.
  616. 616”Först då det tillgripes åtgärd, som ej allenast förkastligt och obehörig utan alldeles oafsedt sitt skadegörande syfte, är en omedelbart mot vederbörande riktad brottslig handling, uppstår rätt till ersättning, nemligen till den del som samma handling haft skada till följd”; quoted in ibid. As examples of such practices prohibited under criminal law Winroth mentions preventing the access to a competitors shop or the dissemination of rumours denigrating his goods. See Eberstein (1951a), 2.
  617. 617Bernitz, ‘Otillbörlig konkurrens: det glömda rättsområdet’ in: Bernitz, Festskrift Jan Hellner, (Stockholm: Norstedts, 1984), 115 ff„ at 119. See Kleineman (1987), 17.
  618. 618See the reference to Winroth (1907), 350 ff. in Kleineman (1987), 281.
  619. 619”Under det att vållande av t.ex. kroppsskada, åtminstone i den mån den förorsakar förmögenhetsförlust, utan inskränkning kan och bör medföra ersättningsskyldighet, skulle det vara orimligt att låta t.ex. förmögenhetsförlust förorsakad av en än så avsiktlig ekonomisk konkurrens, försåvitt en med hänsyn till medlen håller sig inom vissa gränser, medföra ersättningsskyldighet; det skulle vara detsamma som att förbjuda konkurrens och därmed döda samhällets ekonomiska nerv”.
  620. 620”Sålunda delar sig hela området för förorsakande av förmögenhetsförlust i två delar: tillåtet och otillåtet - d.v. här säga: ersättningsskyldighet icke-medförande och ersättningsskyldighet medförande. Gränsen mellan dessa båda delområden måste uppdragas genom den positiva rätten (låt vara sedvanerätt: illojalitetsprincipen)”; quoted in Thyrén, Culpa legis Aquiliae enligt justiniansk rätt. Ett bidrag till läran om utomobligatoriskt skadestånd (Lund 1893).
  621. 621Kleineman (1987), 83 ff.
  622. 622God affärssed (1954), 6 with reference to the Rules of the Boards (stadga).
  623. 623About 60percent of the files in the collection of decisions of the NOs for the years 1935-51 (50 of 80 reported) concerned misleading and incorrect advertising, including misleading comparisons and special offers, God affärssed (1954). A similar ratio is reported by Tengelin in a review of the activity of the 1957 NO. See Tengelin (1970), 118. Another big group, especially after the amendment of 1942, formed instances of alleged confusion with trade name, firm, trademark, get-up and other distinguishing and well-established commercial mark. See 9 § IKL. Cf. Körner (1954), 81 ff.
  624. 624Mnookin/Kornhauser (1978-79).
  625. 625See Godaffärssed (1954), 22 ff.
  626. 626The case involved a comparison between methods of production (between inorganic and organic concrete tightening material) that would in Germany be qualified as Systemvergleich. See God affärssed (1954), 13 ff.
  627. 627See God affärssed (1954), 9, 22, 36. Likewise spreading discrediting and incorrect information concerning the business organisation (cooperative enterprise) of a competitor to potential foreign customers with the purpose of diverting orders was against good commercial practice, see ibid., 45 ff. On the practice of the 1957 NO see Bernitz/Modig/Malmén (1970), 150 ff. On the change in attitude after 1966, see below Ch. 5.
  628. 628See God affärssed (1954), 15, 28.
  629. 629See God affärssed (1954), 10 ff., 20 ff.
  630. 630”Nämnden anser sig i ärendet kunna göra allenast det uttalandet, att utdelning av gratisprov icke bör ske i sådan omfattning, att densamma inverkar störande på varans omsättning i den allmänna handeln. Nämnden finner nämligen alltför stora svårigheter möta att fastställa någon bestämd gräns, som proven med hänsyn till god affärssed icke må överskrida, även om Nämnden anser önskligt, att provpaketens storlek så långt görligt är inskränkes.” God affärssed (1954), 13.
  631. 631See Otillbörlig konkurrens, 1960 (1963), 330.
  632. 632SOU 1966:71, 187. See also the succinct comments of Tengelin on the difficulty to balance conflicting business interests in these matters, Tengelin (1959), op. cit., 109.
  633. 633On trading stamps see SOU 1966: 71, 189 with reference to NO, 676, 677/63. On ‘lockvaruförsäljning’ - sale under self-cost see SOU 1966:71, 191 with reference to NO 279/60.
  634. 634See section above.
  635. 635God affärssed (1954), 7; Bemitz/Modig/Malmen (1970).
  636. 636Illustrative in this respect is the case with Nordisk Familjebok AB. NO issued three decisions, condemning basically the same practice, but apparently the practice resurfaced after a while in the same or slightly modified form. See God affärssed (1954), 32, 35. The Board found clear case of abuse of the gullibility of he public (in accordance with 2 § IKL); Ref. Nr. 48 this time the misleading offer was combined with negative contract building whereby the customers were bound by their passivity. In all cases complaints were lodged by the Swedish Book Publishers Association (Svenska Bokförläggareförening).
  637. 637See the decisions on Nordisk Familjebok. All complaints were lodged by the Swedish Book Publishers’ Association, God affärssed (1954), 32ff, 35ff, 38 ff.
  638. 638See Otillbörlig konkurrens (1963).
  639. 639See Eberstein (1951a), 1 ff; Eberstein (1951b), 1.
  640. 640See the examples of failure of the courts to provide protection in Eberstein (195 lb), 4 ff.
  641. 641Eberstein (195 la), 4 ff. He pointed at several general clauses that have entered into force after the Patent Legislative Committee delivered its report, among them 33 § of the 1915 Contracts Act and 4 § of the 1927 Insurance Act.
  642. 642This argument had earlier been made by Levin (1944), 16.
  643. 643Eberstein (1951a), 6.
  644. 644Eberstein (1951a), 8.
  645. 645Eberstein (1951a), 14 ff.
  646. 646Eberstein (1951b), 1.
  647. 647See in this sense Bernitz/Modig/Malmén (1970), 23.
  648. 648For a detailed account on the idea of consumer protection in the period between 1871-1933, see Geyer, Der Gedanke des Verbraucherschutzes im Reichsrecht des Kaiserreichs und der Weimar Republik (1871-1933) (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2001).
  649. 649”Sverige är veterligen det enda land i den västerländska kulturkretsen, som inte har förbud som påföljd på detta rättsområde.” SOU 1966:71, 287.
  650. 650Komesar (1994), 133.
  651. 651Briiggemeier (1980), 46 ff.
  652. 652See Eberstein (1951a), 5 ff.
  653. 653Strömholm, ‘Equity in Swedish law’ in: Newman, R. (ed.), Equity in the World’s Legal System (Brussels: Bruyant, 1973), 443 ff.
  654. 654According to Fukuyama, “[i]n Germany, then, the guilds were never ruthlessly destroyed as they were in France. They survived and were transmuted into a modern form, becoming the basis of the country’s postwar apprenticeship system.”...“The Germans hardly preserved the guild system intact...., but neither did they
  655. 655Wieacker (1995), 433.
  656. 656Ohly (1997), 233: “Diese Mittlerfunktion kommt unter § 1 UWG den Präjudizen zu. Sie liefern die konkreten materiellen Grundsätzen, die Ethik, Konvention, Verfassung und wettbewerbsfunktionale Topoi nicht zu bieten vermögen.“
  657. 657The legal method for concrétisation of the general clause is well-illustrated and analysed by Ohly (1997), 253 ff.
  658. 658Ohly (1997), 300.
  659. 659Indicative of this blocking effect of TF is a statement in the parliamentary debate on the 1931 IKL made by MP Löfgren, who had been involved in the legislative work that led to the 1919 failure of adopting full-fledged law in the area. Commenting on his reserved attitude to the 1915 Draft on unfair competition act, the deputy admits that he at that time did not act out of conviction that the law proposal was unnecessary or not useful. His main motivation was his fear not to enter into conflict with the TF. “At that time one was indeed terribly afraid not to be seen to act against the Constitutional laws”, he adds. Riksdagens protokoll 1931 FK nr. 37, 110 ff. quoted after Persson (2002), 97 (my translation).
  660. 660See reference to this trait of the Swedish constitutional system in Lindblom, ‘Civil and Criminal Procedure’ in: Bogdan, Swedish Law in the New Millennium (Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik, (2000b), 201 ff.
  661. 661Schricker (1970b), 206, quoting Gehlen, Die Seele im technischen Zeitalter. Rowohlts deutsche Enzyklopädie, Bd. 53, 1957, 74.
  662. 662„Im Wettbewerbsrecht tritt die Bildung solcher »Institutionen’ besonders deutlich z.B. beim Fall der Preisbindungsvertöße und der vergleichenden Werbung hervor. Es bedarf erheblicher Anstrengungen, das Augenmerk auf die tragenden Gründe zurückzulenken, auf die sich die herausgebildeten Normen stützen, um eine Revision der einmal getroffenen Vorentscheidungen zu ermöglichen;“ Schricker (1970b).
  663. 663See Galbraith, The Affluent Society (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1958); Galbraith, The New Industrial State (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1968). On the history of consumerism see Stearns, Consumerism in World History (New York: Routledge, 2001).
  664. 664On different theoretical approaches for explaining the growth of consumer policy see Tarschys, ‘Hur mycket konsumentpolitik?’ in: Måste konsumenten gå till Verket? (Stockholm: Industriförbundets Förlag, 1978).
  665. 665Nader, Unsafe at Any Speed: The Designed-in Dangers of the American Automobile (New York: Grossman, 1965). On Nader’s role in the American consumerist movement, see Pertschuk (1982), 29 ff.
  666. 666The text of the message is reprinted in v. Hippel, Verbraucherschutz, 2 Auflage, (Tübingen: Mohr, 1979), 225 ff.
  667. 667Ibid., 226.
  668. 668Mertens, ‘Kollektivrechtlicher Schadensersatz als Mittel des Verbraucherschutzes’ (1975) ZHR, 438 ff., 442: “Class action und Geltendmachung gebündelten Interessen durch Verbände, die diese als Bürgerinitiative kanalisierende Funktionsträger und letzlich als Wahrer öffentlicher Interessen auftreten läßt, sind in ihrer Tendenz nicht auf politische Neutralisierung von Konflikten vor Gericht, sondern eher auf “Politisierung” von Gerichten zum Zwecke der Durchsetzung gesellschaftlicher Interessen gerichtet.”
  669. 669Lag om otillbörlig marknadsföring (SFS 1970:412).
  670. 670Marknadsföringslagen (SFS 1975:1418).
  671. 671On socialisation tendencies in the early legislative activities in the Länder of Hessen, Württemberg-Baden and Schleswig-Holstein, see Eisenhardt (1999), 510 ff. Cf. Gerber (1994), 25.
  672. 672The following account on the Freiburg school builds extensively on Gerber (1994), 25 ff. For a comprehensive review of ordoliberal economic thought, see also Drexl (1998), 106 ff. Building on ordoliberal ideas, Drexl proposes a novel approach to consumer protection based on the idea of ‘normative efficiency’, ibid.,
  673. 673ff. See also Fikentscher (1958), 14 ff.
  674. 674Ibid., 36 f.
  675. 675Ibid., 41 ff.
  676. 676Müller-Graff, ‘Ordnungspolitische Divergenzen und wettbewerbliche Lauterkeit in der Verfassung des Gemeinsamen Marktes’ in: Festschrift Carstens (Köln, Berlin: 1984), 209 ff., at 213.
  677. 677Eucken, Grundsätze der Wirtschaftspolitik (Bern: A.Francke, 1952), 360, quoted after Gerber (1994), 39 f.
  678. 678In this respect there is a close kinship between the Freiburg School and modern neoinstitutional analysis. The link is emphasised by Williamson (1996), 221. Similar Drexl (1998), 108 ff.
  679. 679The exact meaning of the concept, however, is controversial in contemporary German scholarship. From an economic perspective, the notion ‘economic constitution’ is understood in the sense of ‘economic order’. Viewed as a normative concept, the term is either limited to the Constitution or extended to the legal order as a whole. On the different understandings with analysis of the jurisprudence of the Federal Constitutional Court see Drexl (1998), 218 ff.
  680. 680Fikentscher (1958), 15.
  681. 681See above Ch. 4.4.I.3.
  682. 682According to Böhm, the body of doctrine (Lehrgebäude) of classical economic philosophy had to be translated from the language of economics into the language of legal science. See Gerber (1994).
  683. 683According to Reinhard Blum (as cited by Gerber) the ideal of Wilhelm Ropke’s economic policy (a member of the Freiburg school) was “a comprehensive Mittelstandspolitik which should free the market economy from its two weaknesses - monopolies and the proletariat.” (Blum, Soziale Marktwirtschaft: Wirtschaftspolitik zwischen Neoliberalismus und Ordoliberalismus, 1969, 94.)
  684. 684Eisenhardt (1999), 545; Drexl (1998), 219 ff.
  685. 685Eisenhardt (1999).
  686. 686These prohibitions were not absolute, however, and were mitigated by a long catalogue of exemptions, such as crises cartels, etc. See Gerber (1994), 65 ff.
  687. 687Ludwig Erhard was a liberal economist, minister for economics in Adenauer’s government and succeeded Adenaur in the post of FRG Chancellor from 1963-1966.
  688. 688See Gerber (1994), 71 ff.
  689. 689Lagen (1953:603) om motverkande i vissa fall av konkurrensbegränsning inom näringslivet.
  690. 690See Bernitz (1969), 426; Bemitz/Draper, Consumer Protection in Sweden, 2nd ed. (Stockholm: IFIM Series, No.12, 1986), 32.
  691. 691On the legislative history of the GG, see Eisenhardt (1999), 513 ff.
  692. 692Ibid., 540.
  693. 693Scharpf, ‘The Joint-Decision Trap: Lessons from German Federalism and European Integration’ (1988) Public Administration, 239 ff., at 255.
  694. 694In the words of Carlo Schmid, one of the social-democratic participants in the Parliamentary Council drafting the GG the basic rights had to be created so that they: “nicht bloss Deklamationen, Deklarationen und Direktiven sind, nicht nur Anforderungen an die Länderverfassung, nicht nur eine Garantie der Ländergrundrechte, sondern unmittelbar geltendes Bundesrecht, aufgrund dessen jeder einzelne Deutsche, jeder Bewohner unseres Landes vor den Gerichten soll Klage erheben können”, Eisenhardt (1999), 542.
  695. 695On the different models of constitutional review in Europe and the reasons for preferring the Kelsenian before the American approach see Favoreu (1990), 38 ff.
  696. 696On the Drittwirkung of human rights see Eisenhardt (1999), 543.
  697. 697Hellstem, ‘When Courts Intervene: Judicial Control in a Comparative Institutional Perspective’ in Kaufinann/Majone/Ostrom, Guidance, Control and Evaluation in the Public Sector (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1986),
  698. 698ff. See Knill (2001), 65.
  699. 699See Knill (2001), 69.
  700. 700See Knill (2001), 65.
  701. 701See Heady (1979). Cf. Knill (2001), 66.
  702. 702See Eisenhardt (1999), 348 ff. and 401 ff.
  703. 703On these distinctions from an American perspective, see Pierce/Shapiro/Verkuil, Administrative Law and Administrative Process (Westbury, NY: The Foundation Press, 1992), 2 ff.
  704. 704RF 1:1 “All offentlig makt i Sverige utgår från folket”.
  705. 705Strömberg, Sveriges författning, (Stockholm: Studentlitteratur, 1999), 100 ff.
  706. 706See Lidbom, ‘Lagstiftningsmaktens gränser’ (1993) JT, 283 ff, critical Strömholm, ‘Skall lagreglerna spegla eller påverka den allmänna rättsuppfattningen’ (2001) SvJT, 101 ff.
  707. 707Strömberg (1999), 101. This feature was particularly distinctive during the time of uninterrupted Social Democratic rule from the mid-1930s to the mid-70s. Recently things have changed and the legislative process has become more complicated as well as genuinely deliberative. See Lejonhuvud, ‘Förarbeten’ in: Bernitz (ed.), Finna rätt (Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik, 1996), 102 ff.
  708. 708“In Sweden the political executive could count on decisions being routinely confirmed by the parliament. This pattern of executive dominance was made possible by institutions established to conserve the power of monarchy and the Conservative party during the transition to democracy. Proportional representation and an indirectly elected first chamber helped the Social Democrats achieve stable parliamentary majorities. Because the executive government rested on secure parliamentary majorities executive decisions were automatically ratified by parliamentary votes.” Immergut (1992), 57 ff., at 67.
  709. 709Corporativism should be distinguished from a corporate society where corporate representation is the only form of government. On the distinction between corporate society and corporativism see ‘Avkorporativisering och lobbyism - konturerna till en ny politisk model’, SOU 1999:121, 10 ff.
  710. 710See Lewin, Samhället och de organiserade intressena (Stockholm: Nordstedts, 1992); Hermansson, Politik som intressekamp. Parlamentariskt beslutsfattande och organiserade intressen i Sverige (Stockholm: Nordstedts juridik, 1993); cf. SOU 1999:121.
  711. 711The authors of a government-commissioned report distinguish between decision-making corporativism and implementation corporativism, SOU 1999:121, 22 ff.
  712. 712The first Swedish Instrument of Government of 1809 laid down detailed rules on the different powers of the king, the government and the courts, with each of these institutions being endowed with particular powers and in a position to exert some control over the others. Ibid., 72.
  713. 713Strömberg (1999), 101.
  714. 714RF 11:14 “If a court or other public body finds that a provision conflicts with a rule of fundamental law or other superior statute, or finds that a procedure laid down in law has been disregarded in any important respect when the provision was made, the provision may not be applied. If the provision has been approved by the Riksdag or by the Government, however, it shall be waived only if the error is manifest.” For the debate around this rule see Nergelius (2000), 65 ff., at 79.
  715. 715According to Lindblom, ‘the third branch of power’ is a term which by no one in Sweden will be associated with the courts, but rather with the media. See Lindblom (2000), 201.
  716. 716See in particular RB 4:4.
  717. 717See Nergelius (2000), 65 ff.
  718. 718See Lejonhuvud (1996), 90 ff.
  719. 719See Nergelius (2000), 65 ff.
  720. 720The Convention was signed by Sweden on 28 October 1950, only 14 days after its opening for signature. It was ratified by Sweden on 4 February 1952 and entered into force on 3 September 1953 upon gathering ten ratifications.
  721. 721On the subsequent (imperfect) incorporation of the Convention in Swedish law see Bernitz, ‘Europakonventionens införlivande med svensk rätt - en halvmesyr’ (1994-95) JT, 259 ff.
  722. 722Söderlind/Petersson (1986), 35. Inger (1997), 81 ff.
  723. 723Ibid., 105 ff.
  724. 724See also Strömberg (1999), 66, RF 11:7 (självständighetsprincipen).
  725. 725Söderlind/Petersson (1986), 88.
  726. 726Drexl (1998), 232.
  727. 727Damm, ‘Verbraucherrechtliche Sondergesetzgebung und Privatrechtsystem’ (1978) JZ, 173 ff.
  728. 728See the symptomatic title of the book by Assmann/Briiggemeier/Hart/Joerges (1980).
  729. 729Hart (1983), 161.
  730. 730”...den hägerströmska så kallade värdenihilismen kan sammanfattas i ett antal teser som var och en på sitt sätt kunde underblåsa den beredskap till att ”ändra på saker och ting” som Myrdal talade om.” Källström (2002), 21 ff., at 26.
  731. 731”I själva verket framstår den funktionella begreppsbildningen numera närmast som förhärskande.” Bemitz (1969), 64.
  732. 732See Hart/Joerges, ‘Verbraucherrecht und Marktökonomik: Eine Kritik ordnungstheoretischer Eingrenzungen der Verbraucherpolitik’ in: Assmann/Brüggemeier/ Hart/Joerges, Wirtschaftsrecht als Kritik des Privatrechts (Königstein: Taunus, 1980), 87 ff., at 124.
  733. 733Hart/Joerges (1980), 95.
  734. 734BT-Drs. IV/2236, Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Errichtung eines Warentestinstituts of 6 May 1964.
  735. 735This was the coalition SPD/FDP government of Willie Brandt. The coalition government between the Social Democrats and the Free Democrats lasted from 1969 to 1982.
  736. 736Hart/Joerges (1980), 87 ff.
  737. 737Erster Bericht der Bundesregierung zur Verbraucherpolitik, 18.10.1971, BT-Drs. 4/2724, reprinted in v. Hippel (1979), 175.
  738. 738Zweiter Bericht der Bundesregiernung zur Verbraucherpolitik, 20.10.1975, BT-Drs. 7/4181, reprinted in v. Hippel (1979), 239 ff.
  739. 739Ibid., 239.
  740. 740Joerges/Hart (1980), 129.
  741. 741See Joerges/Hart (1980), 133.
  742. 742Biervert/Fisher-Winkelmann/Rock, Verbraucherpolitik in der Marktwirtschaft (Rowohlt, 1978), 57.
  743. 743Ibid., 57.
  744. 744Biervert/Fischer-Winkelmann/Rock (1978), 57. Czerwonka/Schöppe, ‘Verbraucherinformationspolitik und Funktionsfähigkeit des Wettbewerbs’ (1981) WuW, 165 ff, 286. Joerges/Hart (1980), 134.
  745. 745See Biervert/Fischer-Winkelmann/Rock (1978), 55; Joerges/Hart (1980), 134.
  746. 746Czerwonka/Schöppe (1981), 268; Joerges/Hart (1980), 134.
  747. 747Ibid., 66 ff.
  748. 748Ibid., 61 ff.
  749. 749Joerges/Hart (1980), 132.
  750. 750For a comprehensive account and critical analysis, see Drexl (1998), 25 ff.
  751. 751The distinction is introduced by Norbert Reich, with reference to Claus Offe’s Strukturproblem des kapitalistischen Staates (1973) and Jürgen Habermas’s Legitimationsproblem im Spätkapitalismus (1973). See Reich, ‘Allgemeiner Teil und Einleitung’ in: Reich/Tonner/Wegener, Verbraucher und Recht (Göttingen: Verlag Otto Schwartz & Co., 1976), 20 f. The same classification is followed by Dauner-Lieb, Verbraucherschutzrecht durch Ausbildung eines Sonderprivatrechtsför Verbraucher (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1983). Drexl also proposes a dichotomous classification, but redubs the two groups into ‘Ordnungspolitische Informationsmodel’ and ‘Soziale Altemativmodelle’. See Drexl (1998), 29 ff. Also Simitis uses the notion ‘information model’ as a summary concept for all approaches proceeding from the premises of liberal economic theory. See Simitis,
  752. 752This classification is said to apply beyond legal theory: „Wir unterscheiden zwischen vier Ansätzen oder Stadien von Theorie, Politik und Recht und sehen dabei Verbindungen, die von allgemeinen theoretischen Premissen über rechtstheoretische Positionen bis hin in dogmatische Einzelaussagen reichen.“ Joerges/Hart (1980), 118.
  753. 753Tilmann, ‘Zur Rechtsstellung des Verbrauchers bei Wettbewerbsdelikten’ (1977) ZHR, 32 ff., at 33; Tilmann, ‘Das Haftungsrisiko der Verbraucherverbände’ (1975) NJW, 913 ff; Tilmann, ‘Irreführende Werbeangaben und täuschende Werbung’ (1976) GRUR, 545 ff See Joerges/Hart (1980), 161.
  754. 754Hart/Joerges (1980).
  755. 755Schricker (1970a), 40.
  756. 756See Tilmann (1977), 32 ff.
  757. 757Schricker (1970a), 40.
  758. 758Schricker, ‘Wettbewerbsrecht und Verbraucherschutz’ (1972) 36 RabelsZ, 315 ff, at 316.
  759. 759Simitis (1976), 84.
  760. 760„Das Wirtschaftsrecht und speziell das Wirtschaftsprivatrecht kann dann nur der Aufrechterhaltung der Funktionsbedingungen des allgemeinen Privatrechts als Sicherung von Eigentum und privatautonomer Entscheidungsfreiheit durch Garantie des ökonomischen, prinzipiell sebstregulierenden Funktionsmechanismus Wettbewerb dienen, nicht aber sich einer folgenunsicheren politischen Detail- und Ergebnissteuerung offenen. Tilmann (1977), 35, referring critically to the positions of Norbert Reich and Konstantin Simitis.
  761. 761Schricker (1970a), 44.
  762. 762v. Hippel (1979), 82 ff. with references to the experience with administrative agency in Sweden and in the US.
  763. 763See Simitis (1976), 108 ff., with reference to Gunnar Myrdal’s classic An International Economy, Problems and Prospects from 1956 and Galbraith (1968). 487„Verbraucherschutz ist also eine Frage der Verteilung wirtschaftlicher und der sich daraus ergebenden politischen Macht.“ Simitis (1976), 161.
  764. 764See Reich (1976), 1 ff.
  765. 765Simitis (1976).
  766. 766Reifoer, Das Recht des Konsumentenkredits - Soziale Zivilrechtsauslegung im Verbraucherschutz, Diss. jur., (Berlin: 1977).
  767. 767See Reich (1976), 11; Simitis (1976), 144; Reifher (1977).
  768. 768Reifher refutes an understanding of private law as abstract (formal), being able to make the right decision “with eyes closed to social realities“. Reifher (1977), 9.
  769. 769Reifher (1977).
  770. 770Reifner (1977), 109.
  771. 771Joerges/Hart (1980), 120.
  772. 772„Die Träger der wirtschaftlichen Macht müssen daher der öffentliche Kontrolle unterstellt werden und sich gegenüber den Verbrauchern verantworten.“ Simitis (1976), 157.
  773. 773See Simitis (1976), 157; Reich (1976), 204 ff. and in particular at 221 ff. on extending the possibilities of counterpower through consumer unions.
  774. 774Joerges/Hart (1980). The approach receives further elaboration in Joerges, Verbraucherschutz als Rechtsproblem (Heidelberg: Recht und Wirtschaft, 1981); Joerges (1986), 142 ff.
  775. 775The link to Teubner’s reflexive law and to Selznik’s responsive law is evident, see Teubner (1993).
  776. 776Hart/Joerges (1980), 236 f. For a critique of this approach see Drexl (1998), 34 f.
  777. 777See SOU 1971:37, 155 ff., Thorelli/Thorelli Consumer Information Systems and Consumer Policy (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company, 1977), 192 ff.
  778. 778SOU 1971:37, 156.
  779. 779SOU 1947:46.
  780. 780SOU 1949:18.
  781. 781SOU 1955:16.
  782. 782SOU 1955:45.
  783. 783SOU 1971:37, 12.
  784. 784Thorelli/Thorelli (1977), 191 f., referring to Arbetarrörelsens efterkrigsprogram, Stockholm 1944, sections 24 and 26.
  785. 785Vill Du komma till tals?, Rapport om försöksverksamheten med lokala konsumentkommitteér, 12 maj 1967­
  786. 786juni 1970, Bilaga 2 Skoglundsgruppen slutrapport, ”Om konsumentpolitik” (herinafter the Skoglund Report). See also SOU 1993:59, 119.
  787. 787Fjellström/Ring, ‘Rödluvan behöver inga råd, sa vargen. En orättvis betraktelse över konsumentpolitiken’ (Stockholm: Prisma, 1982), 42.
  788. 788SOU 1971:37, 216. Cf Skoglund’s Report .
  789. 789See Bernitz/Modig/Malmén (1970), 52.
  790. 790Konsumentutredningen, SOU1971:37; see also Government Bill with Guidelines for and Organisation of Society’s Consumer Policy, prop. 1972:33.
  791. 791Reklamutredningen, SOU 1972:7; SOU 1973:10; SOU 1973:11.
  792. 792SOU 1972:7.
  793. 793This definition was first launched in SOU 1949:18, 18 and then quoted in SOU 1971:37, 159.
  794. 794”Det är viktigt att ur samhällsekonomisk synpunkt lika väl som ur den enskildes synpunkt kunna förhindra ett otillfredställande utnyttjande av resurser, dvs. framställning av varor eller tjänster som är olämplig utormade och ej fyller rimliga krav på användbarhet och som konsumenterna därför inte önskar.” Skoglund’s Report, op. cit., 46.
  795. 795See in this sense prop. 1972:33, 8.
  796. 796”Vid bedömningen av hushållens behov kan man i konsumentverkets arbete inte i någon avgörande grad bygga på konsumenternas anspråk uttryckta genom efterfrågan av produkter och på andra sätt. Det är känt att anspråksnivån på många viktiga områden kan vara alltför låg. Exempelvis kan anspråken beträffande kost vara alltför låga i föhållande till näringsbehoven. Behoven måste - som i annat samhällsarbete - formuleras normativt med utgångspunkt från samhällets ambitioner om individernas välbefinnande.” SOU 1971:37, 13 ff., 52.
  797. 797Prop. 1972:33.
  798. 798Prop. 1972:33, 62.
  799. 799Prop. 1972:33, 64.
  800. 800Prop. 1972:33, 60.
  801. 801Prop. 1972:33, 61.
  802. 802Prop. 1972:33, 65. See the devastating criticism in Thorelli/Thorelli (1977), 189. ff.
  803. 803See Bernitz, ‘Consumer Protection: Aims, Methods and Trends in Swedish Consumer Law’ (1976) SSL, 13 ff., at 26 f. Thorelli/Thorelli characterise the political climate in Sweden since the late 1960s as “extensions of statism ... accompanied by considerable antibusiness, antimarketing and, particularly, antiadvertising fanfare.” Thorelli/Thorelli (1977), 197.
  804. 804See, for instance, the massive objections on the part of industry against most of the proposals of the Consumer Inquiry Commission, especially the normative definition of the consumer interest and the programme for ‘producer influence’, prop. 1972:33, 31 f. Industry also directed sharp criticism against the way in which the Inquiry Commission described the functioning of a competition economy and the weak position of consumers in respect to producers and traders, see ibid., 28.
  805. 805Thorelli/Thorelli (1977), 199.
  806. 806See prop. 1956:105, Statsutskottets utlåtande nr. 124, rksd nr. 282. English translations are taken from the official summary of Konsumentpolitik, Riktlinjer och organisation, SOU 1971:37.
  807. 807On the KO, see below.
  808. 808Until 1994, the official English translation was National Board for Consumer Policy.
  809. 809Prop. 1972:33, 12, 67.
  810. 810See above, the quote of Alf Ross in Hart’s critical analysis of Scandinavian legal realism.
  811. 811See the Consumer Sales Act (Konsumentköplag , SFS 1973:877), later on replaced by (SFS 1990:932); Consumer Services Act (Konsumenttjänstlag, SFS 1985:716).
  812. 812On the position of consumer law in relation to general civil law, see Wilhelmsson, ‘Consumer Protection and the Rules and Principles of General Contract Law’ in: Wilhelmsson, Twelve Essays on Consumer Protection (Helsinki: University of Helsinki, 1996a), 120 ff.
  813. 813See Bernitz (1976), 13 ff., at 21.
  814. 814The term ‘market law’ was first advanced by Sven Tengelin in Juristnytt 1968, 415. See Bernitz (1969), 63, fn. 35. On the impact of the systemic approach developed by Bernitz in other Nordic countries see Madsen, Markedsret, Band I (Copenhagen: Jurist- og 0konomforb.:s Forl., 1990), 15 ff. 538”Marknadsrätt kan på det nationella planet definieras som den del av rättsordningen, vilken har till uppgift att normera bedrivandet av näringsverksamhet och företagens handlande på marknaden genom ramregler om företagens etablering, marknadsföring och konkurrens samt skydd för konsumenterna.”Bernitz (1969), 63.
  815. 815Bernitz, ‘Market Law as a Legal Discipline’(1979) SSL, 55 ff., at 62. In this article Bernitz draws the so called ‘Heptagon’ of market law rules, ibid., 63.
  816. 816Bernitz (1979), 56 ff.
  817. 817Bernitz (1969), 63.
  818. 818”Sedd som helhet utgör den [marknadsrätten] uppenbarligen varken genuin civilrätt eller genuin offentlig rätt. Dess regelsystem har inte till uppgift att normera privata rättigheter eller överlåtelser och upplåtelser mellan enskilda men heller inte att ensidigt utgöra ett instrument för offentlig myndighetsutövning.
  819. 819BT-Drs. IV/2001. See Rogge, ‘Verbraucherklage und Streitwertsherabsetzung im gewerblichen Rechtschutz’ (1964) WRP, 336 ff.
  820. 820Act of 21.7.1965, BGBl I 625, which inserted § 13 la UWG (Klagebefugnis der Verbraucherverbände).
  821. 821Notably, in the course of presenting the arguments in support of the draft the order of interests was swapped. Whereas initially, on p. 6 of the Bill, the unions and in particular the consumer unions were mentioned as the main target of the new legislation, on p. 7 the government expressed its belief that “the possibility of reduction of the value in dispute would serve the needs of the small and middle size economy and of the unions in § 13 UWG”. Ibid, 7. “ Der Bundesregierung ist bekannt, dass gerade in Rechtsstreitigkeiten wegen unlauteren Wettbewerbs kleinere und mittlere Unternehmen häufig von einer an sich aussichtsreichen Rechtsverfolgung absehen, weil ihnen das damit verbundene Kostenrisiko nicht tragbar erscheint.”
  822. 822See Borck (1964a), 217 ff.
  823. 823See Brinkmann, Die Verbraucherorganisationen in der Bundesrepublik Detschland und ihre Tätigkeit bei der überbetrieblichen technischen Normung (Köln: Carl Heymanns, 1976), 5 ff.
  824. 824The seven members were more specifically: the German Housewives Association (Deutscher Hausfrauen­ Bund), the Women Section of the German Consumer Co-peratives (Frauengilde Deutscher Konsumgenossenschaften), the Federation of German Consumer Co-operatives (Zentralverband Deutscher Konsumgenossenschaften), the Institute for Self-help (Institutftir Selbsthilfe), the Consumer Federation, Stuttgart (Verbraucherverband), the Federation of Public Dwelling Facilities (Gesamtverband gemeinnütziger Wohnungsunternehmen), the Managing Director of the Assistance Board of the Central Union of the Evangelist Church in Germany (der Geschäftsführer des Hilfswerkes der Evangelischen Kirche in Deutschland). See Brinkmann (1976), 6.
  825. 825Borck (1964a), 217.
  826. 826See Drs.
  827. 827Jahre später, das Wettbewerbsrecht materiell wesentlich verbessert würde.... (my italics)553
  828. 828On the UWG as a reflexive consumer protection law see Schricker (1970a), 32 ff., at 33.
  829. 829See Fezer, ‘Europäisierung des Wettbewerbsrechts’ (1994) JZ, 317 ff.
  830. 830Ibid., 19.
  831. 831See Bundestag Ds.V/2324. On the political history of this reform, see Krieger ‘Die Bestrebungen zur Änderung des Gesetzes gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb’ (1968) GRUR, 511.
  832. 832See Krieger (1968), 512.
  833. 833“Preislistentäuschung, Werbung mit Lockvogelangeboten, Fabrik- und Großhandelspreisen, Kaufscheinhandel, Werbung unter Einschaltung der Autorität Dritter.” Some of these practices had already been considered by the judiciary to fall under the prohibition of § 3 UWG whereas others had still not been a matter for litigation. Krieger (1968), 511.
  834. 834Act of 26 June 1969, BGB1 I 633, amending §§ 3, 23, 24 und introducing the new §§ 6a und 6b as well as §
  835. 835II-IV.
  836. 836BGB1 I 1969, 633.
  837. 837See Schricker (1975).
  838. 838v. Falckenstein, Die Bekämpfung unlauterer Geschäftspraktiken durch Verbraucherverbände (Köln: Bundesanzeiger Verlag, 1977).
  839. 839v. Falckenstein, Schäden der Verbraucher durch unlauteren Wettbewerb (Köln: Bundesanzeiger Verlag, 1978).
  840. 840Meanwhile, some amendments in the UWG were carried through as part of a more general reform of criminal legislation with the overriding purpose to combat economic crime. See EGStGB of 2nd March 1974, BGB1 I 1974, 469. The following sections of UWG were amended: §§ 41, 6 II, 8, 10, 12, 15 I, 17 I and III, 18, 20a, 22,
  841. 841I, 27a V and XI. §§ 11 IV, 26 were repealed. With a statute of 10 March 1975, BGB1 I 1975, 685 a new § 7d was introduced.
  842. 842See BT-Drs. 7/2049. See Stellungnahme der Deutschen Vereinigung für Gewerblichen Rechtschutz und Urheberrecht, GRUR 1974, 456.
  843. 843„Dieses Rechtsgebiet einer ständigen Anpassung an die tatsächlichen Gegebenheiten im Wirtschaftsleben bedarf, um neben einer Erhaltung des lauteren Wettbewerbs auch den Verbraucherschutz zu verbessern.“ BT- Drs. 7/2049, 1.
  844. 844The draft is published as attachment to the article of Gaedertz, ‘Ist eine UWG-Novelle erforderlich?’ (1977) WRP, 681 ff., at 686 ff.
  845. 845Ibid., 687, proposal for a new § 13 Abs. 1 c.
  846. 846BT-Drs. 8/1670, Entwurf des CDU/CSU Bundestagsfraktion vom 22. März 1978.
  847. 847BT-Drs. 8/2145, Entwurf der Bundesregierung, 1 ff.; Stellungnahme des Bundesrat, ibid., 33, Response by the Federal Government (Gegenäusserung der Bundesregierung), ibid., 40.
  848. 848From a consumer perspective the most important proposal was the lowering of the subjective threshold for liability through requiring only dolus eventualis. Schricker (1975), 929.
  849. 849Krieger, ‘Möglichkeiten einer Verstärkung des Schutzes gegen unlauteren Wettbewerb’ (1978) WRP, 1 ff.
  850. 850Tonner, ‘Verbraucherschutz im UWG und die UWG-Reform von 1986’ (1987) NJW, 1917 ff., 1918 and 1922.
  851. 851See ZAW, Diskussionspapier zur Werbepolitik Dezember 1975 (Edition ZAW, Band I); ZAW, Stellungnahme zum Entwurf einer UWG-Novelle, WRP 1978, 255 ff.
  852. 852See ZAW, WRP 1978, 255 ff.
  853. 853The objections were raised already in 1975, and were then reiterated in the Position Paper to the 1978 Government Bill, Ibid.
  854. 854“Die bewährte zivilrechtliche Sanktionssytem des UWG würde durch die zusätzliche Einführung der Untersagungsbefugnis einer Behörde gesprengt und die Effizienz dieses Sytems nicht verstärkt sondern im Gegenteil beeinträchtigt.” ZAW, WRP 1978, 255 ff, at 260.
  855. 855Ibid., 260.
  856. 856Ibid., 261. “Gegen die Schaffung von noch mehr Behördenkompetenz und staatlichen Eingriffsbefugnissen bestehen inzwischen nicht nur bei der Wirtschaft, sondern auch bei den Politikern aller Parteien weitverbreitet Bedenken, insbesondere unter dem Gesichtspunkt der Personal- und Finanzsituation der öffentlichen Hand.”
  857. 857Krieger (1978), 1 ff.
  858. 858Lindow, ’75 Jahre Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs’ in: 75 Jahre Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs (Bad Homburg: 1987), 15 ff., at 21.
  859. 859See Jaschick, ‘Verbraucherpolitik in eigener Verantwortung’ (1974) MA, 242 ff., at 246.
  860. 860Gesetz zur Änderung von Wirtschafts-, verbraucher-, arbeite- und sozialrechtlicher Vorschriften vom 25.7.1986 BGBl I 1169, ber. 1867 I 565.
  861. 861§ 6e (Öffentliche Werbung mit mengenbeschränkenden Angaben) and § 6e (Gegenüberstellungen eigener Preise mit vorher höheren eigenen Preisen) UWG.
  862. 862§§ 7a-7d sowie §§ 9, 9a, 10, 11 UWG were repealed. See Baumbach/Hefermehl (1990).
  863. 863See ibid., § 13a Rücktrittsrecht für Abnehmer, die durch unwahre Werbung zum Vertragsschluss bestimmt wurden
  864. 864See in particular § 23a, facilitating the reduction of the amount in controversy. More details on this amendment follow below.
  865. 865See the speech of the President of the Zentrale, Ernst Wilhelm Lindow (1987), 15 ff., at 21.
  866. 86689 entscheidend einzuschränken.
  867. 867See Lehmann, M., ‘Die UWG-Neuregelungen 1987 - Erläuterungen und Kritik’ (1987) GRUR, 199 ff.; Treis, M., ‘1986 års revision av tyska UWG - konsumentskydd eller strukturpolitik?’ (1988) NIR, 165 ff.
  868. 868Schricker (1975), 216 ff.
  869. 869Krieger (1968), 513.
  870. 870This was allowed only if producers (§ 6a, 1) and wholesalers (§ 6a, 2) sold exclusively to endconsumers, charged endconsumers and retailes or commercial users the same price, or indicated that consumers are charged a higher price than retailers.
  871. 871See BGH WRP 1974, 264 (“Intermarkt”).
  872. 872Drs. 7/2049, 1.
  873. 873Gaedertz (1977), 681 ff; ZAW Organ Werbung 1977/78.
  874. 874Reich, 'UWG-Reform und Verbraucherschutz’ (1978) ZRP, 100 ff., 104.
  875. 875v. Hippel, ‘Verbraucherschutz’ (1976) 40 RabelsZ, 513 ff., 522.
  876. 876His proposal was, however, conditioned upon failure within a reasonable time-limit to develop viable consumer unions which could manage to provide an adequate control of unfair advertising, something he thought highly unlikely, if judging from the experience so far, see v. Hippel (1976), 522. For an evaluation of the Swedish model see also Günther (1972) WuW, 427 ff.
  877. 877v. Hippel (1976), 523.
  878. 878See above, Gaedertz (1977).
  879. 879Ulmer, ‘Der Begriff “Leistungswettbewerb” und seine Bedeutung für die Anwendung von GWB und UWG Tatbestände’ (1977) GRUR, 565 ff.
  880. 880Ulmer (1977), 566 ff.
  881. 881See SOU 1983:40.
  882. 882See Reich/Tonner/Wegener (1976), 210 ff. The specific proposal was of reforming the Federal Office of Cartels into a Higher Market Authority with competencies of a consumer protection agency.
  883. 883Reich, Staatliche Regulierung zwischen Marktversagen und Politikversagen (Heidelberg: C.F. Müller Verlag, 1984).
  884. 884On FTC, Grimes (1971), 1770 ff.; Report in 80 Harv. L. Rev. 1064, fn. 14 (1967).
  885. 885„Soweit es um die aufklärende und wegweisende Tätigkeit der FTC geht, so wird sie schon heute in der Bundesrepublik von zahlreiche Behörden in Bund und Länder, wie von Verbrauchervebänden und Institutionen der gewerblichen Wirtschaft wahrgenommen. Diese Aktivität sollte zweifellos stärker gefordert und ausgebaut werden; systemsprengender neuer Institutionen bedarf es dazu aber wohl nicht.“ Schricker (1975), 235.
  886. 886„Detaillierende Sondernormierungen haben ihren Platz in Wirtschaftsbereichen spezieller Technizität, etwa auf dem Gebiet der Lebensmittel und pharmazeutischen Erzeugnisse, der Verkehrssicherheit von Krafifahrzugen und Maschinen, der Deklaration von Preisen, Massen, Gewichten und des Inhalts von Fertigpackungen u. dgl. Schricker, ibid.
  887. 887v. Falckenstein (1977), 21, Fn. 12; Neumeyer (1973) GRUR Int. 686.
  888. 888Schricker (1975), 235.
  889. 889Schricker (1975), 237.
  890. 890Elster (1984), Wettbewerbrecht, 1941, 21 ff. Einschlägige Vorschriften, 69.
  891. 891Schricker (1975), 243. The examples - BGH 29.11.1963 Grobdesin, GRUR 1964, 269 (271); LG München 22.4.1958, WRP 1958, 219 (221). See Schricker (1970b), 34 ff.
  892. 892See Schricker (1975), 233.
  893. 893Lehmann, ‘Zur Notwendigkeit einer massvollen Liberalisierung des deutschen Wettbewerbsrechts’ (1995) GRUR, 380 ff.
  894. 894See v. Hippel (1977), 180.
  895. 895Brinkmann (1976), 162 ff. v. Falckenstein (1977), 20.
  896. 896See Regierungsentwurf, Drs.
  897. 897See for instance the comments of the Parliamentary Secretary de With with the Federal Ministry of Justice in an interview with ZAW, December 1977: „Ein vor kurzem veröffentlichtes, im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums der Justiz erstelltes Gutachten des Münchner Max-Planck-Instituts hat ergeben, daß sich die zivilrechtlichen Sanktionen des UWG, die Klagebeftignisse der Mitbewerber, der gewerblichen Verbände und der Vebraucherverbände (§ 13 UWG) in der Praxis bewährt haben, wenn hier auch weitere Verbesserungen möglich und nötig sind. Diese Verbesserungen sollten aber im Rahmen der privatrechtlichen Struktur des UWG vorgenommen werden und zunächst auf ihre Wirksamkeit geprüft werden, bevor man Überlegungen über ganz andersartige, etwa öffentlichrechtliche, Sanktionen anstellt, die sich im übrigen mit der weitergehend generalklauselartigen Ausgestaltung des UWG nur schwer in Einklang bringen ließen. Der Entwurf hat sich daher bewußt darauf beschränkt, bestimmte Verbesserungen bei den zivilrechtlichen Ansprüchen des Gesezetzes und bei bestimmten Verfahrensvorschriften vorzusehen.”, as quoted by ZAW, Stelllungnahme, WRP 1978, 261. Similar view was expressed by Krieger (1978), 1 ff.
  898. 898ZAW, Stellungnahme, 261. See also ZAW Diskussionspapier zur Werbepolitik.
  899. 899Schricker (1975), v. Falckenstein (1977).
  900. 900Schricker, ‘Wettbewerbsrechtliche Aspekte des Verbraucherschutzes’ (1976) 40 RabelsZ, 535 ff., 574.
  901. 901BT-Drs. IV/2217, 3. These were some of the arguments in the Bill to the 1965 UWG Novelle. The motives referred to the limitations of the then existing legal framework to take consumer interests into account.
  902. 902One alternative discussed already at the time of the 1965 Novelle was the possibility to grant standing not only to consumer associations but also to individual consumers. The Swiss Unfair Competition Act, which had served as a source of inspiration for the 1965 UWG reform, had indeed granted such right. This option, however, was rejected as too far-reaching and because the prospects for making effective use of the individual consumer’s right of standing were estimated as meagre. BT-Drs. IV/2217, 4.
  903. 903§ 13 UWG, old wording of 1965: „Sachbefugnis von Gewerbetreibenden und Verbänden, Abs. la, 1 Satz“ „In den Fällen der §§3,6,7 Abs. 1 und des §11 kann der Anspruch auf Unterlassung auch von Vebänden geltend gemacht werden, zu deren satzungsgemässen Aufgaben es gehört, die Interessen der Verbraucher durch Aufklärung und Beratung wahrzunehmen, soweit die Vebände als solche in bürgerlichen Rechtsstreitigkeiten klagen können.”
  904. 904BT-Drs. IV/2217, 4.
  905. 905Ibid.
  906. 906Ibid.
  907. 907On the geographical limitations of the right of action, see v. Falckenstein (1977), 48.
  908. 908See Borck (1964a), 218.
  909. 909See § 13 la UWG-E: “Das gleiche gilt in den Fällen des § 1, soweit der Anspruch unrichtige Angaben über Waren oder gewerbliche Leistungen, die geeignet sind, den Anschein eines besonders günstigen Angebots hervorzurufen.“ BT- Drs. IV/2217, 2.
  910. 910BT- Drs. IV/2217, 5. Die Bundesregierung ist jedoch der Auffassung, daß es nicht zu den Aufgaben der Verbraucherverbaende gehört, allgemein öffentliche Belange wahrzunehmen. Aus diesem Gründe braucht sich die Klagebefugnis der Verbraucherverbände auch nicht auf § 7 Abs. 2 und 3 und die §§ 7a-7c UWG erstrecken. Bei diesen handelt es sich vorwiegend um Ordnungsvorschriften.”
  911. 911„..oder eine sonstige Handlung zu Zwecken des Wettbewerbs betrifft, durch die wesentliche Belange der Verbraucher berührt werden.“
  912. 912Proceeding from an alternative draft elaborated on behalf of the AGV Hans Borck defended a broader right of acion encompassing all situations of unfair competition, but also stretching beyond the scope of UWG to cover other areas of relevant consumer legislation. Borck (1964a), 217.
  913. 913Pastor (1969), 575 f.
  914. 914See Borck, ‘Erste Erfahrungen im Umgang mit der Aktivlegitimation für Verbracherverbände’ (1968) WRP, 1 ff. He reports in particular on his experience from representing the Verein zum Schutze der Verbraucher gegen unlateren Wettbewerb (Verbraucherschutzverein) e.V., an association constituted on the initiative and with the participation of the Verbaraucherzentrale der Länder and Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbraucher, especially with the objective to process the complex of problems connected with unfair advertising that concern and burden all of these organisations.
  915. 915See Borck (1968), 2.
  916. 916Pastor (1969), 571.
  917. 917Pastor (1969).
  918. 918Stenographischer Bericht der 240 Sitzung des Deutschen Bundestag, GRUR 1969, 471.
  919. 919OLG Köln GRUR 1969, 484 („Verbraucherverband I“). Cf. Pastor (1969), 571; Wilke, ‘Über den Unsinn einer Reform der §§ 13 und 23a UWG' (1978) WRP, 581 ff., at 584.
  920. 920OLG Köln GRUR 1969, 484 (“Verbraucherverband I“)
  921. 921The threat was all the more effective because it did not refer to injunctive relief, but to a request for punishment due to violation of an already issued preliminary injunctive court order. The fine in these cases could be substantial. Ibid., 485.
  922. 922OLG Köln GRUR 1969, 484 („Verbraucherverband I“).
  923. 923BGH GRUR 1973, 78 („Verbraucherverband II“). See Wilke (1978), 586.
  924. 924BGH GRUR 1973, 78 ff., at 79 („Verbiaucherverband II“).
  925. 925BGH GRUR 1971, 516 ff. WRP 1971, 264 ff. (“Brockhaus Enzyklopädie”).
  926. 926OLG Frankfurt GRUR 1974, 228 ff. („Verbraucherschutzverband III“)
  927. 927Ibid.
  928. 928Wilke (1978), 582.
  929. 929See in this sense Kur, ‘Der Mißbrauch der Verbandsklagebefugnis’ (1981) GRUR, 558 ff., 559.
  930. 930See RGZ 120, 47 („Markenschutzverband“).
  931. 931Borck (1968), 2.
  932. 932Pastor, ‘Die UWG-Reform und der Mißbrauch der Verbandsklagebefugnis aus § 13 UWG' (1978) WRP, 245 ff., 248.
  933. 933Ibid.
  934. 934Pastor (1969), 576 ff.
  935. 935Ibid.
  936. 936In this example Pastor referred to the activity of the influential Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs e.V. in Frankfurt a.M. , see Pastor (1978), 248.
  937. 937Wilke (1978), 581 ff.
  938. 938Kur (1981), 561;Wilke (1978).
  939. 939Kur (1981), 561.
  940. 940Kur (1981), 565 ff.
  941. 941The proposals were prompted not only from a desire to suppress existing abusive litigation, but also to prevent future abuse. In particular, there was a fear that the proposed possibility of aggregating damage compensation claims could be abused. See Referentenentwurf des BJM, WRP 78, 277 ff.
  942. 942Ibid., 278.
  943. 943It was in particular Pastor who pointed at the very different nature of the existing business and consumer associations. The divergence in founding principles, objectives, activity and membership called in his opinion for carefully drafted rules adapted to these specifics. The risk of abuse for instance was highly present in the activity of the so-called “socially useful associations” but was negligible for classical interest organizations and, after curbing initial attempts for abuse through a balanced case law, also for consumer unions. The same reasoning was valid when assessing other factors like risks of litigation costs, economic situation of the union, need for promoting litigious activity, etc. Pastor proposed a rule introducing a more rigorous classification of the different organisations and treating differently the respective categories. Pastor (1978), 248 ff.
  944. 944Proposed § 13 II 3 UWG-E read: „von rechtsfähigen Verbänden, zu deren satzungsgemässen Augaben es gehört, Zuwiderhandlungen gegen Vorschriften dieses Gesetzes im Interesse der Gewerbetreibndn durch Erhebung von Klagen entgegenztreten, wenn si in diesem Aufgabenbereich tätige Verbände oder mindestens fünf Gewerbetreibende als Mitglieder haben.“
  945. 945See § 13 V UWG-E BT-Drs. 8/2145, Regierungsentwurf, 4 f. Wilke (1978), 582 ff. The registration was to take place at the local court, who also had the authority to cancel the entry into the Register if the requirements were no longer met. On the reform proposals, see Kur (1981), 565 ff.
  946. 946See Wilke (1978), who emphatically described the reform proposal as nonsense (Unsinn).
  947. 947Pastor (1978), 274; Wilke (1978), 587; Schricker, ‘Verbraucherschutz - ein neues Rechtgebiet?’ (1979) GRUR Int., 315 ff.
  948. 948Kur (1981), 566.
  949. 949Borck, ‘Zuckerbrot und Peitsche für Verbände?’ (1978) WRP, 161 ff.
  950. 950Pastor (1978), 247; Wilke (1978), 588.
  951. 951Bender/Strecker, ‘Access to Justice in the Federal Republic of Germany’ in: Cappelletti/Garth, Access to Justice, Vol. I (Alphen aan den Rijn; Sijthoff and Noordhoff, 1978), 520 ff., 530.
  952. 952Similar rules apply by appeal proceedings: an unsuccessful appellant stands for his costs, whereas by partial success § 92 I ZPO is applied accordingly (§ 97 I ZPO). By voluntary settlement litigation costs are regarded as waived, if nothing else is agreed between the parties. The parties can however request a court decision on the division of costs under § 91a ZPO. Melullis (1995), 382 ff.
  953. 953§ 7 Federal Ordinance on Attorney’s Fees (Bundesrechtsanwaltsgebührenordnung, BRAGebO) BGB1. I 1957, 861, 907. Nevertheless, there exists a possibility for the client and the attorney to agree on the size of the attorney fee (which does not affect the court’s decision).
  954. 954Ibid., 531.
  955. 955§ 31 II Nr. 4 BRAGebO.
  956. 956Bender/Strecker (1978), 531. The same authors estimate in 1979 that for litigation involving approximately DM 14,400 the cost can total approximately one half of the amount in controversy. Under the present BRAGebO a single attorney’s fees for a sum in controversy of 5 000 EUR amounts to 313 EUR.
  957. 957Kur, Streitwert und Kosten in Verfahren wegen unlauteren Wettbewerbs (Köln: Bundesanzeigerverlag, 1980), 14,27 ff.
  958. 958§ 3 ZPO „Der Wert wird von dem Gericht nach freiem Ermessen festgesetzt; es kann eine beantragte Beweisaufnahme sowie von Amts wegen die Einnahme des Augenscheins und die Begutachtung durch Sachverständige anordnen.“ See Bender/Strecker (1978), 532 ff.
  959. 959Kur (1980).
  960. 960Kur (1980), 27. Kur points to the very divergent practices of the various District and Local Courts, with differences between 1600 to 10000 for the same violation; ibid., 14.
  961. 961In this sense already the Imperial Court, see Callmann (1929), 444; cf. Kur (1980), 28; BGH GRUR 1968, 106, 107, (“Ratiomarkt”).
  962. 962BGH GRUR 1968, 106 (“Ratiomarkt”).
  963. 963BGH GRUR 1956, 279 (“Olivin”); BGH GRUR 1957, 606 (“Heilmittelvertrieb”); BGH GRUR 1958, 32 (“Haferschleim”); BGH GRUR 1960, 379 (“Zentrale”); BGH GRUR 1964, 567 (“Lavamat”).
  964. 964The case concerned an innovatory retail practice used by a powerful wholesaler to enter the end-consumer market. Retailers could enter a contract with the wholesaler and acquire the right to distribute authorisation purchase cards to their customers. The retailers who entered into such an arrangement were granted 4 percent of the purchases of the recruited customers. The practice was attacked as unfair and contrary to the Rebates Act and the Free Gifts Act. See more on the legislative reaction to this type of practice above.
  965. 965Kur (1980), 149 ff.
  966. 966§ 945 ZPO: „Erweist sich die Anordnung eines Arrestes oder einer einstweiligen Verfügung als von Anfang an ungerechtfertigt oder wird die angeordnete Maßregel auf Grund des § 926 Abs. 2 oder des § 942 Abs. 3 aufgehoben, so ist die Partei, welche die Anordnung erwirkt hat, verpflichtet, dem Gegner den Schaden zu ersetzen, der ihm aus der Vollziehung der angeordneten Maßregel oder dadurch entsteht, daß er Sicherheit leistet, um die Vollziehung abzuwenden oder die Aufhebung der Maßregel zu erwirken.“
  967. 967BT- Drs. IV/2217, 6.
  968. 968§ 23a Litigation costs in civil disputes: “(l)If a party to a civil dispute in which a complaint was filed under this Act presents a credible showing that the payment of costs according to the full amount in controversy would substantially endanger his economic situation, the court may direct pursuant to a motion by such a party that the obligation of this party to pay court costs be measured by an amount in controversy that is adjusted according to said party’s economic position. The effect of the order is also that the beneficiary party shall have to pay the fees
  969. 969Borck (1978), 161 ff. A similar function of litigation costs is suggested by Kur. She rejects proposals of setting a ceiling (of DM 50,000) to the amount in controversy with the argument that this would favour the violator. “Damit würde es dem Verletzer zu einfach gemacht werden, die Kosten eines möglicherweise zu führenden Wettbewerbsprozesses als leicht zu verschmerzenden Kostenfaktor einer grösseren Werbekampagne einzukalkulieren. Die Neigung zu aussergerichtlichem Einlenken würde verringert.“ Kur (1980), 123 f.
  970. 970Kur (1980), 122 ff.
  971. 971Pastor, ‘Die Streitwertherabsetzung nach dem Gesetz zur Änderung des Gesetzes gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb, des Warenzeichengesetzes und des Gebrauchsmustergesetzes vom 21.7.1965’ (1965) WRP, 271 ff., at 279.
  972. 972Ibid.
  973. 973See Pastor (1965), 281.
  974. 974See in this sense Pastor (1965), 279 (womit das Gesetz seinen Gebührenanspruch zu einem (an sich unzulässigen) Erfolgshonorar umgestaltet hat).
  975. 975Drs. IV/2217, 8.
  976. 976Pastor (1965), 271 ff., 276.
  977. 977Borck, ‘Nochmals: Aktivlegitimation für Verbraucherverbände und Wettbewerbsarmen-recht’ (1964b) WRP,
  978. 978ff., at 402.
  979. 979See in this sense Pastor (1965), 271 ff. and the reference there to the Position Paper of the Attorney Association, AnwBl, 1964, 169, 170. The Position Paper spoke according to Pastor of an intervention “close to expropriation”.
  980. 980See in this sense Borck (1968), 4.
  981. 981See Pastor (1965), 283.
  982. 982Kur (1980).
  983. 983Borck (1968), 1. Kur (1980), 122.
  984. 984Most courts rejected attempts on the part of consumer associations to have their economic situation assessed on the basis of their aggregate litigious activity throughout the year. Cf. the analysis in Kur (1980), 113 ff. with further references to case law.
  985. 985Kur (1980), 114.
  986. 986„Ein Verein, welcher die Interessen der Verbraucher zu vertreten hat und dessen Mittel gering sind, solle mit diesen Mitteln haushalten und sie bei praktisch bedeutsamen Wettbewerbsverstössen einsetzen. Es sei unangebracht, in einem solchen Falle zu Lasten der Staatskasse und des den Verein vertretenden Rechtsanwalts eine Streitwertbegünstigung anzuordnen.“ Quoted after Kur (1980), 116.
  987. 987Kur (1980), 114.
  988. 988Ibid., 401.
  989. 989Borck (1964b), 398 ff., at 401. See also Borck’s view reiterated in his later article, Borck (1968), 4. Kur is critical of such views. She rightly points at the distorted priority setting that would follow, if consumer associations were to select and litigate only the simple, deadsure cases of competition offences. Kur (1980), 123.
  990. 990For a positive view on this proposal with the sole reservation that the ceiling was set too high, see Reich (1978), 104.
  991. 991BT-Drs. 8/1670, 12. Similar proposals were advanced in the Government Bill BT-Drs. 8/2145. Stellungnahme des Bundesrates, 33, Gegenausserung der Bundesregierung, 40.
  992. 992Hart/Joerges (1980), 105.
  993. 993§ 93 ZPO, „Hat der Beklagte nicht durch sein Verhalten zur Erhebung der Klage Veranlassung gegeben, so fallen dem Kläger die Prozeßkosten zur Last, wenn der Beklagte den Anspruch sofort anerkennt.“ See Baumbach/Hefermehl (1998), Einl.. UWG, Rdnr. 526, 420.
  994. 994Melullis, Handbuch des Wettbewerbsprozesses, 2 Auflage (Köln: Dr. Otto Schmidt Verlag, 1995), 404 ff. It is to be underlined that the a declaration to cease and desist would not make judicial proceedings obsolete and would not respectively have the effect on the allocation of the costs secured by penalty (strafgesicherte Unterlassungserklärung). Only then can the defendant really prove that his commitment to cease with and desist from the infringement is seriously intended. Baumbach/Hefermehl (1998) Einl. UWG 528, 435.
  995. 995In any case the plaintiff has to prove in the proceedings that he has given the necessary notification, or that such notification for some reason is obsolete. The defendant has in his turn to prove that he has submitted a voluntary cease and desist declaration under penalty and thus has deprived the plaintiff of his/her cause of action (“klaglos gestellt hat"). Baumbach/Hefermehl (2001), Einl. UWG, Rdnr. 525 ff. with further references.
  996. 996This notification is called a finalizing notice (Abschlußschreiben) and is equally useful to avoid unnecessary trials. See Melullis (1995), 405.
  997. 997§ 823 BGB, cf. Melullis (1995), 431, 436.
  998. 998The courts tended to accept that there was no general duty of compensation of costs in German law. The protection of one’s own legal sphere was a task of each legal person and the costs connected with such protection should only be compensated in case of damages, or in case of special rules of civil procedure. See GRUR 1970,
  999. 999(“Fotowettbewerb”).
  1000. 1000BGHZ 52, 393; GRUR 1970, 189 (“Fotowettbewerb”) (NJW 1970, 243) „Wer einen Wettbewerbsverstoss begangen hat, muss einem Verein zur Bekämpfung des unlauteren Wettbewerbs die notwendigen Aufwendungen für eine vorprozessuale Abmahnung erstatten.“ According to Reich the doctrine extended only to business unions, Reich (1978), 103, but the dominant opinon seems to be that the rule applies equally to consumer unions.
  1001. 1001§§ 683, 670 BGB, Melullis (1995), 436 ff.
  1002. 1002See reference in Reich (1978), 103.
  1003. 1003BGH, GRUR 1970, 189 (“Fotowettbewerb”). See Halfmeier, ‘Der Anspruch der Verbraucherverbände auf Kostenerstattung anlässlich der Durchsetzung von Unterlassungsansprüchen nach UWG und AGB-Gesetz’ in: Brönneke (ed.), Kollektiver Rechtsschutz im Zivilprozess (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2001).
  1004. 1004See Halfmeier (2000), 146 with reference to BGH NJW 1984, 2525.
  1005. 1005Halfmeier (2001). See Baumbach/Hefermehl (1998), Einl. UWG, Rdn. 556, 432.
  1006. 1006See Borck’s appeal for a specific rule assuring coverage of attorney fees for correspondence and pretrial notification procedure, Borck (1968), 4.
  1007. 1007In his view these were the real damages suffered by consumer unions whose compensation was vital for the effective work of the unions. Reich (1978), 100 ff., 103.
  1008. 1008See Klaka, Comment on Fotowettbewerb decision (1970) GRUR, 190 ff; Kisseler, ‘Das Klagerecht der Verbände in der Bewährungsprobe’ (1977) WRP, 151 ff.; Pastor, ‘Kostenerstattung bei erfolgeicher Verwarnung’ (1979) WRP, 423 ff.; Borck, ‘Ansichten und Argumente zur Erstattung der Abmahnkosten’ (1981) WRP, 438; Melullis, ‘Zum Unkostenerstattungsanspruch bei der Verwarnung durch Verbände im gewerblichen Rechtsschutz’ (1992) WRP, 1 ff.
  1009. 1009Pastor (1978), 249 ff
  1010. 1010It was then, as a rule equal to the amount of the notification costs.
  1011. 1011The courts tended first, to accept an unrealistically high sum in controversy for the main trial, and in addition calculated the attorney fees on the basis of a higher percentage from the normal attorney fees than usual (7/10 instead of 5/10). Pastor (1978), 249.
  1012. 1012One way for the courts to circumvent the risk of abuse was to recognize the right to use the assistance of an attorney only for associations that could demonstrate a regular litigious activity. The expected effect was to suppress the activity of so called “Abmahnvereine” dealing mainly with pretrial notifications as a source of remuneration.
  1013. 1013In this sense Schricker, ‘Hundert Jahre Gesetz gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb - Licht und Schatten’ (1996a) GRUR Int., 473 ff., 478: „Die Rechtsprechung hat gewiss bei der richterrechtlichen Ausgestaltung der Institution der Abmahung rechtsschöpferische Kraft gezeigt; das im Laufe der zeit aufgebaute Regelwerk dient der Vermeidung von Prozessen und der Rechtssicherheit.“
  1014. 1014Schricker (1996a), 478.
  1015. 1015In this sense see Schricker, Ibid.
  1016. 1016BT-Drs. 10/4741, 6, 17.
  1017. 1017Melullis/Eheckelmann, ‘Beibehaltung der Kostenpauschale - ja oder nein?’ (1982) WRP, 560 ff.; Uedelhofen, Die kostenlose Erstabmahnung - eine wirkungslose Waffe gegen den unseriösen Abmahnveren, WRP 1982,
  1018. 1018Baumbach/Hefermehl (1998), § 13 UWG, Rdnr. 7 ff., 1330.
  1019. 1019RG 120,47; cf. Ch. 4.32.3.2 above.
  1020. 1020See Kur (1981), 558 ff, 564.
  1021. 1021By contrast, in case the perpetrator has submitted to a negatively affected “Gläubiger” (creditor) a cease and desist declaration secured by a penalty (“strafgesicherte Unterlassungserklärung”), then the danger of repeated infringements is usually regarded as eliminated also in view of the interests of other affected parties. The substantive rights of action of these latter parties can therefore be considered extinguished. Everything still depends on the individual case, though. Decisive are the opportunities for sanctioning the infringement, and in particular, the willingness of the Gläubiger to leave no doubt that the cease and desist declaration is seriously intended. Baumbach/Hefermehl (1998), § 13 UWG, Rdnr. 8b, 1330. BGH GRUR 60, 379/381 (“Zentrale“);
  1022. 1022See Kur (1981), 565.
  1023. 1023Kur (1981), 565, fn. 68 with reference to Hadding, JZ 1970, 306.
  1024. 1024On this question, see Baumbach/Hefermehl (1998), UWG § 13, Rdnr. 9, 1330-31. Parallel proceedings may also have an effect on litigation costs and in particular on the value in controversy (Streitwert). According to Hefermehl, there may be a reason to set the value of subsequent lawsuits somewhat lower than in the original lawsuit. Even here, however he underlines that this should not be taken as a rule and has to be weighed for each particular case. See Baumbach/Hefermehl (1998), UWG § 13, Rdnr. 9, 1330-31.
  1025. 1025Baumbach/Hefermehl (1998), § UWG § 13, Rdnr. 10, 1331.
  1026. 1026See the complaints of Borck (1968), 3.
  1027. 1027Pastor (1978), 245, 253 ff.
  1028. 1028See § 32 ZPO, “Für Klagen aus unerlaudbten Handlungen ist das Gericht zuständing, in dessen Bezirk die Handlung begangen ist.”
  1029. 1029See Borck (1968), 3. With the 1994 UWG Novelle the provision on “fliegende Gerichtsbarkeit” was abolished, see Ch. 7.3.1.1 above.
  1030. 1030Schricker (1975), 231. See Baumbach/Hefermehl, Einl., § 25 UWG
  1031. 1031The reform proposals built on the well-known empirical study conducted by the Max Planck Institute, attempting to estimate the damages suffered by consumers as a result of unfair and deceptive trade practices. See v. Falckenstein (1978).
  1032. 1032See Reich (1978), 104.
  1033. 1033BT-Drs. 8/2145, 15.
  1034. 1034See proposed § 13 a III UWG-E, BT-Drs. 8/2145, 5.
  1035. 1035Mertens, ‘Kollektivrechtlicher Schadensersatz als Mittel des Verbraucherschutzes’ (1975) ZHR, 438 ff.
  1036. 1036Schricker (1975), 246.
  1037. 1037BGH GRUR 1963, 270 (“Bärenfang”). The dispute in this much celebrated decision concerned a honey liquer traditionally produced in Eastern Prussia. The defendant was marketing his product as “being produced after an old East-Prussian recepy”. The matter was refered back to the second instance court, extensively motivating a possibility to reverse the burden of proof towards the defendant in case the decisive circumstances for the case are in his sphere of control. It should be noted that the reversal in this case was not in any way inspired by concerns for higher protection of consumers.
  1038. 1038BT-Drs. 8/1670, 12. For positive comments on this proposal, see Reich (1978), 103.
  1039. 1039See Reich (1978), 103.
  1040. 1040See Fukuyama for further evidence.
  1041. 1041Grimes (1971), 1769 ff.
  1042. 1042Kisseler, ‘Verfahren der Wettbewerbszentrale vor dem Bundesgerichtshof in: 75 Jahre Zentrale (1987), 131 ff.
  1043. 1043In 1995 Lehmann gives similar estimates, which speaks for a rather stable rate of litigious activity. See Lehmann (1995), 380 ff.
  1044. 1044BGH GRUR 1959, 143 (“Blindenseife”); Leistungswettbewerb, rejected in BGH GRUR 1983, 374 („Spendenbitte“); BGH WRP 1984, 399 („Werbung in Schulen“).
  1045. 1045The leading case was BGH GRUR 1971, 162 („Diagnose-Zentrum“). The defendant was enjoined from offering free car inspection (worth 10-18 DM) in its garages, in so called “diagnosis centres”. Such offer was qualified as violating good commercial practice while marketing an excessively advantageous offer. It is worth quoting the summary of the case by Kisseler: „Der Bundesgerichtshof sah hierin ein übertriebenes Anlocken von Kunden und ließ demgegenüber auch nicht den Gesichtspunkt gelten, dass die kostenlose Überprüfung von Kraftfahrzeugen der Verkehrssicherheit diene“ Kisseler (1987), 136. See also BGH GRUR 1981, 746 ff. (“Ein­ Groschen-Werbeaktion”).
  1046. 1046BGH, GRUR 58, 557 („Direktverkäufe“).
  1047. 1047Kisseler (1987), 134.
  1048. 1048BGH, WRP 1974, 26 („Intermarkt“); BGH, WRP 1979, 300 (“Verkauf unter Einstandspreis“).
  1049. 1049Kisseler (1987), 136.
  1050. 1050Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs e.V., Stellungnahme zum Grünbuch der Kommission zum Verbraucherschutz in der Europäischen Union, February 2002, to be found at the site of the Commission DG SANCO: http://europa.eu.int/comm/consumers/cons_int/safe_shop/fair_bus_pract/green_pap_comm/responses/business_g ermany/zbuw.pdf.
  1051. 1051„Erst der - etwa im deutschen UWG verankerte - Wettbewerbschutz mit Unterlassungsansprüchen für Wettbewerber und deren Wirtschaftsverb’nde führt damit effektiv zu einem umfangreichen Verbraucherschutz.“, ibid., 4.
  1052. 1052See v. Falckenstein (1977), 189.
  1053. 1053Among them were Verein gegen die Unwesen in Handel und Gewerbe, with a seat in Köln, pro virtute, Vereinigung gegen unlauteren Wettbewerb, Singen, Schutzveband gegen Unwesen in der Wirtschaft, München. Verein zur Förderung des lauteren Wettbewerbs, Bielefeld, etc. See v. Falckenstein (1977), 188.
  1054. 1054v. Falckenstein (1977), 168.
  1055. 1055BGH GRUR 1957, 606 ff., at 607, („Heilmittelvertrieb“); BGH GRUR 1966, 267 ff., at 270, („White Horse“).
  1056. 1056Schricker (1996a), 478.
  1057. 1057Wolf, ‘Zur Zulässigkeit der Verbandsklage’ (1971) BB, 1293 ff. with critical comments on BGH, BB 1971, 1297 („Spezialklinik“).
  1058. 1058On the early history of the consumer organisations in Germany, see Brinkmann (1976).
  1059. 1059During the time of the Weimar Republic these organizations achieved even some political representation. They were granted 30 (of 326) seats in the Imperial Economic Council. The situation changed drastically with coming to power of National Socialists, which were generally hostile to independent grass root associations. See Brinkmann (1976), 5ff. On early forms of consumer organisation and representation in Germany see Geyer (2001).
  1060. 1060Brinkmann (1976), 5 ff.
  1061. 1061Falckenstein (1977), 32. Critical Brinkmann (1976), 148.
  1062. 1062See Brinkmann (1976), 12 f.
  1063. 1063Initially the AGV was mainly financed by the Central Union of German Cooperative Associations.
  1064. 1064See Brinkmann (1976), 22 f.
  1065. 1065Falckenstein (1977), 33.
  1066. 1066Borck, ‘Fälle entgültig abgeschlossen’ (1970) Verbraucher Rundschau, 2 ff.
  1067. 1067See v. Falckenstein (1977), 26.
  1068. 1068v. Falckenstein (1977), 34, fn. 40 with reference to the Consumer Report of the Federal Government, Bonn, 1975, 59.
  1069. 1069The largest organisation, the Deutsche Verbraucherbund (with 50,000 members) specifically aimed to protect consumer interests by purchase of package tours and other travel services, and offered a defence and recovery service up to 500 DM. See v. Falckenstein (1977), 35.
  1070. 1070For processing of complaints the VZ of the Länder employed altogether 33 employees, of which 10 full-time lawyers, v. Falckenstein (1977), 41 ff.
  1071. 1071Ibid., 42.
  1072. 1072Schricker (1976), 574.
  1073. 1073Kur (1980), 122.
  1074. 1074See Wolf (1971), 1293.
  1075. 1075Kur (1980), 16 ff.
  1076. 1076Pastor/Ahrens, Der Wettbewerbsprozess (München: Beck, 2001).
  1077. 1077See Pastor (1969), 571 ff., 574.
  1078. 1078Pastor (1969), 572 ff.
  1079. 1079Pastor (1969), 576.
  1080. 1080Pastor (1969), 576.
  1081. 1081Borck (1964b), 399.
  1082. 1082On the history of Nordic legal cooperation, see Sevon, ‘Några reflexioner kring det nordiska lagstiftningssamarbetet’ (1988) TļR, 509 ff. For a critical legal analysis of the use of legal material from other Nordic countries, see Wilhelmsson, ‘Den nordiska rättsgemenskapen och rättskälleläran’ (1985) TJR, 181 ff.
  1083. 1083SOU 1966:71.
  1084. 1084With the limitation of appreciable effect on consumer behaviour “ägnad att påverka efterfrågan”. See SOU 1966:71, 333.
  1085. 1085SOU 1966:71, 295 ff.
  1086. 1086Ibid., 296.
  1087. 1087Although the Commission did not make an explicit reference to the American model with a Federal Trade Commission, references at other points in the report demonstrate the awareness of and perceptible influence of this model. Proposals in the direction of the US model were nevertheless rejected, but for the most part without comprehensive justification. See SOU 1966:71, 286.
  1088. 1088SOU 1966:48, 122.
  1089. 1089Prissamverkan och konkurrens, price co-operation and competition., SOU 1966:48, 122.
  1090. 1090SOU 1966:71, 49; prop. 1970:57, 59.
  1091. 1091See prop. 1970:57, L3U 1970:45.
  1092. 1092“Det har redan framgått att jag for min del vill se uppställandet av normer for marknadsföringen som en konsumentpolitisk fråga.” Prop. 1970:57, 57 f.
  1093. 1093”Ett vikigt del i konsumentpolitiken är att rikta konsumenternas uppmärksamhet på de faktorer som i första hand bör påverka konsumtionsvalet och öka deras motståndskraft mot säljarargument av irrationell art ...” Prop. 1970:57, 56.
  1094. 1094”Min principiella ställning är att samhället bör ha ett förstahandsansvar för att en god etisk standard iakttas i reklam och marknadsföring. Lagstiftningen bör vara så avancerad som behövs för att den skall kunna utgöra grundvalen för utbildandet av fullt tillfredsställande etiska normer, och normbildningen bör vara en uppgift för offentliga organ.” Prop. 1970:57, 59.
  1095. 1095Prop. 1970:57.
  1096. 1096Interestingly, as evidence of the failure of self-regulation to efficiently combat unfair marketing, a reference was made to a survey within the framework of the Advertising Committee suggesting that about 11-18 percent of the daily newspapers and 20-27 percent of the popular press contained announcements incompatible with valid norms. This somewhat casual reference indicates that the ambitions of the Government as to substantive outcomes were close to complete elimination of any unfair and deceptive advertising in the media. Prop. 1970:57, 59.
  1097. 1097Prop. 1975/76:34.
  1098. 1098SOU 1973:20.
  1099. 1099SOU 1973:10; SOU 1974:23.
  1100. 1100Prop. 1975/76:34, 93 ff.
  1101. 11010 iundertakings also in this area.
  1102. 1102SOU 1979:5.
  1103. 1103“På en rad områden, där samhället har tagit ansvar för att medborgarnas intressen tas till vara, har således möjligheter till direkt insyn i företagens aktiviteter tillskapats lagstiftningsvägen. Denna insyn är inte begränsad till situationer där åtgärder från myndigheternas sida antas vara påkallade utan ingår i en allmän tillsyn inom de områden som lagstiftningen omfattar. Ett område där motsvarande möjligheter i stort ännu saknas är konsumentpolitiken.” SOU 1979:5, 11.
  1104. 1104See SOU 1979:5, 13.
  1105. 1105It may be interesting to note that in the course of its work the Inquiry Commission undertook a comparative survey by sending questionnaires to governments and public authorities in other Western countries. In its response the German Federal Government bluntly stated that any attempt on the part of public authorities to influence undertakings’ decisions about product development would be in Germany perceived as unacceptable encroachment on the free market economy. See, SOU 1979:5, 61.
  1106. 1106SOU 1983:40.
  1107. 1107SOU 1983:40, 227 ff.
  1108. 1108These provisions were integrated in the MFL pending the adoption of a special Act on Product Safety. Prop. 1985/85:121, Inriktningen av konsumentpolitiken.
  1109. 110913 a § lag om marknadsdomstol (SFS 1970:417) as amended by SFS 1985:927.
  1110. 1110Prop. 1984/85:213; cf. SFS 1985:926.
  1111. 1111Treis speaks of “Möglichkeiten politischer Profilierung”, Tries (1991), 24. One can read in the Government Bill that the KF, LO and Husmodersförbundet point out the economic importance of marketing questions to consumers, and that the investigations to be carried out by the new public organs ought to take the social impact of the measures on consumers into account. LO emphasizes that the new organs have a responsibility for developing a consumer-useful advertising and marketing. Prop. 1970:57, 155.
  1112. 1112See, however, the Report of the Unfair Competition Inquiry Commission noting the dual role of the KF representing the interests of consumers but also acting in its capacity of producer and retailer, SOU 1966:71, 296.
  1113. 1113Prop. 1970:57, 155.
  1114. 1114Thorelli and Thorelli call the policy of influencing producers “producer jawboning”, Thorelli/Thorelli (1977), 200.
  1115. 1115It is likewise specific for Sweden that the judiciary is among the consulted parties in the course of legislative deliberations. Wee should for instance take note of the Market Court, but also the ordinary courts like Svea Hovrätt, taking a stand on many specific issues that are or could become subject of individual litigation. See e.g. prop. 1975/76:34, 41, where the Market Court takes a negative stand on the desire of the KO to expand the rules on special offers, thereby interpreting the intentions of the law-maker and defending its position in specific cases.
  1116. 1116Strömholm, ‘Public Rule-Making and Private: The Swedish Experience’ (1971) 15 SSL, 219 ff.; Strömholm, ‘Nordiskt samarbete - utvecklingslinjer och argument’ in: Festshift til W.E. v. Eyben (Kobenhavn: Juristforb:s forl., 1982), 173 ff.; Bernitz (1979), 53 ff, at 75.
  1117. 1117In a recent monograph Bernitz calls the appearance of the Swedish MFL of 1970 the ‘first nail into the coffin’ of a fruitful period in the development of Nordic legal cooperation. See Bernitz (2002b), 108.
  1118. 1118Lidbom, ‘Den nordiska rättenhetens problem i dag’ (1973) SvTJ, 273 ff; Lidbom, ‘Konsumentpolitik och lagstiftning’ (1971) SvJT, 81 ff.
  1119. 1119See 1 § Draft, SOU 1966:71, 13.
  1120. 1120Cf. 2 § MFL (SFS 1975:1418). Improper Marketing: “A tradesman who, in the marketing of any goods, service or other commodity, advertises or takes other action which, by conflicting with good commecial standards or otherwise, adversely affects consumers or traders, may be prohibited by the Market Court from continuing therewith or undertaking any similar action. A prohibition may also be issued to an employee of a tradesman and to any other acting on behalf of a tradesman, as well as to any other person who has substantially contributed to the action.” English translation as in Bernitz/Draper (1986), 321ff.
  1121. 11211 § MFL (SFS 1975:1418).
  1122. 1122Prop. 1970:57, 63 f.
  1123. 1123Prop. 1970:57, 69.
  1124. 1124Prop. 1970:57, 69. ,
  1125. 1125Prop. 1970:57, 70.
  1126. 1126See Bernitz (1993), 110.
  1127. 1127See prop. 1970:59, 64.
  1128. 1128For a detailed analysis and critique of the inadequate protection of traders against interference with contractual relations in Swedish law, see Bernitz (1993), 199 ff.; cf. Treis (1991), 105.
  1129. 1129SOU 1974:23. It may be interesting to note that in part I and part II (SOU 1972:7) of its report the Advertising Committee had proposed a number of alternative measures for stimulating informative advertising. One such measure was, for instance, tax relief for particularly informative advertising and measures for restricting the volume of advertising considered as excessive. See SOU 1972:7, 32. See prop. 1976/76: 34, 121.
  1130. 11303 § MFL (SFS 1975:1418).
  1131. 1131Prop. 1975/76:34, 109.
  1132. 1132SOU 1972:7, 48.
  1133. 11333-4 §§ 1970 MFL (SFS 1970:412) = 7-8 §§ 1975 MFL (SFS 1975:1418).
  1134. 1134See lag om vissa bestämmeler om marknadsföring av alkoholdrycker (SFS 1978:763); Prop. 1977/78:178, repealed by SFS 1999:1001.
  1135. 1135SFS 1978:764, repealed by SFS 1993:581.
  1136. 1136See, however, 69 § rusdryckförordningen (SFS 1954:521) and 7 § lagen om handel med drycker (1977:293). Cf. Persson (2002), 161 ff., 187 ff.
  1137. 1137See TF 1:9.
  1138. 1138The Inquiry Commission on Alcohol and Tobacco Advertising was of the opinion that a ban on marketing of legally produced goods would nevertheless come into conflict with freedom of speech and trade mark law. The Commission therefore proposed only a clause on ‘particular moderation’, to be filled in by special guidelines. See SOU 1976:63, 173 ff.
  1139. 1139See 2 § alkoholreklamlagen (SFS 1978:763). With the introduction of commercial telvision and radio in 1991, alcohol advertising was prohibited also in these media, SFS 1991:1076.
  1140. 1140“In particular, no advertising or marketing measure may be taken which is intrusive, seeks out prospective customers, or encourages the use of alcohol.” See 2 § (SFS 1978:763). On the recent changes in the regulation of alcohol advertising as a result of European influences see Ch. 7.2.2.
  1141. 1141Inrikesdepartamentet. Since 1996 the official translation is Ministry of Public Administration.
  1142. 1142The official English translation of the agencies has changed in 1996. Previously KOV has been translated as National Board for Consumer Policies. Since 1996 the official translation is Swedish Consumer Agency. Inrikesdepartamentet has been previously translated as Ministry of Public Administration and since 1996 as Ministry of Domestic Affairs.
  1143. 1143Förordning med instruktion for konsumentverket (SFS 1976:429) with multiple subsequent amendments.
  1144. 1144”Sakkunskap, medborgerlig omdöme och medborgerlig insyn”. See Verkledningsbeslutet, prop. 1986/87:99. Alternative forms of management are a one-man responsibility model where the head of agency bears exclusive responsibility (with or without "insynsråd") and board with full responsibility. On the discussion about the need for increased control of the executive over the work of independent public agencies see SOU 1985:40; see Söderlind/Petersson (1986), 113 ff.
  1145. 1145Prop. 1972:33, 15.
  1146. 1146Prop. 1972:33, 75.
  1147. 1147See NU 1972:40, rskr 1972:225.
  1148. 1148Prop. 1975/76:159.
  1149. 1149See prop. 1975/76:159, 25.
  1150. 1150It may be interesting to note the careful phrasing of the proposal where the word ”interest representation” is only used for consumer interests. By contrast for industry the expression “experience from” or “representing experience from industry” are used.
  1151. 1151See SOU 1983:40, 66.
  1152. 1152Prop. 1975/76:159, 25.
  1153. 1153Prop. 1975/76:34, 116. See also Bernitz/Draper (1986), 70.
  1154. 1154Prop. 1975/76:159, 26.
  1155. 1155See the comparison with the Public Food Agency in SOU 1983:40, 444 ff.
  1156. 1156The Bill to the first MFL underlined the importance of keeping a parallel between the institutional framework of marketing practices law and antitrust law. See prop. 1970:57.
  1157. 1157Prop. 1975/76:34, 96, 106. See more recently SOU 2000:29, 397.
  1158. 1158Prop. 1972:33, 65; NU 1972:40; rskr. 1972:225.
  1159. 1159The latter was based on voluntary compliance and negotiations, but there were some possibilities of using binding government measures as a last resort.
  1160. 1160SOU 1974:23.
  1161. 1161SOU 1974:23, 85 ff.
  1162. 1162Prop. 1975/76:34, 64 ff.
  1163. 1163At the time of the debate KOV and KO constituted two separate bodies. The arguments against stricter sanctioning competencies of KOV were therefore fundamentally of a co-ordination and efficiency character. Vesting formal decision-making powers in the Consumer Agency implied divided competence on questions of unfair marketing and on information disclosure (to be monitored and enforced by KO and by KOV respectively). The risk of overlapping and conflict of competencies was obvious. Moreover, a divided system could confuse both consumers and traders who had to comply with possibly incongruent sets of norms. See ibid., 66.
  1164. 1164It may be interesting to compare the powers of KOV with the definition of agency given in the US Administrative Procedures Act (APA). “Agency is a part of government that is generally independent in the exercise of its functions and that by law has authority to take final and binding action affecting the rights and obligations of individuals, particularly by the characteristic procedure of rule-making and adjudictaion.” Judging from this definition rule-making and adjudication seem to be the most important functions characterising a governmental agency. Naturally other functions may be added here: information gathering and processing, negotiation and policy formulation. Yet neither of these has the property of affecting the rights and obligations of individuals, at least not in a direct manner.
  1165. 1165Prop. 1970:57, 148.
  1166. 1166“Som jag tidigare påpekat bör ombudsmannen i första hand försöka komma till rätta med otillfredsställande förfaranden på frivillig väg. I många fall torde utsikterna härför vara goda. Erfarenheterna från den utomrättsliga
  1167. 1167Prop. 1970:59, 84.
  1168. 1168Prop. 1970:59, 84.
  1169. 116922 § (SFS 1976:429): “Anföres klagomål mot viss marknadsföringsåtgärd och är fråg endast om prövning enligt 2-4 §§ marknadsföringslagen (SFS 1975:1418), får klagomålen lämnas utan åtgärd, om det från allmän synpunkt är av ringa betydelse att saken prövas.” Cf. 12 § (SFS 1995:868).
  1170. 1170See SOU 1983:40,633.
  1171. 1171See this Ch. below.
  1172. 1172This prerogative was first intoduced in 9 § lag om otillbörlig marknadsföring. See prop. 1970:57, 84. It was taken over in 14-15 §§ MFL 1976:1418 and constitutes 21 § of the present 1995 MFL (SFS 1995:450).
  1173. 1173See Ch. 48 RB, cf. SOU 1983:40, 303.
  1174. 1174SOU 1983:40, 444.
  1175. 1175This was also confirmed by prop. 1994/95:123 where the possibility of reconsideration of individual administrative decisions under 27 § Administrative Procedure Act (Förvaltningslagen, FL) is explicitly envisaged for the consent orders. In the Bill it says that a consent order has the power of a court decsion that has entered into force, this without prejudice to the possibility to appeal under 27 § FL.
  1176. 1176See Strömberg, Allmanförvaltningsrätt (Malmö: Liber-Hermods, 1995), 160 ff.
  1177. 1177Prop. 1970:59, 99.
  1178. 1178SOU 1983:40, 212 f.
  1179. 1179Prop. 1970:59, 84.
  1180. 1180As the Committee puts it: ”Ever since the rules entered into force it had been customary to send consent orders only to traders who could be expected to respond to KO.”, SOU 1983:40, 304.
  1181. 1181SOU 1983:40, 213 ff., 303.
  1182. 1182See prop. 1984/85:213, 219; cf. the reservations expressed by Holm and Tengelin, SOU 1983:40, 341.
  1183. 1183Ibid.
  1184. 1184See Cranston (1979), 116 ff.
  1185. 1185Revesz, ‘Specialized Courts and the Administrative Lawmaking System’ (1990) 138 University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1111 ff.
  1186. 1186The critique cooled down during the 1980s. See 1983:40, 466.
  1187. 1187SOU 1983:40, 56.
  1188. 1188Ibid., 56.
  1189. 1189See SOU 1983:40, 100.
  1190. 1190The seeds for a flexible co-operative approach were planted already with the reference to “voluntary and unbound forms” of producer influence in the Governmental Bill on Consumer Policy, prop. 1972:33, 65.
  1191. 1191Prop. 1975/76:34.
  1192. 1192Examples from this category are the guidelines on skateboards (KOVFS 1977:3), riding and skiing helmets (KOVFS 1977:7), automatic fire-detectors (KOVFS 1978:3).
  1193. 1193Examples from this category are the guidelines for information on fuel consumption of new cars (KOVFS 1977:2); for information to consumers upon temporary price promotions in retail trade (KOVFS 1977:1; for marketing of dipers (KOVFS 1977:4); for information to consumers in the marketing of potatoes (1977:6).
  1194. 1194See the statistics in SOU 1983:40, 59.
  1195. 1195SFS 1976:429 (amended 1979:826, 1980:873 and 1981:494).
  1196. 1196SFS 1976:429.
  1197. 119711 § 1 Standing Instruction of KOV (SFS 1976:429) as amended.
  1198. 1198SOU 1983:40, 235.
  1199. 1199Prop. 1975/76:34, 109. See also SOU 1983:40.
  1200. 1200Prop. 1975/76:34, 93, 99.
  1201. 1201Prop. 1975/76: 34, 108.
  1202. 1202”[Riktlinjerna] kommer nu att öka i betydelse genom att de enligt statsmakternas beslut kommer att vara vägledande för marknadsdomstolens avgörande i enskilda fall.” Prop. 1975/76:159, 10. See the critical comments of Stjernquist, ‘Riktlinjer i svensk offentlig rätt’ (1992) 15 FT, 233 ff., at 240 f.
  1203. 1203Prop. 1976/77:123, 345 ff., at 350.
  1204. 1204Prop. 1976/77:123, 370.
  1205. 1205Ds 1982:11, Större klarhet i fråga om olika reglers rättsliga karaktär och syfte.
  1206. 1206See Lagrådet in prop. 1976/77:123.
  1207. 1207SOU 1983:40, 440.
  1208. 1208SOU 1983:40,286.
  1209. 1209The Committee also noted that the Market Court always opened its deliberations by analysing whether the information was “of particular significance for consumers”, as required by the legal text of 3 § MFL and only then proceeded with reference to the guidelines. See SOU 1983:40, 163.
  1210. 1210SOU 1983:40, 108 ff., 162 ff.
  1211. 1211MD 1981:20 (“Saab”); MD 1981:21 (“Ford Company”); MD 1981:22 (Svenska Renault”).
  1212. 1212SOU 1983:40, 103.
  1213. 1213SOU 1983:40, 103.
  1214. 1214SOU 1983:40, 111.
  1215. 1215The report “More clarity in the question of the legal character of different regulations” (Ds 1982:11) had proposed to treat the guidelines as “general advice” (“allmänna råd”) since the term was conventional in Swedish administrative law. See SOU1983:40, 286.
  1216. 1216It is defined in 1 § of Regulation on the collection of administrative rules 1976:725 (Författningssammlingsförordningen, FSamlF) as “such general recommendations on the implementation of a normative act which specify how someone can or should act in a certain context”. These are consequently not binding prescriptions, but at the same time classified in the category rules of the same Regulation (27 § FsamlF). See Bejstam, ‘Föreskrift och föreskriftsprövning enligt 1974 års Regeringsform. En Bokanmälan’ (2000) FT, 23 ff.
  1217. 1217SOU 1983:40, 292. On the difference between ‘shall’ and ‘should’ (‘skall’ och ‘bör’ regler), see SOU 1983:40, 104.
  1218. 1218See SOU 1983:40, 73.
  1219. 1219SOU 1983:40, 76.
  1220. 1220See SOU 1983:40, 50. For the budgetary year 1980/81 the direct financing of the activity of KOV was reduced with 2.3 million crowns announcing additional 1.7 million cuts for the next year.
  1221. 1221See prop. 1981/82:100, bilaga 14.
  1222. 1222SOU 1983:40, 415 ff.
  1223. 1223SOU 1983:40, 693.
  1224. 1224SOU 1983:40, 235.
  1225. 1225”Det är vårt intryck att organisationerna föredragit att söka påverka det konsumentpolitiska skeendet på ett mera allmänt plan, inte minst genom sina representanter i KOV:s styrelse. De konkreta åtgärderna har man överlåtit till verket och till KO.” SOU 1983:40, 238.
  1226. 1226Prop. 1984/85:213, 137.
  1227. 1227SOU 1983:40, 65.
  1228. 1228Thus 30 consumer complaints were sufficient to launch negotiations concerning the design of baby-dummies. See SOU 1983:40, 67.
  1229. 1229SOU 1983:40, 239. In his analyis of the practice of the FTC Bernizt underlines that in the US rule-making is an extremely formalised procedure, whereby a draft is first made public, then anybody interested is invited to participate, and finally there is a possibility to appeal.
  1230. 1230For the negative reaction of KOV to the idea of public hearings see prop. 1984/85:213, 116.
  1231. 1231Similar general formulations are characteristic for the instructions of most Swedish public agencies. See Söderlind/Petersson (1986), 38.
  1232. 1232See RF 11:7 on the independence of administrative authorities in the exercise of administrative power (myndighetsutövning) and in law enforcement (lagtillämpning). The principle of independence of public authorities in relation to the executive has been a matter of debate in a number of investigations and in the public administration literature. This principle is seen by some to contravene the major premise of parliamentary democracy, namely that the process of government should be carried out and closely controlled by democratically elected parliament and government. Therefore demand for increased and more formalised control through the executive is sometimed advanced. See Förvaltningsutredningen, SOU 1983:39, 19; Cf. Söderlind/Petersson (1986), 110 ff.
  1233. 1233See prop. 1981/82:100, Bilaga 14 on the Consumer Agency.
  1234. 1234Söderlind/Petersson, (1986), 23 ff. Orig.: den lagstyrda förvaltningen; den folkstyrda förvaltningen (demokratisk-parlamentarisk styrningskedja; den administrativa korporatismen; kommunal självstyre; självförvaltning); den marknadsstyrda förvaltningen.
  1235. 1235Lag om marknadsdomstol (SFS 1970:417).
  1236. 1236See Bernitz/Draper (1986), 85.
  1237. 1237The decision to join the handling of competition and marketing practices cases into one judicial body was evidently influenced by the US American experience and the Federal Trade Commission..
  1238. 1238See Johansson, Rättegången i marknadsdomstolen (Uppsala: Justus Förlag, 1986).
  1239. 1239See Bernitz (1969), 425 ff.: Johansson (1986), 25 ff.
  1240. 1240In most cases, disputes were resolved already with the NO. Proceedings before the Board were extremely rare.
  1241. 1241Prop. 1970:57, 156.
  1242. 1242Prop. 1970:57, 167.
  1243. 1243Prop. 1971:30, 610, 695, 713.
  1244. 1244Notably by experts in administrative and procedural law, Strömberg, Allmän förvaltningsrätt (Lund: Gleerup, 1974), 34, 94; Heuman, Process och straffrätt för Juridisk översiktskurs, (Lund: Juridiska föreningen i Lund, 1974), 7. Reference in Johansson (1986), 19 ff.
  1245. 1245Bernitz/Modig/Mallmén (1970), 297.
  1246. 1246On ‘resning’ as an extraordinary remedy, see Lindblom (2000), 229.
  1247. 1247MD 1974:23, NJA 1975, 589 (“Helg-Extra”); MD 1977:1; NJA 1977, 751 (“Vivo-Favör”); see Bernitz/Draper (1986), 86 ff. On the relations between Swedish marketing practices law and freedom of information, see Levin, ‘Werbung und Informationsfreiheit’ (1987a) GRUR Int., 207 ff.
  1248. 1248MD 1976:6, NJA 1975, 461 (“Scientologikyrkan i Sverige”). The Supreme Court found that the application of the law forming the basis of the order was manifestly inconsistent with the relevant statutory provisions.
  1249. 1249See Johansson (1986), 22, referring to the critical comments of Ragnemalm, ‘Regeringsformer 11:11, några reflektioner i anledning av ett färskt HD-avgôrande’ (1976) FT, 80.
  1250. 1250Prop. 1970:57, 157.
  1251. 12513 § lag om marknadsdomstol (SFS 1970:417).
  1252. 12529 § lag om marknadsdomstol (SFS 1970:417).
  1253. 1253See Johansson (1986), 35; Westerlind, ‘Marknadsdomstolen i nuet och inför framtiden’ (1976) SvJT, 417 ff., 423.
  1254. 1254Bet. 1992/93:NU17.
  1255. 1255Johansson (1986), 37 ff.
  1256. 1256See MD 1977:22 (“Alcro”).
  1257. 1257See Bernitz., ‘Brand Differentiation Between Identical Products. An Analysis from a Consumer Law Viewpoint’ (1981) JCP, 21 ff. The second decision on product differentiation concerned the right of the biggest producer of home electric appliances on the Swedish market, ’Electrolux*, to market practially identical products under different brands and for different prices. The KO brought an injunction asking the Market Court to enjoin the defendant to give information about the equivalence of the products. This time the claim was upheld by a unanimous court. See MD 1981:4 (“Electrolux”).
  1258. 1258See MD 1982:11 (“Bästa bankboken”);MD 1980:19 (“Verdexa”); MD 1980:5 (”Goodyear-!”).
  1259. 1259See Bernitz/Draper (1986), 83.
  1260. 1260Johansson (1986).
  1261. 1261Johansson(l986), 37 ff.
  1262. 1262See prop. 1970:57, 164.
  1263. 1263Prop. 1970:57, 164.
  1264. 1264Prop. 1970:57, 167.
  1265. 1265This was the case concerning rule on voting, litigation costs and possibility to review its own decision. See prop. 1970:167.
  1266. 1266Förvaltningsprocesslag (SFS 1971:291).
  1267. 1267Johansson (1986), 22 f.
  1268. 1268As Söderlind and Petersson point out, the adjudicative function was in the Middle Ages a prerogative of the monarch and was then only gradually transferred to public servants with legal competence to be finally fully separated and concentrated in the courts. Nevertheless, they observe that the impact of history can still be traced in the present functioning of Swedish public administration. Formality, legality, requirements of all-sided investigation, communication with the parties and possibility of appeal are all features of Swedish public administrative, which have much in common with judicial activity and flow from the thinking of a law-bound administration, characteristic of the Rechtsstaat. See Söderlind/Petersson (1986), 34.
  1269. 1269Johansson (1986), 23.
  1270. 1270On the functions of NO and Marknadsrådet, see Bemitz (1969), 425 ff.
  1271. 127110 § MFL (SFS 1970:418): ”Fråga om förbud elle åläggande enligt 2-4 §§ uptages efter ansökan. Sådan ansökan göres av konsumentombudsmannen. Beslutar denne för visst fall att ej göra ansökan, får ansökan göras av sammanslutning av konsumenter, löntagare eller näringsidkare eller, beträffande föbud enligt 2 §, av näringsidkare som beröres av handlingen.”
  1272. 1272SOU 1983:40, 294.
  1273. 127322 § KOV Instruktion (SFS SFS 1976:429).
  1274. 1274See SOU 1983:40, 293 ff.
  1275. 1275SOU 1983:40, 295 ff.
  1276. 1276SOU 1983:40, 205 ff.
  1277. 1277SOU 1983:40, 298.
  1278. 1278Prop. 1984/85:213, 52: ”Konsumentverket bör därför rent principiellt ha förstahandansvaret för utvecklingen och för lagtillämpningn även i fråga om konkurrentärenden.”
  1279. 1279Prop. 1984/85:213, 53.
  1280. 1280SOU 1983:40,299. 1000 SOU 1983:40, 308 ff.; prop. 1984/85:213, 56 ff.; 13 a § lag om marknadsdomstol (SFS 1970:417). 1001 Prop. 1970:57, 97. See Johansson (1986), 58. 1002 Prop. 1983/84:92, 22. 1003 See Johansson (1986), 58.
  1281. 1281(592), according to Schricker dominant opinion in doctrine and standing case law. Schricker (1975), 216. See also Schricker (1970b), 221. 1042 Following Nipperdey one of the main categories of unfair competition under the general clause is that of "Behindrungswettbewerb" (obstructive competition). Here fall the following situations: Absatz,- Werbe-, Lizenz- and Bezugsbehinderung; Betriebstörung; Preisunterbietung (635-637), Boykott (645-654), Diskriminierung (655-660), Geschäftsverletzung und Anschwärzung (661), Vergleichende Werbung (661-715). Another category of factual situations fully devoted to the protection of competitors is the so called “Exploitation” (Ausbeutung). Within this group Hefermehl orders the imitation of a foreign achievement (Leistung, 718-745), the immediate takeover of someone else’s product (749-758), misuse of foreign advertising (760-764), exploitation of someone else’s reputation (767-782). Beater (2000a), 12 ff. 1043 BGH GRUR 1956, 223 (“Anzeigenblatt”); BGH GRUR 1957, 365 (“SUWA”); BGH GRUR 1965, 489 (“Kleenex”); BGH GRUR 1959, 277 (“Künstleipostkarten”); BGH GRUR 1966, 45 (“Markenbenzin”); BGH GRUR 1965, 315 (“Werbewagen”); BGH GRUR 1969, 295 (“Goldener Oktober”); BGH GRUR 1972, 40 (“Feld und Wald”); BGH GRUR 1976, 637 (“Rustikale Brettchen”). 1044 BGH GRUR 1957, 365 („SUWA“). 1045 RG GRUR 1938, 207 ff. („Persil").
  1282. 1282ff. 1057 BGH GRUR 1959, 31 (,, Feuerzeug als Werbegeschenk“). 1058 See Sosnitza (1995), 26 with reference to BGH GRUR 1967, 202 (“Gratisverlosung”). 1059 BGH GRUR 1971, 322 (“Lichdi-Centrum”).
  1283. 1283on advertising in case of death with further references to case law. 1080 See BGH GRUR 1989, 753 („Telefonwerbung II“). 1081 For a general criticism at the “Vorspungsgedanke” see Beater (2000a), 41. See also Micklitz, ‘Die Rechtsbruchsklage nach § 22 AGBG’ in: Brönneke (ed.), Kollektiver Rechtsschutz im Zivilprozess (Baden­ Baden: Nomos, 2001), 87 ff, at 89 ff. 1082 Schricker (1970b), 261 ff. See Beater (2000a), 38. 1083 See Baumbach/Hefermehl (1998); cf. Köhler/Piper (2002), 731 ff.
  1284. 1284__1241 7 ‘ 1241 On the somewhat marginal position of consumer law research in Sweden, cf. the reflections of Olsen (2000­ 2001), 330. 1242 For a discussion on advantages and disadvantages of specialised courts in the US American context, see Sunstein, ‘Participation, Public Law and Venue Reform’ (1982) 49 U Chi. L. Rev., 976 ff., at 998: “Specialisation carries with it a risk of partisanship, and it is naïve to believe that experts or technocrats can impartially discern the ‘public interest’. Prolonged exposure to a particular agency tends to produce bias in one direction or another and perhaps an illusion of competence in handing complex regulatory issues. To be sure there are potential advantages to specialization as well; familiarity with a subject may aid in the resolution of cases. Moreover centralization of cases in one forum tends to promote predictability and uniformity in the law. Nonetheless, specialization would be an undeniable departure from the convenional understanding of the proper role of federal courts.”
  1285. 1285The dichotomy between these two models corresponds, mutatis mutandi, to the observation made by Dine in the area of company law. Dine points out that company law may be seen either, in a private perspective, as an ‘enabling framework’ or, in a public one, as a ‘tool of social engineering’. I submit that the attitude to marketing practices law in Germany and in Sweden can be ordered under these two categories - the ‘enabling’ private perspective of German unfair competition law and the ‘social engineering’ public perspective - of Swedish market law. See Bernard, ‘The Future of European Economic Law in the Light of the Principle of Subsidiarity’ (1996) 33 CMLRev., 633 ff., (649 quoting Dine, ‘The Harmonisation of Company law in the European Community’ (1989) 9 YEL, 93).
  1286. 1286Joerges/Brüggemeier, ‘Europäisierung des Vertrags- und Haftungsrechts’ in: Müller-Graff (ed.), Gemeinsames Privatrecht in der Europäischen Gemeinschaft (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1993), 238: “Wer deshalb dem Integrationsprozess eine eigene Bedeutung zuweist behauptet damit zugleich, dass die Logik der Privatrechtsentwicklung und die Logik der Integration zu unterscheiden seien, dass man es mit einem Spannungsverhältnis zu tun habe und weder von einem harmonischen Gleichlauf noch von einem natürlich oder normative vorgegebenen Rangverhältnis ausgehen dürfe.”
  1287. 1287„Konflikte zwischen der Logik der Integration und der Logik der Privatrechtsentwicklung können weder durch eine Vorrangregel zugunsten der Integration noch durch Vorbehaltsansprüche des nationalen Rechts gelöst werden. ... Es geht bei der Vermittlung von Privatrechtsentwicklung und Integration um ein Kollisionsverhältnis, für das praktische Kompatibilitätsprinzipien und -regeln gefunden werden müssen. Weil beide Prozesse, die Privatrechtsentwicklung und die Integration offen sind, weil man weder den einen noch den anderen auf präskriptive Endmodelle festlegen kann, ist die Europäisierung des Privatrechts nur als kontinuierlicher Prozess der Vermittlung zwischen der Autonomie der Privatrechtssysteme und der integrationspolitischen Intervention vorstellbar.” Ibid., 239 f.
  1288. 1288Micklitz speaks of European fair trading law praeter legem, in Micklitz et al. (2000), 337 ff.
  1289. 1289See Koopmans (1991).
  1290. 1290See Gerber (1994), 71 ff.
  1291. 1291See Joerges (1997), 382 ff.; Joerges, ‘European Economic Law, the Nation-State and the Maastricht Treaty’ in: Dehousse, R., Europe After Maasstricht. An Ever Closer Union? (München: Law Books in Europe, 1994), 29 ff.
  1292. 1292Ulmer (1932); Fikentscher (1958).
  1293. 1293See Müller-Graff (1984), 209 ff.; Fikentscher, ‘Das Veihältnis von Kartellrecht und Recht des unlauteren Wettbewerbs im deutschen und europäischen Recht’ in: Festschrift Hallstein (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1966), 127 ff., 158 ff.
  1294. 1294Müller-Graff (1984), 222 with reference to Fikentscher, Wirtschaftsrecht, Bd. 1 (München: Beck, 1983), 667.
  1295. 1295See Beier (1984), 71; Müller-Graff (1984), 219. Müller-Graff refers to one sectoral provision which he considers as a specific reference to fair competition, namely Art. 60(1) ECSC Treaty referring to “unfair competitive practices” and “discriminatory practices”.
  1296. 1296Now Art. 3(1) (g) with slightly amended wording.
  1297. 1297Dethloff (2001), 8 ff.
  1298. 1298On the jurisprudence of the ECJ rejecting such interpretation see below, Ch. 6.3
  1299. 1299See the comments by the representative of the Commission Hans von der Groeben, in Ulmer (1965), VI.
  1300. 1300On the dichotomy between ‘market-building’ and ‘market-correcting’ policies in the European Community, see Scharpf, ‘European Governance: Common Concerns vs. the Challenge of Diversity’ (2001), retrievable at: http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.0rg/papers/01/010701.html (8-05-2003), 4. Scharpfuses the notions of market­ building and market-correcting measures, classifying in the first group measures directed at creating a free market (negative integration and competition rules) and in the second one social policies purpoting to correct market failures such as environmental and consumer protection initiatives.
  1301. 1301See Schricker, ‘Die Arbeiten zur Angleichung des Rechts des unlauterne Wettbwerbs inden Ländern der Europäischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft’ (1973) GRUR Int., 141 ff., at 144; Schricker, ‘Einleitung: Teil F’ in: Jakobs/Lindacher/Teplitzky, Handbuch des Wettbewerbs (Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1994b), 454 ff., at 459.
  1302. 1302Majone, Regulating Europe (London: Routledge, 1996), 1 ff.
  1303. 1303Ibid., 54 ff.
  1304. 1304Majone (1996), 2.
  1305. 1305Commission of the Communities, 6th General report of the activities of the European Communities, 1972, Brussels - Luxembourg, 1973, p. 12, point 6, quoted after Bourgoignie (1987), 98.
  1306. 1306Bourgoignie (1987), 99 ff.
  1307. 1307Council Resolution, OJ 1975 C 92/1.
  1308. 1308Council Resolution, OJ 1981 C 133/1.
  1309. 1309In the words of Bourgoignie: “Consumer policy, thus, could serve as a useful but somewhat deceptive illustration of the self-proclaimed willingness of the Community to go further than unification of Europe’s economies and markets. This is likely to be a popular option. In addition, the promotion of consumer interests throughout the common market is obviously ‘good politics’ for the European integration process, since... it has immediate popular appeal and, thus, can be used for promoting or reviving the European ideal by giving the Community order a more ‘human face’, fostering the image of a less bureaucratic Community, one not simply focusing on complex international business affairs, but also dealing with the daily problems faced by common citizens.” Bourgoignie (1987), 115.
  1310. 1310Chapter B. Protection of the Economic Interests of Consumers, Principles, in Preliminary Programme, OJ 1975 C92/6, 18 and Chapter B., Principles, in the Second Programme, OJ C 1981 133/7, 28.
  1311. 1311See Second Programme of the EEC for a consumer protection and education policy, OJ 1981 C 133/1, para 42: “It is important that as far as possible the market itself should be so structured as to facilitate the adjustment of demand to price changes, primarily through increased transparency.”
  1312. 1312See Case C-362/88 GB-INNO-BM [1990] ECR I-667.
  1313. 1313See Henning-Bodewig (1999), 385.
  1314. 1314Beier (1984), 70.
  1315. 1315Dehousse (1994) AJCL, 761 ff.
  1316. 1316On the concept ‘multi-level governance’ see Scharpf, ‘Regieren im europäischen Mehrebenensystem - Ansätze zu einer Theorie’ (2002) Leviathan, 65 ff.
  1317. 1317Case C-26/62 Van Gend and Loos [1963] ECR 1,12.
  1318. 1318Case C-6/64 Costa v. Enel [1964] ECR 585.
  1319. 1319Ibid., 594 f.; cf. Case C-106/77 ECR Simmenthal [1978] 640, paras 17 and 24.
  1320. 1320Hartley (1998), 9. For a review of the debate on ‘divisible sovereignty’ see Maier, L., EU, arbetsrätten och normgivningsmakten (Stockholm: Stockholms Universitet, 2000), 93 ff. with further references.
  1321. 1321The doctrine is alternatively known as the doctrine of attributed powers.
  1322. 1322In the words of Weiler (1999): “In the 1970s and early 1980s, the principle of enumerated powers as a constraint on Community material jurisdiction (absent Treaty revision) was substantially eroded and in practice virtually disappeared.” Ibid., 42 f.
  1323. 1323Art. 308 reads: “If action by the Community should prove necessary to attain, in the course of the operation of the common market, one of the objectives of the Community and this Treaty has not provided the necessary powers, the Council shall, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament, take the appropriate measures.”
  1324. 1324Elsewhere the same author states: “My point is that die relevant interpretative communities, by choosing to opt for the wide and flexible reading of the Treaty, have transformed strict enumeration into a very flexible notion, practically emptied of material content in the Community.” Ibid, 45, fn. 8345, ft. 83
  1325. 1325Weiler (1999), 58.
  1326. 1326Weiler (1999), 39 ff.; Bourgoignie (1987), 117.
  1327. 1327According to Bourgoignie “there were no budgetary nor administrative constraints limiting the addition of new services to the Commission machinery but, quite the contrary, incentives and even obligations to do so.” Bourgoignie (1987), 117.
  1328. 1328Bourgoignie (1987), 119.
  1329. 1329Bourgoignie (1987), 119.
  1330. 1330Bourgoignie mentions the following organizations: Community of National Consumer Cooperative Organizations in the Common Market (1957); European Organization of the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (1958); European Organization of the International Confederation of Christian Trade Unions (1959). Only one organization reportedly had consumer policy as its exclusive objective, namely the European Union of Consumer Unions (1962). Bourgoignie (1987), 122, th. 84.
  1331. 1331Bourgoignie (1987), 123.
  1332. 1332For a similar general explanation of the role of organized interests in the Community see Maduro, We, The Court. The European Court of Justice and the European Economic Constitution (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1998a), 120. “Furthermore, to enhance its powers as a European government the Commission must find support beyond the Member States. Thus it makes alliances with other forces: either Community institutions such as the European Parliament and the European Court or supra-national groups and elite technocrats who support its policies and its image of independence of from national interests.”
  1333. 1333See Stuyck, ‘European Consumer Law After the Treaty of Amsterdam: Consumer Policy in or Beyond the Internal Market?’ (2000) 37 CML Rev., 367 ff., 378 with further references to the Community Directives adopted under this provision. Cf. Weatherill, ‘The Evolution of European Consumer Law and Policy: From Well- Informed Consumer to Confident Consumer’ in: Micklitz (ed.), Rechtseinheit oder Rechtsvielfalt in Europa? (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1996a), 423 ff.
  1334. 1334Nonetheless, see Art. 100a (4) allowing for exceptions in case a Member State can demonstrate ‘major needs’ for retaining more stringent regulation. Cf. Weatherill/ Micklitz, ‘Consumer Policy in the European Community: Before and After Maastricht’ (1993) JCP, 285 ff., 295.
  1335. 1335See Art. 3 (t) (ex. (s)): “a contribution to the strengthening of consumer protection”.
  1336. 1336See Weatherill/Micklitz (1993), 285, 295 ff.
  1337. 1337See Bourgoignie, ‘European Community Consumer Law and Policy: from Rome to Amsterdam’ (1998) CLJ,
  1338. 1338ff., at 447 arguing for expanded Community powers in the field of consumer protection after Maastricht. The author also notes the confusion surrounding the issue of distinguishing between measures with common market relevance and measures with no such relevance. On the limited practical implication of the amendment, see Stuyck (2000), 380.
  1339. 1339OJ 1998, L80/27.
  1340. 1340Case C-192/93 El Corte Ingles [1996]ECR I-1281, para 20; cf. Comment by Stuyck (1996) 33 CMLRev., 1261.
  1341. 1341Art. 153 (3)(b). See Stuyck (2000), 383 ff.
  1342. 1342For a fully-fledged analysis, see Stuyck (2000), 384 ff.
  1343. 1343Art. 129a(3) (new Art. 153(6)).
  1344. 1344Stuyck speaks of constitutionalization of the minimum harmonisation approach. Stuyck (2000), 367 ff.
  1345. 1345Case C-376/98 Germany v. European Parliament and Council (tobacco advertising)[2000] ECR 1-8419.
  1346. 1346Directive 98/43/EC on the advertising and sponsorship of tobacco products, OJ L213, 9 ff.
  1347. 1347See Usher, ‘Comments on the Case C-376/98’ (2001) CMLRev., 1519 ff.; Byström, ‘Precisering av EGs kompetens: formulering av problem utan lösning i sikte?’ (2001) ERT, 92 ff.
  1348. 1348In this sense, see Weatherill, ‘The Commission’s Option for Developing EC Consumer Protection and Contract Law: Assessing the Constitutional Basis’ (2002) EBLR, 497 ff., at 505. See Directive 2003/33/EC, OJ 2003 L 152/16.
  1349. 1349On the economic concepts see Molle (1990), 11.
  1350. 1350Completing the Internal Market, White Paper from the Commisson, COM (85) 310 final, 18 ff
  1351. 1351See Weiler (1999), 17.'
  1352. 1352If one subscribes to theories of regulatory competition, Germany has here exerted visible pressure to have its own regulative model recognized as a standard. See Héritier/Mingers/Knill/Becka (1994); Reich, ‘Competition Between Legal Orders: A New Paradigm of European Law’ (1992a) CMLRev., 861 ff.
  1353. 1353Ulmer (1965), 15 ff.; Schricker (1973) GRUR Int. 1973, 141 ff.,
  1354. 1354Ulmer (1965), 232 ff.
  1355. 1355See Steiner, Textbook on EC Law, 4th ed (London: Blackstone, 1994), 26 ff; Weatherill/Beaumont, EU Law, 3rd ed. (London: Penguin Books, 1999), 392 ff., see Case C-14/83 Von Colson v. Land Nrthrein-Westfalen [1984] ECR 1891.
  1356. 1356Ulmer (1965), 245.
  1357. 1357Ulmer (1965), 250-256.
  1358. 1358Ulmer (1965), 256 ff. Positive to this proposal, Beier (1984), 69.
  1359. 1359Ulmer (1965), 258.
  1360. 1360Ulmer (1965), 258.
  1361. 1361Ulmer (1965), 241.
  1362. 1362Ulmer (1965), 241.
  1363. 1363Ulmer, ‘Die Bekämpfung des unlauteren Wettbewerbs im gemeinsamen Markt’ (1973) GRUR Int., 135 ff., at 137.
  1364. 1364See Ohly (1998-99), 69 ff., at 77.
  1365. 1365For a detailed analysis of English law, see Ohly (1997), 73 ff. See also Schricker (1990), 118 ff.
  1366. 1366See Krämer, EEC Consumer Law (Brussels: Story Scientia, 1986).
  1367. 1367See Henning-Bodewig (1999), 385.
  1368. 1368Krämer (1986), 26.
  1369. 1369Beier (1984), 70.
  1370. 1370OJ 1978 C 70/4 ff. An even earlier draft was submitted in 1975, Doc. XO/C/94/75.
  1371. 1371Draft Art. 2, third indent, ibid., 5.
  1372. 1372See Krämer (1986).
  1373. 1373On the reasons for the failure of these harmonization attempts, see Ohly (1998-99), 69 ff. For an in-depth analysis of the differences between the common law and the German approaches to a general clause on unfair competition, see Ohly (1997), 73 ff.
  1374. 1374Council Directive 84/450/EEC concerning misleading advertising, recently amended by Directive 97/55/EC concerning comparative advertising.
  1375. 1375See Select Committee, Misleading advertising, House of Lords, London (1978) quoted after Krämer (1986), 153.
  1376. 1376Consumer Law Today, Vol. 7, Issue Nr. 10, 1, quoted after Ohly (1998/99), 74.
  1377. 1377See Rec. 7 Directive 84/450. See Case C-373/90, Criminal proceedings against X [1992] ECR 131, para 9.
  1378. 1378See Art. 1 Directive 84/450.
  1379. 1379See Art. 2 Directive 84/450.
  1380. 1380See Art. 4 (2) Directive 84/450.
  1381. 1381See OJ 1978 C 70/4, 6.
  1382. 1382OJ 1979 C 140/23, 26.
  1383. 1383Schricker (1991a), 788 ff., at 791; Gamerith, ‘Neue Herausforderungen für ein europäisches Lauterkeitsrecht’ (2003) WRP, 143 ff, at 146 ff.
  1384. 1384See Prechal, Directives in European Community Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995), 44.
  1385. 1385See Weatherill/Beaumont (1999), Hartley (1998).
  1386. 1386Schricker, ‘Einführung in das Recht der Werbung. Internationales und EWG Recht’ in: Schricker (ed.), Recht der Werbung in Europa, Band 1: (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1996b), 85; Schricker (1994b), 456.
  1387. 1387Sosnitza (1995), 208.
  1388. 1388Art. 1 Directive 84/450/EEC.
  1389. 1389See Krämer (1986), 161 with reference to Schricker, ‘Ein bescheidenes Pflänzchen europäischer Harmonisierung’ ZAW-Service, No. 123, 335 ff.
  1390. 1390Bourgoignie (1997), 174 ff.
  1391. 1391Krämer (1986), 50.
  1392. 1392See Ward, Judicial Review and the Rights of Private Parties in EC Law (Oxford University Press, 2000), 158 ff.
  1393. 1393Case C-329/88 Commission v Hellenic Republic [1989] ECR 4159; Case C-360/88 Commission v Kingdom of Belgium [1989] ECR 3803.
  1394. 1394Schricker (1990), 118 ff.
  1395. 1395Case C-14/83 Von Colson [1984] ECR 1891, para 26; Case C-106/89 Marleasing [1990] ECR I- 4135, para 8. On the minimum harmonization character of Directive 84/450/EEC see Case C-373/90 Criminal proceedings against X (Nissan) [1992] ECR I-131, para 7, below Ch. 7.1.1.1.
  1396. 1396Doc. N. XI/C94/75-E and Memorandum No. XI/C/93/75-E, Nov. 1975, quoted by Spink/Petty (1998), 855.
  1397. 1397This position has been criticized in legal doctrine as conflating information with advertising, the latter being a commercial, and hence biased, marketing instrument. See Bourgoignie, ‘Comparative Advertising and the Protection of Consumer Interests in Europe: Reconcile the Irreconcilable?’ (1992) European CU, 3 ff., at 4 ff. Cf. Howells/Wilhelmsson, EC Consumer Law (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1997), 145.
  1398. 1398Draft Art. 4, OJ 1978, No. C 70, 4 ff. On the history of the Directive, see Krämer (1986) 152 ff. Cf. Rijkens/Miracle, European Regulation ofA dvertising (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1986), 101 ff.
  1399. 1399Henning-Bodewig (1999), 385. Similar Ohly (1998/99), 73.
  1400. 1400See Gamerith (2003), 143 ff., 146.
  1401. 1401Rec. 6 Directive 84/450 includes an explicit commitment to continue with harmonisation of unfair advertising and “as far as necessary” of comparative advertising.
  1402. 1402OJ 1992 C 337/136, 137.
  1403. 1403OJ 1992 C 337/136, 139.
  1404. 1404Spink/Petty (1998), 857.
  1405. 1405See para 2.2 , Opinion of the ECOSOC, OJ 1992 C 49/35.
  1406. 1406COM (94) 151 final, OJ 1994 C 136/4.
  1407. 1407Spink/Petty (1998), 857.
  1408. 1408Ibid.-, cf. Henning-Bodewig (1999), 394, fn. 67.
  1409. 1409See Kur (1993), 436 ff, 447-48; Bourgoignie (1992), 3 ff.
  1410. 1410For instance Art. 3a(l)(b) and (c) require that such advertising ‘compares goods or services’; (b): “it compares goods or services meeting the same needs or intended for the same purpose”; (c): “it objectively compares one or more material, relevant, verifiable and representative features of those goods and services, which include price” (my italics)
  1411. 1411See Henning-Bodewig (1999), 391; Spence/Ohly (1999), 693.
  1412. 1412BGH GRUR 1996, 983 ff„ at 984 („Preisvergleich”).
  1413. 1413Henning-Bodewig (1999), 385; Ohly/Spence (1999), 693; cf. Bernitz (2002a), 11 ff., 21 and 24.
  1414. 1414The text of the draft of 1991 was even stricter prohibiting comparative advertising likely to create confusion.
  1415. 1415On distinguishing marks and unfair advantage, see Case C-112/99 Toshiba [2001] ECR I-7945.
  1416. 1416COM (91) 147 final, Draft Art. 3a(l)(c).
  1417. 1417Kur (1993), 449 ff.
  1418. 1418This Directive shall not preclude Member States from retaining or adopting provisions with a view to ensuring more extensive protection with regard to misleading advertising, for consumers, persons carrying on a trade, business, craft or profession, and the general public.
  1419. 1419Paragraph 1 shall not apply to comparative advertising as far as the comparison is concerned.
  1420. 1420Kur (1993), 457.
  1421. 1421Joerges/Brüggemeier (1993), 233 ff. See in particular at 253 concerning the Package Tour Directive: „Das Ergebnis ist ... ein Reisevertragsrecht, das die in den Mitgliedstaaten verfolgten Schutztechniken kombiniert und dadurch überbietet.“ Similar regulative drift is discussed at 254 concerning the Doorstep Selling Directive.
  1422. 1422Joerges (1994), 29 ff., at 42 f.
  1423. 1423Weiler (1999), at 34.
  1424. 1424Similar Ohly/Spence: „Die Richtlinie ist in vielerlei Hinsicht ein schwieriges Regelwerk, unklar in ihrem Anwendungsbereich, häufig allzu deutlich das Ergebnis politischer Kompromisse und problematisch hinsichtlich ihrer mögichen Auswirkungen. Obwohl sie vielfach als Massnahme der Liberalisierung begrüsst wurde, beschränkt die Richtlinie den Bereich erlaubter vergleichende Werbung in Grossbritannien und geht hinsichtlich der Liberalisierung des deutshen Rechts nicht so weit, wie teliweise erhofft.“ Ibid., (1999), 682.
  1425. 1425COM (91)147 final - SYN 343, 21 June 1991.
  1426. 1426For details on the Swedish position in the course of harmonisation negotiations, see Dölling, ‘Jämförande Reklam - Sverige och EU’ (Stockholm: IFIM Series Nr. 84, 1996), 60.
  1427. 1427In this sense Sack (1998a), 263, 270.
  1428. 1428See Art. 4(2), first and second indent: “to order the cessation of, or to institute appropriate legal proceedings for an order for the cessation of the misleading advertising or unpermitted comparative advertising, or if the misleading advertising or unpermitted comparative advertising has not yet been published but publication is imminent, to order the prohibition of, or to institute appropriate legal proceedings for an order for the prohibition of, such publication” (my italics).
  1429. 1429Cf. Henning-Bodewig: “Vor dem Hintergrund von Sinn und Zweck der Richtlinie lässt sich hieraus m. E. kein anderer Schluss ziehen lassen, als dass die Richtlinie einen nach oben und unten verbindlichen Standard setzt.“, Henning-Bodewig (1999), 386 with further references; cf. Tilmann (1999), 551.
  1430. 1430See Art. 7(2) as amended by Directive 97/55/EC.
  1431. 1431See Henning-Bodewig (1999), 386; Sack (1998a), 271; Tilmann, ‘Anwendungsbereich und Bindungswirkung der Richtlinie Vergleichende Werbung* (1999) GRUR, 546 ff., 550.
  1432. 1432Directive 89/552/EEC, OJ 1989 L 298/23.
  1433. 1433Directive 97/36/EC amending Directive 89/552/EEC, OJ 1997 L 202/60.
  1434. 1434The full provision reads: Television advertising shall not cause moral or physical detriment to minors, and shall therefore comply with the following criteria for their protection: (a) it shall not directly exhort minors to buy a product or a service by exploiting their inexperience or credulity; (b) it shall not directly encourage minors to persuade their parents or others to purchase the foods or services being advertised; (c) it shall not exploit the special trust minors placie in parents, reachers or other persons; (d) it shall not unreasonably show minors in dangerous situations.
  1435. 1435For the areas pertaining to fair trading, the relevant rules are listed above.
  1436. 1436Cf. also Rec. 26, Preamble Directive 89/552/EEC “Whereas in order to ensure that the interests of consumers as television viewers are fully and properly protected, it is essential for television advertising to be subject to a certain number of minimum rules and standards and that the Member States must maintain the right to set more detailed or stricter rules and in certain circumstances to lay down different conditions for television broadcasters under their jurisdiction”.
  1437. 1437On the concept regulatory competition, see Reich (1992a), 861; Sun/Pelkmans, ‘Regulatory competition in the Single Market’ (1995) 33 JCMS, 67 ff.; Van den Bergh, ‘Subsidiarity as an Economic Demarcation Principle and the Emergence of European Private Law’ (1998) 5 Maastricht Jorumal, 129 ff., Bernard, ‘Social Dumping and the Race to the Bottom: Some Lessons for the European Union from Delaware’ (2000) 25 ELRev., 57 ff.Bernard (2000), 57. Cf. Editorial Comments, ‘Are European Values Being Hovered Away?’ (1993) 30 CML Rev., 445.
  1438. 1438A number of alternative concepts have been in vogue, such as ‘transmission state principle’ (‘sändarlandsprincipen’), or the more classical term ‘country-of-origin principle’ familiar from the Cassis de Dijon jurisprudence. Given the Court’s interpretation of the notion of jurisdiction in close connection with the broadcaster’s place of establishment, the principle would most strictly be denominated ‘the country-of- establishment principle’. See Lans, Jurisdiktion over TV sändningar i EU (Stockholm: Juristförlaget, 1996), 43.
  1439. 1439Equivalent to Art. 2(2) of Directive 89/552/EEC, OJ 1989 L 298/23.
  1440. 1440Cf. Arts. 2(1) and 3(2) of Directive 89/552/EEC, OJ 1989 L 298/23.
  1441. 1441See Bernitz, ‘TV-reklam och räckvidden av svensk marknadsrätt’ (1997-98) JT, 479 ff., 480.
  1442. 1442Cf. Rec. 16 Directive 97/36/EEC: “Whereas it is necessary to ensure the effective application of the provisions of Directive 89/552/EEC as amended by this Directive throughout the Community in order to preserve free and fair competition between firms in the same industry.”
  1443. 1443See the discussion in connection with the De Agostini case, Ch. 7.1.1.3 below.
  1444. 1444See below on enforcement. Cf. Henning-Bodewig, ‘Die EG Fernsehrichtlinie von 1989’ in: Schricker/Henning-Bodewig, Neuordnung des Wettbewerbsrecht (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1998/1999), 81 ff., at 84.
  1445. 1445On the developments before the amendment see Lans (1996).
  1446. 1446Case C-222/94 Commission v. United Kingdom [1996] ECR 1-4025.
  1447. 1447See now Art. 2(2) of Directive 97/36/EC.
  1448. 1448Case C-33/74 Van Binsbergen [1974] ECR 1299.
  1449. 1449Ibid., para 13.
  1450. 1450Case C-141/91 Veronica [1993] ECR 487.
  1451. 1451Case C-23/93 TV 10 [1994] ECR 1-4795.
  1452. 1452On this issue see the De Agostini ruling of the ECJ discussed below. Ch. 7.1.1.3.
  1453. 1453Directive 97/7/EC, OJ 1997 L 144, 4.6.1997, 19 ff.
  1454. 1454Rec. 3 Directive 97/7/EC seeks to unite the consumer-related and the internal market logic: “Whereas, for consumer, cross-border distance selling could be one of the main tangible results of the completion of the internal market ...”
  1455. 1455See Art.4-8 Directive 97/7/EC.
  1456. 1456These provisions are mentioned as setting out rules for advertising and commercial communication in Annex
  1457. 1457to the Proposal for a Directive concerning business-to-consumer commercial practices in the Internal Market, COM (2003) 356 final.
  1458. 1458See Rec. 17, Directive 97/7/EC.
  1459. 1459Directive 98/34/EC, OJ 1998 L 204/37 as amended by Directive 98/48/EC, OJ 1998 L 217/18.
  1460. 1460Thus consulting an electronic catalogue in a shop is not an ISS since the parties are present (Annex V, 1 b); telephone and telefax services, direct marketing or consultation are not ISS, because not provided by electronic means (Annex V, 2) and television and radio broadcasting are excluded because involving point to multipoint transmission and no provision upon individual request (Annex V, 3).
  1461. 1461The Court has held that although under Art. 60 of the Treaty a service was normally provided for remuneration, the Treaty did not specify the means of financing a particular services, Case C-352/85 Bond van Adverteerders [1988] ECR 2085, para 16.
  1462. 1462Art. 6(d), Directive 2000/31/EC.
  1463. 1463See COM (1998) 586 final, 98/0325 (COD).
  1464. 1464For a critical view see Lehmann (1999), 180.
  1465. 1465See Hoeren, “Vorschlag für eine Richtlinie über E-commerce’ (1999) MMR, 192 ff., at 198; Maennel, ‘Elektronischer Geschäftsverkehr ohne Grenzen - die Richtlinienvorschlag der Europäischen Kommission’ (1999) MMR, 187 ff., at 190. On the Internal Market principle, see the sub-section below.
  1466. 1466See COM (1998) 586 final, 98/0325 (COD).
  1467. 1467COM (1998) 586 final.
  1468. 1468Ibid., 21.
  1469. 1469See rules on free gifts (Case C-268/81 Oosthoek’s [1982] ECR 4575); on misleading advertising (Case C- 238/89 Pall [1990] ECR I-4827); mandatory consumer protection rules on cancellation of contract (Case C- 91/92 Faccini Dori [1994] ECR I-3325; Case C-45/96 Dietzinger [1998] ECR I-1199. On the ECJ’s jurisprudence on free movement of goods see below Ch. 6.3.
  1470. 1470Brussels Convention on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, OJ 1978 L304/36; Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, OJ 2001 L12/1.
  1471. 1471On the autonomous interpretation of the term civil and commercial matters under the Brussels Convention and on the problems of cross-border enforcement ensuing from different institutional approaches to fair trading see Reich, ‘Rechtsprobleme grenzüberschreitender irreführender Werbung im Binnenmarkt’ (1992b) 56 RabelsZ, 444 ff., 445 ff.
  1472. 1472See Ch. 7.1.2.3 below.
  1473. 1473Bodewig, ‘Elektronischer Geschäftsverkehr und Unlauterer Wettbewerb’ (2000) GRUR Int., 475 ff.
  1474. 1474On the different versions of the minimum harmonisation approach, see Dougan, ‘Minimum Harmonizaion and the Internal Market’ (2000) 37 CML.Rev., 853 ff.
  1475. 1475Critical of such interpretation, mainly on normative grounds, Henning-Bodewig (2001), 775.
  1476. 1476In this regard see Bogdan, ‘EU Direktivet om förbudsföreläggande för att skydda konsumenternas intressen’ (1998a) SvJT, 532 ff.; Bogdan, ‘Some Reflections regarding the new EU Directive on Injunctions for the Protection of Consumers’ Interests’ (1998b) CLJ, 369 ff.
  1477. 1477It has been rightly pointed out in the literature that in the European context the term ‘procedural’ should not be construed narrowly. See Prechal (1995), 149, fh. 17.
  1478. 1478Prechal (1995), 149.
  1479. 1479Case C-130/79 Express Dairy Foods [1980] ECR 1887, para 12.
  1480. 1480Ulmer (1965), 257.
  1481. 1481Ulmer (1965), 258.
  1482. 1482The prominent position of enforcement in the Misleading Advertising Directive has been noticed by Steiner, Enforcing EC Law (London: Blackstone, 1995), 58.
  1483. 1483A similar view concerning Directive 92/28 on the advertising of medicinal products, which contains the same procedural provisions as the Misleading Advertising Directive, is expressed by Prechal (1995), 150, fh. 25.
  1484. 1484Cf. Art. 4(1), third subparagraph: “It shall be for each Member State to decide which of these facilities shall be available and whether to enable the courts or administrative authorities to require prior recourse to other established means of dealing with complaints, including those referred to in Article 5.”
  1485. 1485On Nordic legal cooperation, see Ch. 5.4.1.
  1486. 1486Schricker (1994b), 454.
  1487. 1487See the Opinion of the European Parliament on the initial Commission’s proposal, OJ C 1979 140/23, 27. The Commission’s amended proposal OJ 1979 C 194/3, at 5. Cf. Krämer (1986), 160.
  1488. 1488Art. 4(3), second subparagraph.
  1489. 1489Art. 4(3), second subparagraph, in fine.
  1490. 1490Directive 97/7/EC on the protection of consumers in respect of distance contracts, OJ 1979 L 144/19.
  1491. 1491See amendment of the proposal for a Council Directive concerning misleading and unfair advertising, OJ 1979 C 194/3. Cf. Reich (1992b), 444 ff., at 449; see also Krämer (1986), 159 ff.
  1492. 1492COM (93) 576.
  1493. 1493Directive 93/13/EEC, OJ 1993 L 95/29.
  1494. 1494Steiner (1995), 112.
  1495. 1495See Micklitz, ‘Verbandsklage und die EG-Richtlinie über missbräuchliche Klausulen’ (1998a) 19 Zeitschrift för Wirtschaftsrecht, 937 ff.; Dean, ‘Unfair Contract Terms: the European Approach’ (1993) 56 MLR, 581 ff; see
  1496. 1496Micklitz (1998a), 937.
  1497. 1497Case C-82/96 R. v. Secretary for Trade and Industry, ex parte CA/Which, OJ 1996 C145, 3.
  1498. 1498Rott (2001), 401 ff.
  1499. 1499COM (92) 11 final, Annex 1, Table 3, See Dickie, ‘Consumer Confidence and the EC Directive on Distance Contracts’ (1998) 21 JCP, 217 ff., 226.
  1500. 1500See Dickie (1998), 225-26.
  1501. 1501Micklitz, ‘Richtlinie 97/7/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rats über den Verbraucherschutz bei Vertragsabschlüssen im Fernabsatz (Fernabsatzlinie)’ in: Grabitz/Hilf (eds.), Das Recht der Europäischen Union, Vol.4 A.3 (München: Beck, 2000). See Rott (2001), 403 with fruther references.
  1502. 1502Art. 10(1) EC Treaty reads: “Member States shall take all appropriate measures, whether general or particular, to ensure fulfillment of the obligations arising out of this Treaty or resulting from action taken by the institutions of the Community. They shall facilitate the achievement of the Community’s tasks.”
  1503. 1503Art. 4(2), subparagraph 2.
  1504. 1504Rec. 14 Whereas it may be desirable to order the publication of decisions made by courts or administrative authorities or of corrective statements in order to eliminate any continuing effects of misleading advertising;
  1505. 1505Schricker (1994), 454: „Als hauptsächliche Sanktionsmassnahmen schriebt die Richtlinien zwingend die Möglichkeit der Anordnung einer Einstellung der irreführenden Werbung und einer Unterlassung einer bevorstehenden irreführenden Werbung vor...“ (my italics)
  1506. 1506Rec. 12, Directive 84/450/EEC.
  1507. 1507See below Ch. 7.1.1.1.
  1508. 1508See Ch. 6.2.3.2 below.
  1509. 1509Case C-222/84 Johnston [1986] ECR 1651, para 18. See Ward (2000), 71 ff. with analysis of subsequent case law. Most cases concerned Art. 6 Equal Treatment Directive and Art. 6 ECHR.
  1510. 1510See Ward (2000), 30 ff.
  1511. 1511“The general opinion is that there is indeed a growing influence of EC law on Dutch administrative law. This influence is of a ‘creeping’ character, brought to bear through, in particular, the case law of the Court of Justice.” Jans/de Jong ‘Between Direct Effect and Rewe/Comet: ‘Remarks on Dutch Administrative Law, Procedural Defects and the EIA Directive’ in: Ladeur (ed.), The Europeanisation of Administrative Law (Dartmouth: Ashgate, 2002).
  1512. 1512See Weatherill (2000), 14. Cf. De Bùrca/Ryall, ‘The ECJ and Judicial Review of National Administrative Procedure in the Field of EIA' in: Ladeur (ed.), Europeanisation of Administrative Law (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002), 145 ff., 159.
  1513. 1513On the Misleading Advertising Regulation in the UK and, in particular, on the mechanism of enforcement see Schricker (1990), 118 ff.
  1514. 1514Bastian, ‘Sanktionensysteme im Recht des unlauteren Wettbewerbs’ in: Schricker/Henning-Bodewig (eds.), Neuordnung des Wettbewerbsrecht (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1998-99), 199 ff.
  1515. 1515See Bastian (1998-99); Bastian, ‘Recht der Werbung in Italien’ in: Schricker (ed.), Recht der Werbung in Europa (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1996c).
  1516. 1516See Henning-Bodewig (1998/99), 84.
  1517. 1517The first report concluded with proposal to revise the Directive, COM (95) 86 final.
  1518. 1518Most recently, see the Commission’s White Paper on European Governance COM (2001) 428 final. For a critical comment see Joerges, ‘Guest Editorial: The Commission’s White Paper on governance in the EU - A Symtom of Crisis?’ (2002) 39 CMLRev., 441 ff.
  1519. 1519See Maduro (1998a), 120.
  1520. 1520Cf. Art. 22 and 22a in connection with Art. 2a Television Directive.
  1521. 1521Art. 19 Directive 2000/31/EC.
  1522. 1522Reportedly, British industry had credibly threatened to withdraw its financial support from the self-regulatory bodies in case their independence and authority would be jeopardized by increased public intervention in the field. See Kramer (1986), 160.
  1523. 1523Art. 5: “This Directive does not exclude the voluntary control, which Member States may encourage, of misleading or comparative advertising by self-regulatory bodies and recourse to such bodies by the persons or organizations referred to in Art. 4, if proceedings before such bodies are in addition to the court or administrative proceedings referred to in that article.”
  1524. 1524As mentioned above, a similar outcome may be observed in some areas of harmonisation of substantive rules, especially under the rule of full harmonisation. See the example of comparative advertising above.
  1525. 1525Art. 18(2) Directive 2000/31/EC.
  1526. 1526OJ 1998 L 166/51.
  1527. 1527Micklitz, ‘Cross-border Consumer Conflicts - A French-German Experience’ (1993) 16 JCP, 411 ff.
  1528. 1528See LG Achen, Verbraucher und Recht 1994, 36 with a comment by Micklitz; OLG Köln, Verbraucher und Recht 1995, 292 with a comment by Koch. Cf. Franck/Goyens, ‘L’action en cessation des organisations de consommateurs à l’épreuve du Marché Unique’ (1995) REDC, 27 ff.
  1529. 1529Micklitz (1993), 411 ff. Cf. Rott (2001), 401 ff.,
  1530. 1530See Bogdan (1998), 532 ff., at 533.
  1531. 1531On the complexities of cross-border litigation of collective consumer interests with the associated problems of jurisdiction and applicable law, see Reich (1992b), 444 ff.
  1532. 1532See now Art. 1 Brussels Regulation. See Reich (1992b), 455 ff.
  1533. 1533Preamble of Directive 98/27/EC, Rec. 3. See Rott (2001), 403.
  1534. 1534Preamble of Directive 98/27/EC, Rec. 4.
  1535. 1535Bogdan (1998), 542.
  1536. 1536See Commission Working Paper on Enforcement of European Consumer Legislation, 26 May 1998.
  1537. 1537Changes to the list of national qualified entities within these six-month periods shall be published without delay. See Art. 4(3). For the most recent communication updating the list, see OJ 2003 C159/2.
  1538. 1538Art. 4(2) Directive 98/27/EC.
  1539. 1539See Baetge (1999), 344.
  1540. 1540See Rott (2001), 401 ff.
  1541. 1541Directive 84/450 (Misleading Advertising Directive); Directive 89/552/EEC (Television Directive); Directive 92/28/EEC (Directive on Advertising of Medicinal Products for Human Use); Directive 85/577/EC (Doorstep Selling Directive); Directive 2000/31/EC (Electronic Commerce Directive); 97/7/EC (Distance Selling Directive). The Commission has issued a document, clarifying which of the provisions in these Directives the Commission considers as directed at collective consumer interests. Rott (2001), 406.
  1542. 1542See Rott (2001), 405.
  1543. 1543Member States are of course only obliged to grant such rights to foreign ‘qualified entities.’ However, the political unpopularity of situations of ‘reverse discrimination’ in most cases prompts national lawmakers to extend the new rules to domestic entities as well. See Rott (2001).
  1544. 1544See Art. 2(1)(c) Directive 98/27/EC.
  1545. 1545See Baetge (1999), 346 ff.
  1546. 1546On the subsidiarity of the right of action of business and consumer associations in Swedish marketing practices law, see above. This requirement has been annulled by the 1995 MFL, but remains in force for actions under 4 § Act on Contract Terms in Consumer Relations (SFS 1994:1512).
  1547. 1547Art. 7 Directive 98/27/EC ‘Provisions for wider action’.
  1548. 1548Rott (2001).
  1549. 1549On the notions of ‘purely internal situation’ and ‘reverse discrimination’, cf. Maduro, ‘The Scope of European Remedies: The Case of Purely Internal Situations and Reverse Discrimination’ in: Kilpatrick, C./Novik, T./Skidmore, P., The Future of Remedies in Europe (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2000), 117 ff., 120 ff. See also Nicolaysen, ‘Inländerdiskriminierung im Warenverkehr’ (1991) Europarechl, 95 ff.
  1550. 1550See Baetge (1999), 336 with reference to OJ 1996 C 107/5.
  1551. 1551See Beatge (1999), 336.
  1552. 1552See the Commission statement in respect to access to justice: “Any failure or difficulty in guaranteeing access to justice to individual consumers automatically leads to failures in the enforcement of European law at national level.” Commission’s Working Paper on Enforcement of European Consumer Legislation, 26 May 1998.
  1553. 1553The literature on the subject is abundant. See among others Hauschka, ‘Lauterkeitsrecht und Verbraucherschutz zwischen nationalem Regelungsanspruch und der Rechtsprechung des EuGH’ (1990) ZVergl.RW, 166; Steindorff, ‘Unlauterer Wettbewerb im System des EG-Rechts’ (1993) WRP, 214 ff.; Joliet,
  1554. 1554See Case C-6/81 Beele [1982] ECR 707 ff; Case C-58/80 Dansk Supermarked [1981] ECR 181, ff. See Beier, ‘Industrial Property and the Free Movement of Goods in the Internal European Market’, (1990) IIC, 131 ff.; Rose, ‘Passing-off, Unfair Competition and Community Law’ (1990) EIPR, 123 ff.
  1555. 1555Beier (1990) IIC, 131 ff, 145.
  1556. 1556Commission Directive 70/50/EEC, OJ L 13, 29-31. With this Directive the Commission sought to provide guidance as to the measures to be abolished until the end of the transitional period.
  1557. 1557Cf. Marenco, ‘Pour une interprétation traditionelle de la notion de mesure d'effet équivalent à une restriction quantitative’ (1984) CDE, 291 ff, at 325 ff.
  1558. 1558Furthermore, to fall under the scope of Art. 30 EC Treaty, the enforcement organs had to make sure that “the restrictive effect of such measures on the free movement of goods exceeds the effects intrinsic to trading rules.” This was the case in particular where: “the restrictive effects on the free movement of goods are out of proportion to their purpose or where the same objective can be achieved by other means which are less of a hindrance to trade.” See Art. 3 (1) and (2) Directive 70/50/EEC. See further Weatherill/Beaumont (1999), 565 ff.
  1559. 1559Case C-8/74 Dassonville [1974] ECR 837. On the Dassonville judgment and its consequences see Gormley, ‘Actually or Potentially, Directly or Indirectly? Obstacles to the Free Movement of Goods’ (1989) Yearbook of European Law, 196 ff.
  1560. 1560In the literature and especially in ordo-liberal accounts, this approach has been conceptualised as constitionalising economic freedom. Economic freedom was arguably recognized as a higher-order constitutional value in the Community legal order, taking precedence over national regulatory policies. For a presentation of these interpretations and critical anlaysis, see Joerges (1994), 37 ff.; Maduro (1998a), 35 ff.
  1561. 1561Case C-120/78 Rewe-Zentrale Ac. V. Bundesmonopolverwaltung für Branntwein (Cassis de Dijon) [1979] ECR 649.
  1562. 1562See Weiler (1999), 39 ff.; Pinder, ‘The Single Market: A Step Towards European Union’ in: Lodge, The European Community and the Challenge of the Future (London: Pinter Publishers, 1989), 94 ff., 97.
  1563. 1563Case C-120/78 [1979] ECR 649, para 14.
  1564. 1564See Weatherill/Beaumont (1999), 569.
  1565. 1565Completing the Internal Market, White Paper from the Commisson, COM (85) 310 final, 18 ff. See Pinder (1989), 97; Pelkmans, The New Approach to Technical Harmonization and Standardization (1987) 25 JCMS,
  1566. 1566ff. According to Maduro the programmatic importance attached to the Cassis de Dijon judgement was not intended or foreseen by the Court. See Maduro (1998a), 33.
  1567. 1567Case C-152/78 Commission v French Republic [1980] ECR 2299 ff.
  1568. 1568It suffices to note that following the scheme advertising of cognac was allowed whereas that of whisky - prohibited.
  1569. 1569Ibid., para 11.
  1570. 1570Case C-177/83 Kohl v Ringelhan & Rennett (r+r) [1984] ECR 3651, para 15.
  1571. 1571“Even though a provision of national legislation on unfair competition applies without distinction to the marketing of domestic and imported goods it cannot fulfil the condition [of non-discrimination against imported goods] if it is interpreted in such a way that it becomes possible to prohibit the use of a distinctive symbol for the sole reason that the public may be mislead as to the domestic of foreign origin of the goods.” Ibid. See the critical comments of Rose (1990), 123 ff., at 125, who points that the case rather concerned possible confusion as to the connection with a particular manufacturer.
  1572. 1572On discriminatory rules related to fair trading see further C-113/80 Commission v. Ireland (Irish Souvenirs Case) [1981] ECR 1625, concerning mandatory rules on indication of country of origin.
  1573. 1573Case C-268/81 Oosthoek [1982] ECR 4575. See Greaves (1998), 305 ff., 309.
  1574. 1574For instance by printing two different sets of advertising materials, see Case C-268/81 Oosthoek [1982] ECR 4575 ff, at 4577.
  1575. 1575Ibid, para 15.
  1576. 1576Case C-382/87 Buet v. Ministère public [1989] ECR 1235.
  1577. 1577Case C-362/88 GB-INNO-BM v Confederation du commerce luxembourgeois ASBL [1990] ECR I-667.
  1578. 1578Ibid., para 14 of the AG’s Opinion.
  1579. 1579OJ 1975 C 92/1; OJ 1986 C 167/1. See Case C-362/88 GB-INNO [1990] ECR I-667, para 14-16 of the judgment.
  1580. 1580Case C-362/88 GB-INNO [1990] ECR I-667, para 8.
  1581. 1581Ibid., para 18.
  1582. 1582See, for instance, Case C-155/80 Oebel [1981] 1993 on legislation on night-work in bakeries and Case C- 145/88 Torfaen Borogh Council [1989] ECR 3851 and Case C-169/91 Stoke-on-Trent [1992] ECR I-2361 on Sunday trading. See the emphasis on the cross-frontier element in AG Lenz, Case C-362/88 GB-INNO [1990] ECR I-667, para 15.
  1583. 1583Joerges (1997), 402.
  1584. 1584Case C-126/91 Yves Rocher [1993] ECR I-2361.
  1585. 1585Other cases of relevance for fair trading law are: Case C-241/89 SARPP [1990] ECR I 4695; Case C-238/89 Pall [1990] ECR I-4827, para 13.
  1586. 1586Joint Cases C-1/90 and 176/90 Aragonesa de Publicidad Exterior [1991] ECR I-4151, para 11.
  1587. 1587Case C-152/78 Commission v French Republic [1980] ECR 2299 ff.
  1588. 1588Joint Cases C-1/90 and 176/90 Aragonesa de Publicidad Exterior [1991] ECR I-4151, para 17.
  1589. 1589Joined Cases C-267 & 268/91 Keck and Mithouard[1993] ECR I-6097. The commentaries on Keck in legal doctrine are legion. See, among others, Reich, ‘The ‘November Revolution’ of the European Court of Justice: Keck, Meng and Audi Revisited’ (1993) 31 CMLRev., 459 ff.; Maduro, ‘Keck: The End? The Beginning of the End? Or Just the End of the Beginning?’ (1994) 1 Irish Journal of European Law, 30 ff.; Weatherill, ‘After Keck: Some Thoughts on How to Clarify the Clarification’ (1996) CMLRev., 885 ff.; Heermann, P., ‘Artikel 30 EGV im Lichte der „Keck“-Rechtsprechung: Anerkennung sonstiger Verkaufsmodalitäten und Einführung eines einheitlichen Rechtfertigungstatbestands?’ (1999) GRUR Int., 578 ff.
  1590. 1590Joined Cases C-267 & 268/91 Keck and Mithouard [1993] ECR 1-6097, para 16.
  1591. 1591Ibid., para 15.
  1592. 1592Ibid., para 14.
  1593. 1593See Reich (1994).
  1594. 1594Reich (1994), 465 ff. The test followed by the Court had been elaborated and advocated earlier by a member of its legal service. See White, ‘In Search of the Limits to Article 30 of the EEC Treaty’ (1989) 26 CMLRev.,
  1595. 1595ff.
  1596. 1596Weatherill (1996b), 885.
  1597. 1597See Reich (1994), 470 ff.; Weatherill (1996b) 885 ff; Maduro (1998a), 83 ff.
  1598. 1598Reich (1994), 471.
  1599. 1599Case C-292/92 Hünermund [1993] I-6787, Opinion of AG Tesauro.
  1600. 1600Ibid., para 11.
  1601. 1601Ibid., para 22.
  1602. 1602Weatherill (1996), 897.
  1603. 1603Reich (1994), 487.
  1604. 1604Case C-315/92 Clinique [1994] ECR I-317 ff. The case involved interpretation of the provisions on deceptive advertising in Directive 76/768/EEC of 27 July 1976 and will be discussed in more detail below, Ch. 7.2.1.
  1605. 1605Case C-470/93 Mars [1995] I-1923. See also below Ch. 7.2.1.
  1606. 1606Case C- 368/85 Familiapress [1997] ECR I-3689. See Greaves (1998), 310; see Maduro, ‘The Saga of Article
  1607. 1607EC Treaty: To Be Continued’ (1998b) 5 Maastricht Journal, 298 ff.
  1608. 1608Case C-368/85 Familiapress [1997] ECR I-3689, para 11.
  1609. 1609Ibid., para 11-12.
  1610. 1610The rationale behind the restriction was to channel adverts to the press and thus promote this sector.
  1611. 1611Case C-412/93 Leclerc-Siplec [1995] ECR I-179. What appears specific of Lecler-Siplec is that the advertising restriction at issue affected a whole distribution sector and not of a specific product. Therefore its impact on the market access of specific products was not obvious. See Woodridge, ‘Article 30 and TV Advertising; the ECJ Judgment in Leclerc-Siplec’ (1996) EBLR, 3 ff.
  1612. 1612Joint Cases C-34/95 & 35/95 De Agostini & TV Shop [1997] ECR I-384; Case C-405/98 Gourmet [2001] ECR I-1795.
  1613. 1613On the question of fairness of competition as a principle of primary Community law, see also Beier (1985), 139.
  1614. 1614Case C-113/80 Commission v. Ireland (Irish Souvenirs Case) [1981] ECR 1625; cf. Case C-12/74 Commission v. Germany (Sekt/Weinbrand) [1975]ECR 181. See Oliver (1996), 237-243. For a critical view see Beier (1990), 131 ff., at 145.
  1615. 1615Case C-177/83 Kohl v. Ringelhan & Rennett [1984] ECR 3651, para 19.
  1616. 1616See Case C-6/81 Beele [1982] ECR 707, para 9.
  1617. 1617Müller-Graff (1984), 220.
  1618. 1618See in this sense Maduro (1998a), 51.
  1619. 1619See Maduro (1998b), 306 ff.; cf. Case C-405/98 Gourmet [2001] ECR I-1795.
  1620. 1620See Dougan (2000), at 864 ff.
  1621. 1621Bernard (1996), 633 ff, at 646-7.
  1622. 1622Slot, ‘Harmonisation’ (1996) 21 EL Rev., 378 ff, at 385.
  1623. 1623Buet, Case 382/87 [1989] ECR 1235; SARPP, Case 241/89 [1990] ECR I-4695. After Keck, Case C-39/96 Aher-Waggon [1998] ECR 1-4473.
  1624. 1624Oliver (1996), 376 ff.; Stuyck (2000), 367; Dougan (2000), 870 ff.
  1625. 1625Case C-169/89 Gourmetterie Van den Burg [1990] ECR I-2143; Case C-1/96 R v. Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, ex parte Compassion in World Fanning (CIWF) [1998] ECR I-1251.
  1626. 1626Case C-155/73 Sacchi [1974] ECR 409.
  1627. 1627Case C-352/85 Bond van Adverteerders [1988] ECR 2085.
  1628. 1628Case C-52/79 Procureur du Roi v. Debauve [1980] ECR 33.
  1629. 1629See Hatzopolous, ‘Recent Developments of the Case Law of the ECJ in the Field of Services’ 37 (2000) 43 ff.
  1630. 1630See Joint Cases C-34/95 & 35/95 De Agostini & TV Shop [1997] ECR I-3843; Case C-405/98 Gourmet [2001] ECR 1-1795.
  1631. 1631See Joint Cases C-34/95 & 35/95 De Agostini & TV Shop [1997] ECR I-3843.
  1632. 1632See Case C-405/98 Gourmet [2001] ECR 1-1795.
  1633. 1633Hatzopoulos (2000), 58.
  1634. 1634See Case C-384/93 Alpine Investments [1995] ECR I-1141.
  1635. 1635See also the ruling in Schindler & Schindler, Case C-275/92 [1994] ECR I-1039, where the Court found a prohibition on lotteries to be restrictive for intra-Community trade, but recognized the protection of the freedom of the press as a sufficient public interest. A more peculiar case in this group is the case on abortion publicity C-159/90 SPUC v. Grogan [1991] ECR I-4675. A private organisation, brought legal proceeding to prevent student unions in Ireland from publicizing the addresses of British abortion clinics. The students argued that abortion was a service within the terms of Art. 49 (ex 59) and that Community law therefore prohibited Ireland from placing restrictions on the right of Irish residents to have abortions in another Member States. The Court accepted that abortion should be regarded as a service despite objections on the part of SPUC but finally held that the students could not benefit from this right because they were not acting on behalf of the abortion clinics. See Hartley (1998), 136-7. For criticism of this judgment see Phelan, ‘Right to Life of the Unborn v. Promotion of Trade in Services: the ECJ and the Normative Shaping of the European Union’ (1992) MLR, 670 ff., at 674.
  1636. 1636See Hatzopolous (2000), 68.
  1637. 1637See Maduro (1998a), 99 ff.
  1638. 1638See Maduro (1998a), 3 ff
  1639. 1639On developments in the Court’s case law after Keck see Weatherill, S., ‘Recent Case Law Concerning the Free Movement of Goods: Mapping the Frontier of Market Deregulation’ (1999) 36 CMLRev., 51 ff.
  1640. 1640Expressly in this sense ith a detailed analysis of the ECJ’s jurisprudence, see Maduro (1998a).
  1641. 1641See Maduro (1998a), 3, 150 ff.
  1642. 1642INSTITUTIONAL ADAPTATION TO EUROPEAN INTEGRATION: Germany AND
  1643. 1643Knill speaks of changes in opportunity structure, see Knill (2001), 215.
  1644. 1644This is the so-called Stockholm Convention between Austria, Denmark, Great Britain, Norway, Portugal, Sweden, Switzerland. On EFTA and Sweden’s ‘long way’ to EU membership see Bernitz/Kjellgren, Europarättens grunder (Stockholm: Norstedts, 1999), 11 ff.
  1645. 1645The Treaty on the EEA was signed on 2 May 1992 and entered into force at the beginning of 1993, at the same time as the completion of the Internal Market was announced.
  1646. 1646On the EEA, see Bernitz/Kjellgren (1999), 164 ff. On the effect of the EEA Agreement on consumer protection in Sweden see Eklund, P. ‘The Effect of the EEA Agreement on Consumer Protection Interests in Sweden’ (1994) JCP, 123 ff.
  1647. 1647Ibid., 166.
  1648. 1648See Bernitz/Kjellgren (1999), 21 ff.
  1649. 1649SOU 1992:49.
  1650. 1650Art. 7(1) Directive 84/450.
  1651. 1651On Germany see Schricker (1991a), 788 ff., 790. On Sweden see SOU 1992:49.
  1652. 1652A similar attitude was adopted by the governments of Denmark, France and the Netherlands. In contrast, Spain, United Kingdom and Greece passed statutory amendments in close approximation to the Directive, Schricker (1990), 114 ff.; Schricker (1991a), 792.
  1653. 1653Schricker (1981), 537 ff.
  1654. 1654Schricker (1981), 542; Beier (1985), 161.
  1655. 1655„Anknüpfen sollte man dabei nicht an den letzten, fast gänzlich in das Fahrwasser des Verbracuherschutzes abgedrifteten Entwurf, sondern - und hier sehen Sie mich nach, wenn ich pro domo spreche - an die rechtsvergleichend fundierten, zurückhaltenden, sorgfältig abgewogenen Vorschläge Ulmers zur Gesamtharmonizierung des Wettbewerbsrechts der Gemeinschaft.“ Beier (1984), 71.
  1656. 1656Keilholz, K., ‘Die misslungene Harmonisierung des Verbots der irreführenden Werbung in der EG und ihre Konsequenzen für die deutsche Rechtsprechung’ (1987) GRUR, 390 ff, 392 ff.
  1657. 1657Prop. 1992:49, 39.
  1658. 1658SOU 1992:49, 39 with reference to Danelius, Mänskliga rättigheter, 4th ed. (Stockholm: Norstedts, 1989), 71.
  1659. 1659SOU 1992:49, 17.
  1660. 1660SOU 1992:49, 21 ff.
  1661. 1661See Art. 4(2), second indent of Directive 84/450.
  1662. 1662SOU 1992:49, 44.
  1663. 1663See Art.4(3), third indent, Directive 84/450.
  1664. 1664TF 7:6 and Freedom of Expression Act (YGL) 7:5.
  1665. 1665See “Member States may confer...” Art. 4(2) second indent.
  1666. 1666SOU 1992:49, 45.
  1667. 1667For analysis of this act see Ch. 7.3.2 below.
  1668. 1668Bernitz (1997), 23.
  1669. 1669Bernitz (1997), 23.
  1670. 1670See Svensson/Stenlund/Brink/Ström (1996), 582.
  1671. 1671Keilholz (1987), 391. Schricker (1990), 120 with reference to a statement of the Federal Minister of Justice.
  1672. 1672This interpretation was supported by Schricker (1991), 790; Möllering, ‘Das Recht des unlauteren Wettbewerbs in Europa: Eine neue Dimension’ (1990) WRP, 1 ff., 9 ff.; Meyer ‘Das Verbraucherleitbild des Europäischen Gerichtshofs - Abkehr vom „fluchtigen Verbraucher“’ (1993) WRP, 215 ff., at 217; Spätgens, ‘Wandel der deutschen Rechtsprechung?’ in: ZAW,Irreföhrende Werbung in Europa. Masstäbe und Perspektiven (Bonn: 1990). 71 ff., 77) as quoted in Köhler, ‘Irreführungsrichtlinie und deutsches Wettbewerbsrecht’ (1994) GRUR Int., 396 ff., 397.
  1673. 1673See reference in Keilholz (1987), Tilmann, ‘Irreführende Werbung in Europa - Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Rechtsentwicklung’ (1990) GRUR, 87 ff.
  1674. 1674Tonner (1987), 1987, 1922 ff. The nature of the requirement on reversed burden of proof, however, is uncertain. Tonner seems to interpret it as a mandatory requirement to the implementing Member States.
  1675. 1675Schricker (1991a), at 793.
  1676. 1676Schricker (1991a), 793.
  1677. 1677Schricker, ibid.
  1678. 1678See Keilholz (1987), 390 ff.; Schwanhäuser (1988), 180 ff.
  1679. 1679„Verstärkte subjective Anforderungen an die Irreführung könnten manche vielleicht mehrdeutige, aber unschädliche Behauptungen durch die Maschen des Gesetzes lassen und würden uns mehr Spielraum geben, um die Spreu vom Weizen zu sondern.“ Schwanhäuser (1988) 180 ff., 184.
  1680. 1680„Es ist bei weitem früh, eine ca 80 Jahre alte, grossenteils bewährte und vor allen Dingen sehr differenzierte Rechtsprechung mit groben Schlägen von den gesicherten Geleisen zu holen. Es wird sich um einen langwierigen Prozess handeln. Die Darlegungen sollten allein dem ewig jungen, alten Ziel dienen, erlebte wettbewerbsrechtliche Erfahrung unter den Herausforderungen der europäischen Harmonisierung zu überdenken.“ Schwanhäuser (1988), 184.
  1681. 1681See Keilholz (1987), 392. „Zunächts einmal muss zur Kenntnis genommen werden, dass auch diese Richtlinie Harmonisierung bewirkt. Auf die Dauer wird auch sie durch das, was sie bestimmt hat und das, was sie offengelassen hat, zu einer EG-einheitlichen Behandlung der irreführenden Werbung fuhren.“
  1682. 1682The reference is to the so-called Nussbaum-doctrine requiring application of German unfair competition law to competitive acts between German enterprises, even when the competition takes place on foreign markets. On the origins of the doctrine in the jurisprudence of the RG and its subsequent evolution see Keilholz (1987), 392 ff. On German private international law of unfair competition see Joerges (1972); Schricker (1994b), 371.
  1683. 1683Everling, ‘Zur Bedeutung der Rechtsprechung des Europäischen Gerichtshofes für die Werbung in Europa’ in: ZAW (ed.), Irreführende Werbung in Europa - Maßstäbe und Perspektiven (Bonn, 1990), 43 ff.; Sympathetically, Köhler (1994), 396, 399 ff.; Schricker (1994a), 586, 592, fn. 69.
  1684. 1684Sosnitza (1995), 208. The author is, however, aware of the difficulties to sustain such an interpretation.
  1685. 1685At the same time, it is difficult to reconcile Everling’s interpretation with the clear language of Art. 7(1) Directive 84/450.
  1686. 1686„Die bisherige nationale Rechtsprechung mit ihrem kaum übersehbaren Präzedenzfällen wird dadurch überlargert und muss neu durchdacht werden.“ Everling (1990), 51 ff.
  1687. 1687ECJ C-238/89 Pall [1990] ECR I-4827 ff., para 22.
  1688. 1688Ibid., para 22.
  1689. 1689Case C-373/90 Criminal proceedings against X (Nissan) [1992] ECR I-131.
  1690. 1690Loi No. 73-1193 of 27 December 1973 on the Orientation of Business and Crafts. Art. 44 of this law prohibits untruthful and unlawful advertising.
  1691. 1691Case C-373/90 Nissan [1992] ECR I-131, para 14.
  1692. 1692Case C-373/90 Nissan [1992] ECR I-131, para 19.
  1693. 1693See Steiner (1994), 37 ff.
  1694. 1694Case C-373/90 Nissan [1992] ECR I-131, Opinion of the AG Tesauro, para 2.
  1695. 1695Case C-373/90 Nissan [1992] ECR I-131.
  1696. 1696Certify in particular qualifications like: “I will only say”, “in the present case”, “in any case”.
  1697. 1697Case C-373/90 Nissan [1992] ECR I-131.
  1698. 1698On the discussion in German legal doctrine.
  1699. 1699In a similar sense Beater (2000a), 77 ff.; Beater, ‘Zum Verhältnis von europäischem und nationalem Wettbewerbsrecht’ (2000b) GRUR Int., 963 ff.
  1700. 1700Everling, Die Einwirkung der Grundfreiheiten des EWG- Vertrages auf das Werberecht der Mitgliedstaaten, Referat im Rahmen der Tagung ‘Werbung in Europa’ (Bonn, 1992). Similar view by Sosnitza (1995), 206 and Köhler (1994), 396, 399 ff. The latter, however, introduces corrections to this view in the light of the subsequent Clinique ruling of the ECJ.
  1701. 1701Köhler (1994), 396, 399 ff.
  1702. 1702Art. 5 EC Treaty as interpereted by the ECJ in Marleasing, von Colson and Kammann etc. See Sosnitza (1995), 206.
  1703. 1703Deutsch, ‘Der Einfluß des europäischen Rechts auf den Irreführungstatbestand des § 3 UWG’ (1996) GRUR,
  1704. 1704ff.; Heermann, ‘Auswirkungen der Europäischen Rechtsentwicklung auf das deutsche Wettbewerbsrecht’ (1993) WRP, 578 ff. Kisseler, ‘Das deutsche Wettbewerbsrecht im Binnenmarkt’ (1994) WRP, 1 ff., 3 ff.
  1705. 1705See in particular Kisseler (1994), 2.
  1706. 1706Deutsch (1996), 541 ff., at 544 ff.
  1707. 1707A similar reading of the Nissan judgment is suggested by AG Gulmann in his opinion in Case C-315/92 Clinique [1994] ECR I-317 ff., fn., 6. Against this understanding one may wonder why a national court would submit a question lacking relevance for the interpetation of domestic law.
  1708. 1708On the concept of ‘legal irritants’ see Teubner (2000).
  1709. 1709Case C-315/92 Clinique [1994] ECR I-317, Opinion of AG Gulmann, para 12.
  1710. 1710Case C- 315/92 Clinique ECR [1994] I-317 ff., para 10, judgment. The Court furthermore held that even a directive providing for exhaustive harmonisation of national rules, such as the Directive on the packaging and labelling of consmetic products, should be interpreted n the light of the Treaty rules on the free movement of goods. Ibid., para 11-12.
  1711. 1711Case C-470/93 Mars [1995] ECR I-1923, Opinion of AG Leger, para 58.
  1712. 1712See Beater (2000a), 88.
  1713. 1713BR-Drs. 459/91, Beschluss des Bundesrats, 5.
  1714. 1714Spink/Petty (1998), 854 ff.
  1715. 1715BGH GRUR Int. 1998, 891 („Testpreis-Angebot“); BGH GRUR Int. 1999, 453 („Vergleichen Sie“); BGH GRUR Int. 1999, 69 („Preisvergleichsliste“).
  1716. 1716Tilmann (1999), 546.
  1717. 1717See Sack, ‘Die Berücksichtigung der Richtlinie 97/55/EG über irreführende und vergleichende Werbung bei der Anwendung der §§ 1 und 3 UWG' (1998b) WRP, 241 ff.
  1718. 1718BT-Drs. 14/2959, 6 with reference to Commission v. Germany Case C-361/88 [1991] I-2567.
  1719. 1719Henning-Bodewig (1999), 394; Ohly/Spence (1999), 696
  1720. 1720Cf. BR-Drs. 459/91; BT-Drs. 14/2959 Gesetzesentwurf der Bundesregierung.
  1721. 1721Köhler/Piper (2002), 875.
  1722. 1722Thus Henning-Bodewig directs attention at the dissonance between the language of the Directive and the traditional prohibitive approach in UWG and proposes a substantial revision of the UWG beyond a literal transposition of the text of the Directive, Henning-Bodewig (1999), 394.
  1723. 1723In this sense Bastian (2000),151 ff., 159.
  1724. 1724BT-Drs. 14/2959, 6.
  1725. 1725On Gut Springenheide and Estée Lauder, see below Ch. 7.2.1.
  1726. 1726In Tilmann (1997), 790, 796; Tilmann (1999), 550; Henning-Bodewig (1999), 386; Sack (1998b), 242; Sack (1998a), 271; more hesitant Ohly/Spence (1999), 689-90; Bastian (2000),151 ff., 161.
  1727. 1727Art. 7(1) as amended by Directive 97/55/EC.
  1728. 1728This is debatable. In my view the reference to the first parapraph of Art. 7 is to the principle of minimum harmonisation as such, and not to its specific application to misleading advertising. German commentators preferred the second inteipetation, despite that such a reading could not explain the reference to Art. 7(1) in Art. 3a(l)(a).
  1729. 1729See Henning-Bodewig (1999), 385 ff.; Ohly/Spence (1999), Sack (1998b), 242.
  1730. 1730Art. 3(l)(a), Directive 84/450 as amended by Directive EC/97/55.
  1731. 1731Tilmann (1999), 550.
  1732. 1732Tilmann (1999), 550; Henning-Bodewig (1999), 385 ff.
  1733. 1733See Dölling (1996), 61.
  1734. 1734Doc. SN/281/95. Quoted after Drs. 14/2959, 7.
  1735. 1735Drs. 14/2959, 7.
  1736. 1736See, however, the recent interpretation by the ECJ in Pippig this section, below.
  1737. 1737See Ch. 6.2.2.2.
  1738. 1738See Henning-Bodewig (1999), 391. Henning-Bodewig gives the example of a ‘Pepsi-Cola’ advert, where an archeologist in the distant future ‘excavates’ a ‘Coca-Cola’ bottle and wonders what this strange object had been used for. The competitor in this advert is clearly identified, so the advertising should arguably be classified as comparative under the Directive. The comparison, however, is not of objective features but of such elusive traits like potential to survive in competition. Should it be prohibited for failure to comply with Art. 3a(l)(b).
  1739. 1739See Tilmann (1999), Henning-Bodewig (1999), 385 ff.; Ohly/Spence (1999).
  1740. 1740See Henning-Bodewig (1999), 385 ff.
  1741. 1741In this sense Köhler/Piper (2002), 866 ff.
  1742. 1742Tilmann (1999), 546. § 14 UWG thus is viewed as exempted from the scope of the Directive.
  1743. 1743Henning-Bodewig considers advertisings of the sort “Only Revlon has more colours” for leather furniture and “Our Yoghurt is the Rolls Royce of yoghurts” to fall outside the scope of the Directive due to lack of competitive relationship. Henning-Bodewig (1999), 392. Of different opinion apparently Spink/Petty (1998), 855, at 862.
  1744. 1744This interpretation is supported by the history of the Directive. In its opinion on the 1991 Commission proposal for a Directive, the European Parliament proposed a new condition of permissibility, namely that comparative advertising “does not extend to the competitor’s person or circumstances.” OJ C 337/140. This provision, somewhat revised, was incorporated in the amended proposal by the Commission reading: “does not refer to the personality or personal situation of a competitor.” Neither of these proposals, however, was included in the final text of the Directive. Instead the term “circumstances” is inserted in the prohibition against discrediting or denigrating comparative advertising. In the German version of the Directive “circumstances” is translated as “Verhältnisse” (i.e. “relations”).
  1745. 1745BGH GRUR 1996, 983 (“Preisvergleich”), 983 ff.
  1746. 1746BGH GRUR 1996, 983 (“Preisvergleich”), 983 ff., at 984
  1747. 1747BGH GRUR 1996, 983 (“Preisvergleich”), 983 ff, at 984-85.
  1748. 1748BGH GRUR Int. 1998, 891(“Testpreis-Angebot”).
  1749. 1749BGH GRUR Int. 1999, 69 („Preisvergleichsliste II”); BGH GRUR Int. 1999, 453 („Vergleichen Sie“).
  1750. 1750See Ch. 5.5.1.1 above
  1751. 1751See Ohly/Spence (1999); Henning-Boweig (1999) .
  1752. 1752Bastian (2000), 160.
  1753. 1753See BVerfG WRP 2001, 1160 (“Therapäutische Äquivalenz”)
  1754. 1754See BVerfGE 102, 347 („Benetton-Werbung“)
  1755. 1755BVerfG WRP 2001, 1162.
  1756. 1756Ibid., 1163.
  1757. 1757Ibid., 1162.
  1758. 1758Jesper Alwall, Legal Adviser in the Consumer Unit of the Ministry of Public Administration (Civildepartementet), Promemoria: Ang. Förslag till direktiv om jämförande reklam, 1995-12-12, quoted after Dölling (1996), 60 (my translation).
  1759. 1759Bernitz (2002a), 11 ff., 16.
  1760. 1760Howells/Wilhelmsson (1997), 145.
  1761. 1761Dölling (1996), 60-61; Bernitz (2002a), 19.
  1762. 1762Bernitz (2002a), 25, 27 ff.
  1763. 1763In this sense Bernitz (2002a), at 21, 24, 25
  1764. 1764See on the new MFL below.
  1765. 1765See Council on Legislation, prop. 1999/2000:40, 51.
  1766. 1766See MD 2002:20 (“Champagne”). See also MD 2003:16 (“L 0 Smith”) with explicit reference to the Directive and to the Toshiba ruling of the ECJ seeking to find argument for a broad prohibition of comparative advertising.
  1767. 1767See MD 2002:20 (“Champagne”)
  1768. 1768Eventually the Court proceeded to try the case under the doctrine of goodwill exploitation (renommésnyltning) and found the marketing to be in conflict with the general clause on good marketing practice on the basis of this doctrine.
  1769. 1769See Nordell, Marknadsrättens goodwillskydd (Stockholm, Media Mercur, 2003a), 83; Nordell, ‘Champagnesmak! Kommentar till MD 2002:20’ (2003b) NIR, 94 ff.
  1770. 1770Case C-112/99 Toshiba [2001] ECR I-7945.
  1771. 1771“Is advertising by a supplier of spare parts and consumable items for an equipment manufacturer’s product to be regarded as comparative advertising within the meaning of Art. 2a of the Directive if the advertising indicates the manufacturer’s product numbers (OEM numbers) for the relevant original parts and consumable items for reference purposes in order to identify the supplier’s products?”
  1772. 1772Case C-112/99 Toshiba [2001] ECR I-7945, para 22.
  1773. 1773Ibid., para 23 ff.
  1774. 1774Ibid., para 26.
  1775. 1775Ibid., para 31.
  1776. 1776Ibid., para 33.
  1777. 1777Directive 89/104/EEC, OJ 1989 L 40/1.
  1778. 1778Ibid., para 36 f.
  1779. 1779Case C-44/01 Pippig Augenoptik, judgment of the Court of 8 April 2003, nyr.
  1780. 1780“Faced with the apparent textual contradiction, those provisions [of Arts. 3a(l)(a) and 7(2)] must be interpreted in such a way as to take account of the objectives of Direcive 84/450 and in the light of the case-law of the Court accordnng to which the conditions required of comparative advertising must be interpreted in the sense most favourable to it.” Ibid., para 42.
  1781. 1781Directive 89/552/EEC, OJ 1989 L 298/23 as amended by Directive 97/36/EC, OJ 1997 L202/61.
  1782. 1782See the semi-official title of the Directive ‘Television Without Frontiers.’
  1783. 1783On the doctrine of * Vorsprung durch Rechtsbruch’ in German unfair competition law, and on lagstridighetsprincipen ' in Swedish marketing practices law, see Ch. 5.5.1.1 and Ch. 5.5.2.4.
  1784. 1784Staatsvertrag über den Rundfunk im vereinten Deutschland of 31.8.1991 (RfStV, most recently amended GVBl. I 2002 Land Hessen, 779).
  1785. 1785See Eisenhardt, ‘Werbung gegenüber Kinder’ (1997) WRP, 283 ff., at 287; Engels, ‘Wettbewerbsrechtliche Grenzen der Fernsehewerbung für Kinder’ (1997) WRP, 6 ff.
  1786. 1786Gemeinsame Richtlinien der Landesmedienanstalten für die Werbung, zur Durchführung der Trennung von Werbung und Programm und für das Sponsoring im Fernsehen, 10.2.2000.
  1787. 1787Engel gives television broadcasting as a typical area of German law, building on ‘regulation through organization and procedure’. See Engel, ‘Regulierung durch Organisation und Verfahren’ in: Immenga/Möschel/Reuter, Festschrift för Mestmäcker (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1996), 119.
  1788. 1788§ 6(1) RfStV, see Engels (1997), 7.
  1789. 1789Engels (1997), 15; Eisenhardt (1997), 293.
  1790. 1790See Engels (1997), 15; Eisenhardt (1997), 293.
  1791. 1791Channel 1 was launched in 1956 and Channel 2 - in 1969.
  1792. 1792See prop. 1995/06:160, 41-42; 84. Cf. Kallersand, TV-reklam riktad till barn - regler och attityder (Stockholm: IFIM series. Nr. 96, 1998), 8 ff.
  1793. 1793SOU 1973:10. See Levin, Satellitreklam och konsumentskydd (Stockholm: Nordstedts, 1987b).
  1794. 1794This meant that the programmes had to comply with the requirements of ‘geographic justice’, ‘editorial independence’, and ‘diversity and balance’ and provide a varied programme content of high quality.
  1795. 1795Prop. 1990/91:149. The rights and obligations of TV4 are determined by agreement between the company and the Swedish state. In return for the right to broadcast commercial advertising TV4 pays concession fees to the state.
  1796. 1796Prop. 1995/96:160, 106; SOU 1994:105.
  1797. 1797SOU 1992:49, 87.
  1798. 1798Ibid.
  1799. 1799Radiolag (SFS 1966:755), amended by SFS 1991:1066.
  1800. 180011 § RL (SFS 1966:755) as amended by SFS 1991:1066. See prop. 1990/91:149. Cf. prop. 1995/96:160, 106. Similar rules were later on introduced in the Cable Broadcasting Act (lag om kabelsändningar till allmänheten (SFS 1991:2027), prop. 1991/92:53.
  1801. 18017:4 RTVL (SFS 1996:844).
  1802. 180217 a§RL.
  1803. 18032 § MFL (SFS 1975:1418); 4 1 § MFL (SFS 1995:450).
  1804. 1804See Ch. 5.5.2.5.
  1805. 18059:2 RTVL (SFS 1996:844), cf. 10:7 RTVL. This division of supervisory activities between the Supervisory Board for Radio and Television and the KO was made possible not least by the approximation of the sanctions under the RTVL and MFL. Both statutes allow the imposition of a fine for breach of relevant provisions of 5,000 to 5m. Swedish crowns, though not exceeding 10 percent of the broadcasting company’s annual turnover. Cf. 10:6 RTVL and 24 § MFL. This sanction is clearly inspired by the system of fines in Community competition law.
  1806. 1806Other provisions to be enforced in the same manner are the restrictions on alcohol advertising in 4:10 Alcohol Act (alkohollagen, SFS 1994:1738) and the prohibition of tobacco advertising in 14 a § Tobacco Act (tobakslagen, SFS 1003:581)).
  1807. 1807See SOU 1992:49, 86, referring to the statements by the Minister responsible on children advertising in prop. 1990/90:149, 121.
  1808. 1808SOU 1992:49, 85 ff.
  1809. 1809SOU 1992:49, 86.
  1810. 1810To arrive to this conclusion the Inquiry referred to the case of a Greek prohibition of television advertising of toys. In 1986 the Commission had made objections to Greece as to the compatibility of this prohibition with the principle of free movement of goods. In a reply to a parliamentary interpellation the Commission had stated that the Television Directive indeed allowed Member States to lay down stricter rules in respect to children advertising. However, these rules ought to be consistent with Art. 30 of the Treaty. As a consequence thereof Greece limited the prohibition to military toys. See ibid., 86.
  1811. 1811Note, however, the dissenting opinion of the Deputy KO Per Eklund on the issue, SOU 1992:49, 91.
  1812. 1812On the ‘effektlandsprincipen’ see prop. 1970:57, 93.
  1813. 1813Prop. 1992/93:75, 33 ff.; 1992/93:110. Cf. 2 § 1975 MFL, introduced with SFS 1992:1361.
  1814. 1814Prop. 1992/93:75, 35 ff.
  1815. 1815Dir. 1995:32, see Skr. 1995/96:181, Konsumentpolitiken i EU - mål och inriktning for det svenska arbetet, Bilaga 1, 66. The Television Directive was at that time in the process of amendment, resulting in Directive 97/36/EC amending Council Directive 89/552/EEC.
  1816. 1816Skr. 1995/95:181, 45 ff. Förbud mot TV-reklam riktad till bam.
  1817. 1817Skr. 1995/96:181, 45.
  1818. 1818Ibid.
  1819. 1819See Common Rules on the Evaluation of TV-advertising of August 1991 issued by the Consumer Ombudsmen of Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden (Felles spilleregler for fjernsynsreklamen), attachment 5, SOU 1992:49, 143 ff.
  1820. 1820Nordiska Ministerrådet, Barn og TV-reklame - tre nordiske undersogelser. Nord 1992:4. The report claimed that children aged under 8 could generally differentiate between advertising and programme content, but not when the advertising was expressly directed at them. Ibid., 200 f, 141.
  1821. 1821‘Vad sänder TV3 till barnen?’ KO rapport 1995/96:12, 8-17. See Kallersand (1998), 51.
  1822. 1822Granskningsnämnden for Radio och TV, Årsbok 1997, 61. Quoted after Kallersand (1998), 51.
  1823. 1823Joined Cases E-8/94 and E-9/94 (reference for an advisory opinion from Markedsrådet): Forbrukerombudet vs. 1. Mattel Scandinavia A/S and 2. Lego Norge A/S, OJ C 239, 14/09/1995, 6; Joined Cases Konsumentombudsmannen v. De Agostini Verlag C-34 & 35, C-36 [1998] ECR.
  1824. 1824Joined Cases E-8/94 and E-9/94 Mattel and Lego Norge A/S, OJ C 239, 14/09/1995, para 6. Reference for an advisory opinion from Markedsrådet.
  1825. 1825Cf. the press release issued by the KO on 20th November 1998, on the occasion of the decision of the Market Court confirming the ECJ ruling. The release is entitled: “Success for the Consumer Ombudsman concerning TV
  1826. 1826On this organisation, see Ch. 7.4.2.2 below.
  1827. 1827Sveriges Konsumentråd, “Vill du att dina barn ska kunna titta på TV utan att behöva utsättas för reklam?”, 1997. On the boycott, see Kallersand (1998), 58 ff.
  1828. 1828See Kallersand (1998), 59.
  1829. 1829Ibid.
  1830. 1830Kallersand (1998), 63.
  1831. 1831See Reich (1992a), 861 ff.; Bernard (2000) 25 ELRev, 57 ff.
  1832. 1832The Court has consistently refused to regard reverse discrimination as falling under Community law, see Nikolaysen (1991), 95 ff, Maduro (2000), 120 ff
  1833. 1833See Sun/Pelkmans (1995), 67; Van den Bergh (1998), 129. Critical Reich (1992a), 861; Editorial Comments, Are European values being hovered away?, 30 CMLRev. 1993, 445.
  1834. 1834For a convincing criticism of this theory based on constitutional and institutional economic analysis, see Maduro (1998a), 136 ff.
  1835. 1835This may be an impracticable choice, though, given the system of ‘channel packages’ that are usually used by distribution companies.
  1836. 1836To quote the terse language in an info to be found on TV4 webpage: “TV4 is a television channel that lives on advertising income. Without advertisers who buy advertising time, there will be no TV4.” http://www.tv4.se, Reklam och nyhetsavbrott i program.
  1837. 1837Case C-268/81 Oosthoek [1982] ECR 4575.
  1838. 1838Case C-362/88 GB-INNO-BM [1990] ECR I-667.
  1839. 1839Case C-126/91 Yves Rocher [1993] ECR I-2361.
  1840. 1840See Ch. 6.2.2.5; Art. 6(c) and (d) of the E-Commerce Directive.
  1841. 1841COM (2001) 546 final.
  1842. 1842Rabattgesetz, RGB1 I 1933, 1011, repealed by BGB1 I 2001, 1663.
  1843. 1843Zugabeverordnung RGBl. I 1932, 121, repealed by BGB1.I 2001, 1661.
  1844. 1844On the history of the acts and more recent legislative developments see Meyer, ‘Rabatt- und Zugabe­ Regulierung auf dem Prüfstand’ (2001) GRUR, 98 ff. 552A detailed review of the caselaw of the BGH and the State Courts can be found in Sosnitza (1995), 127 ff.
  1845. 1845Sosnitza (1995), 139 and 163 with further references.
  1846. 1846See Lehmann (1995), 380 ff., at 381; Schricker (1994a), 586 ff., 590 ff.
  1847. 1847Case C-362/88 GB-INNO [1990] ECR I-667.
  1848. 1848Schricker (1994a), 586 ff.; Lehmann (1995), 380 ff.
  1849. 1849Case C-126/91 Yves Rocher [1993] I-2361.
  1850. 1850See BT-Drs. 12/6722 ; BT-Drs. 12/6723.
  1851. 1851See BR-Drs. 116/94, 5 ff; BT-Drs. 12/7271.
  1852. 1852Case C-126/91 Yves Rocher [1993] I-2361.
  1853. 1853Reasoned opinion by the Commission A/88/189, quoted by the Federal Government in BT-Ds. 116/94, 5 ff. See Schricker, ‘Reformen im Recht des unlauteren Wettbewerbs’ (1994c) ZRP, 430 ff., at 432.
  1854. 1854Micklitz, ‘Perspektiven eines Europäischen Privatrechts’ (1998b) ZEuP 253 ff., at 255 with reference to Kasseler (1994), 1 ff., 9.
  1855. 1855BT-Plenarprotokoll 12/233, 20282. Judging from statements of other MPs the reform plans had unleashed a mass protest among small and medium-sized enterprises. One of the MPs speaks of a storm of protest letters and another claims that he had never received so many faxes and letters. Ibid.
  1856. 1856„Es ist ja eine ganze Mauer, die wir dann anpacken müssen, und wenn mann enen Stein herauszieht, bricht die ganze Mauer zusammen.“ Ibid., 20287.
  1857. 1857The law was passed with the decisive votes of the CDU/CSU and FDP coalition. See BT-Plenarprotokoll 12/233, 20304.
  1858. 1858See Minister of the economy Günter Rexrodt, Parliamentary records, Ibid.,20291.
  1859. 1859See BR-Drs. 116/94, Stellungnahme des Bundesrates, 2.
  1860. 1860Ibid., 2-4.
  1861. 1861BT-Drs. 12/7715; BR-Drs. 602/94.
  1862. 1862This practice had been previously qualified by the BGH as an impermissible combined offer, BGH GRUR 1991, 542 (“Biowerbung mit Fahrpreiserstattung”). See Fezer (1992), see Ch. 5.5.1. See Beschlussempfehlung und Bericht des Rechtssausschusses, BT-Ds. 12/7911; BT-Ds. 12/3164. Gesetz zur Änderung der Zugabeverordnung, BGBl. I 1994, 1688. See Schricker (1994c), 436.
  1863. 1863Cf. Art. 6 (c) and (d).
  1864. 1864BT-Drs. 14/5441, 5 ff.
  1865. 1865BT-Ds. 14/5594.
  1866. 1866Ibid., 1.
  1867. 1867BT-Drs. 14/5441, 7-8.
  1868. 1868BR-Drs. 12/01; BR-Drs. 13/01.
  1869. 1869Gesetz zur Aufhebung des Rabattgesetzes, BGBl. I 2001, 1663; Gesetz zur Aufhebung der Zugabeverordnung, BGBl. I 2001, 1661.
  1870. 1870Cf. BT-Drs. 14/6098.
  1871. 1871In the Economic Commission of the German Bundestag the Christian-Democrats still voted against the reform. In the Parliamentary debates several deputies criticised the reform as hostile to the Mittelstand. The phenomenon of ‘hiding’ behind decision made at the European level is well documented in the political science literature on European integration. See Marks/Hooghe/Blank, ‘Integration Theory, Subsidiarity and Internationalisation of Issues: The Implications for Legitimacy, EUI Working Papers, RSC No. 7, 26: “Lack of autonomous control has advantages as well as disadvantages for member states executives. State executives can hide behind decisions that are made in the European Council or in interlocking policy making with the Commission. They can fend off domestic opposition and defuse ideologically charged issues by claiming that they must adjust to arrangements they cannot change.”
  1872. 1872Political scientist speak of veto points. See Knill (2001), 24; Immergut (1992), 57 ff.
  1873. 1873See Ch 5.4.2.3.
  1874. 18747-8 §§ MFL (SFS 1975:1418). Cf. Kombinationserbjudanden (KOV, 1984), 47 ff.
  1875. 18752 § MFL (SFS 1975:1418).
  1876. 187613 § MFL (SFS 1995:450), see Ch. 7.4.2 below.
  1877. 1877See prop. 1994/95:123.
  1878. 1878See Ds. 2001:13, 95 f.: “Those requirements set in Art. 6 of the Directive already exist in Swedish law, mainly in the form of different provisions in the MFL.”
  1879. 1879Ds. 2001:13, 96 ff.
  1880. 1880Directive 97/7/EC.
  1881. 1881OJ 1998 L 24/1.
  1882. 1882Directive 2000/31/EC.
  1883. 1883Baumbach/Hefermehl (1998), Belästigung (at 508) with sub-catogries: Anreissen; Strassenwerbung; Telefon­ , Telefax, E-Mail, Briefkastenwerbung; Zusendung unbestellter Waren; Hausbesuche; Werbung im Todesfall; Haustürgeschäfte; Geschmakloses Werben (508-526).
  1884. 1884See a summary report by the KOV on aggressive marketing methods, Ds. 1999:35, 71 ff.
  1885. 1885See prop. 1999/2000:40, 14; Ds. 1999:35, 19 ff.
  1886. 1886The two alternatives are known as an ‘opt in’ solution (Art. 10.1) and ‘opt out’ solution (Art. 10.2). See Reichelsdorfer, ‘eMails zu Werbezwecken - ein Wettbewerbsverstoss?’ (1997) GRUR, 191 ff.; Leupold. ‘Die massenweise Versendung von Werbe e-Mails: Innovatives Direktmarketing oder unzumutbare Belästigung des Empfängers?’ (1998) WRP, 270 ff.; Lehmann (1999), 180 ff.; Busche, ‘Werbung per electronic mail: Eine neue Herausforderung für das Wettbewerbsrecht?’ (1998) WRP, 1142 ff.; Leistner ‘Werbung, Commercial Communication und E-Commerce’ in: Lehmann (ed.), Electronic Business in Europa (München: Beck, 2002),
  1887. 1887ff., at 282 ff. with a review of the case law.
  1888. 1888See the case law reported by Leistner (2002), 282 ff.
  1889. 1889Cf. Annex ‘Derogations from Article 3’, last indent: “the permissibility of unsolicited commercial communication by electronic mail.” Concerning the debate in the German scholarly literature prior to adoption of the Directive see Hoeren (1999), Lehmann (1999), Spindler, ‘Kapitalmarktgeschäfte im Binnenmarkt. Der Einfluss der E-Commerce Richtlinie auf das Internationale Vertragsrecht’ (2001) IPRax, 400 ff.
  1890. 1890BT-Drs. 14/6098, 12. That the solution is not altogether satisfactory becomes evident from the ongoing debate in the legal literature described by Leistner and the lack of case law from the BGH. Leistner (2002).
  1891. 1891Among them SWEDMA, the Association of Direct Marketing Enterprises (Direkthandelsföretagens förening), Swedish Post Order Association (Svenska postorderföreningen), the Advertising Association of Sweden (Sveriges Reklamförbund, SRF), Association of Swedish Advertisers (Annonsföreningen, AF), the TU, Näringslivets delegation för marknadsrätt, the Swedish Marketing Federation (Sveriges Marknadsförhund), the SI, Swedish Federation of Trade (Svensk Handel, SH), a number of major enterprises in the telecommunication industry.
  1892. 1892Ds. 1999:35, 27.
  1893. 1893Cf. draft 16 § MFL: “A trader cannot use (telephone) telefax and electronic mail, automatic calling machines and other similar automatic systems for messages, unless the consumer has agreed thereto in advance.” Ds. 1999:35, 95.
  1894. 1894See 13 a § MFL (SFS 1995:450).
  1895. 1895See prop. 1999/2000:40, 20.
  1896. 1896Prop. 1999/2000:40, 20. Cf. the critical comments by the SKR, “Cowardly decision on e-mail advertising”, press release of 25.1.2000.
  1897. 1897See Ds. 2001:13; 95 ff.; prop. 2001/02:150, 73.
  1898. 1898See KO Rapport 2000:21, Spärrregister for e-postreklam.
  1899. 1899See 13 a and 3 §§ MFL (SFS 1995:450).
  1900. 1900See the proposal by the Consumer Agency on aggressive marketing, Ds. 1999:35, 71 ff., referring to Rapport 1997:3, KOV.
  1901. 1901Olsen (2001-02), at 840.
  1902. 1902The position of these countries is diligently given as a positive example in the Swedish debate. See SKR, Press release of 25.01.2000.
  1903. 1903Note, however, that in some Member States even these weak requirements provoked changes. For instance, England was forced to introduce a separate administrative procedure for tackling fair trading claims as a last resort. Changes were also considered necessary in the Italian system of enforcement. See Bastian (1998/99), 199 ff.
  1904. 1904See Micklitz (1998a), 937 ff.
  1905. 1905One of the main targets of this Directive seems to have been Great Britain, where consumer associations have been step-motherly treated in respect to procedural rights. See Reich (1992b), Rott (2001), 401.
  1906. 1906See Basedow/Hopt/Kötz/Baetge (1999).
  1907. 1907Basedow/Hopt/Kötz/Baetge (1999), 3-5.
  1908. 1908Basedow/Hopt/Kötz/Baetge (1999), 4.
  1909. 1909Basedow/Hopt/Kötz/Baetge (1999), 6.
  1910. 1910„Nicht empfohlen werden kann schliesslich die Schaffung von Zivilklagebefugnissen für Behörden oder andere öffentliche Stellen (z. B. Ombudsmänner). Dies würde die Errichtung eines in Deutschland bislang unbekannten Typs von Behörde erfordern, dessen Aufabe darin bestünde, die Rechte Privater einzuklagen. Das erscheint nicht nur ineffizient, sondern gerät auch leicht in den Geruch staatlicher Zwangsbeglückung der Bürger. Die klagweise Geltendmachung ihrer privaten Recht überlässt man den Bürgern daher besser selber.“ Basedow/Hopt/Kötz/Baetge (1999), 7. See, however, the more balanced view by Koch, ‘Der Verbandsklage in Europa’ (2000) ZZP, 413 ff., 428.
  1911. 1911Schäffer (1999), at 86 ff.
  1912. 1912„Der Schutz von Interessen, die nicht mit konkreten personen verbunden sind, ist in erster Linie Aufgabe des öffentlichen Rechts. Ein praktisches Bedürfnis zur Einräumung zusätzlicher zivilprozessualer Verbandsklagemöglichkeiten in diesem Bereich ist nicht erkennbar.“, ibid., 7.
  1913. 1913BGBl 2000 I, 897; Art. 3: Änderung des AGB-Gesetzes; Art. 4: Änderung der UWG. See BT-Drs. 14/2658.
  1914. 1914See Greger, ‘Verbandsklage und Prozessrechtsdogmatik: Neue Entwicklungen in einer schwierigen Beziehung’ (2000) 113 ZZP, 399 ff., 400. According to commentators this refom created three sets of procedural rules: for litigation in the area of consumer law in general, for litigation on the basis of unfair contract terms and for unfair competition. See Rott (2001), 412.
  1915. 1915BGB1. 20011, 3173. Cf. BT-Drs.14/6040, 37 ff.
  1916. 1916An underlying objective of this legislative endeavour was the integration of the scattered consumer protection rules, partly resulting from transposition of Community Directives, into a cohesive well-balanced regulative framework within a reformed BGB. See Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Modernisierung des Schuldrechts, BT-Drs. 14/6040. Cf. BGB, BGBl. I, 42 ff.
  1917. 1917See § 2 UKlaG. The term ‘collective interests’ is not explicitly used in the new German legislation, but this restriction can be inferrred from the travaux préparatoires as well as from the phrase ‘im Interesse des Verbraucherschutzes’ in § 2 I UKlaG. See Rott (2001), 415, with reference to BT-Drs. 2658, 27. Cf. Micklitz (2001), 87 ff.
  1918. 1918§ 3 I Nr. 2 and 3 UKlaG. Cf. BT-Drs. 14/6040, 37 ff.
  1919. 1919See Baetge (1999), 336.
  1920. 1920Baetge notes that in the language of the Directive the public bodies have to be specifically responsible for the protection of consumers. Ibid., 336 f.
  1921. 1921See § 2 III UKlaG about abusive litigation restating § 13 V UWG.
  1922. 1922See § 4 II UklaG in conjunction with § 13 II Nr. 3 UWG
  1923. 1923§4 UKlaG.
  1924. 1924See Greger (2000), 399 ff., at 403, pointing at the change in language from „Ansprüche auf Unterlassung... können geltend gemacht werden“ (§ 13 AGBG, old) to „Ansprüche stehen zu“ (§ 22 III AGBG). Cf. BT-Drs. 14/2659, 52.
  1925. 1925On proposals for annulment of this requirement in the new comprehensive UWG reform see below, Ch. 7.3.1.2.
  1926. 1926See Micklitz (2000), 87, 102.
  1927. 1927For a detailed analysis of the question of litigation costs of consumer associations, see Halfmeier (2001).
  1928. 1928For the critical view on compensation of notification costs see Baetge (1999), 348-49.On this doctrine see Ch. 5.3.3.3.
  1929. 1929Greger (2000), 411.
  1930. 1930Lag om talerätt for vissa utländska konsumentmyndigheter och konsumentorganisationer (SFS 2000:1175); prop. 2000/2001:34; Ds. 2000:32.
  1931. 1931Prop.2000/2001:34, 31 ff.
  1932. 1932See Commission communication concerning Art. 4(3) of Directive 98/27/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on injunctions for the protection of consumers’ interests, concerning the entities qualified to bring an action under Art. 2 of this Directive, OJ 2003 C 159/2.
  1933. 1933Provided, of course, that the latter was a Community Member State. In this sense Bogdan (1998a), 534; Bogdan (1998b), 371.
  1934. 1934See prop. 2000/2001.
  1935. 193510:5-6 RTVL (1996:844).
  1936. 1936See Bogdan (1998), 537 who suggests that the list of qualifed entities should be kept broad.
  1937. 1937Preamble, Rec. 23 Directive 2000/31/EC.
  1938. 1938Hoeren (1999), 192, 195.
  1939. 1939See Reich/Nordenhaus, Verbraucher und Recht im elektronischen Geschäftsverkehr (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2000), 147 ff.; Mankowski, ‘Das Internet im Internationalen Vertrags- und Deliktsrecht’ (1999a) RabelsZ, 256 ff.; Mankowski, ‘Internet und internationales Wettbewerbsrecht’ (1999b) GRUR Int., 909, at 1001.
  1940. 1940See Thünken, ‘Multi-State Advertising over the Internet and the Private International Law of Unfair Competition’(2002) 51 ICLQ, 909 ff, at 928 ff; see also Roth ‘Der Einfluss des Europäischen Gemeinschaftsrecht auf das IPR’ (1991) 55 RabelsZ, 623 ff., at 666 ff. Roth rightly notes that the Community’s efforts to accomplish the Internal Market are mainly directed towards the area of economic (supervisory) law. Consequently, he sees the country-of-origin principle as primarily belonging to the domain of international administrative law. The same author nevertheless identifies a number of intricate repercussions on private international law, including the areas of advertising and unfair competition law.
  1941. 1941Spindler (2001), 400 ff., 401.
  1942. 1942See Thünken (2002), 927.
  1943. 1943Brussels Convention, OJ 1978 L304/36.
  1944. 1944Brussels Regulation (EC) No 44/2001, OJ 2001 L12/1.
  1945. 1945See Mankowski, ‘Das Herkunftslandprinzip als Internationales Privatrecht der E-Commerce-Richtlinie’ (2001) 100 ZvgIRWiss, 137 ff, at 175-6.
  1946. 1946Case C-21/76 Mines de Potasse d’Alsace [1976] ECR 1735. According to the Court’s ruling in Sheville concerning the distribution of allegedly defamatory publication in more than one country, this is the place where the harmful event has caused damage to the injured party. See C-68/93 Sheville v. Presse Alliance S.A. [1995] ECR I-415. See Kur, ‘Das Herkunftslandprinzip der E-Commerce-Richtlinie: Chancen und Risiken’ in: Festschriftför Willie Erdmann (Köln: Carl Heymann, 2002), 629 ff., 635 ff.; Thünken (2002), 925 ff.
  1947. 1947See Rec. 22 Directive EC/2000/31.
  1948. 1948See Kur (2002), 629 ff, 635; Mankowski (2001), 175 ff.
  1949. 1949Kur (2002), 636.
  1950. 1950Ibid.
  1951. 1951How one should qualify the impact of the country-of-origin principle - as a conflict-of-law rule or as a substantive law restriction - is, allegedly, not a purely academic matter. Kur sees the practical relevance of such distinction in that in the first case the more favourable (i.e. less strict for the ISP) law of the country of establishment should be considered by the court ex officio, whereas in the second case the objection about more restrictive rules in the applicable law should be treated as an exception to be substantiated by the defendant in the proceedings. See Kur (2002), 629 ff., 638; see also Ohly, ‘Das Herkunftslandprinzip und Kollisionsrecht’ (2001) GRUR Int., 899ff, 902 ff. Contra Ahrens, ‘Das Herkunftslandprinzip in der E-Commerce-Richtlinie’ (2000) CR,
  1952. 1952ff, 838.
  1953. 1953Hoeren (1999), 195.
  1954. 1954Dethloff, ‘Marketing im Internet und Internationales Wettbewerbsrecht’ (1998) NJW, 1596 ff., at 1599; Dethloff, ‘European Conflict-Of-Law Provisions Governing Unfair Competition’ (1999) Commercial Communications, 2 ff., at4 ff; Dethloff, ‘Europäisches Kollissionsrecht des Unlauteren Wettbewerbs’ (2000) JZ, 179 ff at 181. A more hesitant view is expressed by Dethloff after entry the into force of the E-Commerce Directive, especially in light of the blunt statement in Art. 1(4) that the Directive does not purport to establish new rules of private international law. See Dethloff (2001), 54.
  1955. 1955Dethloff (2001), 179 ff.
  1956. 1956Basedow, ‘Der kollissionsrechtliche Gehalt der Produktfreiheiten im europäischen Binnenmarkt: favor offerentis’ (1995) 59 RabelsZ, 1 ff. On the basis of a survey of ECJ jurisprudence on the basic Community freedoms Basedow elicits a general principle of application of the law more favourable of intracommunity trade to be inherent in these rules. In the area of unfair competition the principle is seen to materialize in cases like GB-INNO, Yves Rocher and Clinique. Ibid., 50 ff. More generally on the influence of Community law on private international law, see Roth (1991), 623 ff.
  1957. 1957See Mankowski (2001), 137 ff, 140; Mankowski (1999b), 909 ff, at 912; Spindler (2001), 400, at 403; Thünken, ‘Die EG-Richtlinie über den elektronischen Geschäftsverkehr und das internationale Privatrecht des unlauter Wettbewerbs’ (2001) IPRax, 15 ff, at 20; Thünken (2002), 940.
  1958. 1958Spindler (2001), 401: „Dieses Dilemma wird sich wohl nur so lösen lassen, dass man zwar Art. 3 I, U als kollisionsrechtlichen Normen begreift, jedoch nur als eine eigenartige hybride Konstruktion zwischen Kollsionsrecht und sachrechtlichem Korrektiv,die sich weder befriedigend kollisions- noch europarechtlich erklären lässt.“
  1959. 1959Thünken (2001), 21, 22.
  1960. 1960The most vocal critic appears to be Mankowski. Thünken agrees on some of the critical points but on balance considers the arguments in favour of the country-of-origin principle as a new conflict-of-law rule to weigh heavier than those against. Thünken (2002), 936 ff.
  1961. 1961Fezer/Koos, ‘Das gemeinschaftsrechtliche Herkunftslandprinzip und die E-commerce -Richtlinie’ (2000) IPRax, 349; Sack, ‘Das internationale Wettbewerbsrecht nach der E-Commerce-Richtlinie (ECRL) und dem EGG-/TDG-Entwurf' (2001) WRP, 1408 ff., at 1409, 1417; Ohly, (2001), at 901; Ahrens (2000, at 837; Nickels, ‘Neues Bundesrecht für den E-Commerce’ (2001) DB, 1919 ff., at 1922.
  1962. 1962Sack (2001), 1408 ff., at 1409.
  1963. 1963Sack (2001), 1411; Ohly (2001), 901; Kur (2002), 637-38. Kur rightly notes that in contrast to the general principles of free movement of goods and services the filter here consists not of primaiy Community law, but of the substantive rules in the country of origin. The law of the market remains applicable, but it may be restricted in its substantive scope after being subject to an evaluating “filtering” test, namely the substantive standards in the country of origin.
  1964. 1964See Bodewig (2000) 475 ff, at 479 ff. Discussing the possibilities for exemption from the country-of-origin principle laid down in Art. 3(4) Bodewig notes that, in contrast to the ‘Cassis de Dijon', such possibility exists only on grounds of consumer protection and not of fairness of commercial transactions. He rightly expresses doubts that national regulations with mixed objectives (e.g. the German regulation on combined offers) would pass this test, ibid., 480.
  1965. 1965See Ohly (2001), 902; Kur (2002), 638.
  1966. 1966And conversely, in case the advertiser would make it clear that he differentiates his marketing in order to comply with local legal rules, then he might be refused the protection under the countiy of origin regime (provided the latter is less restrictive). Kur (2002), 642, 644.
  1967. 1967„Zwar enthält [das Herkunftslandprinzip] eine ausdrückliche Bestätigung des Grundsatzes, dass für die Entscheidung über die Rechtmäßigkeit einer grenzüberschreitenden Handlung nicht die Rechtsordnungen aller berührten Länder zu beachten sind, sondern dass das Recht des Herkunftslandes den entscheidenden Maßstab bildet. Allerdings ist nach dem oben ausgeführten Sinn und Zweck der Richtlinie zu entnehmen, dass dieser Grundsatz nicht dazu herangezogen werden kann, die Verbreitung von Kommunikationsdienstleistungen zu verhindern, die im Herkunftsland selbst keine kommerzielle Wirkung entfalten, während sie nach dem Recht anderer Länder (möglicherweise) zulässig sind.“ Kur (2002), 642.
  1968. 1968For a detailed analysis see Mankowski (1999), 909 ff.; Kur (2002), 639 ff with further refernces.
  1969. 1969§ 4 TDG-E „Herkunftslandprinzip“: (1) „In der Bundesrepublik Deutschland niedergelassenen Diensteanbieter und ihre Teledienste unterliegen den innerstaatlichen Nonnen auch dann, wenn die Teledienste in einem anderen Staat innerhalb des Anwendungsbereichs der Richtlinie 2000/31 ... im Binnenmarkt geschäftsmäßig angeboten oder erbracht werden, soweit sich nicht aus den Regeln des internationalen Privatrechts etwas anderes ergibt.“ BT-Drs. 14/6098, 5.
  1970. 1970§ 4 I Nr. 2 TDG-E: “Auf solche Teledienste ist das nach den Regeln des internationalen Privatrechts maßgebliche Recht eines anderen Staates jedoch nicht anwendbar, soweit dadurch der freie Dienstleistungsverkehr über die Anforderungen des deutschen Rechts hinausgehend eingeschränkt werden würde.“ BT-Drs. 14/6098, 5.
  1971. 1971Referring to a much debated rule of § 38 EGBGB, see Sack (2001), 1412.
  1972. 1972§ 4 II (2) TDG-E: „Auf solche Teledienste sind die nach den Regeln des internationalen Privatrechts maßgeblichen Normen nicht anwendbar soweit dadurch der freie Dienstleistungsverkehr über die Anforderungen des Niederlassungsstaates hinausgehend eingeschränkt werden würde.“ BT-Drs. 14/6098, 5
  1973. 1973BT-Drs. 14/6098, Stellungnahme des Bundesrates, Anlage 2, 32 ff.
  1974. 1974BT-Drs. 14/6098, Gegenäußerung der Bundesregierung, Anlage 3, 36.
  1975. 1975Ibid.
  1976. 1976BT-Drs. 14/7345, 31, Beschlussempfehlung und Bericht des Ausschusses für Wirtschaft und Technologie, Begründung, Deutscher. „Die schwierige Umsetzung des Herkunftslandprinzips kann am besten bewerkstelligt werden, indem man sich möglichst eng an dem Wortlaut der einschlägigen Richtlinienbestimmungen orientirert. Die Fassung des § 4 I TDG wird dementsprechend angepasst. Des Weiteren wird § 4 Abs 1 TDG an den im Entwurf in § 4 V (1) TDG-E synonym verwandten Begriff des „Geltungsbereichs“ der Richtlinie angepasst.“
  1977. 1977Hoffmann, ‘EGG - Eine Reihe von Problemen des elektronischen Rechtsverkehrs ungelöst’ (2002) MMR, 65 ff.
  1978. 1978Hoffmann (2002), 66.
  1979. 1979See the numerous possible interpretations of these provisions for various hypothesis discussed by Sack (2001), 1408 ff.
  1980. 1980BGB1. I 1997, 1870 ff. amended through BGB1. I 2001, 3721 ff.
  1981. 1981For a more sophisticated view on the private international law of multistate advertising, informed by comparative analysis of divergent regulative models; see Reich (1992b); see also Roth (1991), 671 in die context of the right of corrective statement in the Television Directive.
  1982. 1982See Bernitz (1969), cf. Ch. 5.2.2.3 above.
  1983. 1983Prop. 1970:57, 92 f.
  1984. 1984See Levin (1987b), 143; Bernitz, Marknadsrättslig kontroll av reklam-TV, No. 76 (Nordisk Ministerråd NORD, 1988), 17 ff. with reference to decisions where the Market Court has applied Swedish law to the marketing conduct of foreign traders. The doctrine of noticeable effect was tested in the case MD 1989:6 (“Scanorama”). The case concerned an alcohol advertisement inserted in a publication distributed by SAS on board its aircraft. According to a statement in the Government Bill to the Act on Advertising of Alcohol and
  1985. 1985See Pålsson, Svensk rättspraxis i internationell processrätt (Stockholm: Norstedts, 1989), 53; Bogdan (1998) 541.
  1986. 1986“Men även i de fall där talan väckts av t.ex. en berörd näringsidkare eller en sammanslutning av konsmenter, näringsidkare eller en sammanslutning av konsumenter, näringsidkare (se t.ex. 38 § MFL) måste den anses vara av övervägande offentligrättslig karaktär, eftersom den direkt eller i förlängningen handlar om böter vilka betalas till staten.” In a footnote the author nevertheless adds that the situation could change if the claim concerned compensation of damages or other payment to the affected competitor or association. “Saken skulle kunna komma i ett annan läge om talan avsåg skadestånd eller annat slags belopp betalbart till den näringsidkare eller sammanslutning som väckt talan.” Bogdan (1998a), 533-54. Similar Bogdan, ‘Kollektiva konsumentintressen i den internationella processrätten’ (1994/95) JT, 905. (1994/95), 905.
  1987. 1987It was only after the entry into force of the Injunctions Directive, obliging national courts to award foreign entities’ standing to litigate in defence of collective consumer interests before national courts and authorities, that the question was given some consideration. See Bogdan (1998a), 541. On the transposition of the Injunctions Directive see Ch. 7.1.2.2 above.
  1988. 1988See prop. 2000/2001:34, 23.
  1989. 1989See 1 § Lagrådsremissens lagförslag, prop. 2000/2001:34, 47 ff.
  1990. 1990Ibid.
  1991. 1991Prop. 2000/2001:34, 27.
  1992. 1992Prop. 2000/2001:34, 23 ff.
  1993. 1993Ibid., 27.
  1994. 1994Ibid.
  1995. 1995Ds. 2001:31, 90.
  1996. 1996Ds. 2001:13, 87.
  1997. 1997Prop. 2001/02:150, 59 ff.
  1998. 1998”En svensk författningstext skulle ju normalt tolkas på detta sättet. Direktivet är dock resultat av ett omfattande och bitvis besvärlig förhandlingsarbete där flera viljor har måst tillgodoses inom ramen för kompromisslösningar. Detta innebär att direktivtexten inte kan tolkas på samma sätt som en svensk författningstext. Enligt regeringen talar mycket för att bedömningen som gjordes i promemorian är riktig. Samtidigt är Direktivet oklart och någon uttrycklig regel som anger att civilrättsliga frågor inte omfattas av direktiver finns inte. I sista hand är det en uppgift för EG-domstolen att avgöra direktivets innebörd. Den svenska regleringen bör därför nära ansluta till direktivtexten, vilket också är den lagstiftnings teknik som valts i de flesta länder.” Ibid., 62.
  1999. 1999Prop. 2001/02:150, 63.
  2000. 2000Åkerman/Thunman, ‘Jurisdiktions- och lagvalsproblem på Internet’ (1997-98) JT, 432 ff.
  2001. 2001Bogdan (1998), 542.
  2002. 2002Kur indicates that the two may not necessarily coincide. Kur (2002), 634.
  2003. 2003A change may be underway, though. See the discussion in the Government Bill above; cf. the comments by Bogdan provoked by the recent ECJ judgment C-167/00 Verein för Konsumentinformation v. Henkel [2002] ECR I-8111. Bogdan, ‘Om Bryssel/Luganoreglernas tillämpning i marknadsrättsliga mål’ (2002-03) JT, 410 ff. In this judgment the Court holds a dispute between a consumer organization and a private company concerning unfair terms of consumer contract to be “civil and commercial matter” in the sense of the Convention. Moreover, the Court sees no objection for the dispute to be tried by the court in the place where the damage occurred (forum delicti). In the opinion of the Court, the optional jurisdiction rule of Art. 5(3) did not require actual damage to have occurred. It sufficed with potential damage. Given the uncertain distinction between market law disputes and civil law disputes, at least in Swedish law, Bogdan suggests to extend the scope of application of the Brussels Convention to expressly cover market law subject-matter and avoid drawing an arbitrary line between private law and public law lawsuits.
  2004. 2004See Mankowski, ‘Wettbewerbsrechtliche Gerichtspflichtigkeits- und Rechts-anwendungsrisiko bei Werbung über Websites’ (2000) CR, 763 ff., at 769.
  2005. 2005Such interpretation is at least advanced by Ohly (2001), 905.
  2006. 2006See the reaction of the Parliamentary Committee on Civil Law, 2001/02:LU 29.
  2007. 2007Prop. 2001/02:150, 64 ff.
  2008. 2008Joerges, ‘Interactive Adjudication in the Europeanisation Process: A Demanding Perspective and a Modest Example’ (2000) ERPL, 1 ff.
  2009. 2009See the rather early introduction of a Doorstep Selling Act (Hemförsälningslag, SFS 1981:1361)
  2010. 2010In this sense Knill (2001), 215 ff.
  2011. 2011On different,consumer images’ in the European union see Wilhelmsson, T., ‘Consumer Images in East and West’ in: Micklitz, H.-W. (ed.), Rechtseinheit oder Rechtsvielfalt in Europa? (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1996c), 53 ff.
  2012. 2012For a detailed discussion see above Ch. 5.5.1.2.
  2013. 2013See among others Case C-261 Walter Rau [1982] ECR 3961; Case C-178/84 Commission v. Germany (beer purity) [1987] ECR 1227.
  2014. 2014See OJ 1975 C 92/1; OJ 1981 C 133/1.
  2015. 2015Case 16/83 Criminal proceedings against Karl Prantl, [1984] ECR 1299, para 1306.
  2016. 2016See BGH GRUR 1994, 306 ( “Yves Rocher II”) confirming the ECJ’s ruling and dismissing the injunction claim.
  2017. 2017“Moreover, the prohibition in question goes beyond the requirements of the objective pursued in that it affects advertising which is not at all misleading and contains comparisons of prices actually charged, which can be of considerable use in that it enables the consumer to make his choice in fiill knowledge of the facts.” Case C- 126/91 Schutzverein gegen Unwesen in der Wirtschaft e. V. v. Yves Rocher GmbH [1992] I-2361, para 17.
  2018. 2018See Leible (1994), 179, with further references.
  2019. 2019See Reuter, ‘Neues zu Euro-Marketing und §§ 6e, 7 UWG: Der EuGH-Entscheid zu Schlussvekauf und Preisgegenüberstellungen’ (1990) BB, 1649 ff.; On the conceptual model of homo economicus in European law, see Doepner, ‘Verbraucherleitbilder zur Auslegung des wettbewerbsrechtlichen Irreführungsverbots’ (1997) WRP, 999 ff.; Doepner/Hufnagel (1998), 177 ff.
  2020. 2020Case C-238/89 Pall [1990] ECR I-4827, para 19.
  2021. 2021Case C-315/92 Clinique [1994] ECR I-337, para 21.
  2022. 2022Ibid., para 23.
  2023. 2023See C-315/92 Clinique [1994] ECR I-337, Opinion of AG Gulmann, para 2, sixth indent, at I-320.
  2024. 2024See Weatherill (1999), 56, 69.
  2025. 2025See Leible (1994), 179; general on the concept of a European ‘Verkehrsauffassung’ see Streinz, ‘Gibt es eine europäische Verkehrsauffassung?’ (1991) Zeitschrift för Lebensmittelrecht, 242 ff.
  2026. 2026The often advanced criticism that the decision disregarded a linguistic problem which was probably specific to the German language (meaning hospital) does not consider the fact that the term ‘Clinique’ has the same connotation in at least three other Community languages: English (clinic), French (clinique) and Danish (klinik). The ‘majority’ logic of the Court might have therefore been justified. For criticism, see Weatherill (1999b), 56.
  2027. 2027See Leible (1994), 179.
  2028. 2028Art. 2 (2) Directive 84/450. In this sense Schricker (1990), 112 ff.
  2029. 2029According to Schwanhäuser: “Nach bisheriger Auffassung reicht es aus, wenn die beanstandete Angabe geeignet ist, die Kauflust des Verkehrs „irgendwie“ - im Sinne der allgemeinen Wertschätzung - zu beeinflussen.“ Schwanhäuser (1988), 180 ff.
  2030. 2030See Case C- 373/90 Nissan [1992] ECR I-131, para 16.
  2031. 2031See Sack, ‘Die Beurteilung irreführender Webung für Importfahrzeuge aus EG-Staaten nach EG Recht’ (2000) WRP, 23 ff.; Sack (1998b), 242.
  2032. 2032BGH GRUR 1225 (“EG-Neuwagen II”).
  2033. 2033BGH GRUR 1122 (“EG-Neuwagen I").
  2034. 2034In the event this was the case, the practices were suspected of constituting breach of the antitrust rules of the German GWB, restraining producers from imposing binding prices on the distributors.
  2035. 2035Case C-470/93 Mars [1995] I-1923, para 24.
  2036. 2036See Keilholz (1987), 393.
  2037. 2037See Reese, ‘Das “6-Korn-Eier”-Urteil des EuGH -Leitentscheidung för ein Leitbild?’ (1998), WRP, 1035 ff.
  2038. 2038„Unter diesen Voraussetzungen muss man wissen, dass eine Quote von zehn bis fünfzehn Prozent einem Bevölkerungsanteil von acht bis zwölf Milionen Bundesbürgern entspricht. Würde man deshalb von dieser gewährten Methode (der Demoskopie) abgehen, dann müsste man zugleich even die Meinung vertreten, dass acht bis zwölf Millionen Bundsbürger irregeführt werden dürfen, weil sie einen unbeachtlichen Teil der Verbraucherschaft darstellen“. Kisseler (1994), 5. Of the same opinion Deutsch (1996), 541, at 546.
  2039. 2039See Deutsch (1996), 541 ff., at 546 with further references. On recent developments in the case law, see Köhler/Piper (2002), § 3, Rdnr. 139, 986.
  2040. 2040„Dabei bietet dieses Mittel eine wirklich repräsentative Möglichkeit die Meinung der Verbraucher zu erfassen. Schliesslich wird in allen Ländern der Gemeinschaft die Demoskopie im politischen Bereich eingesetzt und die dabei erzielten Ergebnisse stellen doch in der Regel einen sehr klaren Annährungswert an tatsächliche Meinungen, insbesondere im Vorgriff auf Wahlen dar. ...Die gleiche Glaubwürdigkeit geniesst die Demoskopie in Deutschland auch hinsichtlich der Ergebnisse von Meinungsumfragen im Bereich des Wettbewerbsrechts, und zwar zu Recht, weil dort die Fehlerquoten ebenso gering sind wie bei der Demoskopie im politischen Bereich“. Kisseler (1994), 5.
  2041. 2041Schricker (1975), 225; Emmerich (1990), 203.
  2042. 2042Sosnitza (1995), 204; cf. Keßler (1990), 73 ff.
  2043. 2043Sosnitza (1995), 181 ff. Similar Keßler (1990), 73 ff.
  2044. 2044Beater (2000a), 82 ff.
  2045. 2045Case C-210/96 Gut Springenheide [1999] 1-4657.
  2046. 2046See the critique of this catch-all approach in Reese (1998) WRP, 1035 ff., at 1038.
  2047. 2047See Case C-210/96 Gut Springenheide [1999] I-4657, para 27.
  2048. 2048Ibid., para 31.
  2049. 2049Ibid., para 37.
  2050. 2050Ibid., para 35.
  2051. 2051Ibid., para 37, in fine.
  2052. 2052Case C-210/96 Gut Springenheide [1999] I-4657, para 35-36.
  2053. 2053It is interesting to note that the Swedish Government also intervened in the proceedings. It advocated a normative consumer model (“how consumers in general could be assumed to understand [a statement]”) and against the need for opinion polls. Case C-210/96 Gut Springenheide [1999] I-4657, Opinion of AG Mischo, para 49.
  2054. 2054Ibid., Opinion of AG Mischo, para 51-53. The German Government asserted in particular: “Only when the legal rule covers all consumers and is intended to protect them from the danger of being misled and the
  2055. 2055Case C-220/98 Estee Lauder (‘lifting’) [2000] ECR I-117.
  2056. 2056Case C-465/98 Adolf Darbo AG [2000] ECR I-2297.
  2057. 2057Ibid., para 21.
  2058. 2058Ibid., para 22, with reference to Case C-51/94 Commission v. Germany [1995] ECR I-3599, para 34.
  2059. 2059See Beater (2000a), 77 ff.; Beater (2000b), 967 ff.
  2060. 2060Beater (2000a), 78.
  2061. 2061See Case C-16/83 Prantl [1984] ECR 1299, para 2; Case C-179/85 Commission v. Germany (p‘étillant de raisin’) [1986] ECR 3879, para 11.
  2062. 2062Dehousse (1994), 761 ff., at 765 with reference to Singer’s classical analysis of comparative politics, Singer, ‘The Level of Analysis Problem in International Relations’ in: Knorr/Verba (eds.), The International System: Theoretical Essays (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1961), 77 ff.
  2063. 2063Case C-170/78 Commission v. United Kingdom [1980] ECR 417, para 2; Case C-178/84 Commission v. Germany (purity requirement for beer) [1987] ECR 1227, para 32. See Weatherill (1999), 51.
  2064. 2064Case C-178/84 Commission v. Germany [1987] ECR 1227, para 32.
  2065. 2065Notably, a number ofj udges have throughout the years produced voluminous commentaries on unfair competition law and procedure, cf. Pastor/Ahrens (2001); Gloy, Handbuch des Wettbewerbsrechts (München: Beck, 1994); Köhler/Piper (2002).
  2066. 2066Joined Cases C-34/95 & 35/95 De Agostini & TV Shop [1997] ECR I-3843, para 42-43.
  2067. 2067Greaves (1998), 318.
  2068. 2068Ibid., para 50.
  2069. 2069Ibid., para 54.
  2070. 2070See Greaves (1998), 318.
  2071. 2071MD 2000:4 (”De Agostini”).
  2072. 2072Case C-405/98 Konsumentombudsmannen (KO) v Gourmet International Products (GIP) [2001] ECR I-1795.
  2073. 20732 § alkoholreklamlagen (SFS 1978:763). The Act introduced a sophisticated system of control over alcohol advertising, building on a combination of express prohibitions, prescriptions and KOV guidelines. See Ch. 5.4.2.4. Interestingly, already back in 1976 the Commission devoted some attention to the question of possible restrictive effects of the proposed legislation on free trade within the framework of GATT and EFTA. The Commission, however, quickly reached the conclusion that the relevant international agreements allowed exemptions from the principles of free trade on grounds of protection of human life and health. See SOU 1976:63, 192 f. Since 1 January 2000 the provisions of this act were transferred largely unchanged to the Alcohol Act, cf. 4:8-13 alkohollagen (SFS 1994:1738).
  2074. 2074For a brief account of the history of alcohol policy in Sweden, see prop. 1998/99:134, 28 ff. Wamling-Nerep refers to earlier examples of ‘public’ measures restricting alcohol consumption dating back as far as 1622; see Wamling-Nerep, ‘När svenska alkoholrestriktioner möter europeiska dryckestraditioner’ (2002-03) JT, 991 ff.
  2075. 2075Retail sale of alcoholic beverages was handed over to special municipal companies (systembolag) as early as 1855. Since 1873 these companies were directed to abstain from profit (desinteresseringsprincipen). In the 1920s also wholesale trade and production of alcoholic beverages were monopolized. The ration-book was introduced in 1914 and was abolished in 1955. The same year the municipal systembolag merged into a single state company called ‘Systembolaget’. See prop. 1998/99:134, 29 f.
  2076. 2076Calabresi/Melamed (1972), 1113.
  2077. 2077On the complex relationship between Swedish alcohol policy and Community law, see Wamling-Nerep (2002-03), 991.
  2078. 2078With Sweden’s accession to EU the monopoly on production and wholesale trade was abolished. In the wake of the Franzén ruling of the ECJ licensing rules were liberalized and supervision fees reduced. See Case C- 189/95 Franzén [1997] ECR I-5909; prop. 1998/98:134, 30 ff., 76 ff.
  2079. 2079The objective has not been liberalisation, but rather sharpening of the advertising restrictions which were seen to play an important role in a climate of plurality of actors and widened access to alcohol. See SOU 1998:8, 304, Dir. 1996:33.
  2080. 2080The restrictions were based on genuine health policy grounds, which the Community Court had recognised as legitimate in its Aragoneza judgment. SOU 1998:8, 211 ff.
  2081. 2081SOU 1998:8, 177.
  2082. 2082Prop. 1998/99:134, 133.
  2083. 2083The Government’s attention was probably distracted by more important questions related to liberalisation of licensing and taxes, which were discussed in the same Bill.
  2084. 2084Alkohollagen (SFS 1994:1738).
  2085. 20852 § alkoholreklamlagen (SFS 1978:763)
  2086. 2086See MD 1999:6 (“Gourmet”!)
  2087. 2087Case C-189/95 Franzen [1997] ECR I-5909.
  2088. 2088With reference to RB 49:7.
  2089. 2089Case C-405/98 Gourmet [2001] ECR I-1795, Opinion of AG Jacobs, para 33.
  2090. 2090Ibid., Opinion, para 33.
  2091. 2091Ibid., Opinion, para 48.
  2092. 2092Ibid., Opinion, para 55.
  2093. 2093Ibid., Opinion, para 61; see also para 59.
  2094. 2094Case C-405/98 Gourmet [2001] ECR I-1795, para 25: ”A prohibition on advertising such as that at issue in the main proceedings must therefore be regarded as affecting the marketing of products from other Member States more heavily than the marketing of domestic products and as therefore constituting an obstacle to trade between Member States.” (emphasis added).
  2095. 2095Joined Cases C-267 & C-268/91 Keck and Mitouard [1993] ECR I-6097, para 17.
  2096. 2096Joined Cases C-34/95 & 35/95 De Agostini & TV Shop [1997] ECR I-3843, para 42.
  2097. 2097Case C-405/98 [2001] ECR I-1795, para 21.
  2098. 2098Similar Bernitz, ‘Gourmet-målet - kan det diskriminerande svenska förbudet mot alkoholreklam godtas av folkhälsoskäl?’ (2001a) ERT, 402 ff., at 422.
  2099. 2099Case C-405/98 [2001] ECR I-1795, para 33.
  2100. 2100For a comprehensive analysis of the ECJ jurispridence on Arts. 28-30 from a comparative institutional perspective, see Maduro (1998a), 150 ff.
  2101. 2101Case 384/93 Alpine Investments [1995] ECR 1-1141, para 35.
  2102. 2102Case C-405/98 [2001] ECR I-1795, para 37.
  2103. 2103Ibid., para 39.
  2104. 2104Feiden, ‘Europeanisation of European Law Adjudication. A Comment’ (2000) ERPL, 17 ff.
  2105. 2105See Bernitz (1999), 425; Favoreu, ‘Constitutional Review in Europe’ in: Henkin/Rosenthal (eds.), Constitutionalism and Rights (New York: Columbia University Press, 1990), 38 ff, at 24
  2106. 2106T 8-1111-97, judgment of 4 April 2002 (“Gourmet”).
  2107. 2107MD 2003:5 (“Gourmet” II).
  2108. 2108It may be interesting to note that the plaintiff GIP in its defence argued that the proportionality of the Swedish prohibition should be assessed following the methodology advanced by the Commission in its Communication “TheFollow-up to the Green Paper on Commercial Communication in the Internal Market”, COM (1998) 121 final. MD 2003:5, 19.
  2109. 2109MD 2003:5, 10 (“Gourmet IP’).
  2110. 2110MD 2003:5, 27 ff. (“Gourmet II”).
  2111. 2111T 8-1111-97, 28 with reference to Art. 10 EC; MD 2003:5, 24;
  2112. 2112This development is in line with the predictions of Abrahamsson about the increased role ofj udicial norm control and the increased role of courts to provide protection to individuals against measures by national legislatures. See Abrahamsson, ‘Domstolsväsendets anpassning till EES och EG’ (1993) SvJT, 805 ff.
  2113. 2113That these fears were exaggerated was evidenced by the almost marginal increase of alcohol advertisements after the Market Court decision.
  2114. 2114Prop. 2002/03:87, 13.
  2115. 2115Swedish Brewers’ Association (Svenska Bryggareföreningen), The Association of Alcohol and Wine Suppliers (Sprit & Vinleverantörsföreningen), TU och AF. Prop. 2002/03:87, 7, 17.
  2116. 2116Prop. 2002/03:87, 17.
  2117. 2117Prop. 2002/03:87, 20.
  2118. 2118Prop. 2002/03:87, 14.
  2119. 2119SFS 2003:166.
  2120. 2120On these notions see Ch. 2.2.3 above.
  2121. 2121See Weiler (1999), 62-63; Wheatherill (2000), 107.
  2122. 2122According to Komesar: “Where the skewed distribution produces majoritarian bias, the resulting action by the political process converts the skewed distribution into a uniform high distrbution. The side that wins in the political process does not have to muster the resources to litigate the constitutionality of the resulting legislation. The state will bear the burden of defending the legislation in court.” Komesar (1994), 136.
  2123. 2123See Komesar (1994), 137. “Judicial review of legislation can serve as a means to counteract or deal with political malfunctions such as majoritarian and minoritarian bias. The effectiveness of such review, however, depends on whether the government action will be challenged in court. The courts cannot review what they do not see. The analysis of litigation presented in this book strongly suggests that concentrated high stakes victims are more likely to litigate than dispersed low stakes interests. Thus, roughly speaking, if courts offer protection
  2124. 2124Interestingly, there is to my knowledge no single case of consumer association that has reached the ECJ under the ‘consumer image’ debate.
  2125. 2125See MD 2003:5, with reference to the opinion by Bernitz.
  2126. 2126See Weatherill (1999), 51 ff., at 54.
  2127. 2127Similar Stuyck (2000), 389.
  2128. 2128Maduro, ‘Keck: The End? The Beginning of the End? Or Just the End of the Beginning?’ (1994) Irish Journal of European Law, 30 ff.; Maduro, ‘Reforming the Market or the State?’ (1997) 3 ELI, 55 ff.; Maduro (1998a).
  2129. 2129For a categorization of different consumer interests, see Beater (2000a), 139 ff. Beater differentiates roughly between two major categories of consumer interests: protection against exaggerated prices and protection against disadvantageous decisions. The second category is then subdivided into: protection of the basis of decision; protection of the decision process; protection against excessive pressure through combined offers.
  2130. 2130In a similar vein, Drexl regards the standard of deception and the underlying Verbraucherleitbild to imply the weighing of interests of different groups of consumers against each other. The model of normative efficiency advanced by Drexl builds on recognising the interdependedness between markets and legal institutions. In this light, a larger European Market logically requires raising the threshold of deception because a Common Market means more competition, which decreases the need for intervention. At the same time, a low threshold of deception, by insulating national markets, deprives ‘intelligent’ consumers from broader choices. “So ist es nur konsequent, för den europäischen Binnenmarkt die Irreföhrungsschwelle anzuheben, weil auf einem grösseren Markt potentiell mehr Wettbewerb besteht und umgekehrt ein national strengeres Irreföhrungsrecht Entscheidungsalternativen der “intelligenteren“ Verbraucher durch eine Abschottung des nationalen Marktes verhältnissmässig stärker einschränken würde.”Drexl (1998), 203 ff.
  2131. 2131Deregulierung des unlauteren Wettbewerbsrechts: Gesetz zur Änderung des UWG BGBl I 1994, 1738. See BT-Drs. 12/7325. For a comprehensive analysis of the reform see Schricker (1994a); Schricker (1994c).
  2132. 2132See Schreiben des Bundesministerium der Justiz von 15. September 1993 zur Novellierung des Gesetzes gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb (1993) GRUR, 877 ff.
  2133. 2133BT-Drs. 12/5620, Bericht der Bundesregierung zur Zukunftssicherung des Standorts Deutschland, in particular at 50.
  2134. 2134BT-Drs. 12/7345,4.
  2135. 2135Schricker (1994a), 586 ff.
  2136. 2136See Lehmann (1994), 380 ff.
  2137. 2137Schricker calls these provisions “Mittelstand-political saplings engrafted in unfair competition law”, see Schricker (1994a), 432.
  2138. 2138The BGH had reportedly adapted its case law to these rulings in the case “Meister-Aktuell”, GRUR 1990,
  2139. 2139See (1994) DZWir, 213.
  2140. 2140The restrictive regime for advertising direct sales by producers and wholesalers to end-consumers (§§ 6a and 6d UWG) was likewise qualified as unnecessary and having nothing to do with the objectives of consumer protection. Pointing at the extensive interpretation of these provisions by the courts, Schricker deplores the attempts of the judiciary to conserve the forms of trade distribution stemming from the 19th century and carry them over into the 20th. See Schricker (1994a), 592.
  2141. 2141Schricker (1994a), 588.
  2142. 2142Schricker (1994a), 592.
  2143. 2143See Lehmann (1995), 381.
  2144. 2144BGH GRUR 1993, 679 (“PS-Werbung I“); BGH GRUR 1994, 220 („PS Werbung II“).
  2145. 2145See the examples given by Schricker (1994c), 432.
  2146. 2146For criticism of this basic core of the doctrine, see Micklitz (2001).
  2147. 2147Borck, ‘Bauchlandung der fliegenden Gerichtsbarkeit’(1994) WRP, 350 ff.
  2148. 2148Stellungnahme der GRUR Vereinigung, Eingabe zur UWG Novelle (1994) GRUR, 435, at 437. Critical comments in respect of the association’s position are expressed by Beater (1995), 217 ff., 227.
  2149. 2149See BT-Drs. 12/8089.
  2150. 2150See the report of the GRUR Vereinigung (1994) GRUR, 435.
  2151. 2151Of interest in this context are the critical comments by Leible on the changed practice of German courts after the Keck ruling. Thus the Regional Court of Düsseldorf considered the application of § 6e to a foreign undertaking as irrelevant to intra-Community trade, and therefore refused to refer the case to the ECJ for a preliminary ruling. See Leible (1994), 180, fn. 36 with further references.
  2152. 2152On a more general level a similar conclusion is suggested by Alec Stone Sweet and Thomas Brunell on the basis of analysis of broad comparative statistical data on all references for preliminary ruling sent by national courts to the ECJ in the period 1958-1998. Germany stands out as the country with the highest rate of references per year in all areas including free movement of goods and approximation of laws. One explanation advanced by the authors for the variations between countries is “the relative extent to which EC rule-making, as it evolves through case law or legislation, generates tensions or disjunctions between EC and national legal regimes... The more any national regime is required to change in order to meet the (new) demands of EC law, the more references will be produced.” In the particular field of free movement of goods Germany has also excelled, with an average of 303 out of 832 references per year. See Stone Sweet/Brunell, ‘The European Court, National Judges and Legal Integration: A Researcher’s Guide to the Data Set on Preliminary References in EC Law 1958­ 98’(2000) ELJ, 117 ff., 125-26.
  2153. 2153Belgium, a country with a relatively brisk litigious activity in fair trading, reported 600 cases in 1993, and in Spain the total number of proceedings reached 120, including those of self-regulatory bodies. See the comparative data submitted by Schricker (1994a), 587. Naturally, representative statistical data in the area are difficult to gather and analyse due to the broad subject-matter and the different venues of enforcement in different countries. Thus the fact that England had only one case brought by the Director of Fair Trading before the courts in three years does not take into account the lawsuits brought by private plaintiffs under common law and equity (passing off, defamation, etc.) as well as self-regulation. Nevertheless, even when the differences in size and population and in ways of enforcement between the different Member States are taken into account, the litigation rate in Germany remains remarkably high.
  2154. 2154Vultejus, ‘Die Kostenstruktur der Gerichte’ (1994) ZRP, 150 ff., 151.
  2155. 2155“Wo kein Kläger, da kein Richter, oder anders ausgedrückt: Zivilprozesse gibt es nur, wo jemand Interesse hat, solche in Gang zu setzen. Es fragt sich, wer all die wettbewerbsrechtlichen Imponderabilien vor Gerich bringt.“ Schricker (1994a).
  2156. 2156See Ch. 5.3.3.3, and the discussion by Pastor (1969), Borck (1978), Kur (1981).
  2157. 2157The situation was assessed in the following way: “Insgesamt hat diese Entwicklung dazu geführt, dass die hohe Verfolgungsintensität und die Konzentration der Abmahn- und Klagevereine auf Bagatellverstösse sowie die rigorose Durchsetzung von Ansprüchen die Gefahr mit sich bringt, dass das gesamte Rechtsgebiet diskreditiert wird.“ Schreiben des Bundesministerium der Justiz (1993), 879.
  2158. 2158It should be reminded that § 13 II Nr. 1 UWG, determining the locus standi of competitors, did not require that they were actually affected in their business activity. See Schricker (1994a), 588.
  2159. 2159See Schreiben des Bundesministerium der Justiz (1993), 878 ff.
  2160. 2160See the objections voiced by the GRUR association (1994) GRUR, 435 ff.
  2161. 2161Schricker observes that the new provision does not speak of members thus implicitly authorizing the litigious activity of umbrella organizations (so called “Dachverbände”). See Schricker (1994c), 434.
  2162. 2162§ 13 UWG: In den Fällen der §§ 1, 3 ,4 ,6bis, 6c, 7 und 8 kann der Anspruch auf Unterlassung geltend gemacht werden:
  2163. 2163von Gewerbetreibenden, die Waren oder gewerbliche Leistungen gleicher oder verwandter Art auf demselben Markt vertreiben, soweit der Anspruch eine Handlung betrifft, die geeignet ist, den Wettbewerb auf diesem Markt wesentlich zu beeinträchtigen.
  2164. 2164von rechtsfähigen Verbänden zur Förderung gewerblicher Interessen, soweit ihnen eine erhebliche Zahl von Gewerbetreibenden angehört, die Waren oder gewerbliche Leistungen gleicher oder verwandter Art auf demselben Markt vertreiben, soweit sie insbesondere nach ihrer personellen, sachlichen und finanziellen Ausstattung imstande sind, ihre satzungsgemässen Aufgaben der Verfolgung gewerblicher Interessen tatsächlich wahrzunehmen, und soweit der Anspruch eine Handlung betrifft, die geeignet ist, den Wettbewerb auf diesem Markt wesentlich zu beeinträchtigen.
  2165. 2165Borck (1994).
  2166. 2166In this sense Schricker (1994c), 433.
  2167. 2167Stellungnahme des MPI (1993) GRUR, 880, 883.
  2168. 2168See Mitteilungen aus der GRUR Vereinigung (1994) GRUR, 435.
  2169. 2169See the position of the Consumer Union (Verbraucherschutzverein), although it asserted it did not claim such costs in its own activity. Stellungnahme des Verbraucherschutzvereins e. V. (1994) Verbraucher und Recht, 40 ff., 42 ff.
  2170. 2170See BT-Drs. 12/7345, 6.
  2171. 2171Melullis (1995), 437.
  2172. 2172„Auf die Dauer wird man freilich kaum umhin können, das eigentliche Fundament des Abmahnunwesens, den aus dem Gesichtspunkt der Geschäftsführung ohne Auftrag abgeleiteten Aufwendsersatzanspruch erneut kritisch ins Auge zu fassen. ... Dass der Gesetzgeber nicht schon 1986 den Aufwendungsersatz abgeschafft hat, ist nur eine Folge der Hoffnung auf die Wirksamkeit der damals neu eingeführten Missbrauchsklausel des § 13 Abs. 5 UWG; diese Hoffnung hat sich aber nicht erfüllt. Sollte sich erweisen, dass auch die vom Änderungsgesetz 1994 in § 13 eingeführten Kautelen nicht greifen, müsste der Aufwendungsersatzanspruch fallen. Da eine richterrechtliche Korrektur nicht zu erwarten ist, sollte der Gesetzgeber klarstellen, dass der Abmahnende auf eigene Rechnung handelt“. Schricker (1996a), 478.
  2173. 2173Beater (1995), 219 ff.
  2174. 2174„Die Regelung des Klagerecht schließlich führt das UWG in Richtung auf seine deliktsrechtlichen Ursprünge zurück. Die Klage der gewerblichen Verbände wird ihres Charakter einer korporativen Populärklage entkleidet, den sie in der Praxis der Abmahn- und Klagevereine angenommen hatte; das Klagerecht wird allgemein wieder enger mit dem materiellen Wettbewerbsinteresse verbunden.” Schricker (1994c), 430 ff. Similar Schricker (1996a), 473.
  2175. 2175Beater (1995), 220.
  2176. 2176See Ibid.
  2177. 2177See Gloy, ‘Hat die Einschränkung der Klagebefugnis gewerblicher Verbände sich bewährt?’ (1999) WRP, 34 ff., at 40: “Es hat sich für die agilen Verbände gezeigt, dass es ein Leichtes war, sich auf die neue Situation einzustellen und die nötigen Voraussetzungen für die Zuerkennung der Klagebefugnis hinsichtlich der erheblichen Zahl der Mitglieder zu schaffen.“
  2178. 2178See Ulrich, ‘Die UWG-Novelle 1994 und der Streitwert in Wettbewerbssachen’ (1995) WRP, 362 ff.
  2179. 2179Lehmann (1995), 382. The ‘filter’ function of a public authority on the definition of the public interests and on dampening on prosecution of trifle cases is underlined by Bastian: “Grundsätzlich spricht für eine Behördenlösung, dass durch sie die Verfolgung von Bagatellverstössen engedämmt würde, da sich eine Behörde bei Ausübung ihres Aufgreifermessens auch an Zweckmässigkeitsüberlegungen orientieren müsste.“ Bastian (1998/99), 213
  2180. 2180„Zwischen unerwünschten gewinnorientierten Verbände und seriösen Verbänden abzugrenzen, fällt freilich schwer. Ganz allgemein muss die Verbandsklage den Effekt haben, tendenziell das Verbotsniveau zu erhöhen. Wenn in der Mehrzahl der Wettbewerbsprozesse auf der Klägerseite eine routinierte, sachkundige Partei steht, die aus Gebührengründen, zur Erfüllung von Aufträgen oder in Verfolgung des Satzungszwecks systematisch darauf hinarbeitet, Geschäftspraktiken als unlauter verbieten zu lassen, während die Beklagtenseite typischerweise an Wissen und Erfahrung unterlegen ist, muss sich dieses Übergewicht der Klägerseite im Laufe der Zeit auswirken. Die konstant bessere Darstellung der Verbotsargumente wird sich in zunehmender Strenge der Judikatur niederschlagen.“ Schricker (1996a), at 478.
  2181. 2181Schricker (1996a), 478.
  2182. 2182Ibid.
  2183. 2183See Ch. 5.6.2.1 with reference to Schäfer (1999), 86 ff.
  2184. 2184See BR-Drs. 301/03, Gesetzentwurf der Bundesregierung; BR-Drs. 301/1/03, Empfehlung der Ausschüsse.
  2185. 2185See Fezer (2001), 989 ff.; cf. the objectives of ther reform stated in the Government Bill: „Das geltende Gesetz gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb ist modernisierungsbedürftig. .. Auch unter europapolitischen Gesichtspukten gilt es, das deutsche Lauterkeitsrecht zu liberalisieren. Ausserdem soll der Verbraucher den ihm gebührenden Stellenwert in einem modernen Lauterkeitsrecht erhalten.“ Drs. 301/03, 1.
  2186. 2186Köhler, H./Bomkamm, J./Henning-Bodewig, F., ‘Vorschlag für eine Richtlinie zum Lauterkeitsrecht und eine UWG-Reform’(2002) WRP, 1317 ff., at 1324.
  2187. 2187BT-Drs. 323/03, 17.
  2188. 2188BT-Drs. 301/03, 18.
  2189. 2189See the press release of the Federal Ministry of Justice, announcing Government Bill Nr. 32/03 of 7.5.2003: „Die Novelle verstärkt den Schutz der Verbraucherinnen und der Verbraucher vor unlauteren Wettbewerbshandlungen. Das Gesetz schafft einen angemessenen Ausgleich zwischen den Interessen der Wirtschaft und denen der Verbraucherinnen und Verbraucher.“ Cf. the statements of the Minister of Justice
  2190. 2190COM (2001) 546 final; OJ 2002 C 75 E/11; Opinion of the ECOSOC, OJ 2002 C 221/73; Amended proposal COM (2002) 585 final, 25.10.2002.
  2191. 2191See Micklitz et al. (2000).
  2192. 2192See the Commission’s Green Paper on European Union Consumer Protection, COM (2001) 531 final; Follow-up Communication to the Green Paper on EU Consumer Protection, COM (2002) 289 final; Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Concerning Unfair Business-to-Consumer Commercial Practices in the Internal Market and Amending Directives 84/450/EEC, 97/7/EC and 98/27/EC (the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive),COM (2003) 356 final.
  2193. 2193On these developments see Ch. 8 below.
  2194. 2194The term ‘interlocking politics’ is occasionally used in the political science literature on European integration as a translation of the concept ‘Politikverpflechtung’ first advanced by Scharpf (1988). See for instance Börzel, ‘What can Federalism Teach Us About the European Union. The German Experience’, The Federal Trust, May 2003. I believe, however, that the German term ‘Verpflechtung’ is better translated as ‘interweaving’. ‘Interlocking’ would correspond to the German word ‘Verzahnung’ and conveys the idea of a joint and interdependent movement, associated with gear-wheels.
  2195. 2195See Fezer (2001); Köhler/Bornkamm/Henning-Bodewig (2002).
  2196. 2196Press-release of the Federal Ministry of Justice Nr. 32/03 of 7.5.2003 “Kabinett verabschiedet modernes Wettbewerbsrecht.”, 239.
  2197. 2197Cf. Regierungsentwurf: “Der Verbraucher wird als Schutzsubjekt erstmals ausdrücklich im Gesetz erwähnt.“, BR-Drs. 301/03, 20.
  2198. 2198See BR-Drs. 323/03, Bericht der Bundesregierung - Aktionsplan Verbraucherschutz.
  2199. 2199Press-release Nr. 32/03 (2003).
  2200. 2200Entwurf eines Gesetzes gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb (UWG-E). BR-Drs. 301/03, 1.
  2201. 2201See Fezer (2001), 991: “Die Entwicklung des Lauterkeitsrechts zwischen Beginn und Ende des 20. jahrhunders, die Rechtsprechung des EuGH zur Verwircklichung des Binnenmarktes als eines Rechtsprinzip und zum Schutz der Freiheit des Waren.- und Diesnstleistungsverkehrs, die rechts- und wirtschaftliche Diskurs zur Integration des Verbraucherrechts in das Recht der Wirtschaftsordnung, die Rechtserheblichkeit dr Konsuumentensouveränität in einer marktwirtschaftlichen Wettbewerbsordnung und die Stellung der Verbracuher als glechgewichtiger Marktpoartner sind schlaglichtartig formulierte Daten eines Paradigmenwechsels zum Schutz der Verbraucherinteressen im Wettbewerbsrecht. Verbraucherschutz ist in eigenständiger Topos einer europäioschen Rechtsharmonisierung im Wettbewerbsrecht.“
  2202. 2202„Dadurch wird die Rechtsprechung zum geltenden UWG aufgenommen und gleichzeitig eine Forderung der Verbraucherverbände erfüllt.“ BR-Drs. 301/03, at 20 under the subtitle „Inhaltliche Schwerpunkte“ and at 22 with reference to the ‘Schutzzweckwandel’ and the case law giving more recent recognition of the triad of protected interest, including those of consumers: BGH GRUR 1999, 75 ( “Güllepumpen ”); BverfG WRP, 2001, 1160 (“Benetton”), BverfG GRUR 2002, 455 ff. Cf. Referentenwurf, 23.01.2003, 19.
  2203. 2203See the discussion in Fezer (2001), 998 f.
  2204. 2204See Fezer (2001), 994: „Ihrer rechtlichen Struktur nach sind Generalklauseln als Delegationsnormen zu verstehen die die Jurisdiktive als Institution zur Bildung von Rechtsätzen anhand einer einen einzelnen Rechtsfall entscheidenden Rechtsprechung ermächtgen.“ With reference to Teubner (1971).
  2205. 2205Explicitly on the need of a 'de minimis’ threshold ('Bagatellklausel') and, with reference to the ECJ case law on a European consumer image, Fezer (2001), 1000.
  2206. 2206See Fezer’s interpretation of the Keck ruling of the ECJ as a test of appreciable impact on the Internal Market, Fezer (2001), 993.
  2207. 2207BR-301/03, Regierungsentwurf, 31.
  2208. 2208See Köhler/Bornkamm/Henning-Bodewig (2002), 1319 ff.
  2209. 2209§ 4 Nr. 2 UWG-E. On the case law under the present UWG cf. Ch. 7.1.1.3 above.
  2210. 2210On these categories see Baumbach/Hefermehl (1998), Verlockung, Wertreklame, at 527; Verunsichernde Werbung, at 573, and Umweltbezogene Werbung, at 576.
  2211. 2211Fezer (2001), 998, quoting approvingly the systematisation introduced by Hefermehl : Kundenfang, Behinderung, Ausbeutung, Rechtsbruch, Marktstörung.
  2212. 2212Cf. the comments in the Government Bill on obstructive competition: “Die weite generalkaluselartige Fassung stellt sicher, dass alle Erscheinungsformen des Behinderungswettbewerbs einbezogen werden, einschliesslich des Boykotts, des Vernichtungswettbeweb, aber auch z. B. des Missbrauchs von Nachfragemacht zur Ausschaltung von Mitbewerbern.“ BR-Drs. 301/03, 36.
  2213. 2213Fezer (2001), 1001.
  2214. 2214See Schricker (1994); Lehmann (1995), Fezer (2001).
  2215. 2215Cf. § 4 Nr. 4 and Nr.5 UWG-E.
  2216. 2216Cf. § 5 II UWG-E.
  2217. 2217See the following comments of the Bundesrat: „Seitens der Befürworter von weiteren Informationspflichten wird zur Begründung eines weitergehenden Regelungsbedarfs ein Paradigmenwechsel im Lauterkeitsrecht angeführt. Dieser Wechsel soll darin liegen, dass die generellen Verbote durch Informationspflichten ersetzt werden. Eine Lokerung des Wettbewerbsrechts sei indes nur dann vertretbar, wenn der Abnehmer ausreichend informiert werde. ... Der Gesetzentwurf trägt diesem Grundsatz insoweit Rechnung, als mit Blick auf die Aufhebung des Rabattgestezes und der Zugabeverordnung für diese Formen der Wertreklame in § 4 Nr. 4 Informationspflichten geregelt werden. Im Übrigen findet jedoch kein Paradigmenwechsel durch eine generelle Aufhebung von Verboten statt, weshalb es nicht gerechtfertigt wäre, die Unternehmen mit weitergehenden Informationspflichten zu belasten.“ BR-Drs. 301/03.
  2218. 2218Fezer (2001), 994.
  2219. 2219Similar Fezer (2001), 998.
  2220. 2220On the critique of the general clause as a source of uncertainty, see Fezer (2001), 994, underlining the consensus in German legal literature as to the success of the method ofj udicial law-making via general clause. A plea for clearer analysis of values underlying the general standards of fair trading is to be found in Beater (2000),
  2221. 2221ff.
  2222. 2222§ 12 I UWG-E
  2223. 2223BR-Drs. 301/03, Entwurf der Bundesregierung, 53.
  2224. 2224BR-Drs. 301/03, Entwurf der Bundesregierung, 46.
  2225. 2225BR-Drs. 301/03, Stellungnahme des Bundesrates, 10-11.
  2226. 2226BR-Drs. 301/03, Stellungnahme des Bundesrates, 12.
  2227. 2227For details of this proposal, see Köhler, H., ‘UWG und Verbraucherschutz’ (2003) GRUR, 265 ff.; Micklitz/Stadler, ‘Der Reformvorschlag der UWG-Novell für eine Verbandsklage auf Gewinnabschöpfung’ (2003) WRP, 559 ff.
  2228. 2228See Bernitz (1984), 115 ff.
  2229. 2229Dir. 1991:79, Direktiv om översyn av marknadföringslagen, SOU 1993:59, Bilaga 1, 599.
  2230. 2230The investigator was Prof. Bernitz.
  2231. 2231See reference to the general instruction to all committees and individual investigators to consider aspects of adaptation to EU law, dir. 1988:43.
  2232. 2232SOU 1992:49.
  2233. 2233“Saken måste emellertid ses i ett bredare perspektiv. Helt oavsett den rättsliga formen för det svenska samarbetet med EG pågår en stark, faktisk ekonomisk integration. Svenska företag arbetar på alltmer internationaliserad marknad och över huvud under i stort sett samma marknadsbetingelser som företag i andra västeuropeiska länder. Det behov av skydd mot otillbörlig konkurrensåtgärder som föreligger i dessa länder kan man utgå ifrån i regel också finns hos oss. Europeiska företag torde normalt räkna med att de i Sverige får ett skydd mot otillbörliga konkurrensåtgärder som ungefår motsvarar en europeisk normalstandard som den i korthet presenterats i 10-punktsuppräkningen i föregående avsnitt. Det bör vara en deluppgift inom ramen för en allmän Europaharmonisering av svensk rätt att tillse att vi når upp till denna skyddsnivå.” See Bernitz (1993), 39 f.
  2234. 2234Compare 1 § MFL (SFS 1975:1418) ”Denna lag har till ändamål att främja konsumenternas intressen i samband med näringsidkarens marknadsföring av varor, tjänster och andra nyttigheter och att motverka marknadsföring som är otillbörlig mot konsumenter och näringsidkare“ with 1 § MFL (SFS 1995:450) ”Denna lag har till syfte att främja konsumenternas och näringslivets intressen i samband med marknadsföring av produkter och att motverka marknadsföring som är otillbörlig mot konsumenter och näringsidkare.”
  2235. 2235„Till skillnad mot 1 § den nuvarande lagen anges att lagen inte bara skall främja konsumenternas intressen i samband med marknadsföring, utan även näringslivets intressen. Även om lagen till största delen är inriktad på konsumentintressena är det enligt regeringens mening angeläget att också framhålla näringslivets intressen i sammanhanget.” Prop. 1994/95:123, 162.
  2236. 2236”Denna lag har till ändamål att främja konsumenternas och näringslivets intresse av en vederhäftig, tillbörlig och från konkurrenssynpunkt väl fungerande marknadsföring samt att säkerställa att konsumenterna har tillgång till behövlig information i samband därmed”, SOU 1993:59, 59.
  2237. 2237Bernitz (1997).
  2238. 2238Directive 84/450.
  2239. 2239Bernitz (1997), 28.
  2240. 2240Concerning the institutional discussion, see Ch. 4 and 5.
  2241. 2241See SOU 1993:59, 194.
  2242. 2242As indicated earlier, preparatory material had stressed that no extension of such rights should occur by way of marketing practices law. See Ch. 5.4.I.2.
  2243. 2243See prop. 1994/95:123, 56. The most critical comments to the proposal came from the Competition Agency, which cited the risks to free competition inherent in such a proposal, ibid., at 57.
  2244. 2244Comparing with Germany, one can surmise that an absence of a sizeable entrepreneurial middle class in Sweden is one reason for the relatively low profile of marketing practices law as a strategic instrument.
  2245. 2245Prop. 1994/95:123,
  2246. 2246Konkurrenslagen (SFS 1993:20).
  2247. 2247In this sense Nordell, Marknadsrätten. En introduktion (Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik, 2002), 17.
  2248. 2248Bernitz (1969).
  2249. 2249SOU 1993:59, 198.
  2250. 2250”Det är fortfarande inte ovanligt att det i olika västeuropeiska länders marknadsföringslagstiftning finns kvar bestämmelser som utgör skråmässiga relikter och närmast är till för att bereda småföretagare skydd mot konkurrens. De ...berörda avgörandena av EG-domstolen i rättsfallen GB-INNO och Yves Rocher ger exempel på detta. ... Liksom hittills bör en konkurrenshämmande tillämpning av marknadsföringslagstiftningen inte komma i fråga i Sverige.” SOU 1993:59, 198.
  2251. 2251SOU 1994:14.
  2252. 2252See prop. 1994/95:140.
  2253. 2253Statement of Government Policy, 18th September 2001.
  2254. 2254The Board consists of ten members, including the Director-General and two representatives of the staff. The Director-General is also Chairman of the Advisory Board.
  2255. 2255See SFS 1995:868, cf. prop. 1994/95:140. See on consumer policy SOU 2000:29 and the following prop. 2000/01:135.
  2256. 2256SFS 1995:868.
  2257. 225727 § Förvaltningslagen (SFS 1986:223), see prop. 1994/95:123, 98.
  2258. 2258SOU 2000:29 Starka konsumenter i en gränslös värld, 367.
  2259. 2259A comparison with the Food Administration was also carried out by the Guidelines Committee SOU 1983:40, 59.
  2260. 2260SOU 2000:29, 380.
  2261. 2261SOU 2000:29, 386.
  2262. 2262SOU 2000:29, 401.
  2263. 2263SOU 2000:29, 396.
  2264. 2264SOU 2000:29, 400.
  2265. 2265Prop. 2000/01:135.
  2266. 2266Among them NDM, SI, SRF and SH. Prop. 2000/01:135.
  2267. 2267On decorporativisation, see the analysis by Hermansson et al. in SOU 1999:121.
  2268. 2268SOU 1999:121.
  2269. 2269Jacobsson/Laegreid/Pedersen, ‘Transforming States’ (2001) SCORE Rapportserie, No. 4, 11.
  2270. 2270See Ch. 5.4.4.1.
  2271. 2271See Case Langborger v. Sweden, ECHR 20/1987/143/197, decision of 22/06/89.
  2272. 2272See prop. 1990/91:98, in particular at 33 about the MD. SOU1991:59, Del. 2, 372. Cf. also the discussion in JT 1992-93, 376 ff.
  2273. 2273See the discussion in Debatt (1989-90) JT, 376 ff.; Bernitz, ‘Marknadsdomstolen och Langborgerdomen’ (1989-90) JT, 396 ff.
  2274. 2274Ds 1993:34, Specialdomstolaraa i framtiden, see in particular 21-26 on interest representation.
  2275. 2275See Ds 1993:34.
  2276. 2276“En förklaring till att det över huvudtaget förekommer intresseledamöter i domstolar är den starka ställningen som organisationer av skilda slag har i det svenska samhället, och det kan hävdas att det genom åren har funnits en benägenhet hos lagstiftaren att tillgodose dessa organisationers intressen på den enskildes bekostnad; de kollektiva regleringar som finns på det aktuella rättsområdena har ju konsekvenser även för den som inte tillhör kollektivet eller den som inte har samma mening som kollektivet. Att dessa regleringar i så stor utsträckning har accepterats i Sverige hänger bl. a. samman med speciella svenska förhållanden som den höga andelen personer och företag som är organiserade i olika intressesammanslutningar.” Ds 1993:34, 23-4.
  2277. 2277See SOU 1993:16.
  2278. 2278See Dahl, After the Revolution. Democracy in a Good Society (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1970).
  2279. 2279See SOU 1991:59, 370 ff.; prop. 1992/93:56, 57 ff.; bet. 1992/93:NU 17, rskr. 1992/93:144.
  2280. 2280“För Sveriges trovärdighet som europeisk - och internationell - samarbetspartner är det angeläget att MD för en sådan sammanställning att dess ställning som oavhängig och opartisk domstol inte kan ifrågasättas.” SOU 1991:59, 377.
  2281. 22813-4 §§ (SFS 1970:417 as amended by SFS 1993:22).
  2282. 2282Prop. 1992/93:56,57 with the views of SI, the SKF, KO, LO and TCO.
  2283. 2283Motion 1992/93:N7.
  2284. 2284Bet. 1992/93:LU45.
  2285. 228545-49 §§ MFL. 49 § MFL reproduces the rule in RB 4:10a.
  2286. 2286See Ds. 1993:54; SOU 1991:59, Del 1.
  2287. 2287SFS 1996:861, cf. prop. 1997/98:188, bet. 1998/99:LU6, rskr. 1998/99:125.
  2288. 228838 § MFL (SFS 1995:450).
  2289. 2289Prop. 1997/98:188.
  2290. 2290SOU 1993:59, 450 ff.; prop. 1994/95:123, 111.
  2291. 2291SOU 1983:40; prop. 1984/85:213; 1985/86:LU10, 1988/89:LU13.
  2292. 2292With the amendment advanced in prop. 1984/85:213 the position of interested traders in the preliminary procedure before the Ombudsman was somewhat improved, but only marginally. See prop. 1984/85:213, 50 ff; cf. Ch.5.4.4.2 above.
  2293. 2293SOU 1993:59, 457 ff.
  2294. 2294Prop. 1994/95:123, 132.
  2295. 2295On this sanction see Ch. 7.3.2.3 below. 1000 Prop. 1994/95:123, 134. 1001 Prop. 1994/95:123, 134. 1002 See prop. 1994/95:123, 144.
  2296. 2296Wie beurteilt er die Arbeit der Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs e. V. in einer Zeit, a) in der nach Lockerung von Wettbewerbsnachteilen gerufen wird und z.B. durch Tankstellen-Kioskbetrieb, den Internetverkauf und den Versandgeschäften über die Fernsehwerbung zu allen tages- und Nachtzeiten geworben wird und z. B. dem Einzelhandel dadurch täglcih Kaufkraft entzogen wird, b) in der nach zusätzlichen Dienstleistungen gerufen wird, aber Handwerksmeistern und andere Gewerbetreibenden unter Strafandrohung die Dienstleistung in Randbereichen der eigetlichen Tätigkeit untersagt wird?
  2297. 2297Hält sie die zunehmende Kritik an der Zentrale zur Bekämfung unlauteren Wettbewebs e.V. für berechtigt? 1050 Stellungnahme zum Grünbuch der Kommission zum Verbraucherschutz in der Europäischen Union, February 2002, 2. 1051 „Deutschland is im übrigen das einzige Land, das sein Werberecht über Abmahnorganisationen wie die renommierte Centrale (sic!) zur Bekämfpung unlauteren Wettbewerbs durchsetzen lässt. Diese Form der Selbstkontrolle würde sich zusammenbrechen, wenn es bei Online-Diensten aufgrund des Herkunftslandprinzips nicht mehr oder nur sehr eingeschränkt tätig weren dürfte.“
  2298. 2298initiated orders). For statistics from the earlier practice of KO, see SOU 1983:40, 59. 1060 It should be kept in mind that not all notifications concern matters related to fair trading and marketing practices. 1061 Including 4,884 from consumers, 294 from municipalities, 237 from industry, 525 from governmental authorities and organisations, and 428 on KO’s own initiative. KOV Årsredovisning 2000. For 2001 the total number of files is 6,161, the number of consent orders 30 and the cases before MD 7. For 2002 the number of files is 6,484. The number of consent orders is 42 and the cases filed before the MD are 10. KOV Årsredovisning 2001 and 2002. 1062 The grounds for closing the file have been described as follows: the question has been answered, the signal has been transferred to another competent authority, the file does not call for any action, the same question is part of another file, the consumer interest is insignificant according to KOV’s Standing Instructions, KOV has addressed a reprimand (påpekande) to the trader, the case involves a private dispute, settlement with individual enterprise or an undertaking by the enterprise, the conduct is not against the law. 1063 For instance on ecological labelling, on information about electricity consumption of household appliances, etc. 1064 The relation between the total number of cases under the MFL and the number of cases brought by KO has been as follows: for 1988 - 10 out of 23 cases; for 1989 - 10 of 19 cases; for 1990 - 9 of 20 cases; for 1991- 17 of 24 cases; for 1992 - 10 of 27 cases; for 1994 - 7 of 28 cases; for 1996 - 6 of 25 cases; for 1997 - 3 of 8 cases; for 1998 - 6 of 12 cases; for 1999 - 3 of 9 cases; for 2000 - 5 of 20 cases; for 2001 - 4 of 22 cases. Source: Marknadsdomstolensavgöranden, Norstedts Juridik, 1988-2001.
  2299. 2299PEERING INTO THE FUTURE: TOWARDS A European FAIR TRADING Law? 1112 COM (2003) 356 final. 1113 Press release IP/03/857, Brussels, 18 June 2003.
  2300. 2300One example of the problems with representation of the consumer interest by consumer organisations is their long-standing resistance to liberalisation of the restrictive regime on disounts. This position was abandoned only in 2001. See Drexl (2002), 557 ff., at 578.
  2301. 2301Basedow/Hopt/Kötz/Baetge (1999), 7.
  2302. 2302Komesar (1994), 136.
  2303. 2303Joerges (1997), 394.