EU-domstolen

1.C-354/15, Henderson v. Novo Banco 15 C-484/15, Zulikarpaṧić v. Gajer 9, 11 C-499/15, W, V v. X 2, 5 C-507/15, Agro v. Petersime 6 C-541/15, Freitag 2 C-551/15, Pula Parking v. Tederahn 9, 11 C-670/15, Šalplachta 12 C-24/16 och 25/16, Nintendo v. BigBen 8, 9 C-29/16, HanseYachts v. Port D’Hiver 9 C-54/16, Vinyls v. Mediterranea 13 C-106/16, Polbud 2 C-168/16, Nogueira v. Crewlink 9 C-169/16, Moreno Osacar v. Ryanair 9 C-194/16, Bolagsupplysningen v. Svensk Handel 9 C-218/16, Kubicka 6 C-249/16, Kareda v. Benkö 9 C-274/16, flightright v. Air Nostrum 9 C-283/16, M.S. v. P.S. 5 C-340/16, KABEG v. MMA 9 C-341/16, Hanssen v. Prast-Knipping 9 C-368/16, Assens Havn v. Navigators Management 9 C-372/16, Sahyouni v. Mamisch 3 C-433/16, BMW v. Acacia 9 C-436/16, Leventis v. Malcon 9 C-447/16, Becker v. Hainan Airlines 9 C-448/16, Barkan v. Air Nostrum 9 C-467/16, Schlömp v. Landratsamt 9 C-498/16, Schrems v. Facebook Ireland Ltd. 9 C-558/16, Mahnkopf 4, 6 C-560/16, E.ON v. Dědouch 9 C-565/16, Saponaro och Xylina 5 C-641/16, Tünkers France v. Expert France 9, 13 C-649/16, Valach v. Waldviertler Sparkasse 9, 13 C-673/16, Coman v. Inspectoratul General 3 C-1/17, Petronas v. Guida 9 C-20/17, Oberle 6 C-21/17, Catlin v. O.K. Trans 11, 15 C-27/17, flyLAL v. Starptautiska lidosta 9 C-64/17, Saey v. Lusavouga 9 C-66/17, Chudaś v. DA 11 C-67/17, Iliev v. Ilieva 4, 9 C-83/17, KP v. LO 5 C-88/17, Zurich Insurance v. Abnormal 9 C-106/17, Hofsoe v. LVM 9 C-111/17, OL v. PQ 2, 5 C-214/17, Mölk v. Mölk 5 C-250/17, Tarragó da Silveira v. Massa Insolvente da Espírito Santo 13 C-289/17, Collect Inkasso v. Rain Aint 11 C-296/17, Wiemer & Trachte v. Tadzher 13 C-304/17, Löber v. Barclays Bank 9 C-306/17, Nothartová v. Boldizsár 9 C-308/17, Grekland v. Kuhn 9 C-335/17, Valcheva v. Babanarakis 5 C-337/17, Feniks v. Azteca 9 C-379/17, Al Bosco 10 C-478/17, IQ v. JP 5 C-512/17, HR 2, 5 C-595/17, Apple Sales v. MJA 9 C-604/17, PM v. AH 5 C-627/17, ZSE v. RG 11 C-85/18, CV v. DU 5 C-325/18 och C-375/18, Hampshire City Council v. C.E. 5 C-393/18, UD v. XB 2, 5s. 635