Fotnot 9
NJA 1989 s. 177 (the district court held that the reference was clear and the Supreme Court that the arbitration clause was covered by the contract) and NJA 2013 s. 1190 and Unnersjö, JT 2014–15 s. 176 and 177. See also NJA 2016 s. 900, 14.
Hänvisas från p. 9 (s. 419)
NJA 1989 s. 177 (the district court held that the reference was clear and the Supreme Court that the arbitration clause was covered by the contract) and NJA 2013 s. 1190 and Unnersjö, JT 2014–15 s. 176 and 177. See also NJA 2016 s. 900, 14.s. 419