Litteratur

Accountability for International Crimes in Syria: Universal Jurisdiction and its Application

Öppna hos källan ↗PDF ↗Rättskälldiskussion
Citera
Mikael Schantli, Accountability for International Crimes in Syria: Universal Jurisdiction and its Application, SvJT 2021 s. 303–316
BibTeX
@article{svjt-2021-303,
  author       = {Mikael Schantli},
  title        = {{Accountability for International Crimes in Syria: Universal Jurisdiction and its Application}},
  journal      = {Svensk Juristtidning},
  year         = {2021},
  pages        = {303--316},
  url          = {https://svjt.se/svjt/2021/303}
}
Öppna i bibliografi

Abstract

The principle of universal jurisdiction — the legal foundation that enables states to establish and exercise jurisdiction over certain atrocious crimes of universal concern such as war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity — is a noble albeit somewhat controversial instrument. So far, it seems to be more of a theoretical concept than a practical one. This is due to numerous reasons, many of which will be addressed in this article. Exercising universal jurisdiction can pose certain practical challenges, and there seems to exist a slight gap between principle and practice. However, as this article will try to show, the gap is nonetheless slowly closing, particularly in some Western

Omtalad i rättsvetenskapen

Ingen rättsvetenskaplig artikel citerar den här källan ännu.