Rättsfall

NJA 2013 s. 477

Rättskälldiskussion

Citera

NJA 2013 s. 477

BibTeX

@misc{nja-2013-s-477,
  author       = {{Högsta domstolen}},
  title        = {{NJA 2013 s. 477}},
  year         = {2013},
  howpublished = {Rättsfall}
}

Öppna i bibliografi

Dom

Hämtar dom…

Omtalad i rättsvetenskapen

1 hänvisningar i 1 artiklar · 1 stycken/fotnoter

Kompetenz-Kompetenz in Swedish Arbitration Law is being recast, how should it be done?1 hänvisning

Finn Madsen · SvJT 2016 s. 653–673 · 1 ställe

In a recently delivered judgment by the Supreme Court in case NJA 2013 s. 477, the Supreme Court held that a bifurcation of a dispute in arbitration and court proceedings would lead to a review of the merits of the dispute in two different proceedings causing complex issues and with lis pendens and res judicata being further complicated. Moreover, it would, in general, result in the dispute resolution lacking efficiency. Therefore, it is natural that arbitral tribunals and courts, when called upon to interpret arbitration clauses, assume to a considerable extent that it was not the intention of the parties to bifurcate the proceedings to different foras.Why the doctrine of assertion should not be codified · p. 17 · s. 672